Skip to main content

Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis activates IL-8 expression through Stat3 in colorectal cancer cells



Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF) has been implicated in colorectal carcinogenesis through the actions of its toxin, B. fragilis toxin (BFT). Studies on colorectal cell lines have shown that treatment with BFT causes disruption of E-cadherin leading to increased expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokine, IL-8. Stat3 activation has also been associated with ETBF-related colitis and tumour development. However, a link between E-cadherin, IL-8 and Stat3 has not been investigated in the context of ETBF infection.


We found that co-culture of HT-29 and HCT116 colorectal cell lines with ETBF, had a similar effect on activation of IL8 gene and protein expression as treatment with purified BFT. Inhibition of Stat3 resulted in a decrease in IL-8 gene and protein expression in response to ETBF in both cell lines. A reduction in E-cadherin expression in response to ETBF treatment was not restored by blocking Stat3.


We found that treatment of colorectal cancer cell lines with live cultures of ETBF had the equivalent effect on IL-8 expression as the use of purified toxin, and this may be a more representative model of ETBF-mediated colorectal carcinogenesis. IL-8 gene and protein expression was mediated through Stat3 in HT-29 and HCT116 cells, whereas disruption of E-cadherin appeared to be independent of Stat3 signalling.


Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF) has been implicated in colorectal carcinogenesis through the actions of its toxin, B. fragilis toxin (BFT), on multiple molecular processes [1]. Studies using both in vitro cell line and in vivo models have identified disruption of E-cadherin, an important regulator of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and initiation of pro-inflammatory cascades to be involved in ETBF-mediated carcinogenesis [2,3,4]. Several in vitro studies of colonic epithelial cells (CECs), predominantly using HT-29 CRC cell lines, have demonstrated an increase in interleukin (IL)-8 expression in response to purified BFT [4, 5].

IL-8 is a potent inflammatory chemokine, and its secretion by CECs leads to downstream activation of numerous signalling pathways involved in cell survival, angiogenesis and cell migration/invasion. BFT has been shown to stimulate the secretion of IL-8 through E-cadherin disruption [5], which releases bound β-catenin and allows nuclear translocation and subsequent TCF-dependant transcription of IL-8 [6]; treatment of CECs with BFT has been reported to increase β-catenin pathway activation [7]. β-catenin signalling is believed to have a role in modulating acute inflammation [8, 9], which may, in turn, facilitate chronic inflammation, hypothesised to play a role in carcinogenesis. IL-8 signalling has also been shown to activate Stat3 [10], which regulates various cell functions, including acute inflammation.

Stat3 can act in two ways: by transducing extracellular signals, often from cytokine receptors, in a feed-forward loop, and also by regulating the expression of a large number of genes by acting as a transcription factor. When Stat3 is constitutively activated, it acts as an oncogene, promoting chronic inflammation and tumourigenesis [11], and recent evidence suggests that Stat3 may be involved in skewing the host response towards tolerance at the cost of immunity in Helicobacter pylori [12] and ETBF [13] infections. Stat3 activation has also been associated with ETBF-associated colitis [14] and colonic tumour development in mice [13]. The interplay between IL-8 and Stat3 [15, 16], and E-cadherin and Stat3 [17, 18] has been described in other types of cancer, but the potential interaction linking these molecular pathways has not been interrogated in the context of ETBF-mediated colorectal tumourigenesis.

The inflammatory effect of ETBF-related tumourigenesis has been described in detail, from studies carried out in mouse models, particularly in APC-min mice [2, 3, 19]. However, cell line models of ETBF-related CRC have relied solely on the use of purified BFT to mimic the effect of the bacteria. This approach may not adequately account for modifying factors present in whole bacterial preparation, such as cell-wall components, or account for the fact that ETBF does not always secrete toxin in vivo.

Here, we investigate the effect of ETBF cultures compared to purified BFT on the activation of molecular pathways involved in ETBF-related pathogenesis. This study also elucidates the interplay between IL-8, Stat3 and E-cadherin in response to ETBF in colorectal cell lines.


Bacterial cell culture

Enterotoxigenic B. fragilis (ETBF) strain 86-5443-2-2 was cultured in brain–heart-infusion broth enriched with 0.2% heme iron (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, US). Bacterial concentration was measured by spectral absorbance. In brief, 1 ml of bacterial broth was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min and the supernatant discarded, and the bacterial pellet resuspended in 1 ml of PBS. Following a further centrifugation, the supernatant was removed, and the bacteria resuspended in 1 ml of PBS. This bacterial suspension was further diluted 1:10 and 1:5 in PBS and the absorbance measured in 600 nm using a SkanIt plate reader (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, US). An absorbance reading at 600 nm of 0.1 corresponds to 1 × 108 bacteria.

Colorectal cancer cell culture

HT-29 and HCT116 cells (American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Manassas, VA, US) were cultured in McCoy’s medium (Thermo Fisher), containing 10% foetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin and grown in 5% CO2. For all experiments, cells were grown in 24-well plates and seeded at a density of 5 × 104 cells/well. These cell lines have an approximate doubling time of 24 h, giving 2 × 105 cells/well after 48 h incubation. Cells were harvested, washed in PBS and stored in RNAlater (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) at − 20 °C for subsequent RNA extraction and gene-expression analysis. Cell supernatants were removed directly from culture wells and stored at − 20 °C for ELISA analysis, while SDS buffer (60 mM Tris pH 4.8, 2% SDS, 20% glycerol, 0.1 M DTT, 1 × protease inhibitor; Thermo Fisher) was added to 80% confluent cells and directly harvested for subsequent Western Blot analysis.

IL-8 protein detection

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect IL-8 protein was performed using Human IL-8/CXCL8 DuoSet ELISA kit (R + D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, US) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, a 96-well microplate was coated with 100 μL per well of the diluted capture antibody, overnight at room temperature, before aspirating and washing. The microplate was blocked by adding 300 μL of block buffer to each well, and incubated at room temperature for 1 h, followed by aspiration and washing. 100 μL of sample or standards was added to each well and incubated for 2 h at room temperature, followed by aspiration and washing. Detection Antibody (100 μL) was then added to each well and incubated for 2 h at room temperature, followed by aspiration and washing. Streptavidin-HRP was added (100 μL) and incubated for 20 min in the dark, before washing. Substrate solution was then added to each well for 20 min in the dark, followed by 50 μL of Stop Solution. The optical density of each well was read immediately, using a SkanIt microplate reader set to 450 nm.

Quantitative gene expression analysis

RNA was extracted from cultured cells using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen), as per the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was reverse transcribed using qScript cDNA SuperMix (Quantabio, Beverley, MA, US), using 2ul of sample and 18ul of master mix. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was carried out to quantify levels CXCL8 using the LightCycler®480 thermocycler (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA) using SYBR-green chemistry. Each 10 µl reaction consisted of 25–35 ng of genomic DNA, 0.5 µM of each primer pair, 5 µl of SYBR Green Master Mix (Roche Diagnostics), and 1.5 µl of water. Thermal cycling conditions were as follows: 1 cycle of 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 60 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 58 °C for 10 s and 72 °C for 20 s. Melting curves were obtained by heating samples from 65 to 97 °C in increments of 0.11 °C/s with 5 acquisitions per °C. Each analysis was carried out in triplicate, with HPRT as a reference gene. Primer sequences are available in Additional file 1.

Western blot analysis

Proteins from the cell lysates were separated with SDS-PAGE based on the Laemmli method, using Bio-Rad Mini-Protean system. In brief, samples were denatured for 5 min at 95 °C prior to SDS-PAGE analysis using pre-cast gradient gels (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, US) at 200 V for 40 min. The separated proteins were then transferred to 0.4 μm PVDF membrane (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, US) with Mini-Trans-Blot Cells in cold Western Blot transfer buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, pH 8.3, and 10% methanol) at 100 V for 90 min based on the size of the protein of interest. Membranes were blocked with non-fat milk powder (5%) in Tris buffered saline with 0.05% (v/v) Tween-20 (TBST) for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were then incubated with primary antibodies diluted in non-fat milk overnight at 4 °C. Primary antibodies used were anti-E-cadherin mouse monoclonal (Abcam, Cambridge, UK; ab76055), anti-Stat3 mouse monoclonal (Abcam, ab119352), anti-β-catenin rabbit monoclonal (Abcam, ab32572) and anti-β-actin mouse monoclonal (Sigma-Aldrich, A5441).

The membrane was washed with TBST three times before incubation with the appropriate goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody for 1 h at 1:10,000 dilution, followed by washing and chemiluminescent detection using ECL Plus detection reagent (GE Healthcare). The signal was visualised, and the expression of proteins quantified with the NineAlliance Q9 (UVITECH, Cambridge, UK). Proteins were normalized to the β-actin band on each lane.

Statistical analyses

Two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test was performed using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California USA, Findings were considered significant at a P-value of < 0.05.


ETBF co-cultured with CRC cell lines induces IL-8 expression

HT-29 and HCT116 cells were incubated with either ETBF at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 100:1 or purified B. fragilis toxin (BFT; 1 ug/ml in McCoy’s media) or control (McCoy’s media). Cells were incubated for 3 or 24 h, supernatants removed, and cells harvested. Relative expression of CXCL8 (the IL-8 gene) was measured by qPCR. After three hours both ETBF and BFT induced a twofold increase in CXCL8 expression compared to control in HT29 cells, which increased to more than fourfold increase after 24 h. In HCT116 cells a 1.5-fold and fivefold increase in CXCL8 expression was detected at 3 and 24 h, respectively (Fig. 1). All subsequent experiments were carried out using 24-h incubations. Levels of secreted IL-8 protein were measured in the supernatants of cell lines treated with ETBF or BFT for 24 h using an ELISA method. An approximately twofold increase in IL-8 protein was detected in both cell lines after ETBF or BFT treatment, compared to control.

Fig. 1
figure 1

CXCL8 expression in HT-29 and HCT116 cells, following treatment with Bacteroides fragilis toxin (BFT, 1 ug/ml) or enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF, MOI 100:1) for 3 or 24 h

Induction of IL-8 expression is STAT3 dependent

In order to investigate the potential molecular pathways involved in the induction of IL-8 expression by ETBF/BFT, we pre-treated CRC cell lines with antagonists to Stat3 (Stattic) and β-catenin (B21) prior to incubation with ETBF or BFT. Both antagonists were optimised for use at 10 µM. HT-29 and HCT116 cells were pre-treated with antagonists ( ±) for 1 h, followed by washing in PBS and co-incubation with ETBF/BFT/control for 24 h as detailed above. Supernatants were collected and frozen for protein analysis and RNA extracted from harvested cells for gene-expression analysis. Pre-treatment with Stat3 antagonist significantly reduced expression of CXCL8 in both cell lines, when cells were cultured with either ETBF or BFT. Blocking β-catenin activity did not lead to a comparable reduction in CXCL8, although a non-significant reduction was seen in HCT116 cells co-cultured with BFT (Fig. 2). Subsequent analyses were carried out using ETBF only and not BFT.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Changes in CXCL8 expression in A HT29 and B HCT116 cells induced by Bacteroides fragilis toxin (Bft) or Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF), following treatment with Stat3 antagonist (Stattic) or Beta-catenin antagonist (B21). ns, non-significant; **P-value < 0.005

Similar to gene-expression analysis, protein expression of IL-8 was decreased in response to ETBF when cells were pretreated with Stat3 inhibitor. The reduction in IL-8 protein was less marked in HCT116 cells in response to BFT. Blocking β-catenin, using B21, did not have a significant impact on IL-8 protein expression (Fig. 3) (Additional file 2: Table S1).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Changes in secreted IL-8 protein expression in A HT29 and B HCT116 cells induced by enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF), following treatment with Stat3 antagonist (Stattic) or β-catenin antagonist (B21). ns, non-significant; * P-value < 0.05; *** P-value < 0.0005

Treatment with ETBF leads to a reduction in E-cadherin expression

Treatment of cell lines with ETBF resulted in a reduction of E-cadherin protein in both HT-29 and HCT116 cell lines (Fig. 4). Blocking Stat3 using a Stat3 antagonist did not restore E-cadherin expression, suggesting that the effect of ETBF on E-cadherin is not mediated through Stat3. Surprisingly, expression of β-catenin was slightly reduced in HT-29 cells in response to ETBF treatment, whereas this effect was not observed in HCT116 cells.

Fig. 4
figure 4

A Western Blot of HT29 (left) and HCT116 (right) colorectal cancer cell lines probed with antibodies to E-Cadherin, β-catenin and Stat3. β-actin was used as a loading control. Relative quantification of B Stat-3 and C E-cadherin expression derived from Western blot analysis in HT29 and HCT116 cells


In the current study, we have investigated the effect of co-culturing with live strains of enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF) compared to purified toxin from the bacterium (BFT) in colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines. ETBF has been implicated in CRC pathogenesis through the action of its toxin on E-cadherin and several inflammatory pathways, including upregulation of IL-8. Studies to date have predominantly used HT-29 and HCT116 CRC cell lines and treatment with purified BFT to investigate ETBF-related colorectal carcinogenesis [4, 5, 20, 21]. Recent studies, however, have suggested that Bacteroides species may have an anti-inflammatory effect on gut mucosa, through the action of cell-wall components, such as lipopolysaccharide [22], and using purified toxin in experimental systems may not account for the nuanced effect of the bacterium on pro- and anti-inflammatory pathways. Non-toxigenic B. fragilis can reduce ETBF-mediated colitis in a mouse model, demonstrating that anti-inflammatory components of B. fragilis may play a physiological role in mitigating toxin-induced inflammation by polysaccharide A-dependent [23] and independent mechanisms [24]. In addition, the bacterial toxin may not be expressed in established CRC, despite the presence of the bacteria in tumour samples (unpublished data). Using IL-8 induction as a measure of ETBF-mediated molecular changes, we treated HT-29 and HCT116 cell lines with purified BFT and ETBF at a multiplicity of infection of 100:1. We found that treatment with ETBF had a similar effect on gene (CXCL8) and protein expression of IL-8, compared to purified toxin, highlighting the utility of using a bacterial culture rather than purified toxin.

We next sought to elucidate the interplay between IL-8 and Stat3 in ETBF-related colorectal carcinogenesis. As a key component of the JAK/STAT pathway, Stat3 has been reported to be constitutively activated in several studies of CRC [25,26,27]. Disruption of Stat3 signalling leads to tumour-cell invasion through disruption of cell adhesion complexes, including E-cadherin, a crucial event of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer [17, 28, 29]. ETBF has been shown to induce persistent colitis in mice, with increased Stat3 expression and mucosal permeability [13], independent of Stat3 activation in colonic epithelial cells in a study by Wick et al. [14].

IL-8 is upregulated in many cancers and has tumourigenic effects via angiogenesis, neutrophil recruitment and proliferation and migration of tumour cells [16, 30,31,32]. IL-8 also activates classic inflammatory signalling pathways, such as NF-κB [33], while its expression is induced by other inflammatory pathways, such as MAPK [34], suggesting that IL-8 may play a role in chronic inflammation-related cancer. BFT has previously been reported to induce expression of IL-8 gene and protein in CRC cell lines [4, 21] and this increased expression was shown to occur through disruption of E-cadherin junctions, although cleavage of E-cadherin is not required [5]. We saw a similar increase of both IL-8 gene and protein expression in response to treatment with both ETBF and BFT. In order to ascertain the role of Stat3 in ETBF-mediated IL-8 signalling, we used to Stat3 antagonist to block Stat3 signalling. This resulted in a significant decrease in gene and protein expression of IL-8 in both CRC cell lines, suggesting that IL-8 signalling in response to ETBF is dependent on Stat3. BFT has been shown to induce IL-8 through MAPK and NF-kB in HT29 cells [4]. Stat3-mediated gene expression and tumourigenesis can also be activated by MAPK and NF-kB [35, 36]. Our findings suggest that Stat3 may be a crucial mediator of MAPK and NF-kB signalling in response to ETBF that leads to downstream IL-8 expression that may, in a similar manner to IL-6 [37], promote a feed-forward loop in inflammation.

Loss of E-cadherin expression is a crucial step and fundamental feature of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in cancer progression, and this disruption of E-cadherin has been demonstrated in response to BFT in numerous studies using CRC cell lines [20, 38, 39]. However, although E-cadherin disruption and subsequent invasion has been shown to be induced by Stat3 in CRC cell lines [25], this has not been demonstrated in the context of ETBF. Our findings also demonstrated that treatment with ETBF resulted in decreased expression of E-cadherin in HT-29 and HCT116 cells. However, blocking Stat3 using a Stat3 antagonist did not restore E-cadherin expression, suggesting that the effect of ETBF on E-cadherin is not mediated through Stat3.

In vitro investigations of ETBF/BFT in CRC have predominantly been carried out using the HT-29 cell line. Our findings of subtle differences in the expression of β-catenin in response to ETBF in HCT116 cells compared to HT-29 cells emphasises the limitations of extrapolating data from a single cell line. One important difference between these cell lines is that HT29 cells have a mutated APC gene whereas HCT116 retains wildtype APC, and this may impact β-catenin, through its direct interaction with APC in the nucleus. Differences in molecular mechanisms at play in the colonic mucosa and within different molecular subtypes of CRC may impact how an individual tumour responds to an assault by ETBF. Crosstalk between different cell types in the tumour microenvironment may also play an important role in cell signalling, as previously shown by the activation of immune-cell Stat3, independent of activation of epithelial cell STAT3 and subsequent increase in mucosal permeability, in a mouse model of ETBF response [14]. Future studies into the role of Stat3 in IL-8 signalling in response to ETBF should use co-cultures of CRC and immune cells or a mouse model to investigate crosstalk between different cell types.


We found that treatment of CRC cell lines with live cultures of ETBF had the equivalent effect on IL-8 expression as the use of purified toxin, and this may be a more representative model of ETBF-mediated colorectal carcinogenesis. IL-8 gene and protein expression was mediated through Stat3 in HT-29 and HCT116 cells, whereas disruption of E-cadherin appeared to be independent of Stat3 signalling.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the article (and its Additional file).


  1. Sears CL, Geis AL, Housseau F. Bacteroides fragilis subverts mucosal biology: from symbiont to colon carcinogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(10):4166–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Geis AL, Fan H, Wu X, Wu S, Huso DL, Wolfe JL, et al. Regulatory T-cell response to enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis colonization triggers IL17-dependent colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Discov. 2015;5(10):1098–109.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Thiele Orberg E, Fan H, Tam AJ, Dejea CM, Destefano Shields CE, Wu S, et al. The myeloid immune signature of enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis-induced murine colon tumorigenesis. Mucosal Immunol. 2017;10(2):421–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu S, Powell J, Mathioudakis N, Kane S, Fernandez E, Sears CL. Bacteroides fragilis enterotoxin induces intestinal epithelial cell secretion of interleukin-8 through mitogen-activated protein kinases and a tyrosine kinase-regulated nuclear factor-kappaB pathway. Infect Immun. 2004;72(10):5832–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hwang S, Gwon SY, Kim MS, Lee S, Rhee KJ. Bacteroides fragilis toxin induces IL-8 secretion in HT29/C1 cells through disruption of E-cadherin junctions. Immune Netw. 2013;13(5):213–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lévy L, Neuveut C, Renard CA, Charneau P, Branchereau S, Gauthier F, et al. Transcriptional activation of interleukin-8 by beta-catenin-Tcf4. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(44):42386–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu S, Morin PJ, Maouyo D, Sears CL. Bacteroides fragilis enterotoxin induces c-Myc expression and cellular proliferation. Gastroenterology. 2003;124(2):392–400.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sun J, Hobert ME, Duan Y, Rao AS, He TC, Chang EB, et al. Crosstalk between NF-kappaB and beta-catenin pathways in bacterial-colonized intestinal epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2005;289(1):G129–37.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duan Y, Liao AP, Kuppireddi S, Ye Z, Ciancio MJ, Sun J. beta-Catenin activity negatively regulates bacteria-induced inflammation. Lab Invest. 2007;87(6):613–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burger M, Hartmann T, Burger JA, Schraufstatter I. KSHV-GPCR and CXCR2 transforming capacity and angiogenic responses are mediated through a JAK2-STAT3-dependent pathway. Oncogene. 2005;24(12):2067–75.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao J, Dong Y, Kang W, Go MY, Tong JH, Ng EK, et al. Helicobacter pylori-induced STAT3 activation and signalling network in gastric cancer. Oncoscience. 2014;1(6):468–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar S, Kumari N, Mittal RD, Mohindra S, Ghoshal UC. Association between pro-(IL-8) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokine variants and their serum levels and H. pylori-related gastric carcinogenesis in northern India. Meta Gene. 2015;6:9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu S, Rhee KJ, Albesiano E, Rabizadeh S, Wu X, Yen HR, et al. A human colonic commensal promotes colon tumorigenesis via activation of T helper type 17 T cell responses. Nat Med. 2009;15(9):1016–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wick EC, Rabizadeh S, Albesiano E, Wu X, Wu S, Chan J, et al. Stat3 activation in murine colitis induced by enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20(5):821–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ning Y, Feng W, Cao X, Ren K, Quan M, Chen A, et al. Genistein inhibits stemness of SKOV3 cells induced by macrophages co-cultured with ovarian cancer stem-like cells through IL-8/STAT3 axis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guo Y, Zang Y, Lv L, Cai F, Qian T, Zhang G, et al. IL8 promotes proliferation and inhibition of apoptosis via STAT3/AKT/NFkappaB pathway in prostate cancer. Mol Med Rep. 2017;16(6):9035–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang C, Guo F, Xu G, Ma J, Shao F. STAT3 cooperates with Twist to mediate epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Oncol Rep. 2015;33(4):1872–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xiong H, Hong J, Du W, Lin YW, Ren LL, Wang YC, et al. Roles of STAT3 and ZEB1 proteins in E-cadherin down-regulation and human colorectal cancer epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(8):5819–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chung L, Orberg ET, Geis AL, Chan JL, Fu K, DeStefano Shields CE, et al. Bacteroides fragilis toxin coordinates a pro-carcinogenic inflammatory cascade via targeting of colonic epithelial cells. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23(3):421.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu S, Lim KC, Huang J, Saidi RF, Sears CL. Bacteroides fragilis enterotoxin cleaves the zonula adherens protein, E-cadherin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(25):14979–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanfilippo L, Li CK, Seth R, Balwin TJ, Menozzi MG, Mahida YR. Bacteroides fragilis enterotoxin induces the expression of IL-8 and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) by human colonic epithelial cells. Clin Exp Immunol. 2000;119(3):456–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. d’Hennezel E, Abubucker S, Murphy LO, Cullen TW. Total lipopolysaccharide from the human gut microbiome silences toll-like receptor signaling. mSystems. 2017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee YK, Mehrabian P, Boyajian S, Wu WL, Selicha J, Vonderfecht S, et al. The protective role of bacteroides fragilis in a murine model of colitis-associated colorectal cancer. mSphere. 2018.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Chan JL, Wu S, Geis AL, Chan GV, Gomes TAM, Beck SE, et al. Non-toxigenic Bacteroides fragilis (NTBF) administration reduces bacteria-driven chronic colitis and tumor development independent of polysaccharide A. Mucosal Immunol. 2019;12(1):164–77.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xiong H, Zhang ZG, Tian XQ, Sun DF, Liang QC, Zhang YJ, et al. Inhibition of JAK1, 2/STAT3 signaling induces apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and reduces tumor cell invasion in colorectal cancer cells. Neoplasia. 2008;10(3):287–97.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Binder Gallimidi A, Fischman S, Revach B, Bulvik R, Maliutina A, Rubinstein AM, et al. Periodontal pathogens Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum promote tumor progression in an oral-specific chemical carcinogenesis model. Oncotarget. 2015;6(26):22613–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gargalionis AN, Papavassiliou KA, Papavassiliou AG. Targeting STAT3 signaling pathway in colorectal cancer. Biomedicines. 2021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang B, Liu T, Wu JC, Luo SZ, Chen R, Lu LG, et al. STAT3 aggravates TGF-beta1-induced hepatic epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and migration. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;98:214–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang T, Lin F, Sun X, Jiang L, Mao R, Zhou S, et al. HOXB8 enhances the proliferation and metastasis of colorectal cancer cells by promoting EMT via STAT3 activation. Cancer Cell Int. 2019;19:3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kuai WX, Wang Q, Yang XZ, Zhao Y, Yu R, Tang XJ. Interleukin-8 associates with adhesion, migration, invasion and chemosensitivity of human gastric cancer cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(9):979–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kido S, Kitadai Y, Hattori N, Haruma K, Kido T, Ohta M, et al. Interleukin 8 and vascular endothelial growth factor—prognostic factors in human gastric carcinomas? Eur J Cancer. 2001;37(12):1482–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Waugh DJ, Wilson C. The interleukin-8 pathway in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(21):6735–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Manna SK, Ramesh GT. Interleukin-8 induces nuclear transcription factor-kappaB through a TRAF6-dependent pathway. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(8):7010–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hwang YS, Jeong M, Park JS, Kim MH, Lee DB, Shin BA, et al. Interleukin-1beta stimulates IL-8 expression through MAP kinase and ROS signaling in human gastric carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 2004;23(39):6603–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Liang F, Ren C, Wang J, Wang S, Yang L, Han X, et al. The crosstalk between STAT3 and p53/RAS signaling controls cancer cell metastasis and cisplatin resistance via the Slug/MAPK/PI3K/AKT-mediated regulation of EMT and autophagy. Oncogenesis. 2019;8(10):59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yan K, Xu X, Wu T, Li J, Cao G, Li Y, et al. Knockdown of PYCR1 inhibits proliferation, drug resistance and EMT in colorectal cancer cells by regulating STAT3-Mediated p38 MAPK and NF-kappaB signalling pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;520(2):486–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Waldner MJ, Foersch S, Neurath MF. Interleukin-6—key regulator of colorectal cancer development. Int J Biol Sci. 2012;8(9):1248–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ahn J, Sinha R, Pei Z, Dominianni C, Wu J, Shi J, et al. Human gut microbiome and risk for colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(24):1907–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wu S, Rhee KJ, Zhang M, Franco A, Sears CL. Bacteroides fragilis toxin stimulates intestinal epithelial cell shedding and gamma-secretase-dependent E-cadherin cleavage. J Cell Sci. 2007;120(Pt 11):1944–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This project was funded by the Neil and Pearl Hamilton Trust and the Canterbury Medical Research Foundation (New Zealand).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



RP: project design, laboratory analysis, statistical analysis, manuscript preparation. JP: laboratory and statistical analysis. JK: project design and manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel V. Purcell.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Primer sequences used in the study.

Additional file 2. Table S1.

IL-8 protein expression values from multiple ELISA analyses.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Purcell, R.V., Permain, J. & Keenan, J.I. Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis activates IL-8 expression through Stat3 in colorectal cancer cells. Gut Pathog 14, 16 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis
  • Toxin
  • Interleukin-8
  • IL-8
  • Stat3
  • E-cadherin
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Inflammation
  • HT29
  • HCT116
  • β-catenin