The murine appendiceal microbiome is altered in spontaneous colitis and its pathological progression
© Alkadhi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 28 May 2014
Accepted: 13 June 2014
Published: 21 June 2014
Inflammatory bowel disease (comprising ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease) is a multifactorial disease that is extensively associated with stool microbiome changes (dysbiosis). Appendicitis and appendectomy limits subsequent colitis, clinically, and in animal models. We wanted to examine how the appendiceal and stool microbiome fared in our spontaneous colitic Winnie (Muc2−/−) mice model.
Two C57BL/6 and 10 Winnie mice at ages 12 and 15 weeks were euthanized for stool and caecal patch samples. DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit then the V1-V3 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced using the Roche/454 GS FLX + pyrosequencing instrument. A Galaxy metagenomic pipeline was used to define phyla and families at sequence similarity threshold of ≥ 80%.
Bacteriodetes was decreased in 15-week Winnie mice appendices compared to corresponding stool samples (P < 0.01). Proteobacteria was increased in appendices of Winnie mice compared to corresponding stool samples (P < 0.05). The Bacteroidetes family Rikenellaceae could be identified only in 15-week-old Winnie mice appendices. A higher quantity of Acetobacteraceae (Proteobacteria phylum) was present in 15-week Winnie mice when compared to 12-week Winnie mice (P < 0.01). Helicobacteraceae (Proteobacteria phylum), which is prominent in all Winnie mice, is absent in control mice.
The appendiceal dysbiosis observed in our Winnie mice is commensurate with, and adds to extant literature data. The presence of Helicobacteraceae (Proteobacteria) only in colitic Winnie mice (but not control mice) is consistent with reports of increased Helicobacter in IBD patients. Bacteroides (Bacteroidetes) decreases may be a reflection of reduced anti-inflammatory commensal species such as B. fragilis. Further research is warranted to expand and delineate the relationship between IBD and the appendix microbiome.
KeywordsMicrobiome Appendix Stool Winnie Inflammatory bowel disease Colitis Proteobacteria Bacteroidetes
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) comprises ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). It has a relapsing and remitting clinical course, and is characterized by chronic intestinal inflammation with abdominal pain and intestinal dysfunction. UC and CD differ in extent, localization, and inflammatory mediator profiles . The etiology of IBD is unknown, but is thought to result from complex interactions between host and environmental components like diet, standard of living, and antibiotic use . IBD is on the rise in developed countries, the latest incidence in Australia being 29.6 per 100,000 . IBD poses a significant economic and public health burden .
Gastrointestinal flora (intestinal microbiome) is crucial for human health, mediating important functions in metabolism and immunity . There is a glut of evidence that link the intestinal microbiome to the pathogenesis of IBD . The human microbiome is most concentrated in the colon (1012 cells per gram), which is the region most affected in IBD . Manifold studies link IBD with antigen-sensing and intestinal innate immunity genes such as NOD2 and ATG16L1 . Importantly, compositional changes in the intestinal micriobiota (dysbiosis) are significant features of bowel diseases . The correlation between dysbiosis and IBD is not completely understood, and human studies involve confounding variables on bacterial composition, such as antibiotic use . In contrast, animal models of IBD enable the study of the gut microbiome while reducing environmental influence . The Winnie mouse strain has missense mutations in the mucin Muc2 gene that alters the intestinal barrier, and results in “spontaneous” colitis, characterized by intestinal inflammation and activation of the IL-23/Th17 pathway . Winnie mice are more vulnerable to intestinal antigens due to defects in Paneth and goblet cells , and present with chronologically progressive IBD symptoms such as bloody stools, diarrhoea, and weight loss . All Winnie mice (100%) develop mild spontaneous distal intestinal inflammation by the time they are 6 weeks old . Colitic signs and symptoms become progressively worse chronologically. Colitis is therefore significantly worse in 15-week Winnie mice, when compared to 12-week Winnie mice. Corresponding commensurate histopathological findings have already been published .
The appendix cannot be considered a “vestigial” organ “anymore”. Mouse models of spontaneous colitis have shown a significant role for the appendix in the adaptive immune response . Appendectomy in these models also markedly reduced the risk for colitis development . Several hypotheses exist explain this relationship, and, as more evidence endorses its important role in mucosal immunity . The 2 most plausible explanations are as follows. The appendix may initiate an aberrant immune response against the gut microbiome, predisposing to IBD . Alternatively, appendicitis and appendectomy may induce microbiota changes and/ or major immunological changes in the distal colon which protect against colitis development [8, 16].
Most intestinal flora is anaerobic, and difficult to identify using culture-dependent methods . However, next generation sequencing methods have enabled the high-throughput phylogenetic study of microbial populations from multiple samples in parallel . The bacterial genome is assembled by amplification of fragments of the conserved 16S rRNA gene . Hyper-variable regions within 16S rRNA are utilised to characterize different taxonomic levels . In this study, we sought to investigate the microbiome signatures of Winnie mice in different stages of colitis development (at ages 12 and 15 weeks) and compare those against the control strain (C57BL/6). Microbiome alterations are expected between mice strains, as well as before and after inflammation. The rationale of our study was not only to determine what changes exist between a “normal” mouse strain, and a “spontaneously colitic” (Winnie) strain; but also to determine what bacteria were present at each stage of inflammation progression. These experiments will shed more light on the pathogenetic nuances of IBD. We compared stool and appendix phyla, as well as more intricate differences at the family level. Herewith, we posit the differences between the appendix and colon (stool), in normal controls and colitic Winnie mice.
Results and discussion
Microbiome signature in winnie and C57BL/6
Family-level bacteriodetes signatures in appendices
Family-level proteobacteria signatures in appendices
The human vermiform appendix is commonly, but wrongly perceived to be a vestigial organ, despite its abundant lymphoid tissue, and despite the fact that appendicitis is the most common abdominal surgery requiring hospitalization. Anatomically, owing to its proximity to the caecal segment of the large intestine, it is perpetually exposed to and gastrointestinal microbiota. As the murine caecal lymphoid patch (Figure 1) is the equivalent of human appendix, this study investigated the microbial content differences of the caecal patch to the rest of colon (via stool contents).
Intestinal biopsies from IBD patients display marked aberrations in the microbiome signature , inclusive of its Proteobacteria and Bacteriodetes constituents . Surgical samples from IBD patients show reduced Bacteroidetes load compared to healthy patients . Colonic biopsies show significantly more Proteobacteria in IBD patients . Bacteroidetes species are an important source of short chain fatty acids to the intestinal epithelia . In addition, Bacteroidetes regulate the generation of colonic regulatory T cells, which maintain immunological tolerance against the gut microbiome . Specifically, capsular polysaccharide A from Bacteroides fragilis stimulates colonic regulatory T cells enhances the release of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 .
Proteobacteria levels are higher in IBD patients . Multiple classes of Proteobacteria are associated with IBD including Deltaproteobacteria, which include sulphur-reducing bacteria . Increased sulphide damages intestinal walls  and inhibits butyrate oxidation . More importantly, Helicobacter species, which was represented in Winnie mice but not in C57BL/6 (Figure 5B, Figure 6), is strongly associated with clinical IBD (UC > CD) . The increase in Helicobacteraceae in IBD patients is not due to Helicobacter pylori infection, as Helicobacteraceae is prominent in colonic but not gastric mucosa .
Limitations of our study include small sample sizes, and methodological differences (with other studies) in DNA extraction/sequencing, which may hypothetically impart an element of inconsistency. Firstly, the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini kit we used relies on enzymatic lysis, and produces substantially less DNA yield, compared to extraction methods involving vigorous mechanical lysis , or bead-beating . This may have a disproportionate impact on specific bacterial groups which are tougher to lyse owing to stronger cell walls . In addition, pyrosequencing can be biased by selection of the primer pair, and amplifying different 16S rRNA hyper-variable regions may enhance sequencing coverage .
Our study suggests an association or a pathogenic role for the appendix and its flora in colitic predisposition. Further characterisation of chronological differences in inflammation progression, as well as the magnitude of colitis pathology; would divulge whether our observed microbiome changes indicate association or causality. Dysbiosis within the appendix (caecal patch) of our colitis model was significantly more than within stool samples, especially in older (15-week) Winnie mice, where intestinal epithelial defects become pronounced . It is not clear whether dysbiosis is a cause or consequence of intestinal inflammation . However, it is less likely to be the former, owing to the therapeutic benefit easily conferred by gut microbiome manipulation . Reversing the dysbiotic-inflammatory positive feedback loop with faecal microbiota transplantation has produced positive results in recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) . While the appendix might promote C. difficile infection , retrospective studies in humans show a protective role against CDAD recurrence . Additional research in experimental models is needed to explain these discrepancies.
The correlation between dysbiosis and IBD is incompletely understood. Our Winnie mouse strain has an altered intestinal barrier, resulting in spontaneous colitis, characterized by intestinal ulceration and inflammation. The appendiceal dysbiosis observed in our colitic Winnie mice is commensurate with, and adds to extant literature data. The presence of Helicobacteraceae (Proteobacteria) only in colitic Winnie mice (but not control mice) is consistent with reports of increased Helicobacter in IBD patients. Bacteroides (Bacteroidetes) decreases may be a reflection of reduced anti-inflammatory commensal species such as B. fragilis. Further research is warranted to expand and delineate the relationship between IBD and the appendix microbiome. Despite inherent differences between mouse and human gut flora, this study using our Winnie colitis model will vastly increase our understanding of IBD pathogenesis.
Two C57BL/6 and 18 Winnie mice were purchased from the Animal Resource Centre, Australia. Owing to discrepancies in the supply of mice strains, there were mild differences in the number of animals in each experimental group. The mice were bred in a conventional clean Helicobacter hepaticus - free animal facility used for all the experiments, which were conducted under the directions and approval of the animal ethics committee of the University of Queensland.
Caecal patch (appendix) excision and DNA extraction
Caecal patch was identified as a whitish-patch segment right at the end portion away from the colonic side (Figure 1). About 1 cm excision was made and the sample with contents was immediately snap-frozen for further DNA processing. In the laboratory, stool material was scraped and DNA extracted using QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Bacterial DNA content was confirmed with bacterial 16 s rRNA broad-range primers.
Mice were euthanized at ages 12 and 15 weeks and appendix and stool samples were immediately frozen and stored at −80°C. DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, GER), according to manufacturer’s instructions then stored in −20°C. Bacterial DNA content was confirmed using the A260/A280 ratio and real-time PCR of 16S rRNA using broad-range primers as described previously  on the iQ5 real-time PCR system (Bio-RAD Laboratories, CA, USA).
DNA sequencing and metagenomic analysis
Sequencing amplicons were generated for the V1-V3 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene using the 27 F-519R primers and DNA was sequenced using the Roche GS FLX + 454-pyrosequencing platform at the Australian Genome Research Facility. Profiling of the microbiome was performed using the metagenomic tools available in the Galaxy Public Server  following the metagenomic pipeline described by Kasakovsky Pond et al. . Briefly, sequences were filtered to exclude reads with a quality score <20 and a contiguous length <250 bp. Sequences were compared to the WGS database (28jan2013) using MegaBLAST z  and after removing hits with <50% coverage, Operational Taxonomic Units (OTU) were designated based on 80% similarity and identity defined to the lowest taxonomic rank of kingdom.
Since our results could not form a normal distribution due to the small sample size, we used the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U-test. Graphs were generated with Prism v6 (GraphPad Software, CA, USA).
RE and DK - Conception and design; SA, DK, SR-D - Research work; SA, RC, DK, SR-D, RE – Figure preparation & Manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Inflammatory bowel disease
Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 2
Autophagy related 16-like 1
T helper 17
Appendicitis and appendectomy
- 16S rRNA:
16S ribosomal RNA
Operational taxonomic unit.
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Grant Number 604304.
- Lomer MCE: Dietary and nutritional considerations for inflammatory bowel disease. Proc Nutr Soc. 2011, 70: 329-335.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jaeger S, Stange EF, Wehkamp J: Inflammatory bowel disease: an impaired barrier disease. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013, 398: 1-12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wilson J, Hair C, Knight R, Catto-Smith A, Bell S, Kamm M, Desmond P, McNeil J, Connell W: High incidence of inflammatory bowel disease in Australia: a prospective population-based Australian incidence study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010, 16: 1550-1556.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morrison G, Headon B, Gibson P: Update in inflammatory bowel disease. Aust Fam Physician. 2009, 38: 956-961.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Proal AD, Albert PJ, Marshall TG: The human microbiome and autoimmunity. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2013, 25: 234-240.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Backhed F, Ley RE, Sonnenburg JL, Peterson DA, Gordon JI: Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine. Science (New York, NY). 2005, 307: 1915-1920.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vipperla K, O’Keefe SJ: The Microbiota and Its Metabolites in Colonic Mucosal Health and Cancer Risk. Nutr Clin Pract. 2012, 27: 624-635.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cheluvappa R, Luo AS, Grimm MC: Autophagy suppression by appendicitis and appendectomy protects against colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014, 20: 847-855.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brown K, DeCoffe D, Molcan E, Gibson DL: Diet-Induced Dysbiosis of the Intestinal Microbiota and the Effects on Immunity and Disease. Nutrients. 2012, 4: 1095-1119.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sartor RB: Therapeutic manipulation of the enteric microflora in inflammatory bowel diseases: antibiotics, probiotics, and prebiotics. Gastroenterology. 2004, 126: 1620-1633.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kostic AD, Howitt MR, Garrett WS: Exploring host-microbiota interactions in animal models and humans. Genes Dev. 2013, 27: 701-718.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eri RD, Adams RJ, Tran TV, Tong H, Das I, Roche DK, Oancea I, Png CW, Jeffery PL, Radford-Smith GL, Cook MC, Florin TH, McGuckin MA: An intestinal epithelial defect conferring ER stress results in inflammation involving both innate and adaptive immunity. Mucosal Immunol. 2011, 4: 354-364.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McGuckin MA, Eri RD, Das I, Lourie R, Florin TH: ER stress and the unfolded protein response in intestinal inflammation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010, 298: G820-G832.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heazlewood CK, Cook MC, Eri R, Price GR, Tauro SB, Taupin D, Thornton DJ, Png CW, Crockford TL, Cornall RJ, Adams R, Kato M, Nelms KA, Hong NA, Florin TH, Goodnow CC, McGuckin MA: Aberrant mucin assembly in mice causes endoplasmic reticulum stress and spontaneous inflammation resembling ulcerative colitis. PLoS Med. 2008, 5: e54.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koutroubakis IE, Vlachonikolis IG, Kouroumalis EA: Role of appendicitis and appendectomy in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis: a critical review. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2002, 8: 277-286.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cheluvappa R, Luo AS, Grimm MC: T helper type 17 pathway suppression by appendicitis and appendectomy protects against colitis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2014, 175: 316-322.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mizoguchi A, Mizoguchi E, Chiba C, Bhan AK: Role of appendix in the development of inflammatory bowel disease in TCR-alpha mutant mice. J Exp Med. 1996, 184: 707-715.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsushita M, Takakuwa H, Matsubayashi Y, Nishio A, Ikehara S, Okazaki K: Appendix is a priming site in the development of ulcerative colitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2005, 11: 4869-4874.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krieglstein CF, Cerwinka WH, Laroux FS, Grisham MB, Schurmann G, Bruwer M, Granger DN: Role of appendix and spleen in experimental colitis. J Surg Res. 2001, 101: 166-175.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suau A, Bonnet R, Sutren M, Godon JJ, Gibson GR, Collins MD, Dore J: Direct analysis of genes encoding 16S rRNA from complex communities reveals many novel molecular species within the human gut. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999, 65: 4799-4807.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schloss PD, Handelsman J: Metagenomics for studying unculturable microorganisms: cutting the Gordian knot. Genome Biol. 2005, 6: 229.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frank DN, Pace NR: Gastrointestinal microbiology enters the metagenomics era. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2008, 24: 4-10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Langille MGI, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, McDonald D, Knights D, Reyes JA, Clemente JC, Burkepile DE, Thurber RLV, Knight R, Beiko RG, Huttenhower C: Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol. 2013, 31: 814.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fite A, Macfarlane S, Furrie E, Bahrami B, Cummings JH, Steinke DT, Macfarlane GT: Longitudinal Analyses of Gut Mucosal Microbiotas in Ulcerative Colitis in Relation to Patient Age and Disease Severity and Duration. J Clin Microbiol. 2013, 51: 849-856.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gophna U, Sommerfeld K, Gophna S, Doolittle WF, van Zanten S: Inerences between tissue-associated intestinal microfloras of patients with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2006, 44: 4136-4141.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frank DN, Amand ALS, Feldman RA, Boedeker EC, Harpaz N, Pace NR: Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007, 104: 13780-13785.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lepage P, Hasler R, Spehlmann ME, Rehman A, Zvirbliene A, Begun A, Ott S, Kupcinskas L, Dore J, Raedler A, Schreiber S: Twin Study Indicates Loss of Interaction Between Microbiota and Mucosa of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Gastroenterology. 2011, 141: 227-236.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fava F, Danese S: Intestinal microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease: friend of foe?. World J Gastroenterol. 2011, 17: 557-566.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lathrop SK, Bloom SM, Rao SM, Nutsch K, Lio CW, Santacruz N, Peterson DA, Stappenbeck TS, Hsieh CS: Peripheral education of the immune system by colonic commensal microbiota. Nature. 2011, 478: 250-252.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mazmanian SK, Round JL, Kasper DL: A microbial symbiosis factor prevents intestinal inflammatory disease. Nature. 2008, 453: 620-625.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mukhopadhya I, Hansen R, El-Omar EM, Hold GL: IBD-what role do Proteobacteria play? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012, 9: 219-230.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Loubinoux J, Bronowicki JP, Pereira IA, Mougenel JL, Faou AE: Sulfate-reducing bacteria in human feces and their association with inflammatory bowel diseases. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2002, 40: 107-112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pitcher MC, Cummings JH: Hydrogen sulphide: a bacterial toxin in ulcerative colitis?. Gut. 1996, 39: 1-4.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pitcher MC, Beatty ER, Cummings JH: The contribution of sulphate reducing bacteria and 5-aminosalicylic acid to faecal sulphide in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2000, 46: 64-72.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thomson JM, Hansen R, Berry SH, Hope ME, Murray GI, Mukhopadhya I, McLean MH, Shen Z, Fox JG, El-Omar E, Hold GL: Enterohepatic helicobacter in ulcerative colitis: potential pathogenic entities? PLoS One. 2011, 6: e17184.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang L, Day A, McKenzie G, Mitchell H: Nongastric Helicobacter species detected in the intestinal tract of children. J Clin Microbiol. 2006, 44: 2276-2279.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maukonen J, Simoes C, Saarela M: The currently used commercial DNA-extraction methods give different results of clostridial and actinobacterial populations derived from human fecal samples. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012, 79: 697-708.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ariefdjohan MW, Savaiano DA, Nakatsu CH: Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens. Nutr J. 2010, 9: 23.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Claassen S, du Toit E, Kaba M, Moodley C, Zar HJ, Nicol MP: A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples. J Microbiol Methods. 2013, 94: 103-110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li E, Hamm CM, Gulati AS, Sartor RB, Chen H, Wu X, Zhang T, Rohlf FJ, Zhu W, Gu C, Robertson CE, Pace NR, Boedeker EC, Harpaz N, Yuan J, Weinstock GM, Sodergren E, Frank DN: nflammatory Bowel Diseases Phenotype, C. difficile and NOD2 Genotype Are Associated with Shifts in Human Ileum Associated Microbial Composition. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e26284.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van der Sluis M, De Koning BA, De Bruijn AC, Velcich A, Meijerink JP, Van Goudoever JB, Buller HA, Dekker J, Van Seuningen I, Renes IB, Einerhand AW: Muc2-deficient mice spontaneously develop colitis, indicating that MUC2 is critical for colonic protection. Gastroenterology. 2006, 131: 117-129.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagalingam NA, Lynch SV: Role of the microbiota in inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012, 18: 968-984.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Landy J, Al-Hassi HO, McLaughlin SD, Walker AW, Ciclitira PJ, Nicholls RJ, Clark SK, Hart AL: Review article: faecal transplantation therapy for gastrointestinal disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011, 34: 409-415.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Merchant R, Mower WR, Ourian A, Abrahamian FM, Moran GJ, Krishnadasan A, Talan DA: Association Between Appendectomy and Clostridium difficile Infection. J clinical Med Res. 2012, 4: 17-19.Google Scholar
- Sanders NL, Bollinger RR, Lee R, Thomas S, Parker W: Appendectomy and Clostridium difficile colitis: Relationships revealed by clinical observations and immunology. World J Gastroenterol. 2013, 19: 5607-5614.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kommedal O, Simmon K, Karaca D, Langeland N, Wiker HG: Dual priming oligonucleotides for broad-range amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene directly from human clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2012, 50: 1289-1294.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goecks J, Nekrutenko A, Taylor J, Galaxy T: Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol. 2010, 11: R86.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kasokovsky Pond S, Wadhawan S, Chiaromonte F, Ananda G, Chung W, Taylor J, Nekrutenko A, Galaxy T: Windshield splatter analysis with thye Galaxy metagenomic pipeline. Genome Res. 2009, 19: 2144-2153.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L, Miller W: A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J Comput Biol. 2000, 7: 203-214.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.