Open Access

Prevalence of aac(6')-Ib-cr plasmid-mediated and chromosome-encoded fluoroquinolone resistance in Enterobacteriaceae in Italy

  • Ilaria Frasson1,
  • Antonietta Cavallaro2,
  • Cristina Bergo2,
  • Sara N Richter1, 2Email author and
  • Giorgio Palù1, 2
Gut Pathogens20113:12

DOI: 10.1186/1757-4749-3-12

Received: 6 July 2011

Accepted: 9 August 2011

Published: 9 August 2011

Abstract

The spread of aac(6')-Ib-cr plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants was evaluated in 197 enterobacterial isolates recovered in an Italian teaching hospital. The aac(6')-Ib-cr gene was found exclusively in Escherichia coli strains. The gene was located on a plasmid which presented additional ESBL genes. Most of the clinical strains were clonally related and displayed three point mutations at the topoisomerase level which conferred high resistance to fluoroquinolones.

Keywords

aac(6')-Ib-cr fluoroquinolones plasmid-mediated resistance Gram-negative

Findings

The aminoglycoside acetyltransferase Aac(6')-Ib-cr variant, an enzyme usually encoded by a plasmid-borne gene, extends its drug targets to include fluoroquinolones (FQs) in addition to aminoglycosides. It is characterized by amino acid changes at codon 102 (Trp→Arg) and codon 179 (Asp→Tyr). The Aac(6')-Ib-cr protein is able to specifically acetylate hydrophilic FQs presenting a free piperazinyl amine (i.e. ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin) [1].

The aac(6')-Ib-cr gene has spread rapidly among Enterobacteriaceae, and although only conferring a low-level resistance, it may create an environment facilitating the selection of more highly resistant determinants, especially those harbouring topoisomerase mutations. This fact is particularly worrisome at the nosocomial level, where aac(6')-Ib-cr containing strains should be promptly detected and treated with non-hydrophilic FQs, such as levofloxacin or ofloxacin, or other classes of antibiotics to prevent high-level resistance onset and spread.

In this work we determined the prevalence of the aac(6')-Ib-cr gene variant among clinical isolates of Enterobacteriacea collected at the teaching Hospital of Padua, Italy. In the time period of March-May 2008, 197 non-duplicate clinical isolates were collected. These displayed the whole range of MIC of ciprofloxacin; in particular, 104 samples were susceptible (MIC ≤ 1), 35 intermediate (1 < MIC < 4), and 58 resistant (MIC ≥ 4) to ciprofloxacin. Exact MIC values were measured by means of E-test strips (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). Bacterial isolates were: 145 E. coli, 38 K. pneumoniae, 5 Proteus mirabilis, 5 Enterobacter aerogenes, 2 Enterobacter cloacae and 2 Citrobacter freundii. Sample identity and results are reported in Table 1.
Table 1

Properties of aac(6')-Ib-positive clinical isolates and transformant and transconjugant strains

Isolate ID

Bacterial species

qnr gene

aac(6') -Ib gene

MIC (mg/L)

GyrA

ParC

ESBLi phen

ESBL genotypic

ERIC

    

NA d

CPF e

OFX f

LVF g

MXF h

     

6

Escherichia coli

cr

-

≥ 4

≥ 4

≥ 16

≥ 16

≥ 16

S83L, D87N

E84V

-

-

1

6Ta

E. coli TOP10

cr

-

0.008

0.008

0.016

0.004

0.006

-

-

nd

-

 

13

E. coli

cr

-

≥ 4

≥ 4

≥ 16

≥ 16

≥ 16

S83L, D87N

E84V

-

CTX-M-1

1

13Cb

J53AzKanNaR

cr

-

0.064

0.064

0.047

0.047

0.023

-

-

nd

CTX-M-1

 

13T

E. coli TOP10

cr

-

0.008

0.008

0.016

0.004

0.006

-

-

nd

CTX-M-1

 

19

E. coli

non-cr

-

     

nd

nd

nd

nd

 

23

E. coli

cr

-

≥ 4

≥ 4

≥ 16

≥ 16

≥ 16

S83L, D87N

E84V

X

CTX-M-1+TEM-1

2

23C

J53AzKanNaR

cr

-

0.047

0.047

0.047

0.047

0.032

-

-

nd

CTX-M-1+TEM-1

 

23T

E. coli TOP10

cr

-

0.004

0.004

0.016

0.004

0.006

-

-

nd

CTX-M-1+TEM-1

 

37

E. coli

cr

-

≥ 4

≥ 4

≥ 16

≥ 16

≥ 16

S83L, D87N

E84V

X

CTX-M-1+TEM-1

1

37T

E. coli TOP10

cr

-

0.006

0.006

0.016

0.004

0.006

-

-

nd

CTX-M-1+TEM-1

 

39

E. coli

cr

-

≥ 4

≥ 4

≥ 16

≥ 16

≥ 16

S83L, D87N

E84V

X

CTX-M-1

3

39T

E. coli TOP10

cr

-

0.006

0.006

0.016

0.004

0.006

-

-

nd

CTX-M-1

 

40

E. coli

cr

-

≥ 4

≥ 4

≥ 16

≥ 16

≥ 16

S83L, D87N

E84V

X

CTX-M-1+TEM-1

1

40T

E. coli TOP10

cr

-

0.006

0.006

0.016

0.004

0.006

-

-

nd

CTX-M-1+TEM-1

 

44

E. coli

cr

-

0.047

0.047

0.032

0.047

0.023

-

-

X

CTX-M-1

3

44C

J53AzKanNaR

cr

-

0.047

0.047

0.047

0.047

0.023

-

-

nd

CTX-M-1

 

44T

E. coli TOP10

cr

-

0.006

0.006

0.016

0.004

0.006

-

-

nd

CTX-M-1

 

51

E. coli

cr

-

≥ 4

≥ 4

≥ 16

≥ 16

≥ 16

S83L, D87N

E84V

X

CTX-M-1

1

51T

E. coli TOP10

cr

-

0.006

0.006

0.016

0.004

0.006

-

-

nd

CTX-M-1

 

52

E. coli

cr

-

≥ 4

≥ 4

≥ 16

≥ 16

≥ 16

S83L, D87N

E84V

X

CTX-M-1

1

52T

E. coli TOP10

cr

-

0.004

0.004

0.016

0.004

0.006

-

-

nd

CTX-M-1

 

53

E. coli

cr

-

≥ 4

≥ 4

≥ 16

≥ 16

≥ 16

S83L, D87N

E84V

X

CTX-M-1

1

53T

E. coli TOP10

cr

-

0.004

0.004

0.016

0.004

0.006

-

-

nd

CTX-M-1

 

111

Klebsiella pneumoniae

non-cr

qnrB19

1.5

1.5

4

2

nd

nd

nd

X

TEM-1+SHV-12

 

128

K. pneumoniae

non-cr

-

1.5

1.5

3

2

2

nd

nd

nd

nd

 

137

K. pneumoniae

non-cr

qnrB19

1

1

4

1.5

1.5

nd

nd

X

TEM-1

 

143

K. pneumoniae

non-cr

qnrB19

1.5

1.5

4

1.5

1.5

nd

nd

-

TEM-150+SHV-12

 

144

K. pneumoniae

non-cr

qnrB19

1.5

1.5

6

1.5

1.5

nd

nd

X

TEM-150

 

164

E. coli

cr

-

≥ 4

≥ 4

≥ 16

≥ 16

≥ 16

S83L, D87N

E84V

X

CTX-M-1+TEM-1

1

164T

E. coli TOP10

cr

-

0.004

0.004

0.016

0.004

0.006

-

-

nd

CTX-M-1

 

175

E. coli

cr

-

≥ 4

≥ 4

nd

≥ 8

≥ 8

S83L, D87N

E84V

X

CTX-M-1

1

175T

E. coli TOP10

cr

-

0.006

0.006

0.016

0.004

0.006

-

-

nd

CTX-M-1

 

176

K. pneumoniae

non-cr

qnrB19

1

1

2

1.5

≥ 8

nd

nd

-

TEM-150

 

178

E. coli

cr

-

≥ 4

≥ 4

nd

≥ 8

≥ 8

S83L, D87N

E84V

X

CTX-M-1+TEM-1

1

178T

E. coli TOP10

cr

-

0.006

0.006

0.016

0.004

0.006

-

-

nd

CTX-M-1+TEM-1

 

180

K. pneumoniae

non-cr

-

0.25

0.25

0.75

0.25

0.38

nd

nd

X

nd

 

182

E. coli

cr

-

≥ 4

≥ 4

≥ 8

≥ 8

≥ 8

S83L, D87N

E84V

X

CTX-M-1

1

182T

E. coli TOP10

cr

-

0.006

0.006

0.016

0.004

0.006

-

-

nd

CTX-M-1

 

183

Enterobacter aerogenes

non-cr

-

0.75

0.75

2

1

0.75

nd

nd

nd

nd

 

184

E. coli

cr

-

≥ 4

≥ 4

nd

≥ 8

≥ 8

S83L, D87N

E84V

X

CTX-M-1+TEM-1

1

184T

E. coli TOP10

cr

-

0.006

0.006

0.016

0.004

0.006

  

nd

CTX-M-1+TEM-1

 

185

E. coli

cr

-

≥ 4

≥ 4

nd

≥ 8

≥ 8

S83L, D87N

E84V

X

CTX-M-1+TEM-1

1

185T

E. coli TOP10

cr

-

0.006

0.006

0.016

0.004

0.006

-

-

nd

CTX-M-1+TEM-1

 
 

E. coli TOP10

-

-

0.016

0.016

0.047

0.047

0.023

-

-

nd

-

 
 

J53AzKanR

-

-

0.002

0.002

0.016

0.004

0.006

-

-

nd

-

 

aT = tranformant strain; bC: transconjugant strain. d NA = nalidixic acid, e CPF = ciprofloxacin, f OFX = ofloxacin, g LVF = levofloxacin, h MXF = moxifloxacin. i ESBL phen = ESBL phenotypic determination.

nd = not determined

- = negative

Resistance ranges: nalidixic acid S ≤ 16 mg/L, R ≥ 32 mg/L; ciprofloxacin S ≤ 1 mg/L, I = 2 mg/L, R ≥ 4 mg/L; ofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin S ≤ 2 mg/L, I = 4 mg/L, R ≥ 8 mg/L.

The presence of the aac(6')-Ib or aac(6')-Ib-cr genes was assessed by PCR amplification and subsequent sequencing with primers: aacF 5'-ATGACTGAGCATGACCTTG-3'; aacR 5'-AACCATGTACACGGCTGG-3'; aacSEQ 5'-CGTCACTCCATACATTGCAA-3' [2].

Twenty-five samples out of 197 (13%) were positive for the aac(6')-Ib gene and of these 16 (8%) displayed the aac(6')-Ib-cr variant. In particular, aac(6')-Ib-cr was found exclusively in E. coli, while aac(6')-Ib was present mostly in K. pneumoniae (8 K. pneumoniae, 1 E. coli). Out of the 16 aac(6')-Ib-cr-positive samples, 15 were collected from urine and 1 from skin; 13 were from inpatients (81%) and 3 from outpatients.

All aac(6')-Ib were tested for other plasmid-mediated quinolone-resistence genes, i.e. qnr and qepA, by PCR amplification and sequencing using published procedures [3]. None of these was found in the aac(6')-Ib-cr-positive samples, while 5 out of 9 aac(6')-Ib-positive strains presented the qnrB19 gene, indicating that just one of the reported plasmid-encoded mechanisms of FQ resistance was acquired/maintained in the clinical isolates.

The presence of mechanisms of chromosomial resistance to FQ was assessed on aac(6')-Ib-cr-positive strains. The genotypic analysis, performed with universal primers [4], revealed that all samples, but #44, coded for two mutations in GyrA (S83L, D87N) and one mutation in ParC (E84V). Phenotypic analysis of resistance to nalidixic acid and FQs confirmed the above results: 15 samples were resistant to all tested drugs, while one (#44) was fully susceptible.

The presence of resistance to other classes of antibiotic was next assessed. Genotypic analysis of ESBL and AmpC genes was performed by PCR amplification using specific primers for the detection of ESBL, i.e. blaSHV, blaTEM, blaCTX-M-1, 2, 8, 9, and AmpC genes, i.e. blaMOX-1, 2, blaCMY-1-11, blaLAT-1-4, blaBIL-1, blaDHA-1, 2, blaACC, blaMIR-1T, blaACT-1, blaFOX-1, 5b[58]. Fifteen out of 16 samples presented the CTX-M-1 gene, which was coupled with TEM-1 in 7 strains. No other bla genes, or AmpC were detected. ESBL production, phenotypically measured according to the CLSI M100-S18 and M2-A9 documents [9], was detected in 14 out of 16 samples. Accordingly, most of the samples were resistant to β-lactams, while they retained susceptibility to amikacin, imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam; an equal number of samples resistant and susceptible to gentamicin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ceftazidime, cefepime, aztreonam and tetracycline was detected (data not shown).

Plasmid DNA was extracted from aac(6')-Ib-cr-positive strains and run on agarose gel, to confirm the presence of the aac(6')-Ib-cr gene on a mobile element: all samples presented two main electrophoretic band corresponding to > 100 Kbp and 25 Kbp (Figure 1A). In each case the aac(6')-Ib-cr gene was located in the > 100 Kbp band, as demonstrated by PCR gene amplification, using DNA extracted from each band as template. Plasmid localization of the aac(6')-Ib-cr gene was further confirmed by successful transformation into E. coli Top10 strain of all 16 sample-plasmid DNA, extracted according the Kieser protocol [10]. Transferability of the resistance gene of three clinical isolates was tested by conjugation in a kanamycin/sodium azide resistant E. coli J53 strain [3]. All three samples were successfully conjugated. The presence of the aac(6')-Ib-cr was confirmed by PCR in both transformants and transconjugants. In addition, the ESBL genes previously detected in the clinical isolate were always found on the same plasmid as the aac(6')-Ib-cr gene: just in one case (sample #164) TEM-1 was not co-transformed along with aac(6')-Ib-cr and CTX-M-1.
Figure 1

aac(6')-Ib-cr -positive strain analysis. A) Analysis of plasmids extracted from aac(6')-Ib-cr-positive strains by the Kieser method. Plasmids were run on 0.7% TAE agarose gel at 50 V for 5 h. The numbers above each lane indicate the clinical strains ID. M stands for marker. B) Clonal relationship based on the repetitive element PCR fingerprinting method, using "enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus" (ERIC) primers. Amplified PCR products representative of the three identified subgroups were loaded on 1% TAE agarose gels and run at 100 V for 2 h. Both gels were stained with ethidium bromide.

MIC analysis of FQs in transformants and tranconjugants compared to the wild type isolates showed a drastic decrease in the MIC values of all tested antibiotics. However, MIC of ciprofloxacin increased of 2-4 times in transformants and transconjugats, compared to the wild type recipient strains, E. coli Top10 and J53. These results are in line with the notion that the aac(6')-Ib-cr alone does not confer high level resistance to the drugs, but it stimulates chromosomal mutations on the FQ targets, i.e. gyrase and topoisomerase IV, which in turn dramatically increase resistance to these drugs.

To assess the clonal relationship between aac(6')-Ib-cr-positive isolates, the "enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus" (ERIC)-PCR genomic DNA profiles was analysed with specific primers [5]. Three different main subgroups were identified (Figure 1B). Most aac(6')-Ib-cr-positive samples were clonally related (82%), while 1 (6%) (#23) and 2 (12%) (#39 and #44) samples belonged to two different subgroups (Table 1).

We have shown for the first time the presence of the aac(6')-Ib-cr gene limited to E. coli species in North-East Italy. Like other plasmid-mediated resistance genes, i.e. qnr, the aac(6')-Ib-cr gene does not significantly increment MIC values, but it seriously increases the mutant prevention concentration (MPC) with final production of remarkably resistant strains upon treatment with standard FQ dosage [1]. Indeed, we found that all but one clinical isolate presented three mutations at the topoisomerase level (2 in GyrA and 1 in ParC) with consequent generation of very resistant strains (MIC of ciprofloxacin ≥ 32). These mainly derived by clonal expansion, as demonstrated by ERIC subgrouping. Interestingly, sample #44 did not show any mutation in the topoisomerase genes, and so retained full susceptibility to FQs. However, #44 resulted clonally related to sample #39 which instead was fully resistant, indicating that transition from susceptibily to resistance probably occurred in a very limited time interval.

Finally, aac(6')-Ib-cr-positive strains, which were strongly associated with ESBL, were collected mainly by inpatients and the proven plasmid localization and conjugation underline a very efficient mechanism of horizontal transferability of these multiresistant strains. Therefore, the presence of aac(6')-Ib-cr-positive strains must be promptly detected and referred to clinicians in order to avoid use of FQs which would augment drug resistance and impair therapy.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. P. Courvalin, Prof. M. Galimand (Institut Pasteur, Paris, France), and Prof. E. Cambau (University of Paris XII, France) for kindly donating aac(6')-Ib, qepA and qnr-positive control strains, respectively; Prof. L. Martínez-Martínez (University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla) for the gift of E. coli J53AzR, and Prof. L. Poirel (Université Paris-Sud) for the Kieser protocol.

This work was supported by Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca (MIUR), Grant FIRB-Ideas RBID082ATK.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Histology, Microbiology and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Padua
(2)
Azienda Ospedaliera of Padua, Microbiology and Virology Unit

References

  1. Robicsek A, Strahilevitz J, Jacoby GA, Macielag M, Abbanat D, Park CH, Bush K, Hooper DC: Fluoroquinolone-modifying enzyme: a new adaptation of a common aminoglycoside acetyltransferase. Nat Med. 2006, 12: 83-88. 10.1038/nm1347.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Park CH, Robicsek A, Jacoby GA, Sahm D, Hooper DC: Prevalence in the United States of aac(6')-Ib-cr encoding a ciprofloxacin-modifying enzyme. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006, 50: 3953-3955. 10.1128/AAC.00915-06.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Richter SN, Frasson I, Bergo C, Manganelli R, Cavallaro A, Palu G: Characterisation of qnr plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance in Enterobacteriaceae from Italy: association of the qnrB19 allele with the integron element ISCR1 in Escherichia coli. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010, 35: 578-583. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.02.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lascols C, Robert J, Cattoir V, Bebear C, Cavallo JD, Podglajen I, Ploy MC, Bonnet R, Soussy CJ, Cambau E: Type II topoisomerase mutations in clinical isolates of Enterobacter cloacae and other enterobacterial species harbouring the qnrA gene. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007, 29: 402-409. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.11.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lavilla S, Gonzalez-Lopez JJ, Sabate M, Garcia-Fernandez A, Larrosa MN, Bartolome RM, Carattoli A, Prats G: Prevalence of qnr genes among extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing enterobacterial isolates in Barcelona, Spain. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008, 61: 291-295.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Li H, Li JB: Detection of five novel CTX-M-type extended spectrum beta-lactamases with one to three CTX-M-14 point mutations in isolates from Hefei, Anhui province, China. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 4301-4302. 10.1128/JCM.43.8.4301-4302.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Perez-Perez FJ, Hanson ND: Detection of plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamase genes in clinical isolates by using multiplex PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2002, 40: 2153-2162. 10.1128/JCM.40.6.2153-2162.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Villegas MV, Correa A, Perez F, Zuluaga T, Radice M, Gutkind G, Casellas JM, Ayala J, Lolans K, Quinn JP: CTX-M-12 beta-lactamase in a Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolate in Colombia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004, 48: 629-631. 10.1128/AAC.48.2.629-631.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. CLSI: Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; nineteenth informational supplement. Wayne, PA, 2009.Google Scholar
  10. Kieser T: Factors affecting the isolation of CCC DNA from Streptomyces lividans and Escherichia coli. Plasmid. 1984, 12: 19-36. 10.1016/0147-619X(84)90063-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Frasson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement