Skip to main content
Download PDF

Study of microencapsulated fatty acid antimicrobial activity in vitro and its prevention ability of Clostridium perfringens induced necrotic enteritis in broiler chicken

Gut Pathogens volume 15, Article number: 1 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Necrotic enteritis (NE) is an infectious intestinal disease caused by Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens) that is now re-emerging and causing concern within the poultry industry. Previously, the supplementation of antibiotics in feed was the most popular control strategy against C. perfringens. However, with the ban on supplementing growth-promoting antibiotics in livestock feed, alternatives to antibiotics will be essential in order to control necrotic enteritis. A possible alternative to antibiotics could be the medium or long chain fatty acids (MCFA or LCFA) as these are able to destroy cell membranes which in turn results in the death of bacteria. In this study, the in vitro antimicrobial activity of different combinations with microencapsulated caprylic acid (C8: 0), capric acid (C10: 0), lauric acid (C12: 0) and myristic acid (C14: 0) against C. perfringens and in vivo control the NE-inducing C. perfringens in broiler chicken were analyzed.

Results

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) assay results revealed that three different combinations of medium/long chain fatty acids varied in antimicrobial activities against C. perfringens type A strain (CVCC52, quality control), C. perfringens type A strain (C8-1), C. perfringens type G strain (D25) and C. perfringens type G strain (MZ1). Specifically, combination of C12: 0 and C14: 0 (C12–14) showed the highest antimicrobial activity against the four strains of C. perfringens (MIC ≤ 12.5 μg/mL, MBC = 50 μg/mL), followed by the combination of C10: 0 and C12: 0 (C10–12) (MIC, MBC ≤ 50 μg/mL). The in vivo study, 189 of 818-crossbred chickens that were fed a wheat-based diet and randomly divided into nine groups, with six treatment groups supplemented with either a high dose (1 g/kg) or low dose (0.5 g/kg) of three combinations respectively. The remaining three groups comsisted of a positive group supplement with avilamycin (0.01 g/kg), an infected control and an uninfected control. All chickens were challenged with C. perfringens from day 14 to day 17, except those in the uninfected control group. On day 20, the duodenum and jejunum necrotic lesions scores were calculated and the results showed that there was significant decrease in the C12–C14 high dose group (1.43 ± 0.23, 0.48 ± 0.13) and the C10–12 high dose group (1.52 ± 0.19, 0.48 ± 0.11) compared to the infected group (2.86 ± 0.21, 1.20 ± 0.28).

Conclusions

This finding indicated that dietary microencapsulated C12–C14 and C10–C12 could inhibit the growth of C. perfringens in chickens, which proves is viability to serve as an alternative to antibiotics used for necrotic enteritis caused by C. perfringens.

Introduction

Necrotic enteritis (NE) is one of the most severe intestinal diseases caused by toxin-producing Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens) [17]. C. perfringens is usually classified into seven toxinotypes (A-G) according to the toxins they produced; including alpha (CPA), beta (CPB), epsilon (ETX), iota (ITX), enterotoxin (CPE) and NetB. C. perfringens type A (CPA producing type), C (CPA and CPB producing type) and G (CPA and NetB producing type) are considered the main causative toxinotypes of NE in poultry production [7], Kiu and Hall [8]). C. perfringens can damage the intestinal surface and induce necrotic lesions, resulting in reduced growth rate, impaired feed absorption and increases in broilers mortality of more than 50%, causing huge losses for the poultry industry of approximately six billion US dollars annually [1, 4].

Additive of antibacterial growth promoter (AGP) such as enramycin, zinc bacitracin and virginiamycin in feeds have been an important strategy for the control of NE in poultry for decades [16]. However, with the overuse of AGPs, an increasing number of problems have occurred, including the development and expansion of drug resistance and drug residue which ultimately resulted in the ban of AGP use in food animal production in numerous countries in order to protect human health [4]. Due to the restriction of AGPs, the poultry industry faces an ever growing need to find a AGP alternative as NE is becoming a resurgent infectious disease which causes significant increase in morbidity and mortality, reflecting huge financial losses for the global poultry industry year after year [1]. Therefore, an alternative to antibiotics to control NE has become increasingly urgently needed.

Medium chain fatty acids (MCFA) including C6, C8, C10, C12 and C14 (myristic acid) are naturally found in many plants oil or dairy products [14]. MCFA and myristic acid can react with GPR84 to influence the immune function of a host cell, which plays an important role in stimulating cell-mediated immunity, as well as modulating the intestinal microbiota to improve the host’s immunity [12]. The hydrophilic and hydrophobic characteristics of both MCFA and myristic acid play a key role in its antimicrobial activity, as when it is inserted into the membrane bi-layer of bacteria, it leads to lysis of the cell and thus cell death [2]. Microencapsulation is an important technology widely used for the lipid delivery system, which prevents the oxidation of fatty acids and maintains the quality of lipid after extraction from oil seed and processing. However, what is less known is the antimicrobial activity of microencapsulated MCFA and myristic acid against C. perfringens.

Therefore, in this study, the in vitro antimicrobial activity of different combinations of microencapsulated caprylic acid (C8: 0), capric acid (C10: 0), lauric acid (C12: 0) and myristic acid (C14: 0) against C. perfringens and in vivo control of the C. perfringens induced NE in broiler chicken were analyzed. This current study aimed to find out a combination of MCFA and myristic acid which hopefully will serve as an ideal alternative for antibiotics against C. perfringens-induced necrotic enteritis in the poultry industry.

Results

MIC and MBC results of microencapsulated products against C. perfringens in vitro

The antimicrobial activity of microencapsulated products (C8–C12–C14, C12–C14 and C10–C12) and avilamycin against four strains of C. perfringens: CP-D25, CP-MZ1, CP-C8-1 and CP-CVCC52 (quality control) in vitro were tested using MIC and MBC. As shown in Table 1, the MIC value of C8–C12–C14 against CP-D25, CP-MZ1, CP-C8-1 and CP-CVCC52 were 0.1 mg/mL, 0.1 mg/mL, 0.5 mg/mL and 0.2 mg/mL respectively, and the MBC values were 0.1 mg/mL, 0.2 mg/mL, 1.0 mg/mL and 0.2 mg/mL respectively. The MIC values of C12-C14 against CP-D25, CP-MZ1, CP-C8-1 and CP-CVCC52 were 0.00625 mg/mL, 0.0125 mg/mL, 0.00625 mg/mL and 0.003125 mg/mL respectively, and the MBC values were 0.05 mg/mL in all groups. The MIC value of C10-C12 against CP-D25, CP-MZ1, CP-C8-1 and CP-CVCC52 were 0.05 mg/mL, 0.05 mg/mL, 0.5 mg/mL and 0.025 mg/mL respectively, while the MBC values were 0.1 mg/mL, 0.1 mg/mL, 0.5 mg/mL and 0.1 mg/mL respectively. In addition, the MIC value of avilamycin against CP-D25 and CP-CVCC52 were 0.00625 mg/mL, and the MBC values were 0.05 mg/mL, however, CP-MZ1 and CP-C8-1 were found to resistant to avilamycin.

Table 1 MICs and MBCs of different treatments against different strains of C. perfringens
Full size table

Effect of microencapsulated products on growth performance in broiler chickens

The results of the relative weight gain (RWG) and survival rate (SR) are shown in Fig. 1A and B. There was no significant difference in SR and RWG among all treatment groups compared with the negative control (no additive supplementation and no challenge) group. The challenge group (CC) with no treatment showed a significant decrease in the SR (66.67 ± 4.76%, p < 0.0001) and RWG (76.56 ± 1.03%, p < 0.0001) compared to the negative control group (100.00% ± 0.00), which is shown in Table 2.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparative values of the relative weight gain (RWG), survival rate (SR), lesion score of duodenum and jejunum. A relative weight gain (RWG) in birds of different treatments. B survival rate (SR) in birds of different treatments. C lesion score of duodenums in birds of different treatments. D lesion score of jejunums in birds of different treatments. PC avilamycin-positive control. CC challenge control. NC no additive supplementation and no challenge. Astricts signify statistical significance in comparison to the control group (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, ***p < 0.0005, ****p < 0.0001)

Full size image
Table 2 Comparative values of the survival rate (SR), relative weight gain (RWG), lesion score of duodenum and jejunum
Full size table

Effect of microencapsulated products on gross lesions in broiler chickens

The results of gross lesions of duodenum and jejunum are shown in Fig. 1C and D. The NE lesion scores of duodenum and jejunum in the high dose of C8–C12–C14 (1.43 ± 0.23, p < 0.0001; 0.48 ± 0.13, p < 0.05), C12–C14 (1.52 ± 0.19, p < 0.0005; 0.48 ± 0.11, p < 0.05), C10–C12 (1.72 ± 0.24, p < 0.005; 0.44 ± 0.15, p < 0.05), Avilamycin-positive control (1.35 ± 0.18, p < 0.0001; 0.2 ± 0.09, p < 0.005), and NC (1.32 ± 0.19, p < 0.0001; 0.26 ± 0.10, p < 0.005) groups were significantly lower compared to the CC group (2.86 ± 0.21; 1.20 ± 0.28). No significant difference was observed in the lesion scores of jejunums in low dose of C8–C12–C14 (0.67 ± 0.22, p > 0.05), C12–C14 (0.95 ± 0.22, p > 0.05) and C10–C12 (0.52 ± 0.21, p > 0.05) groups, which is shown in Table 2.

Discussion

MCFA and myristic acid are both derived from plant and animal natural products, they contain antibacterial activities, which are proven to be beneficial for the intestinal health of animals. Food safety is of global concern and it is strongly advocated that industries reduce/replace antibiotics consumption for animals. MCFA and myristic acid are promising alternatives for the protection of intestinal health in modern livestock [6]. However, there are few studies outlining the benefits of MCFA and myristic acid or microencapsulated fatty acids on the prevention and control of chicken necrotic enteritis. To find a novel strategy to control the chicken necrotic enteritis, this study detected the antibacterial activity of different kinds of microencapsulated fatty acids against C. perfringens in vitro and control C. perfringens induced NE in broiler chicken.

Clostridium perfringens is an opportunistic pathogen that can survive and proliferate in the cecum of healthy animals. It has been shown that toxin-type A and G C. perfringens are the most important toxin types that endanger the development of chickens [5], Lee and Lillehoj [9]). Therefore, both type A and G of C. perfringens wild isolated strains are important models for screening potential antibacterial products. In the present study, the results of antibacterial activity of MCFA and myristic acid showed that microencapsulated C8–C12–C14, C12–C14 or C10–C12 had efficient bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects on the two toxin-types of C. perfringens from different isolates. This finding provides the fundamental support required for further screenings of anti-Clostridial preparations for clinical application.

In addition, supplementation of antibiotics has been the chosen method to prevent and control Clostridium for decades, which has led to the emergence of a large number of antibiotic-resistant strains of C. perfringens in the field [3, 11, 15]. Therefore, isolation of antibiotic-resistant strains are important for screening effective antibacterial products. In this study, the antibacterial activity of MCFA and myristic acid against C. perfringens CP-MZ1 and CP-C8-1 which are resistant to avilamycin were tested using MIC and MBC in vitro, while C. perfringens CP-CVCC52 and CP-D25 which are sensitive to avilamycin were used as control bacteria. The results showed that microencapsulated C8–C12–C14, C12–C14 or C10–C12 displayed efficient antibacterial effects on the wild isolated avilamycin-resistant strains, suggesting that microencapsulated combinations of different MCFA and myristic acid have the potential for clinical application as a green antibacterial to replace antibiotics such as avilamycin.

MIC and MBC in vitro are high-throughput and broad-spectrum strategies for antibacterial screening, however, they may not be as effective as in vivo animal trial. In our previous study, we screened some highly efficient bactericidal plant essential oils and short-chain fatty acids in vitro, however they did not show effective protection on C. perfringens induced necrotic enteritis when managing in vivo experiments (unpublished). In this study, we screened C8: 0, C10: 0, C12: 0 and C14: 0 as effective antibacterial agents through in vitro MIC and MBC tests and found that they could also function in the challenged animal model. However, C10–C12 did not show a significant difference in the protection of gut health in vivo, although it showed the lowest dose of antibacterial activity against C. perfringens using MIC and MBC tests in vitro. Therefore, these results suggested that the combination of in vitro high-throughput screening and in vivo challenged animal model is of great significance for high effective antibacterial drugs screening and enhance the reliability.

Conclusions

Medium chain fatty acids (MCFA) and myristic acid from natural sources can destroy cell membranes resulting in the death of bacteria, this presents the possibility of being a suitable alternative to antibiotics. The results of this study indicate that microencapsulated combination with different kinds of MCFA and myristic acid could effectively inhibit the wild isolated avilamycin-resistant strains of C. perfringens type A and G in vitro and it could also effectively protect the chickens against the C. perfringens challenge in vivo. Therefore, with the ban on supplementing growth-promoting antibiotics in livestock feed regulation, combination with MCFA and myristic acid promising to become an alternative to antibiotics for controlling necrotic enteritis in the poultry industry.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and the growth conditions

Three strains of C. perfringens, CP-D25, CP-MZ1 and CP-C8-1 were isolated from the intestinal tract of chicken with necrotic enteritis in southern China, in which CP-D25, CP-MZ1 were identified as toxin type G, and CP-C8-1 was identified as toxin type A. The quality control strain C. perfringens type A CP-CVCC52 was purchased from China Veterinary Culture Collection Center, China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control, Beijing, China. All strains were deposited in the Parasitology Laboratory of Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

All strains were grown in Tryptose Sulfite Cycloserine (TSC, Guangdong Huankai Microbial Sci. and Tech. Co.,Ltd.) agar solid medium and Fluid Thioglycollate medium (FT, Guangdong Huankai Microbial Sci. and Tech. Co., Ltd.) at 37 ℃ in anaerobic conditions.

Medium chain fatty acids MCFA, myristic acid and antibiotic

For fatty acids microencapsulation, Tween 80 was used as a surfactant, and colloidal silicon was employed as an anti-caking agent. The three microencapsulated products of different combination with MCFA or myristic acid (from GuangZhou Wisdom Bio-Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China) are: Wisdem Modified MCFA-1 (C8-C12-C14, 40 mg/mL), Wisdem Modified MCFA-2 (C12–C14, 8 mg/mL), and Wisdem Modified MCFA-3 (C10–C12, 20 mg/mL). Maxus (Avilamycin, 10%) were purchased from Elanco Animal Health Incorporated.

The in vitro antimicrobial effect of the microencapsulated products

To detect the anti-clostridial activity of microencapsulated products or avilamycin in vitro, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) against C. perfringens type A and G (CP-CVCC52, CP-C8-1, CP-D25 and CP-MZ1) was measured in triplicate using broth microdilution as described by Radaelli et al. with some modifications [13]. C. perfringens were grown overnight at 37 ℃ anaerobically on the TSC plates, to which a single colony of the C. perfringens was then inoculated from the TSC plate and cultured overnight anaerobically in FT broth. For the MIC assay, a twofold serial dilution of microencapsulated products and avilamycin was performed using FT broth to achieve a final working concentration ranging from 4 to 0.039 mg/mL of C8–C12–C14, 0.8 mg/mL to 0.0078 mg/mL of C12–C14 and avilamycin, and 2 mg/mL to 0.0195 mg/mL of C10–C12, 100 μL each well. Subsequently, 100 μL of the C. perfringens suspension broth (1 × 107 CFU/mL) was added to each well of 96-well microplates with mixing to achieve a final concentration of 5 × 105 CFU/mL incubated at 37 ℃ for 24 h under anaerobic conditions. After incubation, the optical density of 600 nm wavelength of each well was measured. MIC values were defined as the lowest concentration of the microencapsulated products that inhibited visible bacterial growth after 24 h incubation.

Based on the MIC results, 100 μL cultures of the minimum inhibition concentration group and five of its higher concentrations were plating on TSC agar and incubated anaerobically for 24 h. MBC values were determined by the colony counts on TSC agar plates, in which the corresponding MIC with less than 4 colonies is considered as the MBC of the microencapsulated products [13].

The effect of microencapsulated products in control of C. perfringens induced NE in broiler chicken

Animals and experimental design

A total of 189 818-crossbred chickens at the age of 1 day were obtained from a commercial hatchery named Wen's Foodstuffs Group Co., Ltd. The birds were randomly divided into 9 groups consisting of 3 replicates with 7 birds per replicate, and kept in separate steel cages. They were fed a wheat-based diet (Additional file 1: Table S1), with soybean meal as the protein source and their diet was excluded from additives, such as antibiotics and/ or anticoccidials. The microencapsulated products or Avilamycin were mixed with feed from day eight according to the experimental design shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Trial designs
Full size table

C. perfringens challenge

The challenge trial was carried out using NetB positive C. perfringens G25 strain as described by Mudassar et al. with some modifications [10]. All birds in each group, except the negative control group, were orally given 3 mL (2.5 × 108 CFU/mL) of freshly prepared culture starting from day 14 for 4 consecutive days. Birds were given 3 mL FT broth orally in the negative control group.

Survival rate and growth performance assessment

The bird’s performance was evaluated by calculating the SR and RWG for each group. The birds were weighed on day one and on the day of slaughter (day 20). SR (%) of each group = (The numbers of birds at the end/ the numbers of birds on day one) × 100%, RWG (%) = (weight gain in each treated group/ weight gain in negative control group) × 100%.

Lesion scoring

On day 20, birds from each group were euthanized by CO2 in order to evaluate the NE lesions, and the gross intestinal lesion score (duodenum, jejunum and ileum). The lesion scores ranged from 0 (no lesions grossly), 1 (congestion of intestinal mucosa), 2 (1 to 5 foci), 3 (6 to 15 foci) and 4 (16 or more foci) as described by Mohiuddin et al. [10].

Statistical analysis

The differences among groups in bird performance and lesion score were calculated using One-way ANOVA with GraphPad Prism version 9 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The results were reported as the mean ± SEM, asterisks signify statistical significance in comparison to the control group (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, ***p < 0.0005, ****p < 0.0001).

Availability of data and materials

All relevant data were included in the paper.

References

  1. Abd El-Hack ME, El-Saadony MT, Elbestawy AR, El-Shall NA, Saad AM, Salem HM, El-Tahan AM, Khafaga AF, Taha AE, AbuQamar SF, El-Tarabily KA. Necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens: disease characteristics and prevention using organic antibiotic alternatives: a comprehensive review. Poult Sci. 2022;101:101590.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Batovska DI, Todorova IT, Tsvetkova IV, Najdenski HM. Antibacterial study of the medium chain fatty acids and their 1-monoglycerides: individual effects and synergistic relationships. Pol J Microbiol. 2009;58:43–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Delsol A, Randall L, Cooles S, Woodward MJ, Sunderland J, Roe J. Effect of the growth promoter avilamycin on emergence and persistence of antimicrobial resistance in enteric bacteria in the pig. J Appl Microbiol. 2005;98:564–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gharaibeh MH, Khalifeh MS, Nawasreh AN, Hananeh WM, Awawdeh MS. Assessment of immune response and efficacy of essential oils application on controlling necrotic enteritis induced by Clostridium perfringens in broiler chickens. Molecules. 2021;26:4527.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gu C, Lillehoj HS, Sun Z, Lee Y, Zhao H, Xianyu Z, Yan X, Wang Y, Lin S, Liu L, Li C. Characterization of virulent netB(+)/tpeL(+) Clostridium perfringens strains from necrotic enteritis-affected broiler chicken farms. Avian Dis. 2019;63:461–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jia M, Zhang Y, Gao Y, Ma X. Effects of medium chain fatty acids on intestinal health of monogastric animals. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2020;21:777–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Keyburn AL, Boyce JD, Vaz P, Bannam TL, Ford ME, Parker D, Di Rubbo A, Rood JI, Moore RJ. NetB, a new toxin that is associated with avian necrotic enteritis caused by Clostridium perfringens. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4:e26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kiu R, Hall LJ. An update on the human and animal enteric pathogen Clostridium perfringens. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018;7:141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee KW, Lillehoj HS. Role of Clostridium perfringens necrotic enteritis B-like toxin in disease pathogenesis. Vaccines. 2021;10:61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mohiuddin M, Yuan WK, Song ZF, Liao SQ, Qi NS, Li J, Lv MN, Wu CY, Lin XH, Hu JJ, Cai HM, Sun MF. Experimental induction of necrotic enteritis with or without predisposing factors using netB positive Clostridium perfringens strains. Gut Pathog. 2021;13:68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Osman KM, Elhariri M. Antibiotic resistance of Clostridium perfringens isolates from broiler chickens in Egypt. Rev Sci Tech. 2013;32:841–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Puengel T, De Vos S, Hundertmark J, Kohlhepp M, Guldiken N, Pujuguet P, Auberval M, Marsais F, Shoji KF, Saniere L, Trautwein C, Luedde T, Strnad P, Brys R, Clement-Lacroix P, Tacke F. The medium-chain fatty acid receptor GPR84 mediates myeloid cell infiltration promoting steatohepatitis and fibrosis. J Clin Med. 2020;9:1140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Radaelli M, da Silva BP, Weidlich L, Hoehne L, Flach A, da Costa LA, Ethur EM. Antimicrobial activities of six essential oils commonly used as condiments in Brazil against Clostridium perfringens. Braz J Microbiol. 2016;47:424–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Roopashree PG, Shetty SS, Kumari NS. Effect of medium chain fatty acid in human health and disease. J Funct Foods. 2021;87:104724.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Silva RO, Salvarani FM, Assis RA, Martins NR, Pires PS, Lobato FC. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens strains isolated from broiler chickens. Braz J Microbiol. 2009;40:262–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Immerseel F, De Buck J, Pasmans F, Huyghebaert G, Haesebrouck F, Ducatelle R. Clostridium perfringens in poultry: an emerging threat for animal and public health. Avian Pathol. 2004;33:537–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Immerseel F, Rood JI, Moore RJ, Titball RW. Rethinking our understanding of the pathogenesis of necrotic enteritis in chickens. Trends Microbiol. 2009;17:32–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Xiaoshu Zhan, Alen Slavic (Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph) and Joshua Milmine (Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph) for favorable comments and constructive suggestions on our manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Key Realm R&D Program of Guangdong Province (2020B0202080004, 2020B0202090004), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2021A1515010521, 2021A1515012401, 2020A1515011575, 2019A1515010913, 2021B1515120006), Special fund for scientific innovation strategy-onstruction of high level Academy of Agriculture Science (XTXM202202, 202110TD, 202122TD, R2020PY-JC001, R2019YJ-YB3010, R2020PY-JG013, R2020QD-048, R2021PY-QY007, XT202207), Science and Technology Plan Projects of Guangdong Province (2021B1212050021), Science and technology project of Heyuan, Yunfu and Guangzhou (2021008, 2021020604, 2021020607, 202102080459). Guangdong Provincial special fund for modern Agriculture Industry Technology Innovation teams (2022KJ119).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Livestock Disease Prevention of Guangdong Province, Key Laboratory of Avian Influenza and Other Major Poultry Diseases Prevention and Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

    Nanshan Qi, Shaobing Liu, Xuhui Lin, Shenquan Liao, Juan Li, Minna Lv, Haiming Cai, Junjing Hu, Jianfei Zhang & Mingfei Sun

  2. Guangzhou Wisdom Bio-Technology Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, 510700, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

    Fangquan Yan, Bing Chen & Shilin Wu

  3. College of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang, 233100, Anhui, People’s Republic of China

    Shaobing Liu & Youfang Gu

  4. Wen’s Group Academy, Wen’s Foodstuffs Group Co., Ltd., Xinxing, 527400, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

    Zhuanqiang Yan & Qingfeng Zhou

Authors
  1. Nanshan Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shaobing Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fangquan Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bing Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shilin Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xuhui Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zhuanqiang Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Qingfeng Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Shenquan Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Juan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Minna Lv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Haiming Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Junjing Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Jianfei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Youfang Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Mingfei Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NQ and MS conceived and designed the research. NQ and XL analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. FY, BC, SW, ZY, QZ and JZ conceived and designed the research. SL, SL, JL, ML, HC and JH performed the experiments and analyzed the data. MS and YG supervised the project and revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Youfang Gu or Mingfei Sun.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All the animal procedures carried out in the present study were in accordance with the guidelines of the Animal Ethics Committee (No. PT-2021012) of Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

Competing interests

Qingfeng Zhou and Zhuanqiang Yan are employed by Wen's Group Academy, Wen’s Foodstuffs Group Co., Ltd. Qihong Liu is employed by Jiangsu HFQ Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Zhen Kang are employed by Qingdao Vland Biotech Group Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Table S1. Ingredients and composition of wheat-based diet

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qi, N., Liu, S., Yan, F. et al. Study of microencapsulated fatty acid antimicrobial activity in vitro and its prevention ability of Clostridium perfringens induced necrotic enteritis in broiler chicken. Gut Pathog 15, 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-022-00526-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-022-00526-9

Keywords

Gut Pathogens

ISSN: 1757-4749