- Open Access
Probiotic therapy - recruiting old friends to fight new foes
© Sleator; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 26 May 2010
- Accepted: 25 June 2010
- Published: 25 June 2010
Against a backdrop of increasing antibiotic resistance, and the emergence of new and evolving pathogens, clinicians are increasingly forced to consider alternative therapies - probiotics are one such alternative.
- Probiotic Bacterium
- Probiotic Strain
- Vaccine Delivery
- Probiotic Therapy
- Bile Resistance
With life-cycles measured in minutes as opposed to years, bacteria have an extraordinary ability to evolve and adapt rapidly to changes in their environment . Thus, in a world where only the fittest survive, those bacteria which have developed resistance to antibiotics will predominate. This is particularly apparent in hospital environments where bacteria are in constant contact with many different antibiotics; such repeated exposure has facilitated the development of multiple antibiotic resistance and the emergence of ever more virulent nosocomial infections.
However, despite their potent anti-pathogenic effect, a significant limitation of this approach is that probiotic bacteria tend to be physiologically fragile; often not surviving to sufficiently high numbers during prolonged storage in delivery matrices such as foods (yogurt and probiotic drinks) or tablet formulations . Furthermore, following ingestion, the already depleted probiotics must face the considerable physiological defences of the host (gastric acidity, bile, low iron, elevated osmolarity and temperature) in order to colonize the gastrointestinal tract in sufficient numbers to exert a therapeutic effect [11, 12].
One approach to improving the physiological robustness and stress tolerance of probiotic strains is patho-biotechnology [13, 14]. Essentially, this novel approach involves the generation of "improved" probiotic strains, using stress survival systems mined from more physiologically robust pathogenic microbes . The physiological versatility of pathogenic genera, oscillating between the external environment and the host, makes them a veritable treasure trove of genes that could potentially be used to improve the technological robustness of less well adapted probiotic strains . Indeed, recent work in our laboratory has shown that cloning and heterologous expression of a single bile resistance gene, from the food borne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes in the probiotic strain Bifidobacterium breve, not only improves gastrointestinal colonisation and persistence, but also significantly bolsters the clinical efficacy of the probiotic strain .
In addition to improving their physiological stress tolerance, resulting in improved delivery and persistence within the gut, recent studies have led to the development of 'designer probiotics' which specifically target enteric infections by blocking crucial ligand-receptor interactions between the pathogen and its target host cell [10, 18, 19]. Many disease causing bacteria exploit oligosaccharides displayed on the surface of host cells as receptors for toxins and/or adhesions, enabling colonization of the mucosa and entry of the pathogen or secreted toxins into the host cell. Blocking this adherence prevents infection (Fig. 2B), while toxin neutralization ameliorates symptoms until the pathogen is eventually overcome by the host immune system (Fig. 2C). 'Designer probiotics' have been engineered to express receptor-mimic structures on their surface . When administered orally these probiotics bind to and neutralize toxins in the gut lumen and interfere with pathogen adherence to the intestinal epithelium - thus essentially "mopping up" the infection. A particularly attractive feature of this toxin neutralisation strategy is that, unlike antibiotic therapy, it applies no selective pressure for evolution of resistance by the pathogen. Blocking toxin mediated host injury by the receptor mimic would negatively affect the capacity of the pathogen to survive and reproduce. Furthermore, mutations in a toxin sequence that prevents binding to a receptor mimic would logically also prevent the toxin from interacting with its natural target, thereby attenuating virulence. Therefore, widespread use of such agents in a therapeutic setting should have negligible long-term adverse consequences. As well as treating enteric infections, 'designer probiotics' are among the most recent conscripts in the war against AIDS, expressing HIV receptors which compete with host cell receptors for the virus, thus providing a natural innate barrier to HIV attachment and infection .
In conclusion then, "designer probiotics" can be engineered to kill pathogens, neutralise toxins, and facilitate re-colonisation of the resident beneficial microflora while at the same time priming both the innate and adaptive immune system; strengthening the host against subsequent infection - an approach far beyond the reach of conventional antibiotic therapies. Thus, the war against the antibiotic resistant "super bugs" may eventually be won by recruiting engineered "good bugs" as our allies.
Sleator is Editor-in-Chief of the peer reviewed scientific journal Bioengineered Bugs http://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/biobugs.
The author wishes to acknowledge the continued financial assistance of the Alimentary Pharmabiotic Centre, through funding by Science Foundation Ireland (SFI), the Health Research Board (HRB) and The Department of Agriculture, through the Food Institutional Research Measure (FIRM).
- MacLean RC, Hall AR, Perron GG, Buckling A: The population genetics of antibiotic resistance: integrating molecular mechanisms and treatment contexts. Nat Rev Genet. 2010, 11: 405-414. 10.1038/nrg2778.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Joerger RD: Alternatives to antibiotics: bacteriocins, antimicrobial peptides and bacteriophages. Poult Sci. 2003, 82: 640-647.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sleator RD, Hill C: Battle of the bugs. Science. 2008, 321: 1294-1295. 10.1126/science.321.5894.1294b.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ohashi Y, Ushida K: Health-beneficial effects of probiotics: Its mode of action. Anim Sci J. 2009, 80: 361-371. 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00645.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sleator RD, Hill C: New frontiers in probiotic research. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2008, 46: 143-147. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02293.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Callaway TR, Edrington TS, Anderson RC, Harvey RB, Genovese KJ, Kennedy CN, Venn DW, Nisbet DJ: Probiotics, prebiotics and competitive exclusion for prophylaxis against bacterial disease. Anim Health Res Rev. 2008, 9: 217-225. 10.1017/S1466252308001540.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Asaduzzaman SM, Sonomoto K: Lantibiotics: diverse activities and unique modes of action. J Biosci Bioeng. 2009, 107: 475-487. 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2009.01.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wiedemann I, Breukink E, van Kraaij C, Kuipers OP, Bierbaum G, de Kruijff B, Sahl HG: Specific binding of nisin to the peptidoglycan precursor lipid II combines pore formation and inhibition of cell wall biosynthesis for potent antibiotic activity. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 1772-1779.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sang Y, Blecha F: Antimicrobial peptides and bacteriocins: alternatives to traditional antibiotics. Anim Health Res Rev. 2008, 9: 227-235. 10.1017/S1466252308001497.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Culligan EP, Hill C, Sleator RD: Probiotics and gastrointestinal disease: successes, problems and future prospects. Gut Pathog. 2009, 1: 19-10.1186/1757-4749-1-19.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sleator RD, Watson D, Hill C, Gahan CG: The interaction between Listeria monocytogenes and the host gastrointestinal tract. Microbiology. 2009, 155: 2463-2475. 10.1099/mic.0.030205-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bezkorovainy A: Probiotics: determinants of survival and growth in the gut. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001, 73: 399S-405S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sleator RD, Hill C: Patho-biotechnology: using bad bugs to do good things. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006, 17: 211-216.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sleator RD, Hill C: 'Bioengineered Bugs' - a patho-biotechnology approach to probiotic research and applications. Med Hypotheses. 2008, 70: 167-169. 10.1016/j.mehy.2007.03.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sleator RD, Hill C: Rational design of improved pharmabiotics. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2009, 2009: 87-2752.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sheehan VM, Sleator RD, Hill C, Fitzgerald GF: Improving gastric transit, gastrointestinal persistence and therapeutic efficacy of the probiotic strain Bifidobacterium breve UCC2003. Microbiology. 2007, 153: 3563-3571. 10.1099/mic.0.2007/006510-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Watson D, Sleator RD, Hill C, Gahan CG: Enhancing bile tolerance improves survival and persistence of Bifidobacterium and Lactococcus in the murine gastrointestinal tract. BMC Microbiol. 2008, 8: 176-10.1186/1471-2180-8-176.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sleator RD, Hill C: Designer probiotics: a potential therapeutic for Clostridium difficile?. J Med Microbiol. 2008, 57: 793-794. 10.1099/jmm.0.47697-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elson CO: From cheese to pharma: a designer probiotic for IBD. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006, 4: 836-837. 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.05.034.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paton AW, Morona R, Paton JC: Receptor-mimic probiotics: potential therapeutics for bacterial toxin-mediated enteric diseases. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010, 4: 253-255. 10.1586/egh.10.30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu JJ, Reid G, Jiang Y, Turner MS, Tsai CC: Activity of HIV entry and fusion inhibitors expressed by the human vaginal colonizing probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14. Cell Microbiol. 2007, 9: 120-130. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00772.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Amdekar S, Dwivedi D, Roy P, Kushwah S, Singh V: Probiotics: multifarious oral vaccine against infectious traumas. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2010, 58: 299-306.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.