Skip to main content
Download PDF

Gut microbiota and autism spectrum disorders: where do we stand?

Gut Pathogens volume 15, Article number: 50 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often have digestive problems and microbial imbalances in their guts, suggesting that these conditions may play a role in the development of the disorder. Scopus-based research on the gut microbiota and ASD was examined in this bibliometric analysis to shed light on the current state of research and identify potential hotspots for future work in this area.

Methods

We searched documents from the Scopus database and reference citation analysis to collect published data on the gut microbiota and ASD from 2003 to 2022. The downloaded document records were exported to VOSviewer v.1.6.19 to examine and visualize the collaboration between countries and determine the research hotspots.

Results

The search yielded 958 articles specifically dedicated to gut microbiota and ASD. The number of publications in this field increased rapidly after 2013, with a peak in 2022. The United States (n = 267; 27.87%) was the most active country, followed by China (n = 171; 17.85%) and Italy (n = 96; 10.02). International collaboration was observed, with the USA playing a central role. University College Cork, Ireland, was the most productive institution (n = 24; 2.51%). The National Natural Science Foundation of China was the most active funding agency (n = 76; 7.93%). Nutrients journal had the highest number of publications (n = 28; 2.92%). The articles related to gut microbiota and ASD were highly cited, with an h-index of 108. The research themes identified focused on the modulation of gut microbiota as a potential therapy for children with ASD and gut-brain axis dysfunction in ASD.

Conclusions

In recent years, the study of gut microbiota and its association with ASD has garnered considerable interest as an emergent field of study. The results of this study substantially enhance our current understanding of the knowledge landscape in this field and illuminate potential avenues for future research. It is essential to emphasize the significance of devoting more resources to the newest and most promising research areas, such as investigating the potential therapeutic benefits of modulating the intestinal microbiota in children with ASD. This research has enormous potential and merits intensified focus and investigation.

Background

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is an umbrella term that includes various conditions with a wide range of origins [1, 2]. Notably, the prevalence of ASD has steadily increased over the past decade. This upward trend can be attributed to increased awareness among healthcare and educational personnel and modifications in diagnostic criteria [3, 4]. Emerging evidence also links ASD to a number of environmental factors, such as dietary factors, maternal infections, intestinal dysbiosis, stress, medications, pesticide exposure, and antibiotic use during pregnancy [5,6,7,8,9,10]. Examining these environmental connections [5] can aid in the comprehension of the increase in ASD occurrence. Given the prevalence of ASD among children and adolescents, which ranges from 0.6 to 1.7% [11,12,13], it poses a significant public health concern.

The composition of the gut microbiota is thought to play a crucial role in human health and disease, influencing immunological development, physiological homeostasis, amino acid metabolism, glutathione metabolism, and other processes. Consequently, the involvement of the gut-brain axis in ASD becomes evident [14]. Recent scientific interest has been directed toward exploring the potential contribution of gut microbiota composition as a cofactor in ASD development, given the established bidirectional communication between the gut and the brain, known as the “gut-brain axis” [3, 15]. To inform public policy, promote awareness, and define research objectives, it is critical to have global estimates of research related to gut microbiota and ASD.

Several studies have evaluated research trends in the fields of microbiota [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27] and ASD [28,29,30,31,32,33] separately. These studies used bibliometric analysis to track and measure research activity and its development over time. Bibliometric analysis is often used to evaluate publication output and assess the amount of research in a specific field [34,35,36,37,38]. Until now, no previous study in the literature has been a bibliometric analysis of research related to gut microbiota composition and ASD. The growing interest in the gut-brain axis and its potential involvement in ASD has resulted in a notable increase in scientific investigations focusing on gut microbiota diversity in individuals with ASD. To enhance comprehension of the worldwide research landscape pertaining to this particular subject, a bibliometric study was performed on publications covering the last two decades. The study conducted an analysis of publication patterns, revealing notable trends such as substantial annual growth in the volume of published papers, expanding global collaboration, and the identification of prominent research domains within this exciting science. The investigation additionally unveiled the prominent countries, institutions, funding agencies, journals, and publications inside the domain. The current study offers a significant contribution to the body of research pertaining to the relationship between gut microbiota and ASD, hence serving as a valuable resource for researchers with an interest in this area. Identifying research gaps, providing guidance for future research areas, and helping develop new solutions are potential benefits that can be derived from this approach.

Methods

Database used

In the present investigation, we collected scientific literature related to gut microbiota and ASD from Scopus, a comprehensive academic database developed by Elsevier. Scopus boasts an extensive collection of over 25,000 indexed journals spanning various scientific disciplines. It offers valuable features for evaluating research trends and growth and facilitates data export to other software for literature mapping purposes [39]. When examining research trends and patterns, most studies preferentially employ Scopus, Web of Science, or PubMed to access global scientific literature [40,41,42]. Scopus’s broader inclusivity compared to Web of Science or PubMed makes it a favored choice [43]. Furthermore, Scopus is accessible at no cost to many scholars in low-income countries through the HINARI initiative [44]. A comparative analysis revealed that approximately 99.11% of the journals indexed in Web of Science are also available in Scopus [45]. In addition, Scopus allows researchers to export and thoroughly examine the obtained data, facilitating activities such as data mapping and statistical analysis [41, 46,47,48,49,50]. Finally, it is crucial to emphasize that Scopus is widely regarded as the primary database utilized for conducting bibliometric studies and accessing articles across various scientific disciplines [17, 20, 51,52,53,54]. All data were obtained from Scopus on 25 May 2023. Scopus is the largest peer literature abstract and citation database that helped researchers harvest the largest number of publications [55, 56] related to bibliometric applications in research related to gut microbiota composition and ASD.

Search strategy

We searched Scopus for documents that included at least one of the following keywords in their titles and/or abstracts: “autism”, “autistic”, “Asperger syndrome”, “pervasive developmental disorder”, “PDDNOS”, and “Gastrointestinal Microbiomes” OR “Gut Microbiome” OR “Gut Microflora” OR “Gut Microbiota” OR “Gastrointestinal Flora” OR “Gut Flora” OR “Gastrointestinal Microbiota” OR “Gastrointestinal Microbial Community” OR “Gastrointestinal Microflora” OR “Gastric Microbiome” OR “Gastric Microbiota” OR “Gastric flora” OR “Gastric Microflora” OR “Intestinal Microbiome” OR “Intestinal Microbiota” OR “Intestinal Microflora” OR “Intestinal Flora” OR “Enteric Bacteria” OR “Enteric microbiota” OR “Enteric flora” OR “Enteric microflora” OR “Enteric microbiome” OR “Digestive microbiota” OR “Digestive flora” OR “Digestive microflora” OR “Digestive microbiome” OR “Fecal microbiota” OR “Fecal flora” OR “Fecal microflora” OR “Fecal microbiome” OR “Faecal microbiota” OR “Faecal flora” OR “Faecal microflora” OR “Faecal microbiome” OR “Colonic microbiota” OR “Colonic flora” OR “Colonic microflora” OR “Colonic microbiome” OR “probiotic” OR “Bifidobacterium” OR “Saccharomyces” OR “Escherichia coli” OR “Lactobacillus” OR “dysbiosis”).

Keywords were selected according to the search within Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) in PubMed or from previous bibliometric studies [57,58,59,60,61,62] or meta-analysis and systematic studies [3, 63,64,65,66,67]. The results were filtered by limiting documents to journal research, while proceedings, conferences, books, and book chapters were excluded. We selected the period between 2003 and 2022 to examine recent trends. Search query used for data extraction from Scopus looked like this: ((TITLE-ABS(autism) OR TITLE-ABS(autistic) OR TITLE-ABS(ASD) OR TITLE-ABS(Asperger syndrome) OR TITLE-ABS(pervasive developmental disorder) OR TITLE-ABS(PDDNOS)) AND (TITLE-ABS(“Gastrointestinal Microbiomes” OR “Gut Microbiome” OR “Gut Microflora” OR “Gut Microbiota” OR “Gastrointestinal Flora” OR “Gut Flora” OR “Gastrointestinal Microbiota” OR “Gastrointestinal Microbial Community” OR “Gastrointestinal Microflora” OR “Gastric Microbiome” OR “Gastric Microbiota” OR “Gastric flora” OR “Gastric Microflora” OR “Intestinal Microbiome” OR “Intestinal Microbiota” OR “Intestinal Microflora” OR “Intestinal Flora” OR “Enteric Bacteria” OR “Enteric microbiota” OR “Enteric flora” OR “Enteric microflora” OR “Enteric microbiome” OR “Digestive microbiota” OR “Digestive flora” OR “Digestive microflora” OR “Digestive microbiome” OR “Faecal microbiota” OR “Faecal flora” OR “Faecal microflora” OR “Faecal microbiome” OR “Fecal microbiota” OR “Fecal flora” OR “Fecal microflora” OR “Fecal microbiome” OR “Colonic microbiota” OR “Colonic flora” OR “Colonic microflora” OR “Colonic microbiome” OR “probiotic” OR “Bifidobacterium” OR “Saccharomyces” OR “Escherichia coli” OR “Lactobacillus” OR “dysbiosis”)) AND PUBYEAR > 2002 AND PUBYEAR < 2023) AND (LIMIT-TO (SRCTYPE,“j”)) AND (EXCLUDE (DOCTYPE,“er”)).

In each step of the search query, quotation marks were utilized to precisely retrieve the exact phrase. Additionally, the asterisk truncation served as a versatile wild card, allowing the retrieval of any potential term.

Validation of search strategy

The search was limited to the title and/or abstract of the publications in the Scopus database to achieve reasonable accuracy of the collected data because if it was expanded to all search fields, several publications would be included that are not about gut microbiota and ASD (i.e., false-positive data). This approach would substantially increase specificity while acknowledging a slight reduction in sensitivity [19, 68,69,70]. The adopted research strategy underwent thorough validation to ensure the absence of false-positive results. Initial validation involved reviewing the titles and abstracts of documents with even numbers (10, 20, 30, 40, etc.) until the end, carefully excluding any false-positive findings. This process of fine-tuning and exclusion continued until all randomly screened results were completely free from false positives.

The research productivity of ten active authors in the field was investigated to validate the research strategy against false-negative results (missing findings). A comparison was made between the numbers obtained through their research output and the results obtained using the research strategy. This assessment was conducted using the Spearman correlation test. The findings revealed a significant and robust correlation (p < 0.001; r = 0.983), indicating a high level of validity for the research strategy. Sweileh et al. [41, 71, 72] adopted this validation approach, which proved to be effective.

Bibliometric analysis

The following indicators were selected and analysed: document type, number of articles published per year, top 10 countries contributing to publications, top 10 productive institutions, top 10 funding agencies, top 10 journals with their impact factors (IF), and top 20 cited articles. Ranked order frequencies of publications were used to identify the leading countries, institutions, funding agencies, journals, and the most influential publications in the field. IF was extracted from Clarivate Analytics in 2020, Journal Cited Reports (JCR). The data from reference citation analysis (RCA) are utilized in the calculation of the impact index per article for the top ten publications with the highest number of citations. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc., headquartered in Pleasanton, CA 94,566, USA, is the proud owner of RCA, an open and comprehensive citation analysis database that spans various disciplines [73,74,75].

Visualization analysis

The downloaded document records were exported to VOSviewer v.1.6.19 (https://www.vosviewer.com/) to examine and visualize the collaboration between countries and determine research hotspots. VOSviewer represented terms in both titles and abstracts by colors and size of the circles according to the term occurrence. Hotspots are defined as terms and their frequency in common science fields [76, 77]. VOSviewer grouped terms into different clusters based on the co-occurrence analysis results. The cocitation analysis of countries was presented as a network visualization map, with the division of different clusters identified as related research fields and their frequency of occurrence calculated.

Results

General characteristics of the retrieved articles

A comprehensive search at the global level from 2003 to 2022 yielded a remarkable collection of 390,361 documents pertaining to gut microbiota mentioned in titles and abstracts. Among these scholarly publications, 958 were specifically dedicated to the exploration of gut microbiota and its connection to ASD (autism spectrum disorder). Delving deeper, this body of work comprised 580 articles (60.54%), 354 reviews (36.95%), and 24 miscellaneous entries (2.51%), including letters and editorials. A significant and remarkable positive correlation with a correlation coefficient of 0.984 (p < 0.001) was identified between the quantity of publications related to reviews and the quantity of publications related to original articles concerning time.

Evolution and growth of publications

The trends in the number of publications found by Scopus related to the gut microbiota and ASD over the past 20 years are shown in Fig. 1. A significant and robust positive correlation was observed between publication productivity concerning gut microbiota across various fields and productivity specifically related to gut microbiota and ASD (r = 0.973, P < 0.001). The number of publications increased slightly between 2003 and 2013, with fewer than 9.18 publications annually. However, after 2013, the number of published articles in this field increased rapidly, with an average of more than 95 published articles per year, and peaked in 2022, with 210 publications.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The global number of publications related to gut microbiota and autism spectrum disorders from 2003 to 2022

Full size image

Top ten active countries

Researchers from 74 countries have signed all included publications related to gut microbiota and ASD. Publications from the top 10 countries represented 74.2% of all literature on gut microbiota and ASD (Table 1). Two hundred and sixty-seven contributions came from the USA, followed by 171 from China and 96 from Italy.

Table 1 Top 10 countries most productive in terms of relevant articles related to gut microbiota and autism spectrum disorders from 2003 to 2022
Full size table

International research collaboration

For countries with a minimum of ten publications, international collaboration was visualized for relevant research related to gut microbiota and ASD between 2003 and 2022 (Fig. 2). The map illustrates that the USA is at the center of this area with many linking lines, indicating a significant number of partner countries with the USA.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Visualization map of international collaboration in countries with a minimum productivity of 10 publications

Full size image

Top ten active institutions

The ten most productive institutes for relevant articles related to gut microbiota and ASD from 2003 to 2023 are listed in Table 2. Among these institutions, the top ten collectively contributed to 15.45% (n = 148) of the published articles. University College Cork, Ireland, was the most productive institution (n = 24; 2.51%), followed by APC Microbiome Ireland, Ireland (n = 23; 2.4%), King Saud University, Saudi Arabia (n = 23; 2.4%) and others. There were five institutes from the United States, followed by two from Ireland. Meanwhile, one institution each for Saudi Arabia, China, and Italy was on the list. The publications of the top 10 institutes accounted for 15.45% of all literature related to gut microbiota and ASD.

Table 2 Top 10 productive institutes in research related to gut microbiota and autism spectrum disorders from 2003 to 2022
Full size table

Top ten funding agencies

A total of 502 (52.4%) publications were funded projects of the retrieved articles. The top 10 funding agencies for relevant articles related to gut microbiota and ASD from 2003 to 2022 are listed in Table 3. Among these funding agencies, the leading 10 collectively contributed to 23.90% (n = 229) of the total published articles. The National Natural Science Foundation of China (n = 76; 7.93%) was the most active funding agency in this field, followed by the National Institutes of Health, USA (n = 63; 6.58%) and National Institute of General Medical Sciences, USA (n = 23; 2.4%).

Table 3 Top ten productive funding agencies in research related to gut microbiota and autism spectrum disorders from 2003 to 2022
Full size table

Top ten active journals

As shown in Table 4, the top 10 journals/source titles account for approximately 16.48% of the total publications on research related to gut microbiota and ASD. Nutrients (IF 6.706, 2022) had the highest number of publications, with 28 publications.

Table 4 Top 10 productive journals/source titles in research related to gut microbiota and autism spectrum disorders from 2003 to 2022
Full size table

Citation analysis

All articles related to the gut microbiota and ASD have been cited 50,845 times since 2003, with an h-index of 108. The top 10 most highly cited articles are shown in Table 5. Six documents were published after 2015 [78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87]. The citations varied significantly, ranging from 679 to 2132, demonstrating the diverse attention garnered by the articles. Notably, the top ten most cited articles exhibited a remarkable impact index per article, ranging from 94.8 to 289.0, highlighting their influential contributions to the field. (Table 5).

Table 5 The 10 most cited publications in research related to gut microbiota and autism spectrum disorders from 2003 to 2022
Full size table

Research themes

The terms of the 958 publications were analyzed in the software VOSviewer 1.6.9. Term co-occurrence network maps were developed to establish the hot topics within the research area (Fig. 3). The selection criteria were terms that appeared in the titles and abstracts more than 50 times in the selected publications. Of the 20,013 terms used, 96 terms were divided into two main clusters: red and green. As illustrated in Fig. 3, the two main clusters were “modulation of the gut microbiota is a potential therapy for children with ASD” (green cluster) and “microbiota and gut-brain axis dysfunction in ASD” (red cluster).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Research topics clustered by mapping of co-occurrences of terms in the title/abstract for publications pertaining to gut microbiota and autism spectrum disorders from 2003 to 2022

Full size image

Discussion

This is the first study to provide a detailed bibliometric analysis of worldwide research output in the field of gut microbiota composition and ASD. In the current study, we analyze research in the field of gut microbiota and ASD from various aspects, such as document type, the number of articles published per year, the top 10 countries that contributed to publications, the top 10 productive institutions, the top 10 journals with their impact factors (IF), the top ten cited articles and co-occurrence analysis of the most commonly used terms, to identify the most researched topics relevant to the field of gut microbiota composition and ASD.

The current study also showed that more than 90% of publications in the field of gut microbiota composition and ASD had been published over the last decade. The increase in global research production in the field of gut microbiota composition and ASD may be related to an emerging problem that has demonstrated a link between gut microbiota composition and ASD as an increase in the number of publications in this field [88,89,90,91].

Since 2013, there has been a significant rise in research output regarding the microbiome-gut-brain axis (MGBA), paralleling the overall increase in microbiome-related studies [19, 92,93,94]. Numerous other bibliometric investigations [18, 22, 23, 95,96,97] have reported similar findings. A potential explanation for this surge in publications can be traced back to the second phase of the Integrative Human Microbiome Project (iHMP), initiated by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in 2013 [98]. The number of articles dedicated to MGBA research experienced a rapid upturn between 2009 and 2018. This upward trend can be attributed to the growing interest among experts in psychiatry, neurology, and gastroenterology, such as Cryan J.F., Dinan T.G., Clarke G., Bienenstock J., Forsythe P., Stanton C., Quigley E.M.M., Bercik P., O’Mahony S.M., Shanahan F., Foster J.A., Moloney R.D., and others. These professionals have delved into the physiological role of the gut microbiota in brain function and behavior, recognizing it as a promising avenue for therapeutic interventions in various diseases [19].

Of the prolific countries, the US ranked first regarding the number of articles, collaboration with other countries, and citation patterns. Such findings are consistent with earlier bibliometric studies [70, 99,100,101,102]. The emergence of these results was expected, owing to the United States’ reputation for hosting a wide array of exceptional international journals and accomplished scientists across diverse scientific domains [103]. Additional factors that likely contributed to these outcomes encompass the comparatively substantial research funding allocated within the USA and its rapid economic advancement [104]. Furthermore, due to many institutions and authors in the USA, the number of collaborations with other international countries could be expanded and increased [105].

A remarkable finding highlighting the organization’s commitment to advancing research in this field is the prominent role of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) as a funding agency for studies related to gut microbiota and ASD. This finding carries great significance, as it underscores the organization’s dedication to pushing the boundaries of research. China has made substantial investments in establishing state-of-the-art laboratories and research institutes [106, 107], which have attracted researchers interested in exploring the link between gut microbiota and autism spectrum disorder. The provision of exceptional research facilities may even enhance the chances of securing funding from the NSFC, solidifying its position as a leading supporter of research in this field. The alignment between the goals of the NSFC and the significance of studying gut microbiota in relation to ASD is evident. Considering the mounting evidence linking gut microbiota to neurodevelopmental issues, the NSFC may have recognized the importance of expanding scientific knowledge in this domain and potentially uncovering novel therapeutic approaches for ASD. Consequently, they may have allocated a substantial budget to support research in this area. Moreover, the surge in Chinese publication numbers can be attributed, in part, to the establishment of the NSFC’s fund dedicated to investigating the significance and mechanisms of the ‘gut-liver axis’ in gastrointestinal diseases (H03) [108]. This research initiative focuses on comprehensively studying the gut microbiome, metabolites, nutrition, neurotransmitters, gastrointestinal hormones, and bile acids, specifically emphasizing their intricate interactions with the gastrointestinal tract or liver-localized immune cells/factors contributing to various functional roles. These projects aim to further our comprehension of the gut-liver axis and its important significance in advancing diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for gastrointestinal disorders [108].

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) and its associated institutes have made major contributions to the progress of research on the association between gut microbiota and ASD [109]. The fact that ASD is a complex condition influenced by several factors, including genetics, neurology, immunology, and metabolism, among others, is acknowledged in this statement [110,111,112,113]. These NIH-affiliated institutes show their commitment to thoroughly examining and addressing all potential avenues to gain understanding of and develop interventions for ASD by allocating financial resources to research in this particular area. These findings also demonstrate the NIH’s dedication to expanding the realm of knowledge. The involvement of numerous specialized institutes within the NIH indicates a coordinated effort to approach ASD from a variety of perspectives. ASD is a complex and difficult condition. Adopting an interdisciplinary approach is essential for making significant strides in the field and ultimately raising the standard of living for people with ASD [114].

The term co-occurrence network map reflects the research hotspots in the area of gut microbiota composition and ASD through the weight and strength of the spheres and words [76]. In the current study, most publications related to gut microbiota composition and ASD focused on terms relevant to the topics of “modulation of the gut microbiota composition is a potential therapy for children with ASD” and “microbiota and gut-brain axis in ASD”. Research on the gut microbiota composition and ASD has seen an increase in publications in this time period, which may be due to the many hot topics being published at the same time. These findings suggest new therapeutic and diagnostic concepts for neuropsychiatric disorders (such as depression and ASD) and neurodegenerative disorders (such as Parkinson’s disease) [115, 116]. Interest in therapies targeting the dysbiotic microbiota associated with ASD has steadily grown. Various approaches, including diet [117], probiotics [118], prebiotics [119], antibiotics [120], antifungal supplementation [121], fecal microbiota transplantation [122], and microbiota transfer therapy [123], have been proposed as potential therapeutic options for ASD. Some of these interventions have already shown promise in treating certain psychiatric disorders, such as depression or anxiety. However, in regard to ASD, the available evidence for these interventions is limited [91, 124]. Initial evidence indicates that therapies using microbiota have the potential to bring about beneficial effects for individuals diagnosed with ASD. However, it is of utmost importance to undertake meticulously planned, extensive randomized controlled trials on a large scale, employing standardized protocols. These trials aim to establish the efficacy and safety of these treatments [91, 124]. Numerous studies have extensively investigated the connection between different gut microbiota and ASD. Nonetheless, identifying the exact patterns of alterations in microbial profiles among children with ASD has proved to be challenging. A comprehensive meta-analysis now sheds light on this matter by synthesizing the findings from 26 studies, predominantly published between 2010 and 2023 [125]. The investigations primarily took place in China, the United States, Australia, and Italy, with additional contributions from India, Japan, and Spain [125].

Limitations

Although this is the first bibliometric analysis to assess worldwide research output in the field of gut microbiota and ASD, our study has several limitations, as indicated by previous similar studies [41, 126]. First, we solely relied on Scopus as the data source for gut microbiota and ASD research. Nonetheless, Scopus, being the largest abstract and citation database of peer literature, enabled us to access the largest number of publications. Second, we identified relevant MeSH terms related to gut microbiota and ASD in the title and abstract of the publications, potentially missing any documents that discuss these topics within their content. However, any false-negative results are unlikely to significantly impact the overall findings [41, 126]. Third, an important concern arises regarding the accuracy of affiliation information in the retrieved articles, particularly regarding the reflection of the countries where the study was conducted. This issue, commonly known as “overlap” bias, highlights the challenges when relying solely on affiliation information to determine the research’s origin. Fourth, our examination focused on gut microbiota and did not consider other factors, such as environmental or genetic influences on ASD. This limited scope may not fully represent the comprehensive research landscape. Fifth, language bias may have influenced this study, as we only included publications published in English. Last, it is important to acknowledge that this study is primarily descriptive, providing evidence of the trends and growth in this area of research. It does not evaluate the quality or relevance of the research to the field.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this bibliometric analysis sheds light on the current research on gut microbiota and ASD. The number of publications in this field has significantly increased over the last 20 years, peaking in 2022. In terms of research output, the USA, China, and Italy are the top three nations. International collaboration is extremely important, with the USA at the center of these collaborations. Ireland’s University College Cork emerges as the institution with the highest productivity. Research in this field has received active support from funding organizations such as the National Institutes of Health in the United States and the National Natural Science Foundation of China. The main outlet for disseminating research findings in this area has been the Nutrients journal. The highly cited articles in this field also highlight the significance and influence of research on gut microbiota and ASD. The study identifies two major research themes: investigating gut-brain axis dysfunction in ASD and the modulation of gut microbiota as a potential therapy for children with ASD. The role of gut microbiota in ASD has received much attention recently, reflecting its potential importance. As we move forward, more funding and attention must be given to new research areas, with a particular emphasis on examining the therapeutic potential of altering the gut microbiota in ASD children. The results of this study substantially enhance our current understanding of the knowledge landscape in this field and illuminate potential avenues for future research. It is recommended that more attention be paid to the latest promising hotspots, including modulation of the gut microbiota as a potential therapy for children with ASD.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. Other datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ASD:

autism spectrum disorder

IF:

impact factors

MGBA:

microbiome-gut-brain axis

NSFC:

National Natural Science Foundation of China

MeSH:

Medical Subject Headings

NIH:

National Institutes of Health

References

  1. Kim JY, Son MJ, Son CY, Radua J, Eisenhut M, Gressier F, Koyanagi A, Carvalho AF, Stubbs B, Solmi M, et al. Environmental risk factors and biomarkers for autism spectrum disorder: an umbrella review of the evidence. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6(7):590–600.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lord C, Elsabbagh M, Baird G, Veenstra-Vanderweele J. Autism spectrum disorder. Lancet. 2018;392(10146):508–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Iglesias-Vazquez L, Van Ginkel Riba G, Arija V, Canals J. Composition of gut microbiota in children with Autism Spectrum disorder: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Nutrients 2020, 12(3).

  4. Bölte S, Girdler S, Marschik PB. The contribution of environmental exposure to the etiology of autism spectrum disorder. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019;76(7):1275–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mehra A, Arora G, Sahni G, Kaur M, Singh H, Singh B, Kaur S. Gut microbiota and autism spectrum disorder: from pathogenesis to potential therapeutic perspectives. J Tradit Complement Med. 2023;13(2):135–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grabrucker AM. Environmental factors in autism. Front Psychiatry. 2012;3:118.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Socala K, Doboszewska U, Szopa A, Serefko A, Wlodarczyk M, Zielinska A, Poleszak E, Fichna J, Wlaz P. The role of microbiota-gut-brain axis in neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders. Pharmacol Res. 2021;172:105840.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Modabbernia A, Velthorst E, Reichenberg A. Environmental risk factors for autism: an evidence-based review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Mol Autism. 2017;8:13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Karimi P, Kamali E, Mousavi SM, Karahmadi M. Environmental factors influencing the risk of autism. J Res Med Sci. 2017;22:27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lai MC, Lombardo MV, Baron-Cohen S. Autism Lancet. 2014;383(9920):896–910.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Elsabbagh M, Divan G, Koh YJ, Kim YS, Kauchali S, Marcín C, Montiel-Nava C, Patel V, Paula CS, Wang C, et al. Global prevalence of autism and other pervasive developmental disorders. Autism Res. 2012;5(3):160–79.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Baird G, Simonoff E, Pickles A, Chandler S, Loucas T, Meldrum D, Charman T. Prevalence of disorders of the autism spectrum in a population cohort of children in South Thames: the special needs and Autism Project (SNAP). Lancet. 2006;368(9531):210–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zeidan J, Fombonne E, Scorah J, Ibrahim A, Durkin MS, Saxena S, Yusuf A, Shih A, Elsabbagh M. Global prevalence of autism: a systematic review update. Autism Res 2022.

  14. Pulikkan J, Mazumder A, Grace T. Role of the gut microbiome in Autism Spectrum Disorders. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1118:253–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fattorusso A, Di Genova L, Dell’Isola GB, Mencaroni E, Esposito S. Autism Spectrum Disorders and the gut microbiota. Nutrients 2019, 11(3).

  16. Colombino E, Prieto-Botella D, Capucchio MT. Gut Health in Veterinary Medicine: a bibliometric analysis of the literature. Anim (Basel) 2021, 11(7).

  17. Yuan X, Chang C, Chen X, Li K. Emerging trends and focus of human gastrointestinal microbiome research from 2010–2021: a visualized study. J Transl Med. 2021;19(1):327.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Yao H, Wan JY, Wang CZ, Li L, Wang J, Li Y, Huang WH, Zeng J, Wang Q, Yuan CS. Bibliometric analysis of research on the role of intestinal microbiota in obesity. PeerJ. 2018;6:e5091.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zyoud SH, Smale S, Waring WS, Sweileh WM, Al-Jabi SW. Global research trends in microbiome-gut-brain axis during 2009–2018: a bibliometric and visualized study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019;19(1):158.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu X, Hu J, Deng S, Tan Y, Qiu C, Zhang M, Ni X, Lu H, Wang Z, Li L, et al. Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of the Kynurenine Pathway in Mood Disorders: Focus on Gut Microbiota Research. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:687757.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu X, Hu J, Deng S, Tan Y, Qiu C, Zhang M, Ni X, Lu H, Wang Z, Li L, et al. Bibliometric and visual analysis of Research on the Links between the Gut Microbiota and Depression from 1999 to 2019. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:587670.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ejtahed HS, Tabatabaei-Malazy O, Soroush AR, Hasani-Ranjbar S, Siadat SD, Raes J, Larijani B. Worldwide trends in scientific publications on association of gut microbiota with obesity. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2019;22(1):65–71.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang X, Fan X, Ying J, Chen S. Emerging trends and research foci in gastrointestinal microbiome. J Transl Med. 2019;17(1):67.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu P, Lv T, Dong S, Cui Z, Luo X, Jia B, Jeon CO, Zhang J. Association between intestinal microbiome and inflammatory bowel disease: insights from bibliometric analysis. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022;20:1716–25.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Amer R, Shakhshir M, Shahwan M, Jairoun AA, Akkawi M, Abu Taha A. Global research trends on the links between the gut microbiome and cancer: a visualization analysis. J Transl Med. 2022;20(1):83.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Yue YY, Fan XY, Zhang Q, Lu YP, Wu S, Wang S, Yu M, Cui CW, Sun ZR. Bibliometric analysis of subject trends and knowledge structures of gut microbiota. World J Clin Cases. 2020;8(13):2817–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Zyoud SH, Smale S, Waring WS, Sweileh W, Al-Jabi SW. Global research trends in the microbiome related to irritable bowel syndrome: a bibliometric and visualized study. World J Gastroenterol. 2021;27(13):1341–53.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Carmona-Serrano N, Lopez-Belmonte J, Lopez-Nunez JA, Moreno-Guerrero AJ. Trends in Autism Research in the field of education in web of Science: a bibliometric study. Brain Sci 2020, 10(12).

  29. Carmona-Serrano N, Moreno-Guerrero AJ, Marin-Marin JA, Lopez-Belmonte J. Evolution of the Autism Literature and the influence of parents: a scientific mapping in web of Science. Brain Sci 2021, 11(1).

  30. Carmona-Serrano N, Lopez-Belmonte J, Cuesta-Gomez JL, Moreno-Guerrero AJ. Documentary analysis of the scientific literature on Autism and Technology in web of Science. Brain Sci 2020, 10(12).

  31. Whyatt CP, Torres EB. Autism Research: an objective quantitative review of Progress and Focus between 1994 and 2015. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1526.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Sweileh WM, Al-Jabi SW, Sawalha AF, Zyoud SH. Bibliometric profile of the global scientific research on autism spectrum disorders. Springerplus. 2016;5(1):1480.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang K, Duan W, Duan Y, Yu Y, Chen X, Xu Y, Chen H, Huang H, Xiong B. A bibliometric insight of genetic factors in ASD: emerging Trends and New Developments. Brain Sci 2020, 11(1).

  34. Shen JL, Zhou Z, Cao JS, Zhang B, Hu JH, Li JY, Liu XM, Juengpanich S, Li MS, Feng X. Biologic therapy for Crohn’s disease over the last 3 decades. World J Clin Cases. 2022;10(2):594–606.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang CY, Zhou SC, Li XW, Li BH, Zhang JJ, Ge Z, Zhang Q, Hu JH. Bibliometric analysis of randomized controlled trials of colorectal cancer over the last decade. World J Clin Cases. 2020;8(14):3021–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Frater JL. Trends in iron deficiency anemia research 2001–2020: a bibliometric analysis. World J Meta-Anal. 2021;9(4):389–404.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Brennan C, Laubscher M, Maqungo S, Graham SM. Bibliometric analysis of research on the effects of human immunodeficiency virus in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. World J Orthop. 2021;12(3):169–77.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Qureshi MFH, Mohammad D, Shah SMA, Lakhani M, Shah M, Ayub MH, Sadiq S. Burnout amongst radiologists: a bibliometric study from 1993 to 2020. World J Psychiatry. 2022;12(2):368–78.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Elsevier S. 2023. 2023. https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus (accessed September 2023).

  40. Sweileh WM. Contribution of researchers in arab countries to scientific publications on neglected tropical diseases (1971–2020). Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines. 2022;8(1):14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Sweileh WM. Global research activity on mathematical modeling of transmission and control of 23 selected infectious disease outbreak. Global Health. 2022;18(1):4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Sweileh WM. Substandard and falsified medical products: bibliometric analysis and mapping of scientific research. Global Health. 2021;17(1):114.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22(2):338–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sweileh WM. Analysis and mapping of global research publications on shift work (2012–2021). J Occup Med Toxicol. 2022;17(1):22.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Singh VK, Singh P, Karmakar M, Leta J, Mayr P. The journal coverage of web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics. 2021;126(6):5113–42.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sweileh WM. Global Research Activity on Health System preparedness against viral infectious disease outbreaks. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2021:1–7.

  47. Sweileh WM. Global research publications on irrational use of antimicrobials: call for more research to contain antimicrobial resistance. Global Health. 2021;17(1):94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Ilagan-Vega MKC, Tantengco OAG, Paz-Pacheco E. A bibliometric analysis of polycystic ovary syndrome research in Southeast Asia: insights and implications. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2022;16(2):102419.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Luo J, Leng S, Bai Y. Food Supply Chain Safety Research Trends from 1997 to 2020: a bibliometric analysis. Front Public Health. 2021;9:742980.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Patel A, Abdelsalam A, Shariff RK, Mallela AN, Andrews EG, Tonetti DA, Lunsford LD, Abou-Al-Shaar H. Bibliometric analysis of the top 100 cited articles on stereotactic radiosurgery of intracranial meningiomas. Br J Neurosurg 2022:1–6.

  51. Cabanillas-Lazo M, Quispe-Vicuna C, Barja-Ore J, Fernandez-Giusti A, Munive-Degregori A, Retamozo-Siancas Y, Guerrero ME, Mayta-Tovalino F. A 10-Year Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research on Gut Microbiota and Parkinson’s Disease: Characteristics, Impact, and Trends. Biomed Res Int 2022, 2022:4144781.

  52. Trejo-Castro AI, Carrion-Alvarez D, Martinez-Torteya A, Rangel-Escareno C. A bibliometric review on gut microbiome and Alzheimer’s disease between 2012 and 2021. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:804177.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Xavier-Santos D, Padilha M, Fabiano GA, Vinderola G, Gomes Cruz A, Sivieri K, Costa Antunes AE. Evidences and perspectives of the use of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics as adjuvants for prevention and treatment of COVID-19: a bibliometric analysis and systematic review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2022;120:174–92.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Yao H, Wan JY, Wang CZ, Li L, Wang J, Li Y, Huang WH, Zeng J, Wang Q, Yuan CS. Bibliometric analysis of research on the role of intestinal microbiota in obesity. PeerJ 2018, 2018(6).

  55. Kokol P, Vosner HB. Discrepancies among Scopus, web of Science, and PubMed coverage of funding information in medical journal articles. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018;106(1):81–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Burnham JF. Scopus database: a review. Biomed Digit Libr. 2006;3:1.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Li Z, Ke H, Lin Q, Shen Z, Chen Y. Global trends in gut microbiota and clostridioides difficile infection research: a visualized study. J Infect Public Health. 2022;15(7):806–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Chang Y, Ou Q, Zhou X, Liu J, Zhang S. Global research trends and focus on the link between colorectal cancer and gut flora: a bibliometric analysis from 2001 to 2021. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1182006.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Deng R, Wang M, Song Y, Shi Y. A Bibliometric Analysis on the Research Trend of Exercise and the Gut Microbiome. Microorganisms 2023, 11(4).

  60. Guo K, Li J, Li X, Huang J, Zhou Z. Emerging trends and focus on the link between gut microbiota and type 1 diabetes: a bibliometric and visualization analysis. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1137595.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Shu H, Meng Y, Lin T, Ma J, Zhao J, Zhou X. Association between gut microbiota and bone metabolism: insights from bibliometric analysis. Front Physiol. 2023;14:1156279.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhao M, Meng Y, Cao B, Tong J, Liu X, Yan H, Yang H, Han H, Liang X, Chen H. A bibliometric analysis of studies on gut microbiota in attention-deficit and hyperactivity disorder from 2012 to 2021. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1055804.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Cao X, Lin P, Jiang P, Li C. Characteristics of the gastrointestinal microbiome in children with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2013;25(6):342–53.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Zhang J, Zhu G, Wan L, Liang Y, Liu X, Yan H, Zhang B, Yang G. Effect of fecal microbiota transplantation in children with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Front Psychiatry. 2023;14:1123658.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Xu M, Xu X, Li J, Li F. Association between Gut Microbiota and Autism Spectrum disorder: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:473.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Bezawada N, Phang TH, Hold GL, Hansen R. Autism spectrum disorder and the gut microbiota in children: a systematic review. Ann Nutr Metab. 2020;76(1):16–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Andreo-Martinez P, Rubio-Aparicio M, Sanchez-Meca J, Veas A, Martinez-Gonzalez AE. A Meta-analysis of gut microbiota in children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2022;52(3):1374–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Zyoud SH, Waring WS, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM. Global cocaine intoxication research trends during 1975–2015: a bibliometric analysis of web of Science publications. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2017;12(1):6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Zyoud SH. Global scientific trends on aflatoxin research during 1998–2017: a bibliometric and visualized study. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2019;14:27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Zyoud SH. Investigating global trends in paraquat intoxication research from 1962 to 2015 using bibliometric analysis. Am J Ind Med. 2018;61(6):462–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Sweileh WM. Analysis and mapping of Scientific Literature on Detention and Deportation of International Migrants (1990–2022). J Immigr Minor Health 2023.

  72. Sweileh WM, Wickramage K, Pottie K, Hui C, Roberts B, Sawalha AF, Zyoud SH. Bibliometric analysis of global migration health research in peer-reviewed literature (2000–2016). BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):777.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. Reference Citation Analysis. 2023. https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com/ (accessed May 25 2023).

  74. Wang JL, Ma YJ, Ma L, Ma N, Guo DM, Ma LS. Baishideng’s reference citation analysis database announces the first Journal Article Influence Index of 101 core journals and a list of high-quality academic journals in gastroenterology and hepatology. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28(37):5383–94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Wang JL, Ma YJ, Ma L, Ma N, Guo DM, Ma LS. Baishideng’s reference citation analysis database announces the first Journal Article Influence Index of 104 core journals and a list of high-quality academic journals in orthopedics. World J Orthop. 2022;13(10):891–902.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics. 2017;111(2):1053–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Buffington SA, Di Prisco GV, Auchtung TA, Ajami NJ, Petrosino JF, Costa-Mattioli M. Microbial reconstitution reverses maternal Diet-Induced Social and synaptic deficits in offspring. Cell. 2016;165(7):1762–75.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Carabotti M, Scirocco A, Maselli MA, Severi C. The gut-brain axis: interactions between enteric microbiota, central and enteric nervous systems. Ann Gastroenterol. 2015;28(2):203–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Cryan JF, O’Riordan KJ, Cowan CSM, Sandhu KV, Bastiaanssen TFS, Boehme M, Codagnone MG, Cussotto S, Fulling C, Golubeva AV, et al. The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis. Physiol Rev. 2019;99(4):1877–2013.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Fung TC, Olson CA, Hsiao EY. Interactions between the microbiota, immune and nervous systems in health and disease. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20(2):145–55.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Hsiao EY, McBride SW, Hsien S, Sharon G, Hyde ER, McCue T, Codelli JA, Chow J, Reisman SE, Petrosino JF, et al. Microbiota modulate behavioral and physiological abnormalities associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Cell. 2013;155(7):1451–63.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Kang DW, Adams JB, Gregory AC, Borody T, Chittick L, Fasano A, Khoruts A, Geis E, Maldonado J, McDonough-Means S, et al. Microbiota transfer therapy alters gut ecosystem and improves gastrointestinal and autism symptoms: an open-label study. Microbiome. 2017;5(1):10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Mayer EA, Tillisch K, Gupta A. Gut/brain axis and the microbiota. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(3):926–38.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Nguyen TL, Vieira-Silva S, Liston A, Raes J. How informative is the mouse for human gut microbiota research? Dis Model Mech. 2015;8(1):1–16.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Rivière A, Selak M, Lantin D, Leroy F, De Vuyst L. Bifidobacteria and Butyrate-Producing Colon bacteria: importance and strategies for their stimulation in the human gut. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:979.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Sharon G, Sampson TR, Geschwind DH, Mazmanian SK. The Central Nervous System and the gut Microbiome. Cell. 2016;167(4):915–32.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Vuong HE, Hsiao EY. Emerging roles for the gut microbiome in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2017;81(5):411–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Kang DW, Adams JB, Coleman DM, Pollard EL, Maldonado J, McDonough-Means S, Caporaso JG, Krajmalnik-Brown R. Long-term benefit of Microbiota transfer therapy on autism symptoms and gut microbiota. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):5821.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Liu J, Gao Z, Liu C, Liu T, Gao J, Cai Y, Fan X. Alteration of gut microbiota: New Strategy for Treating Autism Spectrum Disorder. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:792490.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Li Q, Han Y, Dy ABC, Hagerman RJ. The gut microbiota and Autism Spectrum Disorders. Front Cell Neurosci. 2017;11:120.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Sun HL, Feng Y, Zhang Q, Li JX, Wang YY, Su Z, Cheung T, Jackson T, Sha S, Xiang YT. The Microbiome-Gut-Brain Axis and Dementia: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022, 19(24).

  93. Chen P, Zhang L, Feng Y, Liu YF, Si TL, Su Z, Cheung T, Ungvari GS, Ng CH, Xiang YT. Brain-gut axis and psychiatric disorders: a perspective from bibliometric and visual analysis. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1047007.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Wang H, Long T, You J, Li P, Xu Q. Bibliometric visualization analysis of Microbiome-Gut-Brain Axis from 2004 to 2020. Med Sci Monit. 2022;28:e936037.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Tian J, Li M, Lian F, Tong X. The hundred most-cited publications in microbiota of diabetes research: a bibliometric analysis. Med (Baltim). 2017;96(37):e7338.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Ding-Qi B, Hui-Bo C, Xin-Yang L, Yi Z, Lan-Hua L, Yun-Hai G. [Analysis of research status and hotspots of snail intestinal flora based on bibliometrics]. Zhongguo Xue Xi Chong Bing Fang Zhi Za Zhi. 2018;30(5):571–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Li Y, Zou Z, Bian X, Huang Y, Wang Y, Yang C, Zhao J, Xie L. Fecal microbiota transplantation research output from 2004 to 2017: a bibliometric analysis. PeerJ. 2019;7:e6411.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Integrative HMP (iHMP) Research Network Consortium. The Integrative Human Microbiome Project: dynamic analysis of microbiome-host omics profiles during periods of human health and disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;16(3):276–89.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Zyoud SH. Global research trends of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: a bibliometric analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16(1):255.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Zyoud SH, Waring WS, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM. Global research production in glyphosate intoxication from 1978 to 2015: a bibliometric analysis. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2017;36(10):997–1006.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Shi J, Shi S, Shi S, Jia Q, Yuan G, Chu Y, Wang H, Hu Y, Cui H. Bibliometric analysis of potassium channel research. Channels (Austin). 2020;14(1):18–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Demir E, Akmeşe ÖF, Erbay H, Taylan-Özkan A, Mumcuoğlu KY. Bibliometric analysis of publications on house dust mites during 1980–2018. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2020.

  103. Gao W, Guo H-C. Nitrogen research at watershed scale: a bibliometric analysis during 1959–2011. Scientometrics. 2014;99(3):737–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Maassen S. Bibliometric analysis of Research on Wastewater Irrigation during 1991–2014. Irrig Drain. 2016;65(5):644–53.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Gao Y, Wang F, Song Y, Liu H. The status of and trends in the pharmacology of berberine: a bibliometric review [1985–2018]. Chin Med. 2020;15:7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Conroy G, Plackett B. Nature Index Annual Table 2022: China’s research spending pays off. Nature 2022:https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-41022-01669-41580.

  107. Zyoud SH, Shakhshir M, Abushanab AS, Al-Jabi SW, Koni A, Shahwan M, Jairoun AA, Abu Taha A. Mapping the global research landscape on nutrition and the gut microbiota: visualization and bibliometric analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28(25):2981–93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. National Natural Science Foundation of China. National Natural Science Fund Guide to Programs. 2020. 2020. https://www.nsfc.gov.cn/english/site_1/pdf/NationalNaturalScienceFundGuidetoPrograms2020.pdf (accessed January 15 2022).

  109. Proctor LM. The National Institutes of Health Human Microbiome Project. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;21(6):368–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. NIH HMP Working Group, Peterson J, Garges S, Giovanni M, McInnes P, Wang L, Schloss JA, Bonazzi V, McEwen JE, Wetterstrand KA, et al. The NIH Human Microbiome Project. Genome Res. 2009;19(12):2317–23.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Integrative HMP. (iHMP) Research Network Consortium: the Integrative Human Microbiome Project. Nature. 2019;569(7758):641–8.

    Google Scholar 

  112. N. I. H. Human Microbiome Portfolio Analysis Team: a review of 10 years of human microbiome research activities at the US National Institutes of Health, Fiscal Years 2007–2016. Microbiome 2019, 7(1):31.

  113. N. IH-wide microbiome workshop writing team. 2017 NIH-wide workshop report on the human microbiome: emerging themes at the Horizon of the 21st Century. Microbiome. 2019;7(1):32.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). 2023. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/factsheets/autism (accessed September 15 2023).

  115. Song JG, Yu MS, Lee B, Lee J, Hwang SH, Na D, Kim HW. Analysis methods for the gut microbiome in neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022;20:1097–110.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Cenit MC, Sanz Y, Codoner-Franch P. Influence of gut microbiota on neuropsychiatric disorders. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(30):5486–98.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Ruskin DN, Svedova J, Cote JL, Sandau U, Rho JM, Kawamura M Jr., Boison D, Masino SA. Ketogenic diet improves core symptoms of autism in BTBR mice. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):e65021.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Navarro F, Liu Y, Rhoads JM. Can probiotics benefit children with autism spectrum disorders? World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(46):10093–102.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Grimaldi R, Cela D, Swann JR, Vulevic J, Gibson GR, Tzortzis G, Costabile A. In vitro fermentation of B-GOS: impact on faecal bacterial populations and metabolic activity in autistic and non-autistic children. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2017, 93(2).

  120. Sandler RH, Finegold SM, Bolte ER, Buchanan CP, Maxwell AP, Väisänen ML, Nelson MN, Wexler HM. Short-term benefit from oral vancomycin treatment of regressive-onset autism. J Child Neurol. 2000;15(7):429–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Kantarcioglu AS, Kiraz N, Aydin A. Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis: yeast species isolated from Stool samples of children with suspected or diagnosed Autism Spectrum Disorders and in Vitro Susceptibility against Nystatin and Fluconazole. Mycopathologia. 2016;181(1–2):1–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Evrensel A, Ceylan ME. Fecal microbiota transplantation and its usage in Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2016;14(3):231–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Staley C, Khoruts A, Sadowsky MJ. Contemporary applications of fecal microbiota transplantation to treat Intestinal Diseases in humans. Arch Med Res. 2017;48(8):766–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Lasheras I, Gracia-García P, Santabárbara J. Modulation of gut microbiota in autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review. Eur J Psychiatry. 2021;35(2):107–21.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Zhang T, Zhou Y, Zhang X, Wang J. Perturbations of gut microbiota compositions in Autism Spectrum disorder: a review and Meta-analysis. Preprintsorg 2023, 2023051435:https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202305.201435.v202301.

  126. Sweileh WM. Global research publications on systemic use of off-label and unlicensed drugs: a bibliometric analysis (1990–2020). Int J Risk Saf Med. 2022;33(1):77–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank An-Najah National University for all administrative assistance during the project’s implementation.

Funding

No support for conducting this study was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical and Community Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, 44839, Nablus, Palestine

    Sa’ed H. Zyoud, Amani S. Abushanab, Amer Koni & Samah W. Al-Jabi

  2. Clinical Research Centre, An-Najah National University Hospital, 44839, Nablus, Palestine

    Sa’ed H. Zyoud

  3. Department of Nutrition, An-Najah National University Hospital, 44839, Nablus, Palestine

    Muna Shakhshir

  4. Division of Clinical Pharmacy, Hematology and Oncology Pharmacy Department, An- Najah National University Hospital, 44839, Nablus, Palestine

    Amer Koni

  5. College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates

    Moyad Shahwan

  6. Health and Safety Department, Dubai Municipality, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

    Ammar A. Jairoun

  7. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, 44839, Nablus, Palestine

    Adham Abu Taha

  8. Department of Pathology, An-Najah National University Hospital, 44839, Nablus, Palestine

    Adham Abu Taha

Authors
  1. Sa’ed H. Zyoud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muna Shakhshir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amani S. Abushanab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Amer Koni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Moyad Shahwan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ammar A. Jairoun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Adham Abu Taha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Samah W. Al-Jabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Zyoud SH conceptualized and designed the research project, took care of data management and analysis, generated figures, made significant contributions to the manuscript’s literature search and interpretation of the manuscript, and drafted the manuscript; Al-Jabi S contributed to the conceptualization and methodology of the study, was involved in interpretation of the data, contributed to the manuscript writing, and made revisions to the initial draft. Shakhshir M, Abushanab AS, Jairoun AA, Shahwan WM, Abu Taha A and Koni A were involved in interpretation of the data, contributed to the manuscript writing, and made revisions to the initial draft; all authors provided a critical review and approved the final manuscript before submission.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sa’ed H. Zyoud or Samah W. Al-Jabi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

As this is a bibliometric study, without human involvement, there was no need for ethical approval.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zyoud, S.H., Shakhshir, M., Abushanab, A.S. et al. Gut microbiota and autism spectrum disorders: where do we stand?. Gut Pathog 15, 50 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-023-00575-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-023-00575-8

Keywords

Gut Pathogens

ISSN: 1757-4749