Skip to main content

Table 7 Co-infection combinations with two or more infectious etiologies detected in diarrheagenic group vs controls

From: Multiple etiologies of infectious diarrhea and concurrent infections in a pediatric outpatient-based screening study in Odisha, India

Combinations of pathogens

Frequency (%) of detection cases (n = 130)

Frequency (%) of detection controls (n = 48)

Statistical analysis

Double infections

 Shigella+STEC

5 (3.84)

0

Two-tailed p value by Mantel–Haenszel Chi-square test = 0.004915*

 Shigella+EPEC

3 (2.3)

0

 Cryptosporidium+EPEC

1 (0.76)

1 (2.08)

 EPEC+O157

1 (0.76)

1 (2.08)

 Rotavirus+Shigella

7 (5.38)

0

 Adenovirus+EPEC

2 (1.53)

0

 Adenovirus+Cryptosporidium

1 (0.76)

0

 Rotavirus+EPEC

6 (4.61)

0

 Shigella+O157

2 (1.53)

0

 Shigella +EAEC

2 (1.53)

0

 Adenovirus+EAEC

1 (0.76)

0

 Rotavirus+EAEC

1 (0.76)

0

 EPEC+EAEC

2 (1.53)

0

 EPEC+STEC

0

1 (2.08)

 Double infection (total)

33 (25.38)

3 (6.25)

Triple infections

 Shigella+STEC+EPEC

2 (1.53)

0

Two-tailed p value by Mid-P exact test = 0.03917*

 EPEC+EHEC+O157

1 (0.76)

0

 Rotavirus+Shigella+STEC

2 (1.53)

0

 Rotavirus+Cryptosporidium+EPEC

1 (0.76)

0

 Rotavirus+Shigella+EPEC

1 (0.76)

0

 Rotavirus+Shigella+EPEC

1 (0.76)

0

 Shigella+STEC+EPEC

1 (0.76)

0

 Adenovirus+Shigella +EPEC

1 (0.76)

0

 EAEC+O157+EAEC

1 (0.76)

0

 Triple infection (total)

10 (7.69)

0

 Adenovirus+Shigella+STEC+EPEC+O157+EAEC

1 (0.76)

0

Two-tailed p value by Mid-P exact test = 0.7303

Combination of Pathogens (more than three infections)

 
  1. Statistical analysis is shown considering only total number of cases and control subjects and respective co-isolation rates (double, triple, or more than three infections). In a 2 × 2 table analysis for comparison of proportions between cases and controls for double infections group, all expected values (row total X column total/grand total) were ≥5. So Chi-square analysis was recommended. For triple infections group and more than three infections one, at least one expected value (row total X column total/grand total) was <5. So Mid-P exact test was recommended rather than Chi-square (http://www.openepi.com)
  2. n total number of subjects
  3. * Statistically significant