From: Assessment of antibiotic susceptibility in Lactobacillus isolates from chickens
Resistant gene | tetL | tetM | tetW | ermB | ermC | LnuA | tetL + tetM | tetL + tetM + ermB | tetW + ermB | ermB + ermC | ermB + lnuA | cat | ant(6)-Ia | aadE | ant(6)-Ia + aadE | aac(6’)-Ie-aph(2’)-Ia | aph(2″)-Ic | lsaE | lsaE + ant(6)-Ia | acrA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L. salivarius (n = 31) | 19 (61%) | 21 (68%) | 0 | 16 (52%) | 6 (19%) | 15 (48%) | 18 (58%) | 14 (45%) | 0 | 2 (1%) | 12 (39%) | 8 (26%) | 8 (26%) | 4 (13%) | 4 (13%) | 6 (19%) | 4 (13%) | 8 (26%) | 7 (22%) | 31 (100%) |
L. johnsonii (n = 21) | 0 | 0 | 13 (62%) | 10 | 0 | 6 (3%) | 0 | 0 | 7 (3%) | 0 | 4 (2%) | 11 (48%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 (100%) |
L. crispatus (n = 12) | 1 (8%) | 1 (8%) | 7 (58%) | 2 (17%) | 1 (8%) | 1 (8%) | 1 (8%) | 1 (8%) | 1 (8%) | 0 | 0 | 8 (7%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (8%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 (100%) |
L. reuteri (n = 10) | 0 | 0 | 9 (90%) | 4 (40%) | 2 (20%) | 7 (70%) | 0 | 0 | 4 (40%) | 1 (1%) | 3 (3%) | 5 (50%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 (100%) |
L. ingluviei (n = 8) | 0 | 0 | 6 (75%) | 1 (12%) | 0 | 5 (62%) | 0 | 0 | 1 (12%) | 0 | 1 (12%) | 1 (12%) | 1 (12%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (25%) | 1 (12%) | 8 (100%) |
L. agilis (n = 3) | 1 (33%) | 1 (33%) | 0 | 0 | 1 (33%) | 0 | 1 (33%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (100%) |
L. saerimneri (n = 3) | 0 | 0 | 2 (67%) | 1 (33%) | 1 (33%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (33%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (33%) | 0 | 0 | 3 (100%) |
Total: 88 | 21 (24%) | 23 (26%) | 37 (42%) | 34 (39%) | 11 (12%) | 34 (39%) | 20 (23%) | 15 (17%) | 14 (16%) | 3 (3%) | 20 (23%) | 33 (37.5%) | 9 (10%) | 4 (4.5%) | 4 (4.5%) | 7 (8%) | 5 (6%) | 10 (11%) | 8 (9%) | 88 (100%) |