Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and other risk factors among Mongolian dyspeptic patients who have a high incidence and mortality rate of gastric cancer

  • Oyuntsetseg Khasag1,
  • Gantuya Boldbaatar1, 2,
  • Tserentogtoh Tegshee1,
  • Davaadorj Duger1,
  • Azzaya Dashdorj2,
  • Tomohisa Uchida3,
  • Takeshi Matsuhisa4 and
  • Yoshio Yamaoka2, 5Email author
Contributed equally
Gut Pathogens201810:14

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-018-0240-2

Received: 26 January 2018

Accepted: 23 March 2018

Published: 4 April 2018

Abstract

Background

Mongolia has not only the second highest incidence rate but also the highest mortality rate for gastric cancer globally. In addition to gastric cancer, ulcerative disease complications are also life threatening; thus, investigating Helicobacter pylori infection and other risk factors is essential.

Results

H.pylori infection was high in tested dyspeptic patients from all parts of Mongolia, with an overall infection rate of 80.0%. Logistic regression analysis showed that H. pylori infection was associated with gastritis (odds ratio; 9.0 ([95% confidence interval 5.0–16.2]); p < 0.0001). H. pylori infection (3.3 [2.0–5.4]; p < 0.0001) and > 40 years old (1.5 [1.0–2.0]; p < 0.02) were both associated with atrophy. However, > 40 years old (3.8 [2.4–6.0]; p < 0.0001) and high salt intakes (1.6 [1.0–2.3]; p < 0.02), but not H. pylori infection, were associated with intestinal metaplasia. Excessive amount of salt usage was dramatically higher in northern and western parts of Mongolia, where precancerous diseases, such as erosive esophagitis (for cardia cancer), severe atrophy, and intestinal metaplasia (for non-cardia cancer), were highly prevalent.

Conclusions

H. pylori infection was the major gastric health problem among the Mongolian population. In addition, environmental factors such as high salt intake worsened the clinical outcome. Therefore, a nationwide screening and eradication of H. pylori infection as well as salt-reducing measures should be implemented.

Keywords

Helicobacter pylori Risk factorsGastric diseasesMongolia

Background

Mongolia has the second highest incidence of gastric cancer (GC) worldwide [1]. According to the national health indicator data, digestive system diseases are the second most common disease among the Mongolian population [2]. Moreover, ulcerative disease complications such as bleeding and perforation are severe and life threatening [3, 4]. In 1994, Helicobacter pylori was declared to be a class I carcinogen [5, 6]. Currently, it is well known as the main etiological factor for chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer disease (PUD), mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma and GC [7, 8]. In addition, the infection was also reported as a risk factor for gastric dyspepsia in the Maastricht V guideline [9]. H. pylori is a flagellated, spiral-shaped, Gram-negative, microaerophilic bacteria which can survive in acidic environment and colonizes the gastric mucosa in half of the world population [10]. A current global systematic review showed that H. pylori infection continues to be a major public health issue worldwide, and approximately 4.4 billion individuals were estimated to be infected [10]. The prevalence of H. pylori infection varies geographically, based on ethnicity, age, socioeconomic factors, and is more frequent in developing than developed countries [11]. It has been attributed to low socioeconomic status, overcrowded condition, and inadequate hygiene [12, 13]. The infection is usually acquired in early childhood and reaches 80–100% during adolescence in developing countries [8] probably due to oral–oral, fecal–oral [14], or gastro–oral transmission [15].

Mongolia is a landlocked country in Central East Asia, bordered by the Russian Federation in the north and People’s Republic of China in the south, west, and east. According to the age-standardized rate (ASR) of GC per 100,000 Mongolian population, Uvs Province (western part of Mongolia) has the highest (80.7) and Khentii Province (eastern part of Mongolia) has the lowest (11.2) incidence, with the country average of 32.4, which was ranked as the second highest globally [1].

The precancerous diseases of GC and its etiological risk factors including H. pylori infection are not well studied based on geographical location. In addition to high incidence and mortality rates of GC, digestive diseases have been constantly increasing in the last 10 years in Mongolia [2]. In this serious situation, defining etiologies of these diseases is urgently required, especially in areas with high incidence of GC. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the prevalence of H. pylori infection and other risk factors among dyspeptic patients in the major geographical locations (western, northern, southern, and central parts) in Mongolia.

Methods

Sampling, questionnaire and endoscopy of patients

We conducted a cross-sectional study among dyspeptic patients aged > 16 years, from 2014 to 2016. History of partial or total gastrectomy; treatment with bismuth-containing compounds, H2-receptor blockers, or proton pump inhibitors within 2 weeks prior to the start of the study and history of previous eradication therapy for H. pylori infection were the exclusion criteria.

We chose the places according to the geographical location and GC incidence rate in the 2012 Mongolian national data. The selected places were as follows: Ulaanbaatar City (central part of Mongolia, with an ASR of GC incidence of 31.3 per 100,000 population), Uvs Province (western; ASR, 80.7), Khuvsgul Province (northern; ASR, 37.0), Umnugovi Province (northern; ASR, 21.5), and Khentii Province (eastern; ASR, 11.5).

Age and gender were used as non-modifiable risk factors, and high salt intake and bad habits (tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking) were used as modifiable environmental risk factors. A previous nationwide study validated the questionnaire method by evaluating the excessive amount of salt using 24 h urine collection samples, revealing that the urine saline level was higher in daily salty tea drinkers than those who drink from other sources [16]. Therefore, to determine excessive amount of salt, we used the same questionnaire method to screen routine salty tea drinkers. For bad habits, tobacco smoking (daily smokers) and alcohol drinking (excessive amount of standard drink [350 mL glass of beer, 150 mL glass of 12% wine, or 44 mL glass of spirit] per monthly, weekly, or daily) statuses were used.

During endoscopic examination, the Los Angeles (LA) classification was used to determine gastroesophageal reflux disease [17]. Gastric mucosal atrophy was evaluated using the Kimura-Takemoto classification [18] and was classified as closed type (mild atrophy, limited in the antrum and lesser curvature of the proximal corpus) and open type (advanced atrophy, extended into the corpus and cardia). Three gastric mucosal tissues were taken from the antrum approximately 3 cm from the pyloric ring, which were used for rapid urease test (Mon-HP, developed at the Mongolian National University of Medical sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia), histological examination, and bacterial culture. Two more biopsies were taken from the corpus and incisura angularis (angulus) for histological examination. If ulcer or suspected cancer lesions were detected, additional biopsy specimen(s) was taken for histological diagnosis. Biopsy specimens for culture were immediately placed at − 20 °C on the day of endoscopic examination and stored at − 80 °C until used for culture testing. Blood samples from all participants were collected on the same day. The serum was separated and frozen at − 80 °C until analysis. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the ethical permission was approved by the Mongolian Ministry of Health, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, and Oita University Faculty of Medicine (Yufu, Japan).

Histological confirmation

All biopsy materials were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Serial sections were stained with hematoxylin–eosin and May-Giemsa stain. The stained slides were examined by a single pathologist (Tomohisa Uchida). The degree of chronic inflammation (mononuclear cell infiltration), acute inflammation (polymorphonuclear neutrophil infiltration), atrophy, intestinal metaplasia (IM), and bacterial density were classified into four grades, based on the updated Sydney system: 0, “normal”; 1, “mild”; 2, “moderate”; and 3, “marked” [19]. Samples with grade 1 or higher were considered positive.

Helicobacter pylori infection status

H. pylori infection was positive based on culture or histology, confirmed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or both rapid urease test (RUT) and serology that yielded positive results. For H. pylori culture, antral biopsy specimen was homogenized in normal saline solution and placed in a commercially available selective plate (Nissui Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Japan). The plates were incubated for up to 10 days at 37 °C under microaerophilic conditions (10% O2, 5% CO2, and 85% N2). H. pylori were identified based on colony morphology, Gram staining, and positive reactions for oxidase, catalase, and urease tests.

In histological examination, bacterial loads ≥ grade 1 on the updated Sydney system were considered positive for H. pylori [19]. IHC was also performed to confirm H. pylori infection as previously described [20]. Serology of H. pylori infection (anti-H. pylori IgG antibody) was evaluated using a commercially available ELISA kit (Eiken Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

Discrete categorical variables were tested using Chi square test, and non-parametric continuous variables were calculated using Mann–Whitney test or Kruskal–Wallis test. A two-tailed p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Univariate and backward logistic regression analyses were used to calculate odds ratios. In the univariate analysis, p < 0.3 was included to calculate the multivariate backward logistic regression analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Version 22.0 (IBM Corp. Armonk, NY, USA) software.

Results

Patient sampling and demography

Endoscopy was performed on 905 dyspeptic patients from the capital city (Ulaanbaatar, n = 226; November 18–22, 2014), western (Uvs Province, n = 148; July 14–21, 2015), northern (Khuvsgul Province, n = 212; July 19–25, 2015), southern (Umnugovi Province, n = 176; August 4–8, 2016), and eastern (Khentii Province, n = 143; August 9–12, 2016) parts of Mongolia. All patients were examined by experienced Japanese and Mongolian endoscopists. A total of 169 patients were excluded from the study due to our exclusion criteria that patients were previously received H. pylori eradication. Finally, we included 736 dyspeptic patients. Among all patients, 68.2% (502/736) were females and 31.8% (234/736) were males, with the mean age ± SD of 43.6 ± 13.6 years, ranging from 15 to 87 years: 18.5% aged ≤ 30 years; 20.8%, 30–39 years; 24.9%, 40–49 years; 23.4%, 50–59 years; and 12.5%, ≥ 60 years. About 88.7% (653/736) belong to the major (Khalkh) and 11.3% (83/736) to the minor (non-Khalkh) ethnicity groups. The minor ethnicities were Bayad (44.6%, n = 37), Durvud (42.2%, n = 35), Khoton (7.2%, n = 6), Tuva (2.4%, n = 2), Darkhad (1.2%, n = 1), Khotgoid (1.2%, n = 1), and Myangad (1.2%, n = 1).

Demographic and disease backgrounds by geographical location

Table 1 shows the demographic and endoscopic diagnosis based on geographical locations. Age and gender were not different based on the location, but ethnic groups were different. Most patients (66.7%) belonged to the minor ethnic (Bayad, Durvud, and Khoton) groups in the western part (Uvs Province) (p < 0.0001), whereas almost all patients in other locations belonged to the major (Khalkh) group. Northern and western parts had a significantly higher incidence of reflux esophagitis (LA grades, A–D) and atrophic gastritis (open type) compared with other regions. The prevalence of gastric and duodenal ulcer did not differ by location (Table 1). Endoscopic and histological diagnosis was not significantly different by ethnic group.
Table 1

Demography and diseases according to geography

Parameters

Geographical location

Eastern

Southern

Central

Northern

Western

p value

(Khentii)

(Umnugovi)

Ulaanbaatar city

(Khuvsgul)

(Uvs)

Number of cases 

n = 115

n = 124

n = 206

n = 171

n = 120

 

Mean age with SD

47.4 ± 12.6

44.3 ± 13.8

41.5 ± 15.4

43.5 ± 12.7

42.6 ± 11.9

NS

Age range

17–87

15–79

17–79

19–75

16–74

NS

Gender

 Female

73%

71%

65.5%

65.5%

69.2%

NS

 Male

27%

29%

34.5%

34.5%

30.8%

NS

Ethnicity

 Major

97.8%

100%

N/Aa

98.4%

33.3%

0.0001

 Minor

2.2%

0%

1.6%

66.7%

Endoscopy diagnosis

 Gastric ulcer

3.5%

3%

2.4%

2.9%

2.5%

NS

 Duodenal ulcer

0%

0.8%

1.9%

1.8%

1.7%

NS

 Erosive GERD

5.2%

9.7%

5.3%

11.7%

14.2%

0.03

 Open type atrophy

1.3%

1.8%

1.4%

6.0%

13%

0.0001

Histology diagnosis

 Intestinal metaplasia

19.1%

21.8%

16%

23.4%

32.5%

0.01

a We could not obtain data

Helicobacter pylori infection rate by demography

Table 2 shows the different diagnostic tests for H. pylori infection based on age group, gender, and geographical locations of all dyspeptic patients. Based on our criteria (positive by culture or histology, or positive for both RUT and serology), the prevalence of current H. pylori infection was 80.0% (589/736), with 5.2% (38/736) being positive by serology only and therefore were regarded as the cases with past infection. The remaining 14.8% (109/736) were regarded as the uninfected group. Based on gender, the prevalence of current infection was not significantly different from 78.2% (183/234) in men and 80.9% (406/502) in women. The infection rate based on age group was 83.8% for patients < 30 years, 88.2% for 30–39 years, 81.4% for 40–49 years, 74.4% for 50–59 years, and 68.5% for ≥ 60 years. H. pylori infection peaked in patients aged 30–39 years, but was lower in older patients (p = 0.005).
Table 2

H. pylori infection by different tests and overall infection status

Parameters

H. pylori different tests

H. pylori diagnosis

p value

N

RUT (%)

Culture (%)

Histology (%)

IHC (%)

Serology (%)

Current (%)

Past (%)

Uninfected (%)

Overall

736

67.3

48.2

75.8

76.0

64.3

80.0

5.2

14.8

 

Age group

 < 30

136

73.5

55.1

79.4

79.4

69.9

83.8

3.7

12.5

0.005

 30–39

153

79.7

52.3

83.7

83.7

75.2

88.2

5.2

6.6

 40–49

183

62.8

43.2

76.0

76.5

59.0

81.4

4.9

13.7

 50–59

172

61.6

45.3

70.3

70.3

62.2

74.4

5.2

20.3

 < 60

92

56.5

46.7

67.4

67.4

52.2

68.5

7.6

23.9

Gender

 Female

502

67.9

51.0

77.1

77.1

66.9

80.9

5.0

14.1

NS

 Male

234

65.8

42.3

73.1

73.5

58.5

78.2

5.6

16.2

Place

 Umnugovi

124

68.5

63.7

83.9

83.9

70.2

87.1

1.6

11.3

0.03

 Khentii

115

68.7

80.0

80.9

80.9

72.2

87.0

4.3

8.7

 Khuvsgul

171

62.6

19.3

74.9

74.9

63.7

78.4

8.2

13.5

 Ulaanbaatar

206

67.0

63.6

71.8

72.3

58.7

74.8

5.3

19.9

 Uvs

120

71.7

16.7

70.8

70.8

60.8

77.5

5.0

17.5

RUT rapid urease test, IHC immunohistochemistry

The infection rate based on geographical locations was highest in Umnugovi (87.1%; 108/124), followed by Khentii (87%; 100/115), Khuvsgul (78.4%; 134/171), and Uvs (77.5%; 93/120) provinces and Ulaanbaatar city (74.8%; 154/206) (p = 0.03). The prevalence of H. pylori was not different based on ethnic groups: 80.1% (523/653) in the major and 79.5% (66/83) in the minor ethnic groups (p = 0.5).

Histological diagnosis based on H. pylori infection

Figure 1 shows the histological diagnosis based on the updated Sydney system by H. pylori infection. Acute (neutrophil) and chronic inflammation (monocyte) scores were significantly higher in patients with current H. pylori infection compared to those with past infection and those who were uninfected based on each biopsy site (the antrum, angulus, and corpus). Acute and chronic inflammation scores were also significantly higher in those with past infection than in the uninfected group in each biopsy site. The atrophy score was also significantly higher in patients with current infection status than those with negative and past infection status in the antrum and angulus. The corpus atrophy scores were higher in the past infection group than in the current and uninfected groups. Interestingly, IM scores in all sites were independent of H. pylori infection (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Updated Sydney system scores by H. pylori infection status and different gastric biopsy sites

Helicobacter pylori infection rate by endoscopy and histological diagnosis

Figure 2 shows the H. pylori infection rate according to endoscopic diagnoses. On esophageal endoscopy, 63.6% (42/66) of overall erosive esophagitis (LA grade, A–D) patients were infected with H. pylori; in the stomach, 90.5% (19/21) of gastric ulcer and 76.9% (20/26) of open type atrophy; and in the duodenum, 100% (10/10) of duodenal ulcer patients were infected with H. pylori.
Fig. 2

The prevalence of H. pylori infection by endoscopic diagnoses

Next, we summarized H. pylori infection status based on the overall histological diagnosis as “yes” or “no” status for the following groups: normal “yes” status, all scores in three sites were 0 (n = 57); gastritis “yes” status, neutrophil or monocyte scores were 1–3 in at least one site (n = 659); atrophy “yes” status, atrophy score was 1–3 in at least one site (n = 483); and IM “yes” status, IM score was 1–3 in at least one site (n = 160) (Table 3).
Table 3

H. pylori infection status according to histological diagnosis

Parameters

Case number

Current infection (%)

Past infection (%)

Uninfected (%)

p value

Histological diagnosis

 Normal

  No

679

85.6

4.4

10.0

0.0001

  Yes

57

14.0

14.0

72

 Gastritis

  No

77

11.7

11.7

76.6

0.0001

  Yes

659

88.0

4.4

7.6

 Atrophy

  No

253

63.2

8.3

28.5

0.0001

  Yes

483

88.8

3.5

7.7

 IM

  No

576

79.9

5.7

14.4

NS

  Yes

160

80.6

3.1

16.3

IM intestinal metaplasia

As expected, the prevalence of H. pylori infection was significantly lower in the normal group (p < 0.0001), but significantly higher in the gastritis (p < 0.0001) and atrophy (p < 0.0001) groups. Importantly, the presence of IM was independent of H. pylori infection.

Helicobacter pylori infection and other risk factors in high-risk diseases for GC

Since IM was diagnosed among uninfected groups with gastritis, environmental factors were investigated in detail. Figure 3 shows the prevalence of H. pylori infection and other environmental factors by geographical location. Kruskal–Wallis test showed excessive amount of salt usage and alcohol drinking status were significantly higher in western and northern parts of Mongolia (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

The prevalence of H. pylori infection and other environmental factors by geographical location

Next, we evaluated these factors according to the high-risk disease group (erosive GERD for cardia GC and atrophy and IM for non-cardia GC). Table 4 shows the univariate and multivariate analysis results.
Table 4

H. pylori infection and other risk factor status according to high-risk diseases for GC

Parameters

Erosive GERD

Atrophy

Intestinal metaplasia

p value

OR (95% CI)

p value

OR (95% CI)

p value

OR (95% CI)

Univariate

 H. pylori (yes)

0.0001

0.4 (0.2–0.6)

0.0001

4.6 (3.1–6.7)

0.6

0.9 (0.5–1.4)

 Age group (> 40)

0.002

2.3 (1.4–4.8)

0.9

1.0 (0.7–1.4)

0.0001

3.4 (2.2–5.2)

 Gender (male)

0.0001

3.5 (2.1–5.9)

0.4

0.8 (0.6–1.2)

0.04

1.5 (1.0–2.1)

 Salt (yes)

0.01

1.9 (1.1–3.3)

0.1

0.6 (0.4–0.8)

0.06

1.4 (1.0–2.0)

 Smoke (yes)

0.02

2.0 (1.1–3.6)

0.6

1.1 (0.7–1.6)

0.1

1.4 (0.9–2.2)

 Alcohol (yes)

0.5

1.2 (0.7–2.0)

0.6

1.0 (0.7–1.5)

0.1

1.3 (0.9–2.0)

Multivariate

 H. pylori (yes)

0.004

0.4 (0.2–0.7)

0.0001

5.1 (3.5–7.7)

 Age group (> 40)

0.002

2.9 (1.4–5.6)

0.0001

3.8 (2.4–5.9)

 Gender (male)

0.0001

3.3 (1.9–5.8)

 Salt (yes)

0.007

2.1 (1.2–3.7)

0.04

1.5 (1.0–2.2)

 Smoke (yes)

 Alcohol (yes)

OR (95% CI) odds ratio (95% confidence interval)

Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that H. pylori infection was associated with increased risk for corpus gastritis (odds ratio, 54.0 [95% confidence interval 25.8–113.2]); p < 0.0001). H. pylori infection was associated with increased risk for atrophy and decreased risk for erosive GERD. Our finding supports the consensus that H. pylori infection is a protective factor against GERD [21]. Age > 40 years, male gender, and excessive amount of salt intake increased the risk of erosive GERD, and age > 40 years (3.8 [2.4–5.9]; p < 0.0001) and excessive salt intake (1.5 [1.0–2.2]; p < 0.02) increased the risk of IM.

Discussion

Mongolia is known for the highest mortality from GC in the world [1] and upper digestive tracts diseases are common [2]. Therefore we characterized features of gastric precancerous diseases and ulcerative diseases as well as demonstrating its risk factors among the Mongolian population. Gastric atrophy and IM are considered as the precursor disease for non-cardia GC [21] while GERD is considered as precursor disease for cardia GC [22]. We found that all these precursor diseases were higher in western followed by northern, southern, central and eastern part of Mongolia whereas ulcerative diseases were not significantly different by geographical location.

H. pylori infection is the major etiological factor that causes atrophic gastritis and development of IM is considered the most important recognizable risk factors for GC [21]. We found that H. pylori infection was associated with precursor GC diseases and ulcerative diseases among Mongolian patients. Most patients with atrophy and IM were infected with H. pylori (Table 3). For PUD, it was similar with other studies that approximately 90% of duodenal ulcer and 80% of gastric ulcer were associated with H. pylori infection [23]. PUD and GC can lead to fatal conditions, such as severe massive hemorrhage, perforation, and peritonitis [24]. For precancerous disease, multivariate analysis showed that H. pylori infection was associated with gastritis and atrophy (Table 4). Permanent H. pylori infection can cause chronic active gastritis, resulting in loss of glands (atrophy) and then development of IM [25]. H. pylori infection causes nearly 90% of non-cardia GC, and the most GC incidences were high in East Asian countries [1]. In China, Japan, and Korea, prospective studies confirmed that H. pylori infection played a major role in the occurrence of gastric atrophy and IM, which are the precancerous conditions, especially for non-cardia GC [2628]. Indirect evidence from populations with a very low prevalence of H. pylori, such as the Malays of north eastern Peninsular Malaysia, is consistent with the idea that H. pylori decreased the risk of developing pre-neoplastic lesions and GC [29]. Since H. pylori infection is treatable, a 30–40% reduction in the incidence of GC was observed among treated subjects [30], and the cure of H. pylori infection reduced the precancerous disease progression to GC [31]. Therefore, H. pylori infection should be treated to reduce GC incidence among the Mongolian population. A previous study reported that H. pylori infection in adults mainly occurred before 15 years old [32]. Our study showed that the peak age of H. pylori infection was 30–39 years, while it was lower in older age (Table 2). Oral–oral and fecal–oral routes were considered as the crucial routes of H. pylori infection transmission [33]. Further risk factor studies are required to determine the transmission routes. The prevalence of H. pylori infection was generally high in Mongolia and did not differ by geographical location.

Interestingly, in spite of H. pylori infection, excessive amount of salt intake was dramatically higher in the northern and western parts of Mongolia, where precancerous diseases, such as erosive esophagitis (for cardia cancer), severe atrophy, and IM (for non-cardia cancer), were highly prevalent (Table 1). These results were consisted with the GC incidence (Fig. 3). H. pylori infection together with high salt intake has been reported to induce more gastric damage, such as atrophy and IM [34]. Furthermore, a prospective study confirmed that even salt alone could induce gastric atrophy and IM [35]. High salt intake causes damage to the gastric epithelium, followed by rapid restoration [36] and cell replication [37, 38]. Salting of foods increases the mutagenicity of nitrosated foods [39], and salt has been experimentally proven to increase the permeability of the experimental rat’s gastric mucosa to carcinogenic agents [40, 41]. H. pylori-related gastric atrophy is considered as the major precursor disease for IM [42]; however, IM may also develop because of other harmful environmental factors, because of its gastric tissue repairing process [43, 44]. Our study showed that excessive amount of salt intake and advanced age (> 40) increased the risk of IM (Table 4). Moreover, salt, advanced age, and male gender increased the risk of GERD. Some previous studies have found that increased salt consumption was associated with GERD, which was attributed to the delayed gastric emptying and increased pancreaticobiliary secretion after high salt intake [45, 46]. H. pylori infection, especially with a strain bearing CagA, is commonly considered a protective factor against GERD [47]. Our study results are consistent with the concept that H. pylori reduced the risk of erosive GERD. Excessive amount of salt intake seemed to play a major role for esophageal and gastric diseases, especially in western and northern parts of Mongolia. Further prospective studies are required to determine the pathogenesis of these diseases.

Conclusions

Based on our current result, we concluded that H. pylori infection is a major health problem for stomach diseases, such as PUD and atrophic gastritis among the Mongolian population. Nationwide screening and eradication of H. pylori infection are required. In addition, managing modifiable risk factors such as reducing excessive amount of salt intake and bad habits might help in decreasing erosive GERD and IM.

Notes

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

OK, GB and YY conceived and designed the study; OK, GB, TT, DD, AD, TM and YY contributed by collecting samples; GB, AD and TU performed the experiments; GB and YY contributed to analysis and interpretation; OK, GB and YY drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Adiyasuren Battulga, Namdag Bira, Tsogt-Ochir Byambajav, Otgondemberel Bolor and Batsuren Bilguudei for collecting samples.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data and material will be available upon requests to the corresponding author.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committees of Ministry of Health, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia and Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Japan. All participants signed written informed consent in this study.

Funding

This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan (26640114, 15H02657 and 16H05191) (Y.Y.), the Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology from the MEXT of Japan (Y.Y.), and National Institutes of Health Grants DK62813 (Y.Y.). GB and AD are doctoral students supported by the Japanese Government (Monbukagakusho: MEXT) Scholarship Program for 2014 and 2016.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
(2)
Department of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu, Japan
(3)
Department of Molecular Pathology, Oita University of Medicine, Yufu, Japan
(4)
Department of Gastroenterology, Tama-Nagayama University Hospital, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
(5)
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine and Michael De Bakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, USA

References

  1. http://globocan.iarc.fr/. Accessed 17 Apr 2015.
  2. Ch.Bat-Erdene. Mongolian Health Indicators 2012. Center for Health Development, 2013.Google Scholar
  3. Bertleff MJ, Lange JF. Perforated peptic ulcer disease: a review of history and treatment. Dig Surg. 2010;27(3):161–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Thorsen K, Glomsaker TB, von Meer A, Søreide K, Søreide JA. Trends in diagnosis and surgical management of patients with perforated peptic ulcer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(8):1329–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Wroblewski LE, Peek RM, Wilson KT. Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer: factors that modulate disease risk. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23(4):713–39.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Humans IWGotEoCRt. Pharmaceuticals. Volume 100 A. A review of human carcinogens. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. vol. 100, no. PT A, p. 1; 2012.Google Scholar
  7. Maeda S, Mentis AF. Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter. 2007;12(s1):10–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mbulaiteye SM, Hisada M, El-Omar EM. Helicobacter pylori associated global gastric cancer burden. Front Biosci. 2009;14:1490.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’Morain CA, Gisbert JP, Kuipers EJ, Axon AT, et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection—the Maastricht V/Florence consensus report. Gut. 2017;66(1):6–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hooi JKY, Lai WY, Ng WK, Suen MMY, Underwood FE, Tanyingoh D, et al. Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2017;153(2):420–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hunt R, Xiao S, Megraud F, Leon-Barua R, Bazzoli F, Van der Merwe S, et al. Helicobacter pylori in developing countries. World gastroenterology organisation global guideline. J Gastrointest Liver Dis. 2011;20(3):299–304.Google Scholar
  12. Walsh JH, Peterson WL. The treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in the management of peptic ulcer disease. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(15):984–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheng H, Hu F, Zhang L, Yang G, Ma J, Hu J, et al. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and identification of risk factors in rural and urban Beijing, China. Helicobacter. 2009;14(2):128–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bui D, Brown HE, Harris RB, Oren E. Serologic evidence for fecal–oral transmission of Helicobacter pylori. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;94(1):82–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Parsonnet J, Shmuely H, Haggerty T. Fecal and oral shedding of Helicobacter pylori from healthy infected adults. JAMA. 1999;282(23):2240–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Enkhtungalag B, Batjargal J, Chimedsuren O, Tsogzolmaa B, Anderson CS, Webster J. Developing a national salt reduction strategy for Mongolia. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2015;5(3):229.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, Blum AL, Armstrong D, Galmiche JP, et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut. 1999;45(2):172–80 (PubMed PMID: 10403727).View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Kimura K, Takemoto T. An endoscopic recognition of the atrophic border and its significance in chronic gastritis. Endoscopy. 1969;1(03):87–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Dixon MF, Genta RM, Yardley JH, Correa P. Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. International Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994. Am J Surg Pathol. 1996;20(10):1161–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Uchida T, Kanada R, Tsukamoto Y, Hijiya N, Matsuura K, Yano S, et al. Immunohistochemical diagnosis of the cagA-gene genotype of Helicobacter pylori with anti-East Asian CagA-specific antibody. Cancer Sci. 2007;98(4):521–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Correa P. Human gastric carcinogenesis: a multistep and multifactorial process—first American Cancer Society award lecture on cancer epidemiology and prevention. Cancer Res. 1992;52(24):6735–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhao D, Chen W, Yu T, He Y, Chen Z, Wen D, et al. A population-based matched case-control study on the risk factors of gastric cardia cancer. Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chin J Oncol]. 2011;33(10):775–8.Google Scholar
  23. Dixon MF IV. Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulceration: histopathological aspects. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1991;6(2):125–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Penston J. A decade of experience with long-term continuous treatment of peptic ulcers with H2-receptor antagonists. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1993;7(s2):27–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Correa P. Helicobacter pylori and gastric carcinogenesis. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995;19(Suppl 1):S37–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Choi IJ. Endoscopic gastric cancer screening and surveillance in high-risk groups. Clin Endosc. 2014;47(6):497–503.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Uemura N, Okamoto S, Yamamoto S, Matsumura N, Yamaguchi S, Yamakido M, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(11):784–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhou Y, Li HY, Zhang JJ, Chen XY, Ge ZZ, Li XB. Operative link on gastritis assessment stage is an appropriate predictor of early gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(13):3670–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee YY, Mahendra Raj S, Graham DY. Helicobacter pylori infection—a boon or a bane: lessons from studies in a low-prevalence population. Helicobacter. 2013;18(5):338–46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Herrero R, Park JY, Forman D. The fight against gastric cancer—the IARC Working Group report. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;28(6):1107–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Mera R, Fontham ET, Bravo LE, Bravo JC, Piazuelo MB, Camargo MC, et al. Long term follow up of patients treated for Helicobacter pylori infection. Gut. 2005;54(11):1536–40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Kosunen T, Aromaa A, Knekt P, Salomaa A, Rautelin H, Lohi P, et al. Helicobacter antibodies in 1973 and 1994 in the adult population of Vammala, Finland. Epidemiol Infect. 1997;119(1):29–34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Brown LM. Helicobacter pylori: epidemiology and routes of transmission. Epidemiol Rev. 2000;22(2):283–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Song JH, Kim YS, Heo NJ, Lim JH, Yang SY, Chung GE, et al. High salt intake is associated with atrophic gastritis with intestinal metaplasia. Cancer Epidemiol Prev Biomark. 2017;26(7):1133–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Bergin IL, Sheppard BJ, Fox JG. Helicobacter pylori infection and high dietary salt independently induce atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia in commercially available outbred Mongolian gerbils. Dig Dis Sci. 2003;48(3):475–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sørbye H, Svanes C, Stangeland L, Kvinnsland S, Svanes K. Epithelial restitution and cellular proliferation after gastric mucosal damage caused by hypertonic NaCl in rats. Virchows Arch A. 1988;413(5):445–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Furihata C, Sato Y, Hosaka M, Matsushima T, Furukawa F, Takahashi M. NaCl induced ornithine decarboxylase and DNA synthesis in rat stomach mucosa. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1984;121(3):1027–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ohgaki H, Szentirmay Z, Take M, Sugimura T. Effects of 4-week treatment with gastric carcinogens and enhancing agents on proliferation of gastric mucosa cells in rats. Cancer Lett. 1989;46(2):117–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rojas-Campos N, Sigarán MF, Bravo AV, Jimenez-Ulate F, Correa P. Salt enhances the mutagenicity of nitrosated black beans. Nutr Cancer. 1990;14(1):1–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Sørbye H, Kvinnsland S, Svanes K. Effect of salt-induced mucosal damage and healing on penetration of N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine to proliferative cells in the gastric mucosa of rats. Carcinogenesis. 1994;15(4):673–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Tsukamoto T, Toyoda T, Mizoshita T, Tatematsu M, editors. Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric carcinogenesis in rodent models. In: Seminars in immunopathology; 2013. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  42. Correa P, Piazuelo MB, Wilson KT. Pathology of gastric intestinal metaplasia: clinical implications. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(3):493.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Nandurkar S, Talley NJ, Martin CJ, Ng TH, Adams S. Short segment Barrett’s oesophagus: prevalence, diagnosis and associations. Gut. 1997;40(6):710–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Tang S, Wu R, Bhaijee F. Intestinal metaplasia of the stomach. Video J Encyclopedia GI Endosc. 2013;1(1):187–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Nilsson M, Johnsen R, Ye W, Hveem K, Lagergren J. Lifestyle related risk factors in the aetiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Gut. 2004;53(12):1730–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Wu P, Zhao X-H, Ai Z-S, Sun H-H, Chen Y, Jiang Y-X, et al. Dietary intake and risk for reflux esophagitis: a case-control study. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013;2013(1):9.Google Scholar
  47. Backert S, Blaser MJ. The role of CagA in the gastric biology of Helicobacter pylori. Cancer Res. 2016;76(14):4028–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement