Table 2 Antimicrobial resistance patterns of Campylobacter isolates
No. of resistant agents | Antimicrobial resistance profile | No. of isolates | Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
3 | Tet Cip Nor | 3 | 5.8 |
3 | Sul Cip Nor | 1 | 1.9 |
3 | Cef Cip Nor | 1 | 1.9 |
4 | Cli Amp Cip Nor | 1 | 1.9 |
4 | Tet Amp Cip Nor | 10 | 19.2 |
4 | Amp Cef Cip Nor | 2 | 3.8 |
4 | Tet Cef Cip Nor | 2 | 3.8 |
5 | Cli Amp Ery Cip Nor | 1 | 1.9 |
5 | Tet Amp Cef Cip Nor | 7 | 13.5 |
5 | Tet Amp Sul Cip Nor | 1 | 1.9 |
5 | Tet Cef Sul Cip Nor | 1 | 1.9 |
5 | Tet Cef Sul Cip Nor | 1 | 1.9 |
6 | Cli Tet Amp Cef Cip Nor | 3 | 5.8 |
6 | Str Tet Amp Cef Cip Nor | 1 | 1.9 |
6 | Tet Amp Cef Sul Cip Nor | 2 | 3.8 |
6 | Tet Amp Sul Ery Cip Nor | 1 | 1.9 |
7 | Cli Tet Amp Cef Sul Cip Nor | 4 | 7.7 |
7 | Cli Tet Amp Cef Ery Cip Nor | 1 | 1.9 |
7 | Tet Amp Cef Sul Ery Cip Nor | 1 | 1.9 |
8 | Cli Str Ami Tet Amp Ery Cip Nor | 2 | 3.8 |
8 | Cli Str Tet Amp Cef Sul Cip Nor | 1 | 1.9 |
8 | Cli Str Tet Amp Sul Ery Cip Nor | 1 | 1.9 |
9 | Cli Str Ami Tet Amp Cef Sul Cip Nor | 1 | 1.9 |
9 | Cli Str Ami Tet Amp Sul Ery Cip Nor | 3 | 5.8 |