Open Access

Genome sequencing and analysis of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi strain CR0063 representing a carrier individual during an outbreak of typhoid fever in Kelantan, Malaysia

  • Ramani Baddam1,
  • Narender Kumar1,
  • Sabiha Shaik1,
  • Tiruvayipati Suma1, 2,
  • Soo Tein Ngoi2, 3,
  • Kwai-Lin Thong2, 3 and
  • Niyaz Ahmed1, 2Email author
Gut Pathogens20124:20

DOI: 10.1186/1757-4749-4-20

Received: 14 November 2012

Accepted: 29 November 2012

Published: 13 December 2012


Salmonella Typhi is a human restricted pathogen with a significant number of individuals as asymptomatic carriers of the bacterium. Salmonella infection can be effectively controlled if a reliable method for identification of these carriers is developed. In this context, the availability of whole genomes of carrier strains through high- throughput sequencing and further downstream analysis by comparative genomics approaches is very promising. Herein we describe the genome sequence of a Salmonella Typhi isolate representing an asymptomatic carrier individual during a prolonged outbreak of typhoid fever in Kelantan, Malaysia. Putative genomic coordinates relevant in pathogenesis and persistence of this carrier strain are identified and discussed.


Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi, the aetiologic agent of typhoid fever is still posing a major health problem for the developing world, as about 16 million new cases are reported each year[1]. S. Typhi causes systemic infections (typhoid fever) as well as chronic infections (asymptomatic carriers) in humans, the latter serve as the source of infection[2]. The transmission of S. Typhi is primarily through faecal-oral route and a significant number of infected individuals become chronic asymptomatic carriers and keep shedding S. Typhi in faeces for decades[3]. This results in endemicity of S. Typhi in regions of the world with underdeveloped sanitation and community hygiene[4].

Carrier identification becomes extremely important as some of the ancestral haplotypes were observed in recent isolates suggesting their persistence in these asymptomatic carriers[5]. Traditional methods such as culturing of bacteria from faecal samples are not fool proof as the carriers shed bacteria intermittently. Serological tests to detect specific antibodies such as anti-H and anti-O are unable to differentiate between carriers and individuals who have recovered from the infection[6]. Especially, in areas endemic for S. Typhi, due to high background levels of these antibodies, serological tests cannot be adopted for the identification of a carrier[7]. Thus, there is an urgent need for inexpensive and efficient detection methods for the establishment of carrier state, perhaps based on genomic markers.

The genetic typing tools such as PFGE, AFLP, ribotyping etc. can resolve limited genetic variation occurring within specific sites, and therefore are incapable of differentiating highly clonal strains such as outbreak related strains from the ones not associated with the outbreak (carrier isolates)[810]. High-throughput sequencing technologies have already been employed as a high resolution molecular epidemiologic tool to discern microevolution of highly related strains[11].

In this study, we attempted to determine if whole genome sequencing of S. Typhi isolated from a carrier individual can provide insights related to persistence and or adaptation mechanisms. We describe the genome sequence of a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi strain (ST CR0063) isolated from a carrier individual during a prolonged outbreak of typhoid fever in Kelantan, Malaysia.

Results and discussion

Genome statistics

The size of the draft genome of Salmonella Typhi (ST CR0063) is 4,585,851 bp with a coding percentage of 86.1%. The G + C content of this strain is about 51.71%. The total number of CDS determined are 4946 with an average length of gene about 798 nucleotides. The genome of ST CR0063 revealed 77 tRNA and 22 rRNA genes. The subsystems distribution of basic metabolic machinery of this strain is represented in Figure1. The assembled draft genome shows high degree of similarity and shared core genome regions with Salmonella Typhi ST BL196[12], the one identified as associated with a typhoid outbreak in Kelantan during the same period (Figure2).
Figure 1

Subsystem distribution of ST CR0063. The subsystem statistics of ST CR0063 based on genome annotations performed according to RAST conventions.
Figure 2

Comparison of Salmonella Typhi strains ST CR0063 and ST BL196. Comparison of whole genome sequences of S. Typhi strains using MG-CAT – one strain was isolated from a carrier individual (ST CR0063) and another from an infected individual (ST BL196) during a prolonged outbreak of Typhoid fever in Kelantan[13].

Virulence factors

The gene shdA, a key factor predicted to be involved in persistence of the bacterium in the intestines[14] by binding to its extracellular matrix, was identified and annotated. This gene, by mimicking the host heparin, is able to bind to the extracellular matrix proteins, fibronectin and collagen, and probably plays an important role in carriers by contributing to prolonged faecal shedding[15]. The fim gene cluster[16] of chaperone –usher family involved in adhesion to non-phagocytic cells was detected along with its negative regulator fimW. Type IV pili and agf operon[17, 18] encoding curli fimbriae which aid in attachment of the bacterium to intestinal villi and also with each other, were found in the genome. These adherence factors determine the sites of bacterial colonisation and thereby adaptation and pathogenicity of a particular strain[19, 20].

The S. Typhi strain ST CR0063 genome also revealed viaA and viaB loci, the prime regulators of Vi antigen expression. The viaB locus contains all genes for the biosynthesis (tviA E) and export (vexA E) of the Vi antigen, a well-known virulence factor[21, 22]. The mgtC gene involved in Magnesium uptake and ferric uptake regulators (fur)[23] were also identified in ST CR0063. The PhoPQ regulon[24], which induces cytokine secretion and cationic antimicrobial peptide resistance, was also found to be conserved in our carrier strain. The RpoS sigma factor needed to cope up with external stress and nutrient depletion conditions[25] was also identified and annotated. The co-ordinates of these virulence factors in the genome of ST CR0063 are depicted in Figure3.
Figure 3

Circular Genome view of ST CR063. Positions of some of the major virulence factors and their regulators identified in ST CR0063 marked in the circular genome generated using CGview [26].

Phages and pathogenicity islands (PAIs)

The phages gifsy-1 and fels-2[27] together with many phage proteins and a few hypothetical proteins were identified in the genome of ST CR0063 by various algorithms (See Methods for details). It is expected that these phages are acquired by horizontal gene transfer (HGT) events as they were embedded in some of the genomic islands recognized. The phage encoding SopE effector protein of SPI-1 (Salmonella Pathogenicity Island) was present in ST CR0063 as recognized in other Typhi genomes[28, 29].

More than 15 PAIs that encode clusters of virulence associated genes have been identified across various serovars of Salmonella enterica. Ten pathogenicity islands have been identified by us in ST CR0063 and as expected[30], they were characterised by different G + C content and bounded by t-RNA genes. The SPI-1 type III secretion system (TTSS) structural genes spaMNOPQRS and invABCEFGH and their regulatory proteins HilA, HilC, HilD[31] were also identified and annotated. The SPI-1 secreted effector proteins SopE, SopE2, SipA, SipB, SipC and SptP required for endothelial uptake and invasion[32] are also present. The genes SpiC, SseF, SseG, SifA, SifB secreted by SPI-2 TTSS and that are needed for survival in macrophages and colonisation of host organs[33] were also recognised in the present genome. The known regulators of SPI-2, OmpR-EnvZ and PhoP-PhoQ[34] were present. SPI-3, identified by us, contained magnesium transport genes mgtC and marT which are required for survival in macrophages[35]. Type I secretion system and its associated proteins encoded by SPI-4, and that are involved in the invasion of the intestinal epithelium[36], were also located in the present genome. The SPI-1 effector proteins SopB and PipB associated with enteritis and coded by SPI-5[37] were also detected and annotated. The chaperone-usher fimbrial operons carried by SPI-6, SPI-10 and bacteriocin immunity proteins carried by SPI-8[38] were identified. The SPI-7 and SPI-9 were identified in the ST CR0063 genome and were found to encode viaB locus, type IV pili formation proteins and TISS[38, 39].

Conclusions and prospective

The genomic blueprint of Salmonella Typhi isolate ST CR0063 was elucidated in this study. The genome sequence information presented herein may be harnessed to guide comparative genomics and identification of novel and specific diagnostic markers. However, further studies involving large scale genome sequencing of the strains from several of the endemic countries and especially those from carrier individuals of different socio-economical settings is needed to develop a reliable approach to decipher the characteristics of a carrier state. Also, it will be required to determine the true extent of the diversity of carrier strains as juxtaposed to their acutely pathogenic forms in terms of 1) gene gain/loss during colonization and adaptation; 2) dynamics of virulence acquisition/attenuation; 3) possible genomic rearrangements; and 4) the relative preponderance of carrier and virulent strains circulating in different endemic regions of the world. Finally, an in-depth analysis of the host-pathogen interactions and their influence on gut microbiota can only explain the adaptation and persistence mechanisms of the (asymptomatic) carrier strains.


Genome sequencing

DNA was isolated from the stool sample of an asymptomatic carrier individual from Kelantan, Malaysia in 2007 during a prolonged outbreak. The draft genome sequence of this strain (STCR0063) was determined by Illumina Genome Analyzer (GAIIx, pipe- line ver l.6). The 100 bp paired-end sequencing was done with an insert size of 300 bp. About 67X genome coverage was achieved and 1.9 gigabytes of data were obtained.

Assembly and annotation

The sequence data were assembled de novo in the same way as described previously[4045] into 538 contigs using Velvet[46] at optimal hash length 39. SSPACE[47] was used for scaffolding the pre-assembled contigs using paired-end data. The gaps within these scaffolds were filled using Gapfiller by aligning the reads against already generated Scaffolds by SSPACE[48].

A reference guided assembly was generated by aligning reads to Salmonella Typhi str. CT18 [GenBank: AL513382.1] using bwa tools[49]. This reference guided assembly was used to re-order the scaffolds generated in de-novo way. In-house written Perl scripts were used for this re-ordering process and to finalize the gaps. The de novo and reference guided approaches were used to finalize the consensus draft genome. The reference guided assembly and reordered scaffolds were loaded on to Tablet – NGS data visualisation tool, to visualise the repeats, insertions and deletions[50].

The final draft nucleotide sequence after manual curation was annotated in our laboratory using RAST[51] and ISGA pipeline[52]. The genome statistics were gleaned using Artemis[53]. The data were further validated using gene prediction tools such as Glimmer[54] and EasyGene[55]. The RNAmmer[56] and tRNAscan-SE[57] were used to identify rRNA and tRNA respectively.

Phages and PAIs

Prophages and putative phage like elements in the genome were identified using PhiSpy[58] and Prophage Finder[59]. The putative HGT events were determined using Alien Hunter tool[60]. An integrated interface Island Viewer was used to predict putative genomic islands within the genome[61].

Sequence data access

The Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhi str. CR0063 whole genome shotgun (WGS) project has been submitted to the GenBank and has the project accession AKIC00000000. The project version entailing draft assembly described herein has the accession number AKIC01000000, and consists of sequences AKIC01000001-AKIC01000538.



We thankfully acknowledge support received from the University of Malaya High Impact Research Grant (Ref. UM.C/625/1HIR/MOHE/02 [A000002-5000 1]) - MOLECULAR GENETICS.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Pathogen Biology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad
Institute of Biological sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya
Laboratory of Biomedical Science and Molecular Microbiology, UMBIO Research Cluster, University of Malaya


  1. Parry CM, Hien TT, Dougan G, White NJ, Farrar JJ: Typhoid fever. N Engl J Med. 2002, 347: 1770-1782.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyle EC, Bishop JL, Grassl GA, Finlay BB: Salmonella: from pathogenesis to therapeutics. J Bacteriol. 2007, 189: 1489-1495.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gonzalez-Escobedo G, Marshall JM, Gunn JS: Chronic and acute infection of the gall bladder by Salmonella Typhi: understanding the carrier state. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011, 9: 9-14.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gopinath S, Carden S, Monack D: Shedding light on Salmonella carriers. Trends Microbiol. 2012, 20: 320-327.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Roumagnac P, Weill FX, Dolecek C, Baker S, Brisse S, Chinh NT, Le TA, Acosta CJ, Farrar J, Dougan G, Achtman M: Evolutionary history of Salmonella Typhi. Science. 2006, 314: 1301-1304.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Olopoenia LA, King AL: Widal agglutination test – 100 years later: still plagued by controversy. Postgrad Med J. 2000, 76: 80-84.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gupta A, My Thanh NT, Olsen SJ, Sivapalasingam S, My Trinh TT, Phuong Lan NT, Hoekstra RM, Bibb W, Minh NT, Danh TP, Cam PD, Mintz ED: Evaluation of community-based serologic screening for identification of chronic Salmonella Typhi carriers in Vietnam. Int J Infect. 2006, 10: 309-314.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Nair S, Schreiber E, Thong KL, Pang T, Altwegg M: Genotypic characterization of Salmonella typhi by amplified fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting provides increased discrimination as compared to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and ribotyping. J Microbiol Methods. 2000, 41: 35-43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Thong KL, Puthucheary S, Yassin RM, Sudarmono P, Padmidewi M, Soewandojo E, Handojo I, Sarasombath S, Pang T: Analysis of Salmonella typhi isolates from southeast Asia by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Clin Micro boil. 1995, 33: 1938-1941.Google Scholar
  10. Baddam R, Thong KL, Avasthi TS, Shaik S, Yap KP, Teh CS, Chai LC, Kumar N, Ahmed N: Whole-genome sequences and comparative genomics of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi isolates from patients with fatal and nonfatal typhoid fever in Papua New Guinea. J Bacteriol. 2012, 194: 5122-5123.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Aziz RK, Nizet V: Pathogen microevolution in high resolution. Sci Transl Med. 2010, 2 (16): 16-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Baddam R, Kumar N, Thong KL, Ngoi ST, Teh CS, Yap KP, Chai LC, Avasthi TS, Ahmed N: Genetic fine structure of a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi strain associated with the 2005 outbreak of typhoid fever in Kelantan, Malaysia. J Bacteriol. 2012, 194: 3565-3566.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Treangen T, Messeguer X: M-GCAT: Interactively and efficiently constructing large-scale multiple genome comparison frameworks in closely related species. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006, 7: 433.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kingsley RA, Santos RL, Keestra AM, Adams LG, Bäumler AJ: Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium ShdA is an outer membrane fibronectin-binding protein that is expressed in the intestine. Mol Microbiol. 2002, 43: 895-905.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kingsley RA, van Amsterdam K, Kramer N, Bäumler AJ: The shdA gene is restricted to serotypes of Salmonella enterica subspecies I and contributes to efficient and prolonged fecal shedding. Infect Immun. 2000, 68: 2720-2727.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Muscas P, Rossolini GM, Chiesurin A, Santucci A, Satta G: Purification and characterization of type 1 fimbriae of Salmonella typhi. Microbiol Immunol. 1994, 38: 353-358.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Craig L, Pique ME, Tainer JA: Type IV pilus structure and bacterial pathogenicity. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004, 2: 363-378.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Collinson SK, Clouthier SC, Doran JL, Banser PA, Kay WW: Salmonella enteritidis agfBAC operon encoding thin, aggregative fimbriae. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178: 662-667.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Duncan MJ, Mann EL, Cohen MS, Ofek I, Sharon N, Abraham SN: The distinct binding specificities exhibited by enterobacterial Type 1 fimbriae are determined by their fimbrial shafts. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 37707-37716.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Guo A, Cao S, Tu L, Chen P, Zhang C, Jia A, Yang W, Liu Z, Chen H, Schifferli DM: FimH alleles direct preferential binding of Salmonella to distinct mammalian cells or to avian cells. Microbiology. 2009, 155: 1623-1633.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Virlogeux I, Waxin H, Ecobichon C, Popoff MY: Role of the viaB locus in synthesis, transport and expression of Salmonella typhi Vi antigen. Microbiology. 1995, 141: 3039-3047.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Robbins JD, Robbins JB: Re examination of the protective role of the capsular polysaccharide (Vi antigen) of Salmonella typhi. J Infect Dis. 1984, 150: 436-449.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Moncrief MB, Maguire ME: Magnesium transport in prokaryotes. J Biol Inorg Chem. 1999, 4: 523-527.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Guo L, Lim KB, Gunn JS, Bainbridge B, Darveau RP, Hackett M, Miller SI: Regulation of lipid A modifications by Salmonella typhimurium virulence genes phoP-phoQ. Science. 1997, 276: 250-253.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Chen CY, Eckmann L, Libby SJ, Fang FC, Okamoto S, Kagnoff MF, Fierer J, Guiney DG: Expression of Salmonella typhimurium rpoS and rpoS-dependent genes in the intracellular environment of eukaryotic cells. Infect Immun. 1996, 64: 4739-4743.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Stothard P, Wishart DS: Circular genome visualization and exploration using CGView. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21: 537-539.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Stanley TL, Ellermeier CD, Slauch JM: Tissue-specific gene expression identifies a gene in the lysogenic phage Gifsy-1 that affects Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium survival in Peyer's patches. J Bacteriol. 2000, 182: 4406-4413.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mirold S, Rabsch W, Rohde M, Stender S, Tschape H, Russmann H, Igwe E, Hardt WD: Isolation of a temperate bacteriophage encoding the type III effector protein SopE from an epidemic Salmonella typhimurium strain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999, 96: 9845-9850.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hardt WD, Urlaub H, Galan JE: A substrate of the centisome 63 type III protein secretion system of Salmonella typhimurium is encoded by acryptic bacteriophage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95: 2574-2579.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Marcus SL, Brumell JH, Pfeifer CG, Finlay BB: Salmonella pathogenicity islands: big virulence in small packages. Microbes Infect. 2000, 2: 145-156.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee VT, Schneewind O: Type III secretion machines and the pathogenesis of enteric infections caused by Yersinia and Salmonella spp. Immunol Rev. 1999, 168: 241-255.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. McGhie EJ, Brawn LC, Hume PJ, Humphreys D, Koronakis V: Salmonella takes control: effector driven manipulation of the host. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2009, 12: 117-124.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Waterman SR, Holden DW: Functions and effectors of the Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 type III secretion system. Cell Microbiol. 2003, 5: 501-511.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Garmendia J, Beuzón CR, Ruiz-Albert J, Holden DW: The roles of SsrA-SsrB and OmpR-EnvZ in the regulation of genes encoding the Salmonella typhimurium SPI-2 type III secretion system. Microbiology. 2003, 149: 2385-2396.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Blanc-Potard AB, Solomon F, Kayser J, Groisman EA: The SPI-3 Pathogenicity Island of Salmonella enterica. J Bacteriol. 1999, 181: 998-1004.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Gerlach RG, Claudio N, Rohde M, Jackel D, Wagner C, Hensel M: Cooperation of Salmonella pathogenicity islands 1 and 4 is required to breach epithelial barriers. Cell Microbiol. 2008, 10: 2364-2376.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Wood MW, Jones MA, Watson PR, Hedges S, Wallis TS, Galyov EE: Identification of a pathogenicity island required for Salmonella enteropathogenicity. Mol Microbiol. 1998, 29: 883-891.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Parkhill J, Dougan G, James KD, Thomson NR, Pickard D, Wain J, Churcher C, Mungall KL, Bentley SD, Holden MT, Sebaihia M, Baker S, Basham D, Brooks K, Chillingworth T, Connerton P, Cronin A, Davis P, Davies RM, Dowd L, White N, Farrar J, Feltwell T, Hamlin N, Haque A, Hien TT, Holroyd S, Jagels K, Krogh A, Larsen TS, Leather S, Moule S, O'Gaora P, Parry C, Quail M, Rutherford K, Simmonds M, Skelton J, Stevens K, Whitehead S, Barrell BG: Complete genome sequence of a multiple drug resistant Salmonella enterica serovar TyphiCT18. Nature. 2001, 413: 848-852.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Pickard D, Wain J, Baker S, Line A, Chohan S, Fookes M, Barron A, Gaora PO, Chabalgoity JA, Thanky N, Scholes C, Thomson N, Quail M, Parkhill J, Dougan G: Composition, acquisition, and distribution of the Vi exopolysaccharide-encoding Salmonella enterica pathogenicity island SPI-7. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185: 5055-5065.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Avasthi TS, Devi SH, Taylor TD, Kumar N, Baddam R, Kondo S, Suzuki Y, Lamouliatte H, Mégraud F, Ahmed N: Genomes of two chronological isolates (Helicobacter pylori 2017 and 2018) of the West African Helicobacter pylori strain 908 obtained from a single patient. J Bacteriol. 2011, 193: 3385-3386.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Avasthi TS, Kumar N, Baddam R, Hussain A, Nandanwar N, Jadhav S, Ahmed N: Genome of multidrug-resistant uropathogenic Escherichia coli strain NA114 from India. J Bacteriol. 2011, 193: 4272-4273.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Devi SH, Taylor TD, Avasthi TS, Kondo S, Suzuki Y, Megraud F, Ahmed N: Genome of Helicobacter pylori strain 908. J Bacteriol. 2010, 192: 6488-6489.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Siddavattam D, Karegoudar TB, Mudde SK, Kumar N, Baddam R, Avasthi TS, Ahmed N: Genome of a novel isolate of Paracoccus denitrificans capable of degrading N, N-dimethylformamide. J Bacteriol. 2011, 193: 5598-5599.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Yap KP, Teh CS, Baddam R, Chai LC, Kumar N, Avasthi TS, Ahmed N, Thong KL: Insights from the genome sequence of a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi strain associated with a sporadic case of typhoid fever in Malaysia. J Bacteriol. 2012, 194: 5124-5125.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Yap KP, Gan HM, Teh CS, Baddam R, Chai LC, Kumar N, Tiruvayipati SA, Ahmed N, Thong KL: Genome sequence and comparative pathogenomics analysis of a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi strain associated with a typhoid carrier in Malaysia. J Bacteriol. 2012, 194: 5970-5971.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Zerbino DR, Birney E: Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008, 18: 821-829.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Boetzer M, Henkel CV, Jansen HJ, Butler D, Pirovano W: Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics. 2011, 27: 578-579.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Nadalin F, Vezzi F, Policriti A: GapFiller: a de novo assembly approach to fill the gap within paired reads. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012, 13 (14): 8-10.1186/1471-2105-13-S14-S8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Li H, Durbin R: Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler Transform. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25: 1754-1760.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Milne I, Bayer M, Cardle L, Shaw P, Stephen G, Wright F, Marshall D: Tablet–next generation sequence assembly visualization. Bioinformatics. 2010, 26: 401-402.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Aziz RK, Devoid S, Disz T, Edwards RA, Henry CS: SEED Servers: high-performance access to the SEED genomes, annotations, and metabolic models. PLoS ONE. 2012, 7 (10): 48053-10.1371/journal.pone.0048053.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Hemmerich C, Buechlein A, Podicheti R, Revanna KV, Dong Q: An Ergatis-based prokaryotic genome annotation web server. Bioinformatics. 2010, 26: 1122-1124.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Rutherford K, Parkhill J, Crook J, Horsnell T, Rice P, Rajandream MA, Barrell B: Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics. 2000, 16: 944-945.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL: Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27: 4636-4641.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Larsen TS, Krogh A: EasyGene—a prokaryotic gene finder that ranks ORFs by statistical significance. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003, 4: 21.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Lagesen K, Hallin PF, Rødland E, Stærfeldt HH, Ussery DW RT: RNammer: consistent annotation of rRNA genes in genomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: 3100-3108.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Schattner P, Brooks AN, Lowe TM: tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: W686-W689.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Akhter S, Aziz RK, Edwards RA: PhiSpy: a novel algorithm for finding prophages in bacterial genomes that combines similarity- and composition-based strategies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40: e126.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Bose M, Barber RD: Prophage Finder: a prophage loci prediction tool for prokaryotic genome sequences. In Silico Biol. 2006, 6: 223-227.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Vernikos GS, Parkhill J: Interpolated variable order motifs for identification of horizontally acquired DNA: revisiting the Salmonella pathogenicity islands. Bioinformatics. 2006, 22: 2196-2203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Langille MG, Brinkman FS: IslandViewer: an integrated interface for computational identification and visualization of genomic islands. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25: 664-665.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Baddam et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.