Skip to main content

Table 1 Resistance phenotypes of the tested enterobacterial isolates and negative controls, expressed as MIC ranges of carbapenems obtained at the Vitek II

From: Comparison of phenotypic methods for the detection of carbapenem non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae

Isolates #

Species

Resistance determinants

Ertapenem MIC range (mg/L)

Imipenem MIC range (mg/L)

Meropenem MIC range (mg/L)

84

K. pneumoniae

KPC

4 - > 8

4 - > 16

2 - > 16

2

E. coli

KPC

≤ 0,5 - 4

8

1

1

E. cloacae

KPC

> 8

> 16

> 16

3

K. pneumoniae

KPC + VIM

> 8

> 16

> 16

3

E. cloacae

VIM

> 8

> 16

> 16

2

K. oxytoca

VIM

≤ 0,5

1- > 16

1- > 16

1

K. pneumoniae

NDM

> 8

> 16

> 16

3

K. pneumoniae

OXA-48

4 - > 8

2 - > 16

1 - 2

1

E. coli

OXA-48

1

2

≤ 0,25

1

E. cloacae

OXA-48

2

1

≤ 0,25

2

E. aerogenes

AmpC

> 8

> 16

8 - > 16

2

E. cloacae

AmpC

4

≤ 0,25 - 1

≤ 0,25

2

K. pneumoniae

ESBL

> 8

1

4

1

E. coli

ESBL

> 8

> 16

> 16

Controls

     

NC1

E. coli

none

≤ 0,5

≤ 0,25

≤ 0,25

NC2

E. cloacae

none

≤ 0,5

0,5

≤ 0,25

NC3

E. aerogenes

none

≤ 0,5

2

≤ 0,25

NC4

K. pneumoniae

none

≤ 0,5

≤ 0,25

≤ 0,25

NC5

K. oxytoca

none

≤ 0,5

0,5

≤ 0,25

  1. Enterobacterial samples were grouped bases on the species and resistance determinant/s.
  2. NC: negative control.