Open Access

Helicobacter pylori: a poor man's gut pathogen?

  • Mohammed Mahdy Khalifa1,
  • Radwa Raed Sharaf2 and
  • Ramy Karam Aziz1Email author
Gut Pathogens20102:2

DOI: 10.1186/1757-4749-2-2

Received: 9 March 2010

Accepted: 31 March 2010

Published: 31 March 2010

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori is one of the human pathogens with highest prevalence around the world; yet, its principal mode of transmission remains largely unknown. The role of H. pylori in gastric disease and cancer has not been established until the end of the 20th century. Since then, its epidemiology has been extensively studied, and an accruing body of literature suggests that not all humans are equally at risk of infection by this gut pathogen. Here, we briefly review the different epidemiological aspects of H. pylori infection with emphasis on those factors related to human poverty. The epidemiology of H. pylori infection is characterized by marked differences between developing and developed countries, notably among children. In addition, congruent lines of evidence point out to socioeconomic factors and living standards as main determinants of the age-dependent acquisition rate of H. pylori, and consequently its prevalence. These data are alarming in the light of the changing global climate and birth rate, which are expected to change the demography of our planet, putting more children at risk of H. pylori and its complications for years to come.

Introduction

Helicobacter pylori, formerly known as Campylobacter pyloridis then Campylobacter pylori, is one of the human pathogens with highest prevalence around the world; yet, its exact mode of transmission is still uncertain. This organism was isolated from the human stomach but has not been consistently isolated from any other niche, and thus the mechanism by which it colonizes the human stomach remains largely unknown.

H. pylori is a spiral, gram-negative, microaerophilic bacterium, which was established in 1982 by Robin Warren and Barry Marshall as the causative agent of gastritis and peptic ulcer [1, 2], a discovery that revolutionized gastroenterology. Before Warren and Marshall, the human stomach was believed to be a sterile area. Today, H. pylori is recognized as the most common cause of gastritis, which in turn leads to the development of more gastrointestinal complications such as peptic and duodenal ulcers. Additionally, the organism is classified as a class 1 carcinogen because of its causal relationship to gastric adenocarcinoma, one of the world's deadliest cancers [3, 4].

The previously underestimated clinical relevance of this rediscovered spiral bacterium quickly enticed microbiologists, epidemiologists, infectious disease specialists, and veterinarians to explore its physiology, genetics, epidemiology, and transmission. Such scientific activity was translated into more than 40,000 scientific articles about H. pylori in the past 20 years (Fig. 1A). During these 20 years, the number of H. pylori-related articles in PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed became comparable to the number of articles about well-established pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Fig. 1B).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1757-4749-2-2/MediaObjects/13099_2010_Article_27_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

A. H. pylori -related articles published between 1989 and 2009. Data are collected from search results on ISI Web of Science (WoS, URL: http://www.isiwebofknowledge.com) with "Helicobacter pylori OR H. pylori" as search string. B. Example infectious agents in literature. The PubMed literature database (URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) was searched for articles whose titles include the words: Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), Escherichia coli (E. coli), and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Although H. pylori is a recently discovered pathogen, it has more records in literature than well-established pathogens such as S. aureus and M. tuberculosis but is exceeded by HIV and E. coli, the latter being possibly the most cited bacterium and the most commonly used organism in the laboratory.

The growing attention given to H. pylori by academics and clinicians is not surprising since this pathogen colonizes more than half of the world's inhabitants [5], with an evident geographic variation in its epidemiology. This geographic variation is believed to be largely socioeconomically driven on both global and local scales. Other factors have also been reported to influence the incidence and prevalence of H. pylori, such as age, gender, genetic predisposition, ethnicity, educational level, and sanitation. Yet, the remarkably unequal burden of H. pylori-associated diseases on poorer communities and countries is the focus of this review article.

Epidemiology of H. pylori Infection

Prevalence of H. pylori infection

H. pylori is one of the most common bacterial infectious agents; it inhabits the stomachs of more than half of the world's population [5]. The prevalence of infection seems to mostly depend on the rate of acquisition (see below), but also on the rate of loss of infection [6] and the length of the persistence period between acquisition and loss [7]. Based on these factors, H. pylori prevalence differs from one country to another and may differ between different ethnic, social, or age groups within the same country [6, 811].

Globally, the prevalence of H. pylori infection in developing countries is markedly higher than that in developed countries [1216]. Moreover, the acquisition of H. pylori seems to occur at higher rates in developing countries [7, 9]. A plethora of studies reported and emphasized these differences within and between countries (Table 1).
Table 1

Prevalence of H. pylori infection in different populations of the world.

Country

N studied cases

Age range

(years)

Pre-valence

Ref.

Developing Countries 1 :

    

Bangladesh

181

20-44

92%

[95]

Brazil

    

- rural

40 (children)

< 20

77.5%

- rural

 

164 (adults)

20-90

84.7%

[96]

- urban

363

> 20

63.4%

[97]

- poor urban community

204

18-80

80%

[98]

Colombia (rural)

684

2-9

69%

[99]

China

    

- Southern China

1727

N/A

44.2%

[9]

- Hong Kong

397

36-65

58.6%

[100]

- Changle of Fujan

1456

 

80.4%

[100]

Egypt

    

- Alexandria (northern)

169 mothers

N/A

88%

 
 

169 children

< 1

13%

 
  

1.5

25%

[101]

- Cairo (central)

52

< 6

33%

 
 

56

> 6

60%

[102]

- Assiut (southern)

urban

N/A

87%

 
 

rural

N/A

40%

[103]

- poor urban area

schoolchildren

N/A

72.4%

[104]

India

238

3-70

79%

[13]

Mexico

11605

20-90

66%

[61]

Nepal (rural)

1142

4-93

56.8%

[69]

 

407

2 mo-12 yr

48%

[105]

Peru

104

0-17

50%

[70]

Russia

213

20-75

88%

[106]

- St. Petersburg 1995

307

2-19

44%

[18, 106]

- St. Petersburg 2005

370

2-19

13%

[18]

Saudi Arabia

557

5-10

40%

[107]

  

> 20

70%

 

Taiwan

823

1-40+

54%

[78]

Developed Countries 1 :

    

Australia (urban Melbourne)

273

19-47

23%

[32]

Denmark

3589

30-60

25.9%

[108]

Germany (western)

260

18-61

39.2%

[60]

Israel (rural)

377

30-90

72%

[109]

Japan

4361

19-69

30%

[110]

Netherlands

254 (employees)

11-89

27.2%

[111]

New Zealand

579 workers:

40-64

56%

 

- Europeans

190

 

35.8%

 

- Maori

195

 

57.4%

 

- Pacific Islanders

194

 

73.2%

[64]

Spain

332

> 18

43%

[112]

- mountain

1782

 

54%

 

- coastal

154

 

30%

 

South Korea

161

20-75

75%

[113]

Switzerland

176 natives

10-20

7.3%

[81]

 

20 immigrants

 

30%

 

United Kingdom

    

- England

267 (healthy)

> 18

41%

[114]

 

467 (all males)

18-65

37.5%

[115]

- Northern Ireland

4742

12-64

50.5%

[116]

- South Wales

1796

45-59

70%

[117]

United States

    

- South Carolina

938 army recruits

17-26

26%

 
 

324 blacks

 

44%

 
 

47 Hispanics

 

38%

 
 

536 whites

 

14%

[66]

- California

556

20-39

27%

[67]

- Texas

246 blacks

15-80

70%

 
 

239 whites

 

34%

[59]

Examples of differences in H. pylori prevalence within and between countries, representing the developing and developed world.

1. The classification into developing or developed countries was retrieved from the United Nation Development Programme's Human Development Reports (URL: http://hdr.undp.org/en)

2. The number reported in the article was 179, which is likely a typographical error.

N/A: Data not available or not applicable

Incidence of H. pylori infection

The geographic differences in H. pylori prevalence have been attributed to the differential rate of acquisition of the bacterium during the first years of life [5, 6, 9, 17, 18]. In southern China, for example, the prevalence of H. pylori infection was shown to be significantly higher among Chinese subjects than that among Australians, a difference that was associated with the rate of acquisition of H. pylori under the age of ten years [9, 11].

Acquisition of H. pylori is decreasing in developed countries at a faster rate than in developing countries, likely because of the faster improvement in hygiene practices in the developed world [5, 19]. Moreover, infection during childhood in developed countries is not frequent [2023]. In the United States, for example, the incidence of infection among children younger than five years is less than 5%, and only about 10% of the population is infected by adolescence [20, 21]. By contrast, the incidence of H. pylori infection in the developing world is higher and occurs at younger age [22, 24]. By five years of age, about 50% of children in developing countries are already infected [12, 24], and the infection rates in adults can reach 90% or higher (Table 1).

Pounder and Ng classified the world into two groups according to the incidence of H. pylori infection [7]. Group One consisted of countries where the majority of children become infected with H. pylori during childhood, while chronic infection continues during adult life. These are mostly developing countries, e.g., Algeria, Nepal, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, Thailand, and Vietnam. In Group Two, mostly comprising developed countries, only a minority of children becomes infected during childhood, but the prevalence of infection rises with age during adulthood. Examples of Group Two countries are England, Finland, France, Japan, and the United States of America [7]. However, Pounder and Ng concluded their synthesis with an interesting question. Do the age-dependent prevalence data reflect that people in Group Two have more incidence of infection at older ages, or do the data rather reflect that the incidence of infection is declining in newer generations, which implies that the infected adults had been actually infected in their childhood [7]? This question was effectively answered later on, as longitudinal studies confirmed the birth cohort effect in the United States [6] and Russia [18], for example.

Transmission of H. pylori infection

I. Direct transmission [For a detailed review, see Ref. [11]]

The mode of transmission of H. pylori is one of the most controversial areas in the study of this pathogen. Ingestion of the bacteria, which is the most likely portal of entry, may occur by one or a combination of three means: oral-oral, gastro-oral, or fecal-oral, but determining a dominant route is not an easy task. While culturing H. pylori from the gastric secretion is possible, its isolation from stool or the oral cavity is difficult because either location is known for its diverse, abundant resident microbiota. Many members of this microbiota outgrow H. pylori, masking its colonies if present, unless a discriminating selective culture medium is used [11].

1) Oral-oral transmission

Although H. pylori was suggested as a member of the oral microbiota, independent from the stomach's infection status [25], and although the prevalence of H. pylori infection among dentists or dental workers is not higher than in others [26, 27], the mouth is still being considered as a candidate reservoir for H. pylori, and oral-oral transmission is regarded as a plausible route of H. pylori transmission. Recent studies reported that exposure to persons with H. pylori-induced gastroenteritis is a risk factor for new infection [28], while experiments with rhesus macaques supported the hypothesis that oral-oral transmission is the most likely route of transmission [29]. This mode of transmission can be potentiated by specific eating habits, such as the premastication of food by mothers before feeding children in some African countries [30], and the use of chopsticks and communal eating in some immigrant Chinese communities [31, 32], although the chopstick hypothesis has been challenged [33].

Detection of H. pylori-specific DNA from the oral cavity was reported [e.g., [3436]], and even though isolating these bacteria from the oral cavity is difficult because of the presence of fast-growing microbiota, strains, identical to those isolated from the stomachs of the same patients, were successfully cultured [3739]. On the other hand, several other studies failed to detect H. pylori-specific DNA from the oral cavities of H. pylori-positive patients [e.g., [40, 41]].

2) Gastro-oral transmission

Since the human stomach is the primary niche of H. pylori, it is reasonable to suggest a direct gastro-oral route of transmission mediated by refluxed gastric juice [11, 42]. This hypothesis is supported by several studies in which H. pylori was detected in the gastric juice [33, 4346] as well as the vomitus of infected subjects, and even from the air sampled during the vomiting process [47]. Additionally, a high rate of active H. pylori infection was detected by the 13C urea breath test in siblings of H. pylori-infected vomiting children [42].

The gastro-oral hypothesis also explains earlier reports of epidemic gastritis in subjects undergoing repeated gastric secretory studies [48, 49], as well as observations of higher prevalence of H. pylori in gastroenterologists performing endoscopy [26].

3) Fecal-oral transmission

H. pylori is sensitive to the bile's bactericidal effect, so theoretically, and under normal conditions, passage of viable H. pylori through the intestine and its detection in stool are unlikely [11, 50]; yet, some studies suggest that passage of viable H. pylori through the intestine could be verified [e.g., [51]]. While H. pylori-specific DNA was successfully detected in the fecal samples from as few as 10% to as many as 90% of subjects with known H. pylori infection [5255], detection of H. pylori-specific DNA is obviously not a sufficient evidence for bacterial viability [11].

After several attempts for culturing H. pylori from fecal samples failed, viable bacteria were successfully isolated from one adult and 23 children in Gambia [56], and 12 adults in the United Kingdom [57]. Nevertheless, attempts to reproduce these results using similar techniques failed, which led to the suggestion that the malnourishment of Gambian children and their short fecal transit time are the reasons behind the exceptional isolation of H. pylori from fecal samples [58]. In support of the latter hypothesis, Parsonnet and colleagues showed that inducing diarrhea with a cathartic made culturing H. pylori from stool samples possible, also suggesting that gastrointestinal tract illnesses might increase H. pylori transmissibility [47].

II. Indirect transmission

Environmental or animal reservoirs were investigated as sources of H. pylori infection. Food, animals, and water sources have been suggested as reservoirs outside the human gastrointestinal tract, and H. pylori or its DNA was detected in each of these sources (Table 2). However, there is no definitive evidence that they are natural or primary vehicles of transmission.
Table 2

H. pylori reservoirs.

Hypothesis

Evidence/Example studies

Ref.

Food

  

   - Contaminated food prepared under unhygienic conditions is a probable mechanism for transmission.

A positive correlation was reported between prevalence of infection and consumption of food from street vendors in Peru.

[70]

   - The daily amount of raw vegetables is a risk factor, which possibly implies a role for water too.

In the Colombian Andes, frequent consumption of raw vegetables was associated with likelihood of infection.

[99]

   - Sheep and cow milk can be vehicles for transmission.

See below (under Animals)

[118, 119]

Animals

  

   - Several animal species were suggested as H. pylori reservoirs.

H. pylori was isolated from:

 
 

- pigtailed monkeys

[120]

 

- rhesus monkeys

[121]

 

- cats

[122]

 

- sheep

[123]

 

- cockroaches

[124]

 

- houseflies (but the housefly hypothesis was challenged)

[125, 126]

   - Working with animals may increase risk, and animal-to-human transmission is possible.

H. pylori was suggested as zoonotic, occupational infection to meat and abattoir workers.

[127, 128]

 

In Colombian Andes, children who had contact with sheep had higher prevalence odds.

[99]

 

Dore et al. stated that animals, especially sheep and dogs, could transmit H. pylori to humans (shepherds) in Sardinia.

[129]

   - H. pylori can be recovered from animal products.

H. pylori was recovered from sheep and cow milk.

[118, 119]

   - Experimental animal colonization is possible.

Bacillary forms of H. pylori were used to colonize germ-free piglets.

[130]

Water

  

   - Water contamination is a risk factor for H. pylori infection.

Many reports, mostly from developing countries, suggested contaminated water sources as risk factors. Examples include studies performed in Peru, Chile, and Kazakhstan.

[105, 131, 132]

   - Water from running, municipal, and underground sources, as well as wastewater has been suggested as reservoir for H. pylori.

- Municipal water

[105]

 

- Well water

[133]

 

- Running water

[99, 134]

 

- Wastewater

[135]

 

- H. pylori even survives in chlorinated water.

[136]

   - H. pylori proteins and DNA can be detected in water.

- by immunological methods

[137]

 

- by PCR

[133, 138]

 

- by hybridization methods

[139]

   - Viable H. pylori can be detected and isolated from water.

- as individual cells

[140]

 

- associated with biofilm

[141, 142]

 

- cultured

[135]

Examples of studies on different environmental sources of H. pylori and their role in H. pylori transmission.

Genetic and Environmental Determinants of H. pylori Epidemiology

Age

The effect of age on the prevalence of H. pylori is one of the best-documented and least disputed aspects of H. pylori epidemiology. A positive correlation between age and prevalence has been reported in both developed and developing countries [for example, [8, 5961]]. Consistently, the prevalence of infection was found to be higher in adults than that in children, and this pattern has been interpreted to partly reflect a birth cohort phenomenon caused by a higher incidence in the past due to poor living conditions and sanitation [18, 35, 62, 63].

A comprehensive longitudinal study undertaken by Fujisawa et al. evaluated changes in the seroepidemiological pattern of H. pylori in a group of Japanese people over a 20-year period [63]. Sera were collected from 1015 subjects, and the overall prevalence of H. pylori-specific antibodies was 72.7% in 1974, 54.6% in 1984, and 39.3% in 1994. The prevalence of H. pylori was found to be positively correlated with age, suggesting that there was a clear cohort-shift in the seroepidemiological pattern of H. pylori during the 20 years studied [63].

Ethnic and genetic predisposition

Marked differences in H. pylori seroprevalence have been observed and reported among various ethnic and racial groups [10, 14, 64]. For example, in Malaysia, the increased risk of H. pylori infection in Chinese and Indians was suggested as an inherent ethnic genetic predisposition [10]. In New Zealand, ethnicity was suggested as a risk factor among different groups in the populations. H. pylori infection was most prevalent in Pacific Islanders, intermediate in Maori, and least prevalent in Europeans. Even after the adjustment of confounding factors, such as age and socioeconomic status, ethnicity remained a significant covariate [64].

By contrast, in a study conducted in USA, the prevalence of H. pylori infection was almost identical between Hispanic and African Americans, but significantly higher than that among Caucasians. However, ethnicity was ruled out as a major factor and the observed variance was attributed to socioeconomic conditions [8]. Finally, a study of monozygotic and dizygotic twins suggested also that genetic factors might have some influence on the incidence of H. pylori infection [65].

Gender

An excess of H. pylori prevalence in one gender versus the other has been reported [6668]; for instance, Woodward and colleagues observed a higher prevalence of H. pylori in men than in women [68]. Others found no gender-related difference in the prevalence of H. pylori infection [10, 64, 69, 70]. A more recent, more comprehensive meta-analysis of large, population-based studies concluded a male predominance of H. pylori-related diseases in adults but not in children [71].

Interfamilial relations

Many studies reported an influence of interfamilial relation on the spreading of H. pylori infection and highlighted adult-child transmission [7274]. Konno and coworkers suggested mother-to-child transmission as the single most probable cause of the interfamilial spreading of H. pylori infection after a five-year follow-up study. Among 44 children enrolled in that study, five children acquired H. pylori infection, and their bacterial isolates exhibited DNA fingerprinting patterns identical to those of their mothers [74]. Family size has also been shown to positively affect H. pylori infection incidence; the relative risk of infection has been shown to increase according to the number of children per household [60, 75].

Additionally, spouse-to-spouse transmission was suggested [76, 77]. Georgopoulos et al. found a significant number of couples infected with indistinguishable strains of H. pylori [76].

Finally, infected children were also proposed as a source of infection for parents or siblings [60, 78]. However, a case-control study performed in Bangladesh found no difference in infection rates between parents of infected and non-infected infants, and concluded that in communities with high prevalence of H. pylori infection, interfamilial transmission might be masked by other environmental factors [79]

Socioeconomic factors

Socioeconomic status was reported as one of the most important factors affecting the spreading of H. pylori infection [8, 14, 80]. In particular, the high age-specific prevalence of H. pylori infection in developing countries has been attributed to low socioeconomic level [13]. By contrast, the lower prevalence of H. pylori infection in developed countries may be a result of higher socioeconomic status. The overall prevalence of H. pylori among Swiss adolescents was found to be 9.7%. While this prevalence is among the lowest in Europe, further analysis indicated that subjects from foreign countries had higher rates of infection (30%) than natives (7.3%). This significant difference was largely attributed to higher living standards among natives [81].

In USA, Malaty et al. classified children into five social classes. The prevalence of the infection was 82% in the lowest class, 52% in the two middle classes, and 11% in the two high classes, demonstrating an inverse correlation between H. pylori prevalence and socioeconomic status [72].

Obviously, socioeconomic status is not restricted to income and social class but takes in consideration other factors, including living standards, sanitation, urbanization, and educational level [11]. Combined, these factors are likely to increase the risk for infectious diseases in general.

Educational level, in particular, has been used as a marker of socioeconomic status and has been considered as one of the important determinants of H. pylori prevalence in both developed [82] and developing countries [61]. Rosenstock et al. found that the short duration of schooling beside low socioeconomic status increases the likelihood of H. pylori infection in Denmark [82].

Crowding index (Density of living)

Household crowding, sharing a bed, and increasing household contact have been identified as risk factors of H. pylori infection [9, 61, 83, 84]. In a large community-based study, Torres and colleagues stated that density of living conditions is a prime determinant in the acquisition of H. pylori [61]. In childhood, crowded living conditions affect current H. pylori status, and the number of children in the present household increases the risk of infection for the adult family members [60].

Conclusion

The verdict: Is H. pylori a poverty-associated disease?

As with most infectious and non-infectious diseases, no one factor can be singled out as the major determinant of H. pylori incidence and prevalence. However, there is credible evidence that poverty-associated factors are major players.

The studies reviewed in this article show some evident differences in epidemiology between developing and developed countries, notably among children. However, we do not think that H. pylori prevalence is directly correlated with a country's overall wealth inasmuch as human poverty is not necessarily dependent on a country's gross domestic product (compare Fig. 2A with Fig. 2B). Instead, the effects of poverty on H. pylori infection are more pronounced between different communities, often located within the same country or region, but separated based on sanitation, overall hygiene, and standards of living. A good example is given in a recent study, conducted over 10 years, which showed that improved standards of living in Russia have substantially reduced H. pylori transmission [18].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1757-4749-2-2/MediaObjects/13099_2010_Article_27_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Cartograms showing the unequal distribution of (A) wealth, (B) human poverty indices, and (C) total births around the globe. The cartograms, or map projections, were obtained from URL: http://www.worldmapper.org with permission (© Copyright SASI Group, University of Sheffield; and Mark Newman, University of Michigan). They had been generated by a diffusion-based method [91] and were included in the Worldmapper project [9294].

Outlook: Changing climate + changing demography + changing economy = redrawing the global map of H. pylori epidemiology

"Out of every 100 persons added to the population in the coming decade, 97 will live in developing countries." Hania Zlotnik, 2005 [85] (Hania Zlotnik is the director of the Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations Secretariat)

The last question we address in this review article is about the future of H. pylori epidemiology. The foreseeable future, unfortunately, does not seem very promising for the developing countries. Although H. pylori infection may eventually disappear from high-income countries even without intervention, as suggested by mathematical modeling [86], its prevalence is paradoxically expected to rise in low-income countries and communities [87]. The changing climate is expected to change the world's demography, resources, and clean water availability [88]. Combined, these factors have direct impact on living standards and hygiene, and are thus not likely to slow down the rate of H. pylori acquisition in developing countries [89]. If we add to these factors the unequal population growth (Fig. 2C), the uneven economic growth, and the rise in life expectancy all over the world, the picture gets dimmer. A likely scenario is that this combination of factors will translate into higher incidence of H. pylori infection in children, who, according to Hania Zlotnik, the director of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs-United Nations Population Division, will mostly be born and live in developing countries [85]. This higher incidence in children will lead to a rise rather than fall of H. pylori's worldwide prevalence, and consequently to higher risk of gastric cancer especially in the elder population of the developing world (which are expected to live longer than they do today without necessarily being healthier).

Because of this serious risk, researchers should combine efforts and seek efficient methods to prevent H. pylori-associated diseases [87] and perhaps to eradicate this chronic colonizer of half of the human race [90].

Authors' information

Mohammed Mahdy Khalifa is a graduate student at the Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. He received his master's degree in microbiology and immunology in 2009. Radwa Raed Sharaf is an undergraduate student at the Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. Ramy Karam Aziz is currently a lecturer of microbiology and immunology at the Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt and an adjunct faculty member at San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University
(2)
Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University

References

  1. Warren JR, Marshall B: Unidentified curved bacilli on gastric epithelium in active chronic gastritis. Lancet. 1983, 321: 1273-1275. 10.1016/S0140-6736(83)92719-8.Google Scholar
  2. Marshall BJ, Warren JR: Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration. Lancet. 1984, 1: 1311-1315. 10.1016/S0140-6736(84)91816-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. International Agency for Research on Cancer: Infection with Helicobacter pylori. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum, 1994/01/01. 1994, 61: 177-240.Google Scholar
  4. Peter S, Beglinger C: Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer: the causal relationship. Digestion. 2007, 75: 25-35. 10.1159/000101564.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. The EUROGAST Study Group: Epidemiology of, and risk factors for, Helicobacter pylori infection among 3194 asymptomatic subjects in 17 populations. Gut. 1993, 34: 1672-1676. 10.1136/gut.34.12.1672.Google Scholar
  6. Malaty HM, Graham DY, Wattigney WA, Srinivasan SR, Osato M, Berenson GS: Natural history of Helicobacter pylori infection in childhood: 12-year follow-up cohort study in a biracial community. Clin Infect Dis. 1999, 28: 279-282. 10.1086/515105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Pounder RE, Ng D: The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in different countries. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1995, 9 (Suppl 2): 33-39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Malaty HM, Evans DG, Evans DJ, Graham DY: Helicobacter pylori in Hispanics: comparison with blacks and whites of similar age and socioeconomic class. Gastroenterology. 1992, 103: 813-816.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mitchell HM, Li YY, Hu PJ, Liu Q, Chen M, Du GG, Wang ZJ, Lee A, Hazell SL: Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori in southern China: identification of early childhood as the critical period foracquisition. J Infect Dis. 1992, 166: 149-153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Goh KL: Prevalence of and risk factors for Helicobacter pylori infection in a multi-racial dyspeptic Malaysian population undergoing endoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997, 12: S29-35. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1997.tb00455.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mitchell HM: Epidemiology of infection. Helicobacter Pylori: Physiology and Genetics. Edited by: Mobley HLT, Mendz GL, Hazell SL. Washington, D.C.: ASM Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  12. Mégraud F, Brassens-Rabbe MP, Denis F, Belbouri A, Hoa DQ: Seroepidemiology of Campylobacter pylori infection in various populations. J Clin Microbiol. 1989, 27: 1870-1873.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Graham DY, Adam E, Reddy GT, Agarwal JP, Agarwal R, Evans DJ, Malaty HM, Evans DG: Seroepidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection in India. Comparison of developing and developed countries. 1991, 36: 1084-1088.Google Scholar
  14. Bardhan PK: Epidemiological features of Helicobacter pylori infection in developing countries. Clin Infect Dis. 1997, 25: 973-978. 10.1086/516067.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Perez-Perez GI, Rothenbacher D, Brenner H: Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter. 2004, 9 (Suppl 1): 1-6. 10.1111/j.1083-4389.2004.00248.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Salih BA: Helicobacter pylori infection in developing countries: the burden for how long?. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2009, 15: 201-207. 10.4103/1319-3767.54743.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Feldman RA, Eccersley AJ, Hardie JM: Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori : acquisition, transmission, population prevalence and disease-to-infection ratio. Br Med Bull. 1998, 54: 39-53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Tkachenko MA, Zhannat NZ, Erman LV, Blashenkova EL, Isachenko SV, Isachenko OB, Graham DY, Malaty HM: Dramatic changes in the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection during childhood: a 10-year follow-up study in Russia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007, 45: 428-432. 10.1097/MPG.0b013e318064589f.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Brown LM: Helicobacter pylori : epidemiology and routes of transmission. Epidemiol Rev. 2000, 22: 283-297.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dooley CP, Cohen H, Fitzgibbons PL, Bauer M, Appleman MD, Perez-Perez GI, Blaser MJ: Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and histologic gastritis in asymptomatic persons. N Engl J Med. 1989, 321: 1562-1566.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Taylor DN, Blaser MJ: The epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection. Epidemiol Rev. 1991, 13: 42-59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Weaver LT: Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Meeting at Manson House, London, 16 February 1995. Aspects of Helicobacter pylori infection in the developing and developed world. Helicobacter pylori infection, nutrition and growth of West African infants. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1995, 89: 347-350. 10.1016/0035-9203(95)90002-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Rothenbacher D, Brenner H: Burden of Helicobacter pylori and H. pylori-related diseases in developed countries: recent developments and future implications. Microbes Infect. 2003, 5: 693-703. 10.1016/S1286-4579(03)00111-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sack RB, Gyr K: Helicobacter pylori infections in the developing world. Summary of a workshop organized at the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR, B) from February 2 to 4, 1993. J Diarrhoeal Dis Res. 1994, 12: 144-145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Song Q, Lange T, Spahr A, Adler G, Bode G: Characteristic distribution pattern of Helicobacter pylori in dental plaque and saliva detected with nested PCR. J Med Microbiol. 2000, 49: 349-353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lin SK, Lambert JR, Schembri MA, Nicholson L, Korman MG: Helicobacter pylori prevalence in endoscopy and medicalstaff. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1994, 9: 319-324. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1994.tb01249.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. el-Zaatari FA, Nguyen AM, Genta RM, Klein PD, Graham DY: Determination of Helicobacter pylori status by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Comparison with urea breath test. Dig Dis Sci. 1995, 40: 109-113. 10.1007/BF02063952.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Perry S, de la Luz Sanchez M, Yang S, Haggerty TD, Hurst P, Perez-Perez G, Parsonnet J: Gastroenteritis and transmission of Helicobacter pylori infection in households. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006, 12: 1701-1708.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Solnick JV, Fong J, Hansen LM, Chang K, Canfield DR, Parsonnet J: Acquisition of Helicobacter pylori infection in rhesus macaques is most consistent with oral-oral transmission. J Clin Microbiol. 2006, 44: 3799-3803. 10.1128/JCM.01482-06.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Albenque M, Tall F, Dabis F, Mégraud F: Epidemiological study of Helicobacter pylori transmission from mother to child inAfrica. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1990, 78-Google Scholar
  31. Chow TK, Lambert JR, Wahlqvist ML, Hsu-Hage BH: Helicobacter pylori in Melbourne Chinese immigrants: evidence for oral-oral transmission via chopsticks. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995, 10: 562-569. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1995.tb01347.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lambert JR, Lin SK, Sievert W, Nicholson L, Schembri M, Guest C: High prevalence of Helicobacter pylori antibodies in an institutionalized population: evidence for person-to-persontransmission. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995, 90: 2167-2171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Leung WK, Sung JJ, Ling TK, Siu KL, Cheng AF: Use of chopsticks for eating and Helicobacter pylori infection. Dig Dis Sci. 1999, 44: 1173-1176. 10.1023/A:1026632408804.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Mapstone NP, Lynch DA, Lewis FA, Axon AT, Tompkins DS, Dixon MF, Quirke P: Identification of Helicobacter pylori DNA in the mouths and stomachs of patients with gastritis using PCR. J Clin Pathol. 1993, 46: 540-543. 10.1136/jcp.46.6.540.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Banatvala N, Lopez CR, Owen R, Abdi Y, Davies G, Hardie J, Feldman R: Helicobacter pylori in dental plaque. Lancet. 1993, 341: 380-10.1016/0140-6736(93)90191-I.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Dowsett SA, Archila L, Segreto VA, Gonzalez CR, Silva A, Vastola KA, Bartizek RD, Kowolik MJ: Helicobacter pylori infection in indigenous families of Central America: serostatus and oral and fingernail carriage. J Clin Microbiol. 1999, 37: 2456-2460.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Krajden S, Fuksa M, Anderson J, Kempston J, Boccia A, Petrea C, Babida C, Karmali M, Penner JL: Examination of human stomach biopsies, saliva, and dental plaque for Campylobacter pylori. J Clin Microbiol. 1989, 27: 1397-1398.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Shames B, Krajden S, Fuksa M, Babida C, Penner JL: Evidence for the occurrence of the same strain of Campylobacter pylori in the stomach and dental plaque. J Clin Microbiol. 1989, 27: 2849-2850.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Cellini L, Allocati N, Piattelli A, Petrelli I, Fanci P, Dainelli B: Microbiological evidence of Helicobacter pylori from dental plaque in dyspeptic patients. New Microbiol. 1995, 18: 187-192.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Bickley J, Owen RJ, Fraser AG, Pounder RE: Evaluation of the polymerase chain reaction for detecting the urease C gene of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy samples and dental plaque. J Med Microbiol. 1993, 39: 338-344. 10.1099/00222615-39-5-338.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Cammarota G, Tursi A, Montalto M, Papa A, Veneto G, Bernardi S, Boari A, Colizzi V, Fedeli G, Gasbarrini G: Role of dental plaque in the transmission of Helicobacter pylori infection. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1996, 22: 174-177. 10.1097/00004836-199604000-00004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Luzza F, Mancuso M, Imeneo M, Contaldo A, Giancotti L, Pensabene L, Doldo P, Liberto MC, Strisciuglio P, Foca A: Evidence favouring the gastro-oral route in the transmission of Helicobacter pylori infection in children. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000, 12: 623-627. 10.1097/00042737-200012060-00008.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mitchell HM, Lee A, Carrick J: Increased incidence of Campylobacter pylori infection in gastroenterologists: further evidence to support person-to-person transmission of C. pylori. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1989, 24: 396-400. 10.3109/00365528909093065.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Varoli O, Landini MP, LaPlaca M, Tucci A, Corinaldesi R, Paparo GF, Stanghellini V, Barbara L: Presence of Helicobacter pylori in gastric juice. Am J Gastroenterol. 1991, 86: 249-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Mitchell JD, Mitchell HM, Tobias V: Acute Helicobacter pylori infection in an infant, associated with gastric ulceration and serological evidence of intra-familial transmission. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992, 87: 382-386.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Leung WK, Siu KL, Kwok CK, Chan SY, Sung R, Sung JJ: Isolation of Helicobacter pylori from vomitus in children and its implication in gastro-oral transmission. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999, 94: 2881-2884. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01431.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Parsonnet J, Shmuely H, Haggerty T: Fecal and oral shedding of Helicobacter pylori from healthy infected adults. JAMA. 1999, 282: 2240-2245. 10.1001/jama.282.23.2240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Ramsey EJ, Carey KV, Peterson WL, Jackson JJ, Murphy FK, Read NW, Taylor KB, Trier JS, Fordtran JS: Epidemic gastritis withhypochlorhydria. Gastroenterology. 1979, 76: 1449-1457.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Graham DY, Alpert LC, Smith JL, Yoshimura HH: Iatrogenic Campylobacter pylori infection is a cause of epidemicachlorhydria. Am J Gastroenterol. 1988, 83: 974-980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Mitchell HM, Li Y, Hu P, Hazell SL, Du GG, Byrne DJ, Lee A: The susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori to bile may be an obstacle to faecal transmission. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1992, 4: S79-S83.Google Scholar
  51. Dye KR, Marshall BJ, Frierson HF, Pambianco DJ, McCallum RW: Campylobacter pylori colonizing heterotopic gastric tissue in the rectum. Am J Clin Pathol. 1990, 93: 144-147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Mapstone NP, Lynch DA, Lewis FA, Axon AT, Tompkins DS, Dixon MF, Quirke P: PCR identification of Helicobacter pylori in faeces from gastritis patients. Lancet. 1993, 341: 447-10.1016/0140-6736(93)93053-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. van Zwet AA, Thijs JC, Kooistra-Smid AM, Schirm J, Snijder JA: Use of PCR with feces for detection of Helicobacter pylori infections in patients. J Clin Microbiol. 1994, 32: 1346-1348.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Namavar F, Roosendaal R, Kuipers EJ, de Groot P, Bijl van der MW, Pena AS, de Graaff J: Presence of Helicobacter pylori in the oral cavity, oesophagus, stomach and faeces of patients with gastritis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995, 14: 234-237. 10.1007/BF02310363.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Li C, Ha T, Ferguson DA, Chi DS, Zhao R, Patel NR, Krishnaswamy G, Thomas E: A newly developed PCR assay of H. pylori in gastric biopsy, saliva, and feces. Evidence of high prevalence of H. pylori in saliva supports oral transmission. Dig Dis Sci. 1996, 41: 2142-2149. 10.1007/BF02071393.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Thomas JE, Gibson GR, Darboe MK, Dale A, Weaver LT: Isolation of Helicobacter pylori from human faeces. Lancet. 1992, 340: 1194-1195. 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92894-L.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Kelly SM, Pitcher MC, Farmery SM, Gibson GR: Isolation of Helicobacter pylori from feces of patients with dyspepsia in the United Kingdom. Gastroenterology. 1994, 107: 1671-1674.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Mégraud F: Transmission of Helicobacter pylori : faecal-oral versus oral-oral route. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1995, 9 (Suppl 2): 85-91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Graham DY, Malaty HM, Evans DG, Evans DJ, Klein PD, Adam E: Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori in an asymptomatic population in the United States. Effect of age, race, and socioeconomic status. Gastroenterology. 1991, 100: 1495-1501.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Breuer T, Sudhop T, Hoch J, Sauerbruch T, Malfertheiner P: Prevalence of and risk factors for Helicobacter pylori infection in the western part of Germany. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996, 8: 47-52. 10.1097/00042737-199601000-00009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Torres J, Leal-Herrera Y, Perez-Perez G, Gomez A, Camorlinga-Ponce M, Cedillo-Rivera R, Tapia-Conyer R, Munoz O: A community-based seroepidemiologic study of Helicobacter pylori infection inMexico. J Infect Dis. 1998, 178: 1089-1094. 10.1086/515663.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Parsonnet J: The incidence of Helicobacterpylori infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1995, 9 (Suppl 2): 45-51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Fujisawa T, Kumagai T, Akamatsu T, Kiyosawa K, Matsunaga Y: Changes in seroepidemiological pattern of Helicobacter pylori and hepatitis A virus over the last 20 years in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999, 94: 2094-2099. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01283.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Fraser AG, Scragg R, Metcalf P, McCullough S, Yeates NJ: Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in different ethnic groups in New Zealand children and adults. Aust N Z J Med. 1996, 26: 646-651.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Malaty HM, Engstrand L, Pedersen NL, Graham DY: Helicobacter pylori infection: genetic and environmental influences. A study oftwins. Ann Intern Med. 1994, 120: 982-986.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Smoak BL, Kelley PW, Taylor DN: Seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori infections in a cohort of US Army recruits. Am J Epidemiol. 1994, 139: 513-519.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Replogle ML, Glaser SL, Hiatt RA, Parsonnet J: Biologic sex as a risk factor for Helicobacter pylori infection in healthy youngadults. Am J Epidemiol. 1995, 142: 856-863.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Woodward M, Morrison C, McColl K: An investigation into factors associated with Helicobacter pylori infection. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000, 53: 175-181. 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00171-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Kawasaki M, Kawasaki T, Ogaki T, Itoh K, Kobayashi S, Yoshimizu Y, Aoyagi K, Iwakawa A, Takahashi S, Sharma S, Acharya GP: Seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in Nepal: low prevalence in an isolated rural village. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998, 10: 47-50. 10.1097/00042737-199801000-00009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Begue RE, Gonzales JL, Correa-Gracian H, Tang SC: Dietary risk factors associated with the transmission of Helicobacter pylori in Lima, Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998, 59: 637-640.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. de Martel C, Parsonnet J: Helicobacter pylori infection and gender: a meta-analysis of population-based prevalence surveys. Dig Dis Sci. 2006, 51: 2292-2301. 10.1007/s10620-006-9210-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Malaty HM, Graham DY: Importance of childhood socioeconomic status on the current prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection. Gut. 1994, 35: 742-745. 10.1136/gut.35.6.742.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Rothenbacher D, Bode G, Berg G, Knayer U, Gonser T, Adler G, Brenner H: Helicobacter pylori among preschool children and their parents: evidence of parent-child transmission. J Infect Dis. 1999, 179: 398-402. 10.1086/314595.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Konno M, Fujii N, Yokota S, Sato K, Takahashi M, Mino E, Sugiyama T: Five-year follow-up study of mother-to-child transmission of Helicobacter pylori infection detected by a random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting method. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 2246-2250. 10.1128/JCM.43.5.2246-2250.2005.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Goodman KJ, Correa P: The transmission of Helicobacter pylori. A critical review of the evidence. Int J Epidemiol. 1995, 24: 875-887. 10.1093/ije/24.5.875.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Georgopoulos SD, Mentis AF, Spiliadis CA, Tzouvelekis LS, Tzelepi E, Moshopoulos A, Skandalis N: Helicobacter pylori infection in spouses of patients with duodenal ulcers and comparison of ribosomal RNA gene patterns. Gut. 1996, 39: 634-638. 10.1136/gut.39.5.634.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Brenner H, Rothenbacher D, Bode G, Dieudonne P, Adler G: Active infection with Helicobacter pylori in healthy couples. Epidemiol Infect. 1999, 122: 91-95. 10.1017/S0950268898001964.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Teh BH, Lin JT, Pan WH, Lin SH, Wang LY, Lee TK, Chen CJ: Seroprevalence and associated risk factors of Helicobacter pylori infection in Taiwan. Anticancer Res. 1994, 14: 1389-1392.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Sarker SA, Rahman MM, Mahalanabis D, Bardhan PK, Hildebrand P, Beglinger C, Gyr K: Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in infants and family contacts in a poor Bangladesh community. Dig Dis Sci. 1995, 40: 2669-2672. 10.1007/BF02220458.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Malcolm CA, MacKay WG, Shepherd A, Weaver LT: Helicobacter pylori in children is strongly associated with poverty. Scott Med J. 2004, 49: 136-138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Heuberger F, Pantoflickova D, Gassner M, Oneta C, Grehn M, Blum AL, Dorta G: Helicobacter pylori infection in Swiss adolescents: prevalence and risk factors. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003, 15: 179-183. 10.1097/00042737-200302000-00012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Rosenstock SJ, Andersen LP, Rosenstock CV, Bonnevie O, Jørgensen T: Socioeconomic factors in Helicobacter pylori infection among Danish adults. Am J Public Health. 1996, 86: 1539-1544. 10.2105/AJPH.86.11.1539.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Mendall MA, Goggin PM, Molineaux N, Levy J, Toosy T, Strachan D, Northfield TC: Childhood living conditions and Helicobacter pylori seropositivity in adult life. Lancet. 1992, 339: 896-897. 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90931-R.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. McCallion WA, Murray LJ, Bailie AG, Dalzell AM, O'Reilly DP, Bamford KB: Helicobacter pylori infection in children: relation with current household living conditions. Gut. 1996, 39: 18-21. 10.1136/gut.39.1.18.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Zlotnik H: Statement to the Thirty-Eighth Session on the Commission on Population and Development. 2005Google Scholar
  86. Rupnow MF, Shachter RD, Owens DK, Parsonnet J: A dynamic transmission model for predicting trends in Helicobacter pylori and associated diseases in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2000, 6: 228-237. 10.3201/eid0603.000302.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Ahmed N, Tenguria S, Nandanwar N: Helicobacter pylori - a seasoned pathogen by any other name. Gut Pathog. 2009, 1: 24-10.1186/1757-4749-1-24.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. World Health Organization: Safe water, better health. 2008Google Scholar
  89. Blaser MJ: Theodore E. Woodward Award: Global warming and the human stomach: microecology follows macroecology. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2005, 116: 65-75. discussion 75-66PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Graham DY, Yamaoka Y, Malaty HM: Contemplating the future without Helicobacter pylori and the dire consequences hypothesis. Helicobacter. 2007, 2: 64-68. 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2007.00566.x.Google Scholar
  91. Gastner MT, Newman ME: From The Cover: Diffusion-based method for producing density-equalizing maps. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 7499-7504. 10.1073/pnas.0400280101.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Dorling D: Worldmapper: the human anatomy of a smallplanet. PLoS Med. 2007, 4: e1-10.1371/journal.pmed.0040001.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Dorling D, Barford A, Newman M: WORLDMAPPER: the world as you've never seen it before. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2006, 12: 757-764. 10.1109/TVCG.2006.202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Barford A, Dorling D: A new approach to mapping the world: visualizing facets of international health. Natl Med J India. 2006, 19: 234-235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Ahmad MM, Rahman M, Rumi AK, Islam S, Huq F, Chowdhury MF, Jinnah F, Morshed MG, Hassan MS, Khan AK, Hasan M: Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in asymptomatic population--a pilot serological study inBangladesh. J Epidemiol. 1997, 7: 251-254.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Souto FJ, Fontes CJ, Rocha GA, de Oliveira AM, Mendes EN, Queiroz DM: Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in a rural area of the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1998, 93: 171-174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Santos IS, Boccio J, Santos AS, Valle NC, Halal CS, Bachilli MC, Lopes RD: Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and associated factors among adults in Southern Brazil: a population-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2005, 5: 118-10.1186/1471-2458-5-118.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Rodrigues MN, Queiroz DM, Rodrigues RT, Rocha AM, Braga Neto MB, Braga LL: Helicobacter pylori infection in adults from a poor urban community in northeastern Brazil: demographic, lifestyle and environmental factors. Braz J Infect Dis. 2005, 9: 405-410. 10.1590/S1413-86702005000500008.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Goodman KJ, Correa P, Tenganá Aux HJ, Ramírez H, DeLany JP, Guerrero Pepinosa O, López Quiñones M, Collazos Parra T: Helicobacter pylori infection in the Colombian Andes: a population-based study of transmission pathways. Am J Epidemiol. 1996, 144: 290-299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Wong BC, Lam SK, Ching CK, Hu WH, Kwok E, Ho J, Yuen ST, Gao Z, Chen JS, Lai KC: Differential Helicobacter pylori infection rates in two contrasting gastric cancer risk regions of South China. China Gastric Cancer Study Group. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999, 14: 120-125. 10.1046/j.1440-1746.1999.01823.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Bassily S, Frenck RW, Mohareb EW, Wierzba T, Savarino S, Hall E, Kotkat A, Naficy A, Hyams KC, Clemens J: Seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori among Egyptian newborns and their mothers: a preliminaryreport. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999, 61: 37-40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Frenck RW, Fathy HM, Sherif M, Mohran Z, El Mohammedy H, Francis W, Rockabrand D, Mounir BI, Rozmajzl P, Frierson HF: Sensitivity and specificity of various tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori in Egyptian children. Pediatrics. 2006, 118: e1195-1202. 10.1542/peds.2005-2925.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Sayed ASM, Abd Al Azeem MW, Noaman HA, Hassan MA: Seroepidemiological study on H. pylori infection in children and adults in Assiut governorate, Upper Egypt. JASMR. 2007, 2: 129-133.Google Scholar
  104. Mohammad MA, Hussein L, Coward A, Jackson SJ: Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection among Egyptian children: impact of social background and effect on growth. Public Health Nutr. 2008, 11: 230-236. 10.1017/S1368980007000481.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Klein PD, Graham DY, Gaillour A, Opekun AR, Smith EO: Water source as risk factor for Helicobacter pylori infection in Peruvian children. Gastrointestinal Physiology Working Group. Lancet. 1991, 337: 1503-1506. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93196-G.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Malaty HM, Paykov V, Bykova O, Ross A, Graham DP, Anneger JF, Graham DY: Helicobacter pylori and socioeconomic factors inRussia. Helicobacter. 1996, 1: 82-87. 10.1111/j.1523-5378.1996.tb00015.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Al-Moagel MA, Evans DG, Abdulghani ME, Adam E, Evans DJ, Malaty HM, Graham DY: Prevalence of Helicobacter (formerly Campylobacter) pylori infection in Saudia Arabia, and comparison of those with and without upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990, 85: 944-948.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Andersen LP, Rosenstock SJ, Bonnevie O, Jorgensen T: Seroprevalence of immunoglobulin G, M, and A antibodies to Helicobacter pylori in an unselected Danish population. Am J Epidemiol. 1996, 143: 1157-1164.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Gilboa S, Gabay G, Zamir D, Zeev A, Novis B: Helicobacter pylori infection in rural settlements (Kibbutzim) in Israel. Int J Epidemiol. 1995, 24: 232-237. 10.1093/ije/24.1.232.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Kikuchi S, Kurosawa M, Sakiyama T: Helicobacter pylori risk associated with sibship size and family history of gastric diseases in Japanese adults. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1998, 89: 1109-1112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Böhmer CJ, Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Kuipers EJ, Niezen-de Boer MC, Schreuder H, Schuckink-Kool F, Meuwissen SG: The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection among inhabitants and healthy employees of institutes for the intellectually disabled. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997, 92: 1000-1004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Senra-Varela A, Lopez-Saez JB, Gomez-Biondi V: Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in two Spanish regions with different incidence of gastric cancer. Eur J Epidemiol. 1998, 14: 491-494. 10.1023/A:1007485815609.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Malaty HM, Kim JG, Kim SD, Graham DY: Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in Korean children: inverse relation to socioeconomic status despite a uniformly high prevalence inadults. Am J Epidemiol. 1996, 143: 257-262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Harris AW, Douds A, Meurisse EV, Dennis M, Chambers S, Gould SR: Seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori in residents of a hospital for people with severe learning difficulties. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995, 7: 21-23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Webb PM, Knight T, Newell DG, Elder JB, Forman D: Helicobacter pylori transmission: evidence from a comparison with hepatitis Avirus. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996, 8: 439-441.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Murray LJ, McCrum EE, Evans AE, Bamford KB: Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection among 4742 randomly selected subjects from Northern Ireland. Int J Epidemiol. 1997, 26: 880-887. 10.1093/ije/26.4.880.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Strachan DP, Mendall MA, Carrington D, Butland BK, Yarnell JW, Sweetnam PM, Elwood PC: Relation of Helicobacter pylori infection to 13-year mortality and incident ischemic heart disease in the caerphilly prospective heart disease study. Circulation. 1998, 98: 1286-1290.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Dore MP, Sepulveda AR, Osato MS, Realdi G, Graham DY: Helicobacter pylori in sheep milk. Lancet. 1999, 354: 132-10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01724-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Fujimura S, Kawamura T, Kato S, Tateno H, Watanabe A: Detection of Helicobacter pylori in cow's milk. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2002, 35: 504-507. 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2002.01229.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Bronsdon MA, Schoenknecht FD: Campylobacter pylori isolated from the stomach of the monkey, Macaca nemestrina. J Clin Microbiol. 1988, 26: 1725-1728.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Handt LK, Fox JG, Yan LL, Shen Z, Pouch WJ, Ngai D, Motzel SL, Nolan TE, Klein HJ: Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in a colony of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). J Clin Microbiol. 1997, 35: 165-168.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. Handt LK, Fox JG, Dewhirst FE, Fraser GJ, Paster BJ, Yan LL, Rozmiarek H, Rufo R, Stalis IH: Helicobacter pylori isolated from the domestic cat: public health implications. Infect Immun. 1994, 62: 2367-2374.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Dore MP, Sepulveda AR, El-Zimaity H, Yamaoka Y, Osato MS, Mototsugu K, Nieddu AM, Realdi G, Graham DY: Isolation of Helicobacter pylori from sheep-implications for transmission to humans. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001, 96: 1396-1401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Imamura S, Kita M, Yamaoka Y, Yamamoto T, Ishimaru A, Konishi H, Wakabayashi N, Mitsufuji S, Okanoue T, Imanishi J: Vector potential of cockroaches for Helicobacter pylori infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003, 98: 1500-1503. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07516.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Grübel P, Hoffman JS, Chong FK, Burstein NA, Mepani C, Cave DR: Vector potential of houseflies (Musca domestica) for Helicobacter pylori. J Clin Microbiol. 1997, 35: 1300-1303.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Osato MS, Ayub K, Le HH, Reddy R, Graham DY: Houseflies are an unlikely reservoir or vector for Helicobacter pylori. J Clin Microbiol. 1998, 36: 2786-2788.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Morris A, Nicholson G, Lloyd G, Haines D, Rogers A, Taylor D: Seroepidemiology of Campylobacter pyloridis. N Z Med J. 1986, 99: 657-659.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Vaira D, D'Anastasio C, Holton J, Dowsett JF, Londei M, Bertoni F, Beltrandi E, Grauenfels P, Salmon PR, Gandolfi L: Campylobacter pylori in abattoir workers: is it a zoonosis?. Lancet. 1988, 2: 725-726. 10.1016/S0140-6736(88)90196-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. Dore MP, Bilotta M, Vaira D, Manca A, Massarelli G, Leandro G, Atzei A, Pisanu G, Graham DY, Realdi G: High prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in shepherds. Dig Dis Sci. 1999, 44: 1161-1164. 10.1023/A:1026676223825.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Eaton KA, Catrenich CE, Makin KM, Krakowka S: Virulence of coccoid and bacillary forms of Helicobacter pylori in gnotobiotic piglets. J Infect Dis. 1995, 171: 459-462.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Hopkins RJ, Vial PA, Ferreccio C, Ovalle J, Prado P, Sotomayor V, Russell RG, Wasserman SS, Morris JG: Seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori in Chile: vegetables may serve as one route of transmission. J Infect Dis. 1993, 168: 222-226.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. Nurgalieva ZZ, Malaty HM, Graham DY, Almuchambetova R, Machmudova A, Kapsultanova D, Osato MS, Hollinger FB, Zhangabylov A: Helicobacter pylori infection in Kazakhstan: effect of water source and household hygiene. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002, 67: 201-206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Horiuchi T, Ohkusa T, Watanabe M, Kobayashi D, Miwa H, Eishi Y: Helicobacter pylori DNA in drinking water in Japan. Microbiol Immunol. 2001, 45: 515-519.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. Fujimura S, Kato S, Watanabe A: Water source as a Helicobacter pylori transmission route: a 3-year follow-up study of Japanese children living in a unique district. J Med Microbiol. 2008, 57: 909-910. 10.1099/jmm.0.47683-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Lu Y, Redlinger TE, Avitia R, Galindo A, Goodman K: Isolation and genotyping of Helicobacter pylori from untreated municipal wastewater. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002, 68: 1436-1439. 10.1128/AEM.68.3.1436-1439.2002.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Moreno Y, Piqueres P, Alonso JL, Jimenez A, Gonzalez A, Ferrus MA: Survival and viability of Helicobacter pylori after inoculation into chlorinated drinking water. Water Res. 2007, 41: 3490-3496. 10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.020.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Hultén K, Han SW, Enroth H, Klein PD, Opekun AR, Gilman RH, Evans DG, Engstrand L, Graham DY, El-Zaatari FA: Helicobacter pylori in the drinking water in Peru. Gastroenterology. 1996, 110: 1031-1035. 10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8612990.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Hultén K, Enroth H, Nystrom T, Engstrand L: Presence of Helicobacter species DNA in Swedish water. J Appl Microbiol. 1998, 85: 282-286. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00500.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Moreno Y, Ferrus MA, Alonso JL, Jimenez A, Hernandez J: Use of fluorescent in situ hybridization to evidence the presence of Helicobacter pylori in water. Water Res. 2003, 37: 2251-2256. 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00624-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Shahamat M, Mai U, Paszko-Kolva C, Kessel M, Colwell RR: Use of autoradiography to assess viability of Helicobacter pylori in water. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993, 59: 1231-1235.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. Azevedo NF: Survival of Helicobacter pylori in drinking water and associated biofilms. University of Minho and University of South hampton, 2005.Google Scholar
  142. Gião MS, Azevedo NF, Wilks SA, Vieira MJ, Keevil CW: Persistence of Helicobacter pylori in heterotrophic drinking-water biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008, 74: 5898-5904. 10.1128/AEM.00827-08.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Khalifa et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.