Skip to main content
Download PDF

A nineteen-year report of serotype and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric non-typhoidal Salmonella from humans in Southern India: changing facades of taxonomy and resistance trend

Gut Pathogens volume 12, Article number: 49 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The steady increase in the proportion of Non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) infections in humans represents a major health problem worldwide. The current study investigated the serovar distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility trends of NTS isolated from faecal samples during the period 2000–2018.

Methods

Faecal specimens of patients were cultured according to standard lab protocol. The isolates were serotyped and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) were performed according to CLSI guidelines.

Results

A total of 1436 NTS isolates were obtained from faeces samples mostly comprising of S. Typhimurium (27.3%), S. Weltevreden (13%), S. Bareilly (11%), S. Newport (4.2%), S. Cholerasuis (4%), S. Infantis (3.4%), and S. Enteritidis (2.4%). Resistance to nalidixic acid (26%) was most common among the tested NTS, followed by ampicillin (18.5%), cotrimoxazole (13.5%), ciprofloxacin (12%), ceftriaxone (6.3%) and chloramphenicol (3.6%). Multidrug resistance was observed in 5% of NTS isolates with the highest rate (10.52%) in 2014. The incidence of NTS infection was maximum in children < 5 years of age with an average 19.3% of the total affected patients during the time period.

Conclusions

Based on this study, the faecal NTS isolates have high resistance rates against first line antimicrobial agents except chloramphenicol. The gradual but consistent increase in resistance to fluoroquinolones, third generation cephalosporins and macrolide may restrict future treatment options. Hence periodic monitoring of NTS infections, serotype distribution and antimicrobial resistance trend is recommended.

Introduction

Non typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) is frequently associated with diarrheal illness or self-limiting gastroenteritis in humans around the world [1]. Global estimates suggest 93.8 million cases of infection and 155,000 deaths annually [2]. A greater proportion of human NTS infections are often related to the consumption of contaminated food or water [3]. NTS can also be spread via the faecal—oral route or by direct contact with infected animals [4]. Unlike typhoidal Salmonella (Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi) NTS infections primarily reported in developed countries [5]. In developing countries the incidence of NTS causing gastroenteritis remains poorly documented and the burden in public health has not been identified [6].

Based on the antigenic variations (O, H1, H2 and Vi) Salmonella enterica is classified into over 2,500 serotypes in which almost 1531 serovars belong to host specific, clinically relevant Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica [7]. The serotypes have great influence on the severity of the NTS infections as well as the host in which they cause disease [1]. For instance S. Dublin is associated with enteric disease in cattle, S. Gallinarum in chicken, S. Choleraesuis in swine, S. Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis in a wide range of hosts [8]. However recent reports suggest many of these serovars are capable of crossing the intestinal epithelial layer and cause invasive disease in humans [9].

The use of antimicrobial therapy has not been recommended for most of the NTS infections. However, treatment is recommended in the severely ill (bacteremia and meningitis) or immunocompromised patients (HIV) [10]. The emergence of antimicrobial resistant isolates restricted the therapeutic options and increased the disease burden in a global scale [11]. The global establishment of antibiotic resistant NTS isolates is associated with the uncontrolled use of antibiotics in livestock animals [12]. Treatment with third generation cephalosporins or fluoroquinolones was found to be effective previously. Nonetheless resistance to cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones along with first line antimicrobial agents is increasing at an alarming rate [13].

Despite the increasing prevalence of NTS infections, the epidemiology of NTS has not been completely understood in India. Limited studies have been conducted to establish the epidemiology of NTS in humans. Knowledge on the serotype distribution and antibiotic susceptibility patterns is important to formulate appropriate therapeutic and control strategies. In this study, we investigated the serotype diversity, age distribution and antimicrobial resistant trend of NTS isolated from human faecal samples during the period 2000 to 2018 in a tertiary care hospital in Southern India. The data presented here represent all NTS isolates from faecal sample isolated between 2000 and 2018. The samples include both hospitalized (inpatient) and community-based samples (outpatient).

Materials and methods

Isolation and identification of NTS

Faecal specimens of patients having clinical suspicion of gastroenteritis were received by the clinical microbiology lab in Christian Medical College, Vellore, India, for a period of 19 years (2000–2018). The samples were processed according to World Health Organization (WHO) Global Foodborne Infections Network laboratory protocol [14]. Colonies suspected as Salmonella sp. were Gram stained, sub-cultured and identified by standard biochemical tests. Serogroup of NTS isolate was confirmed by slide agglutination with commercial typing antiserum (Becton-Dickinson, CA, USA) followed by the Kauffmann-White scheme [15]. NTS isolates were sent to the National Escherichia and Salmonella Center (NESC), Kasauli, India for antigenic profiling and serovar identification. A standard case report form containing queries about demographic, clinical, and epidemiologic information of the patient was recorded as part of the study.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) for ampicillin (10 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (25 µg), nalidixic acid (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg) and azithromycin (15 µg) was performed using disk diffusion method. Experiments were performed and the results were interpreted as per the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute CLSI, 2016 guidelines for azithromycin and CLSI, 2018 for other antibiotics [16, 17]. Escherichia coli ATCC 25,922, Enterococcus faecium ATCC 29,212, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27,853 was used as quality control strain for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Strains were considered to be multidrug resistant (MDR) if they were resistant to all three first line antibiotics (ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and cotrimoxazole) or at least to three classes of antimicrobials.

Data analysis

All obtained data was entered into Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Descriptive data is given as bar graphs, line graphs and tables. Chi-squared analysis was performed to determine the trends in the proportion of NTS isolates from period 1 and period 2. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 1436 NTS isolates were identified during January 2000 to December 2018 from faecal specimens collected at tertiary care hospital after the exclusion of duplicates. Year wise comparison of the number of NTS isolates suggests a sudden increase from the year 2009 (Fig. 1). An average of 29% NTS isolates was identified from the first 8 years (2000–2008) whereas the incidence increased to 71% in the next 10 years. Among the 1436 isolates, S. Typhimurium found to be the most prevalent serotype with 393 isolates (27.3%). The second and third most prevalent serovars of NTS in the study area were S. Weltevreden and S. Bareilly which accounted for 13% (182/1436) and 11% (155/1436) respectively (Fig. 1). While the isolation of S. Typhimurium was found to be consistent through the years, the prevalence of S. Weltevreden and S. Bareilly was inconsistent although declining over the years. The prevalence of other major serovars are as follows S. Newport (61, 4.2%), S. Infantis (50, 3.4%), S. Enteritidis (35, 2.4%) and S. Cholerasius (58, 4%). S. Lindenberg were only detected from the year 2015, 2015 (4/93), 2016 (25/95), 2017 (12/90) and 2018 (1/153) but not seen before. The other 27 detected serovars accounted for 7% (101/1,436) of the total number of isolates. Unusual serovars were also identified such as S. Hassarek, S. Eastbourne, S. Ughelli, S. Abortusequi and so on.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Year wise distribution of invasive non-typhoidal Salmonella serovars identified from India during the period 2000–2018

Full size image

The antibiotic resistance has been increasing in most of the clinically important bacteria. Resistance to nalidixic acid (27%) was most common among the tested NTS, followed by resistance to ampicillin (19.3%), cotrimoxazole (14%), ciprofloxacin (12.4%) and chloramphenicol (4%). Ceftriaxone susceptibility testing done from 2011 to 2018 showed that 6.2% (50/794) of the isolates were resistant and there was in increasing trend in resistance through the years. Similarly, azithromycin susceptibility done in 2017 and 2018 showed resistant rate of 6% and 8% respectively. Year wise antimicrobial resistance pattern of NTS isolates are shown in Fig. 2. From the data we have observed there was a significant increase in antimicrobial resistance profile to fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin) and third generation cephalosporins (ceftriaxone) from 2010 to 2018. Hence based on changes in antimicrobial resistance the data has been represented in two study periods (Table 1).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Year wise distribution of antimicrobial resistance against clinically relevant antimicrobials by NTS isolates identified from 2000–2018

Full size image
Table 1 Antimicrobial resistance pattern of NTS isolates between 2000–2009 and 2010–2018
Full size table

Multidrug resistance (resistant to all three first line antibiotics (ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and cotrimoxazole) or at least to three classes of antimicrobials was observed in 5% (73/1436) of NTS isolates with the highest rate (10.52%) in year 2014 (Fig. 3). S. Typhimurium was the predominant MDR serotype (33/73) followed by S. Bareilly (9/73), S. Weltevreden (7/73) and S. Newport (4/73). The untypable isolates accounted for 14.1% (10/73) of the total MDR isolates and S. Cholerasius (n = 3) S. Infantis (n = 2), S. Senftenberg (n = 1), S. Chester (n = 1) and S. Lindenburg (n = 1) were the other detected MDR serovars.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Year wise distribution of Multidrug resistant NTS isolates identified from 2000–2018

Full size image

The age distribution of patients having NTS infection through the years (2000–2018) is shown in Fig. 4. The incidence of NTS infection was maximum in children < 5 years of age which is an average of 19.3% the total affected patients during the time period. The overall age specific isolation rates of NTS were 4.7% (5–9 yrs), 3.5% (10–14 yrs), 2.9% (15–19 yrs), 5.5% (20–24 yrs), 5.7% (25–29 yrs), 5.5% (30–34 yrs), 6.5% (35–39 yrs), 6% (40–44 yrs), 9.9% (45–50 yrs), 6.1% (50–54 yrs), 6.9% (55–59 yrs), 6.5% (60–64 yrs), 4.3% (65–69yrs), 2.8% (70–74 yrs) and 0.8% (> 80 yrs). The male-to-female ratio of NTS infection was approximately 1.5:1.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The age based distribution of patients having NTS infection from 2000–2018

Full size image

Discussion

Salmonella enterica represents the most pathogenic species of global public health significance and is the leading cause of foodborne illnesses in humans and animals worldwide [18]. However, NTS infections is often neglected or rarely reported in India [19]. On the other hand, there is a scarcity of data on the occurrence of NTS infections including serovar distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility profile in the country. In this study we have examined the serovar distribution and antimicrobial resistance pattern of 1436 NTS strains isolated from faecal samples during the period 2000–2018.

The year wise distribution of NTS serovars from human faeces samples showed an increasing trend after the year 2008. The sharp increase in the number of NTS isolates suggests the improved surveillance or a greater number of faecal samples processed in the study centre. Previous study from India showed that S. Weltevreden, S. Typhimurium and S. Bareilly were reported to be the three most common human NTS serotype isolated [20]. Whilst, Salmonella Typhimurium was the most frequently identified serovar followed by S. Weltevreden, S. Bareilly, S. Newport, S. Infantis, S. Enteritidis and S. Cholerasius in this study. Although S. Enteritidis is said to be the most commonly isolated serovar from humans globally [21], this study indicated that S. Enteritidis ranked seventh in the frequency of isolation. In contrast previous studies done in NTS bloodstream infections (iNTS) were in agreement with the global report as S. Enteritidis were the second common invasive serotype after S. Typhimurium (Unpublished data; Table 2). The variation in NTS serovar distribution may be due to the changes in geographical or environmental factors in developed and developing countries [21]. In general the proportion of S. Typhimurium to S. Enteritidis in south India follows the trend as in developed countries.

Table 2 Non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica serovars associated with invasive disease, 2000 to 2018, India
Full size table

The important features that makes NTS different from typhoidal includes (a) NTS have broad host range, mostly host adapted (human and animals) and causes infection worldwide in contrast to typhoidal Salmonella which are host (human) restricted and are endemic to developing countries (b) NTS have stable genome than typhoidal Salmonella which tends to degrade (c) NTS has the strong ability to acquire AMR genes from other enteric bacteria in the gut where the possibility of the lateral gene transfer is high [22, 23]. These highlights the significance of NTS in the human infections.

The changing trends in serotype distribution of NTS through the years may influence the clinical manifestations. In this study the distribution of S. Typhimurium was consistent or stable, however the number of S. Weltevreden and S. Bareilly have significantly decreased over the years. However this pattern was not established among the NTS isolates from blood specimen (Table 2). S. Enteritidis (Serogroup D) that has been reported to be invasive has a good distribution in bloodstream infections while S. Cholerasius (Serogroup C1) is found to be prevalent in human faecal samples.

Antimicrobial resistance in NTS isolates was relatively lower when compared to studies from other countries [24]. The isolates exhibited higher antimicrobial resistance to first line antibiotics (ampicillin and co-trimoxazole) except chloramphenicol. Resistance to ampicillin showed a marginal increase until 2014. Resistance to co-trimoxazole and nalidixic acid also showed similar trends between the years 2003 and 2014 with highest level of resistance observed in 2014 and 2001 to co-trimoxazole and nalidixic acid respectively. As a result of the increasing resistance, the first line antibiotics are no longer used for the treatment of NTS infections [25]. Fluoroquinolone or extended spectrum cephalosporins are currently used in the therapeutics for NTS infections. However, the gradual but steady increase in resistance to these therapeutic agents raises concerns regarding the control of pathogenic NTS serovars [26]. Based on changes in overall antibiotic resistance the study period was divided into two in which the resistance rates found to be significantly increased during period 2.

The prevalence of MDR isolates have steady risen worldwide. Our study showed that multidrug resistance has increased from 1.5% in 2002 to 10.5% in 2014. The number of MDR isolates was higher in period 2 (2009–2018) compared to period 1 (2000–2008). Hence the increase in MDR isolates in recent years is in agreement with the global reports [27]. Overall reports from other parts of India showed high levels of antimicrobial resistance to nalidixic acid, ampicillin/amoxicillin, cotrimoxazole and ciprofloxacin in NTS isolates when compared to that in our study [28,29,30].

The antimicrobial resistance of NTS isolates based on serotype distribution at different age groups showed that this data is consistent with studies from other parts of the world [31]. Global reports suggest that the highest risk for NTS was in infants and this study follows the similar trend. About 19.3% of NTS infections were in patients aged < 5 and the prevalence of NTS infections was found to be decreasing with age. The overall NTS was also high in adults between the ages 45–49. This study also showed that the male to female ratio of NTS disease (1.5:1) also correlated with the reports from other parts of the world [32].

The number of infections caused by faecally transmitted pathogens is still challenging in developing countries [33]. The prevalence of human cases of gastroenteritis can be many times higher than the number of reported and confirmed cases. Although relatively low levels of antimicrobial resistance were observed in our study, it is also evident that the overall antimicrobial resistance and multidrug resistance are on the rise over the years. The increasing trend in antimicrobial resistance can be associated with the wide use of antibiotics in animals and plant products [34]. Based on this study, the faecal NTS isolates have high resistance rates against first line antimicrobial agents except chloramphenicol. The gradual but consistent increase in resistance to fluoroquinolones and third generation cephalosporins suggests that NTS infections should be closely monitored. In addition, resistance to azithromycin, one of the clinically important antimicrobial seems to be increasing but not significantly in this study.

Furthermore, reports on carbapenem and colistin resistance in NTS cannot be ignored although these drugs are not first-choice for the treatment of Salmonella infections. Carbapenems and colistin are considered as the last resort antibiotics for the treatment of infections caused by MDR Gram-negative pathogens in humans [35, 36]. The emergence of resistance to these antibiotics in zoonotic pathogens such as NTS poses a pressing threat to public health, as they can transferred to humans through the food chain. Although carbapenem resistance is still very rare in NTS, various carbapenemase-encoding genes were identified in non-typhoidal serovars of Salmonella enterica isolated in humans from different countries including India. This includes, Cubana, Typhimurium, Waycross, Senftenberg, Westhampton, Stanley, Agona, Kentucky, and Saintpaul [23].

With regards to colistin, though there is no clinical relevance, resistance has been reported in S. enterica from food producing animals. This could be due to the wide use of colistin in animal production for therapeutic, prophylactic and growth promotion purposes in several countries [37]. Plasmid mediated colistin resistance (mcr) is the most commonly reported mechanism which spreads by lateral transfer to commensals or pathogens of animal and human origin. These resistance genes in NTS could be derived from other nosocomial enteric bacteria particularly K. pneumoniae and E. coli through lateral gene transfer as these genes are commonly located on mobile genetic elements which can efficiently contribute to their spread [23]. However, carbapenem and colistin susceptibility was not done for the study isolates and thus not discussed.

The clinical presentation of NTS infections such as HIV and malaria in adults and malnutrition in children have not been taken into account. Other limitations of this study include the lack of data on antibiotics exposure within patients before sampling. The limitation of disc diffusion in the antibiotic sensitivity testing is another shortcoming of this study. The inherent drawbacks of serovar prediction based on slide agglutination method (White-Kauffmann-Le Minor scheme) found to be a major limitation in this study. Depending slide agglutination as the only method for serovar identification may not be reliable as phase conversion and microevolution in antigen genes could give incorrect results for closely related serovars [40]. This is in line with the molecular characterisation of serogroup B serovars from the same study centre as traditional serotyping yielded major discrepancies with an accuracy of only 85%. A number of S. Typhimurium isolates from this study were predicted as S. Agona or S. Saintpaul (Serogroup B) after MLST based molecular typing [41]. This shows that molecular typing techniques are needed for the accurate prediction of Salmonella serovars based on the sequence data. Alternatively, Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) based method or CRISPR based typing methods are being reported for accurate identification of NTS serovars [38] But concerns regarding the cost associated with sequencing and the technical proficiency required should be duly considered.

In conclusion, the serotype distribution and overall antimicrobial resistance trend of human NTS isolates from India showed a similar trend to that of sub-Saharan African countries or Southeast Asian countries. The presence of significant number of potentially invasive Salmonella serotypes of serogroup C1 and serogroup D suggest a prospective rise in clinical infections by NTS in India. The slow emergence of antibiotic resistance rates and multidrug resistant phenotypes warrants the continuous monitoring of susceptibility trend of NTS in India. However increasing resistance to fluoroquinolones and third generation cephalosporins may restrict future treatment options. Also, it is of extreme importance to monitor the susceptibility of carbapenem and colistin in NTS in order to save these last resort drugs. Epidemiological surveillance of AMR is required to establish possible links between reservoirs and to limit the lateral transfer of the resistance genes between S. enterica and other bacteria. Hence periodic monitoring of NTS infections, serotype distribution and antimicrobial resistance is recommended.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Eng SK, Pusparajah P, Ab Mutalib NS, et al. Salmonella: a review on pathogenesis, epidemiology and antibiotic resistance. Front Life Sci. 2015;8:284–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Majowicz SE, Musto J, Scallan E, et al. International Collaboration on Enteric Disease “Burden of Illness” Studies. The global burden of nontyphoidal Salmonella gastroenteritis. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:882–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Painter JA, Hoekstra RM, Ayers T, et al. Attribution of foodborne illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths to food commodities by using outbreak data, United States, 1998–2008. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Acheson D, Hohmann EL. Nontyphoidal salmonellosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:263–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eguale T, Gebreyes WA, Asrat D, Alemayehu H, Gunn JS, Engidawork E. Non-typhoidal Salmonella serotypes, antimicrobial resistance and co-infection with parasites among patients with diarrhea and other gastrointestinal complaints in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Feasey NA, Dougan G, Kingsley RA, Heyderman RS, Gordon MA. Invasive non-typhoidal salmonella disease: an emerging and neglected tropical disease in Africa. The Lancet. 2012;379:2489–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Porwollik S, Boyd EF, Choy C, et al. Characterization of Salmonella enterica subspecies I genovars by use of microarrays. J of Bacteriol. 2004;186:5883–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Foley SL, Johnson TJ, Ricke SC, Nayak R, Danzeisen J. Salmonella pathogenicity and host adaptation in chicken-associated serovars. Microbiol Mol Biol R. 2013;77:582–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hurley D, McCusker MP, Fanning S, Martins M. Salmonella–host interactions–modulation of the host innate immune system. Front immunol. 2014;5:481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tsai MH, Huang YC, Lin TY, Huang YL, Kuo CC, Chiu CH. Reappraisal of parenteral antimicrobial therapy for nontyphoidal Salmonella enteric infection in children. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:300–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen HM, Wang Y, Su LH, Chiu CH. Nontyphoid Salmonella infection: microbiology, clinical features, and antimicrobial therapy. Pediatr Neonatol. 2013;54:147–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim MS, Lim TH, Jang JH, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella species isolated from chicken meats produced by different integrated broiler operations in Korea. Poult Sci J. 2012;91:2370–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sethuvel DP, Anandan S, Ragupathi NK, Veeraraghavan B, Vinod O, Walia K. Association of blaCTX-M-15 and qnr genes in multidrug-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium and Shigella spp from India. J Infect Dev Countr. 2015;9:1294–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Network WH. Laboratory Protocol. Isolation of Salmonella spp From Food and Animal Faeces. 2010.

  15. Grimont PA, Weill FX. Antigenic formulae of the Salmonella serovars. WHO collaborating centre for reference research on Salmonella. 2007;9:1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 26th ed. CLSI Document M100. CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA, 2016.

  17. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 20th ed. CLSI Document M100. CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA, 2018.

  18. Jajere SM. A review of Salmonella enterica with particular focus on the pathogenicity and virulence factors, host specificity and antimicrobial resistance including multidrug resistance. Vet World. 2019;12:504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ballal M, Devadas SM, Shetty V, Bangera SR, Ramamurthy T, Sarkar A. Emergence and serovar profiling of non-typhoidal Salmonellae (NTS) isolated from gastroenteritis cases–A study from South India. Infect Dis. 2016;48:847–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Basu S, Sood LR. Salmonella weltevreden: a sero-type of increasing public health importance in India. Trop Geogr Med. 1975;27:387–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hendriksen RS, Vieira AR, Karlsmose S, et al. Global monitoring of Salmonella serovar distribution from the World Health Organization Global Foodborne Infections Network Country Data Bank: results of quality assured laboratories from 2001 to 2007. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2011;8:887–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gal-Mor O, Boyle EC, Grassl GA. Same species, different diseases: how and why typhoidal and non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica serovars differ. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fernández J, Guerra B, Rodicio MR. Resistance to carbapenems in non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica Serovars from humans, animals and food. Vet Sci. 2018;5:40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Centers for Disease Prevention and Control. 2016. National enteric disease surveillance: Salmonella annual report, 2013. https://www.cdc.gov/nationalsurveillance/pdfs/salmonella-annual-report-2013-508c.pdf.

  25. Crump JA, Sjölund-Karlsson M, Gordon MA, Parry CM. Epidemiology, clinical presentation, laboratory diagnosis, antimicrobial resistance, and antimicrobial management of invasive Salmonella infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28:901–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kariuki S, Gordon MA, Feasey N, Parry CM. Antimicrobial resistance and management of invasive Salmonella disease. Vaccine. 2015;33:C21–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Olsen SJ, Bishop R, Brenner FW, et al. The changing epidemiology of Salmonella: trends in serotypes isolated from humans in the United States, 1987–1997. J Infect Dis. 2001;183:753–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Taneja N, Appannanavar SB, Kumar A, et al. Serotype profile and molecular characterization of antimicrobial resistance in non-typhoidal Salmonella isolated from gastroenteritis cases over nine years. J Med Microbiol. 2014;63:66–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Shahane V, Muley V, Kagal A, Bharadwaj R. Correspondence-Non-typhoid Salmonellosis: Emerging infection in Pune? Indian J Med Microbiol. 2007;25:173–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Adesiji YO, Deekshit VK, Karunasagar I. Antimicrobial-resistant genes associated with Salmonella spp. isolated from human, poultry, and seafood sources. Food Sci Nutr. 2014;2:436–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lo HY, Lai FP, Yang YJ. Changes in epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility of nontyphoid Salmonella in children in southern Taiwan, 1997–2016. J Microbiol Immunol. 2018;53(4):585–91.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Williamson DA, Lane CR, Easton M, et al. Increasing antimicrobial resistance in non-typhoidal Salmonella in Australia, 1979–2015. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017: AAC-02012.

  33. Girma G, Prevalence. Antibiogram and Growth Potential of Salmonella and Shigella in Ethiopia: Implications for Public Health: A Review. Res J Microbiol. 2015;10:288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Prestinaci F, Pezzotti P, Pantosti A. Antimicrobial resistance: a global multifaceted phenomenon. Pathog Glob Health. 2015;109:309–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nordmann P, Poirel L. The difficult-to-control spread of carbapenemase producers among Enterobacteriaceae worldwide. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20:821–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Patel G, Bonomo RA. Stormy waters ahead”: Global emergence of carbapenemases. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lima T, Domingues S, Da Silva GJ. Plasmid-mediated colistin resistance in Salmonella enterica: a review. Microorganisms. 2019;7:55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pettengill JB, Timme RE, Barrangou R, Toro M, Allard MW, Strain E, Musser SM, Brown EW. The evolutionary history and diagnostic utility of the CRISPR-Cas system within Salmonella enterica ssp. enterica. PeerJ. 2014;2:e340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. McQuiston JR, Waters RJ, Dinsmore BA, Mikoleit ML, Fields PI. Molecular determination of H antigens of Salmonella by use of a microsphere-based liquid array. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(2):565–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Li P, Liu Q, Luo H, Liang K, Yi J, Luo Y, et al. O-serotype conversion in Salmonella typhimurium induces protective immune responses against invasive non-typhoidal Salmonella infections. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1647. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01647.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Jacob JJ, Rachel T, Shankar BA, et al. MLST based serotype prediction for the accurate identification of non typhoidal Salmonella serovars. Mol Biol Rep. 2020;1–7

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Department of clinical Microbiology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore for providing all necessary facilities and National Escherichia and Salmonella Center (NESC), Kasauli, for their laboratory.

Declarations

Expertise in serotyping.

Funding

The authors received no funding support for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Microbiology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632004, India

    Jobin John Jacob, Dhanalakshmi Solaimalai, Dhiviya Prabaa Muthuirulandi Sethuvel, Tanya Rachel, Praveena Jeslin, Shalini Anandan & Balaji Veeraraghavan

Authors
  1. Jobin John Jacob
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dhanalakshmi Solaimalai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dhiviya Prabaa Muthuirulandi Sethuvel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tanya Rachel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Praveena Jeslin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shalini Anandan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Balaji Veeraraghavan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JJJ, SA and BV designed the study. PJ and TR performed the laboratory work. JJJ, DPMS and DS analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Balaji Veeraraghavan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jacob, J.J., Solaimalai, D., Muthuirulandi Sethuvel, D.P. et al. A nineteen-year report of serotype and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric non-typhoidal Salmonella from humans in Southern India: changing facades of taxonomy and resistance trend. Gut Pathog 12, 49 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-020-00388-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-020-00388-z

Keywords

Gut Pathogens

ISSN: 1757-4749