Skip to main content

Genetic relatedness of the Enterococcus faecalis isolates in stool and urine samples of patients with community-acquired urinary tract infection

Abstract

Background

Community-acquired urinary tract infection (CA-UTI) could be caused by endogenous or exogenous routes. To show this relationship, we investigated molecular fingerprints and genotypes of paired Enterococcus faecalis isolated from the urine of symptomatic patients and their fecal samples.

Results

Out of the studied patients, 63 pairs of E. faecalis isolates were obtained simultaneously from their urine and feces samples. All the strains were sensitive to vancomycin, linezolid, nitrofurantoin, and daptomycin (MIC value: ≤ 4 µg/ml), while resistance to tetracycline (urine: 88.9%; stool: 76.2%) and minocycline (urine: 87.3%, stool: 71.4%) was detected in most of them. The most common detected virulence genes were included efbA, ace, and gelE. RAPD-PCR and PFGE analyses showed the same patterns of molecular fingerprints between paired of the isolates in 26.9% and 15.8% of the patients, respectively.

Conclusions

Similarity of E. faecalis strains between the urine and feces samples confirmed the occurrence of endogenous infection via contamination with colonized bacteria in the intestinal tract. Carriage of a complete virulence genotype in the responsible strains was statistically in correlation with endogenous UTI, which shows their possible involvement in pathogenicity of uropathogenic E. faecalis strains.

Background

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most common bacterial infections both in the community and hospital settings at all age groups. Although uropathogenic Escherichia coli is the most common cause of community-acquired urinary tract infections in humans [1], Enterococcus species, especially Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis), are considered as the second most important cause of UTI among uropathogenic bacteria [2, 3]. E. faecalis can also cause surgical wound infection, bacteremia, endocarditis, neonatal sepsis, and meningitis [4]. E. faecalis is predominantly inhabitant of the human gastrointestinal tract, where they form part of the normal intestinal flora in approximate amounts of 108 colonies per gram of feces [5]. This rate of colonization could predispose our urinary tract to recurrent infections via the perineal urethral route. This type of infection, which is known as community-acquired urinary tract infection (CA-UTI), is generally attributed to women. This infection may be host-specific, due to the existence of receptors for bacterial adhesins, or mediated by potent virulence factors that are necessary for their pathogenesis in the urinary tract [6].

Management of CA-UTI involves the administration of antibiotics based on susceptibility patterns of responsible bacteria in each region. Prompt elimination of the infection is needed to avoid severe complications in infected patients [6].

Some virulence factors have been proposed for E. faecalis to describe its involvement in UTI; however, the pathogenesis of this bacterium and its link with symptoms and complications of the infection is unclear yet. These virulence determinants, such as aggregation substance (asa1), gelatinase (gelE), cytolysin (cylA), enterococcal surface protein (esp), collagen-binding-protein (ace) and PavA-like fibronectin-binding protein (efbA), could facilitate initial colonization, biofilm formation, destruction of the host tissue, and evasion from host immune response. While in the hospitals, factors, such as the use of indwelling medical devices, can facilitate colonization of the urinary tract [6]; however, few data exist about mechanisms that are employed by this bacterium for its colonization in non-hospital settings. Diversity in colonization rate among different strains of this bacterium in different tissues and their pathogenicity could explain the degree of complications that are occurring in the infected patients. While Enterococcal surface protein (Esp), adhesion to collagen of E. faecalis (ACE), aggregation substance (AS), PavA-like fibronectin-binding protein (EfbA), cytolysin (CYL), and gelatinase (GelE) are proposed as main virulence factors of E. faecalis, no virulence genotype has been suggested for discrimination of the pathogenic from non-pathogenic strains [7,8,9]. Comparison of phenetic, genomic, and virulence characteristics of the strains causing UTI with those unable to cause this infection could provide more data about this link. This study was aimed to investigate the diversity of virulence determinants, antibiotic resistance profiles, and the genomic relationship of E. faecalis strains in urine samples of symptomatic patients with community-acquired UTI compared with those isolated from their stool samples.

Results

Patients and clinical isolates of E. faecalis

A total of 126 E. faecalis isolates were obtained from 63 patients with CA-UTI. Of these, 63 were derived from urine and 63 were from fecal specimens, simultaneously.). The isolates showed positive results for esculin hydrolysis, 6.5% NaCl, non-fermentation of arabinose, and catalase tests and their identity were confirmed by species specific PCR assay. The mean age for the studied patients was 43 years, which ranged between 6 and 87 years old. The percentage of E. faecalis UTI in 63 patients varies across age group, 52.4% female and 47.6% men. Most of the E. faecalis isolates were obtained from patients aged between 30 and 60 years old (39/63, 62%).

Antimicrobial resistance patterns among E. faecalis strains

Susceptibility of E. faecalis strains to various antibiotics is shown in Table 1. In general, highest resistance rates were orderly observed against tetracycline (urine: 88.9%, 56/63; stool: 76.2%, 48/63) and minocycline (urine: 87.3%, 55/63; stool: 71.4%, 45/63). No resistance was detected to vancomycin, ampicillin, penicillin, nitrofurantoin, and linezolid in the urine and feces isolates. All the studied strains were susceptible to daptomycin (MIC value: ≤ 4 µg/ml). Except for minocycline, no significant difference was detected between the resistance rates in the strains collected from the urine and stool samples. Comparison of pairs of the isolates from urine and feces specimens showed same resistance patterns among 39 patients (61.9%); however, 17 (26.9%) and 8 (12.6%) pairs of them showed the difference in resistance phenotype to one and greater classes of antimicrobials, respectively (Table 2). A multi-drug resistance (MDR) phenotype was detected in two pairs of isolates. This phenotype was more common in urine samples of the patients with CA-UTIs originating from unrelated strains to the intestinal tract (11.1%, 5/63). All the MDR strains showed tetracyclines/gentamicin (120 µg)/ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin/gatifloxacin resistance patterns.

Table 1 Resistance rates to antimicrobials in E. faecalis isolates from urine and fecal specimens in patients with community acquired-UTIs
Table 2 Antibiotic resistance patterns in E. faecalis isolates form urine and fecal specimens inpatients with community acquired-UTIs

Prevalence of virulence determinants in urine and fecal specimens

Analysis of putative virulence determinants among pairs of E. faecalis strains showed no significant difference between the fecal and urine isolates in the studied patients The most common detected virulence genes were included efbA (100% urine; 96% stool), ace (92.1% urine; 96.8% stool), and gelE (90.5% urine; 95.2% stool), followed by asa (79.4% urine; 65.1% stool), esp (77.8% urine; 74.6% stool) and cyl (54% urine; 46% stool). The same genotypes were detected among 53 (84.1%) pairs of the isolates, which esp/efbA/asa1/ace/cyl/gelE was the commonest genotype among them (Table 3).

Table 3 Prevalence of combined virulence determinants among E. faecalis isolates in urine and feces specimens of patients with community acquired-UTIs

Association of antibiotic resistance patterns and virulence determinants among E. feacalis isolates

A comparison of the results of the urine and feces isolates of each patient indicated that 17 out of 21 pairs of the strains with the same resistance phenotypes also presented same virulence genotypes. Consistency of the resistance phenotypes and virulence genotypes was associated with the strains that depicted T/MN/CIP/GEN(120 µg)/LEV/GAT (100%, 2/2), T/MN/GEN(120 µg)(42.8%, 3/7), T/MN/CIP (100%, 1/1), and TET/MN (60%, 15/25) resistance patterns.

DNA fingerprinting analysis techniques

RAPD-PCR

RAPD-PCR was performed for the 126 isolates (63 urine and 63 feces). A comparison of RAPD-PCR electrophoretic patterns indicated 17 pairs of the strains (26.9%) with similar genotypic patterns. Out of them, 11 pairs of the strains (64.7%) showed complete genotype (esp+/efbA+/asa1+/ace+/cyl+/gelE+) and 6 pairs (35.2%) showed partial genotypes (Table 4). All UTIs that were caused by E. faecalis strains with identical RAPD, drug resistance, and virulence genotype patterns compared with those isolated from the fecal samples in the same patients were defined as endogenous infection. Conversely, the exogenous infection was detected in 46 (73%) samples. Genotypic patterns of these strains are shown in Table 4. There was a significant correlation between the complete genotype and the determined endogenous infection based on the RAPD patterns (p-value = 0.02).

Table 4 Association of genotypic patterns with endogenous and exogenous infections in E. faecalis strains using RAPD-PCR assay

PFGE

According to the results of RAPD-PCR, pairs of the isolates (34 pairs with similar RAPD types and 24 pairs with different RAPD types) were selected for PFGE analysis. Considering a cut off value of 87%, eleven strains (18.9%) showed common pulsotypes (CT) and 32 strains (55%) were singletons (ST). Amongst the CT, 10 pairs of the strains from the urine and fecal samples showed similar pulsotypes (Fig. 1). The characterized pulsotypes in patients with endogenous infections and their link with antibiotic resistance patterns and virulence determinants are shown in Fig. 1 and Table 5. Comparison of E. faecalis isolates in urine and stool samples of patients with exogenous UTI based on antibiotic resistance patterns and virulence determinants are shown in Table 6.

Fig. 1
figure1

Pulse field gel electrophoresis of E. faecalis strains in patients with CA-UTI. First column: Patients’ code plussource of each isolate, F: Feces, U: urine; Second column: F, Female; M, Male; Third column, antibiotic resistance phenotype: TET, tetracycline; MIN, minocycline; GM120, gentamicin 120 µg; CP, ciprofloxacin; LEV, levofloxacin; GAT, gatifloxacin; Fourth column, virulence factors: esp, Enterococcal surface protein; asa1, Aggregation substance; ace, Adhesion of collagen of enterococci; cyl, Cytolysin; gelE, Gelatinase; efbA, Pav A-like fibronectin-binding protein. The PFGE patterns were determined using the Dice coefficient in GelCompar II version 2.0 (Applied Maths, Belgium). Isolates that differed by ≤ 3 bands were assigned to same pulse type (PT), while isolates that differed by ≥ 4 bands assigned to different types

Table 5 Comparison of E. faecalis isolates in urine and stool samples of patients with endogenous UTI based on antibiotic resistance patterns, virulence determinants, and Pulse types
Table 6 Comparison of E. faecalis isolates in urine and stool samples of patients with exogenous UTI based on antibiotic resistance patterns and virulence determinants

Discussion

Although the improvement of the sanitary and hygiene conditions limited the occurrence of some infections in the community, UTIs have remained common yet. E. faecalis isolates have been recognized as the second uropathogen in some countries [2, 3]. CA-UTI is a public health threat [6]; it can be mainly caused by E. coli and Klebsiella spp.; however, other bacteria, such as Enterococcus, Proteus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus spp. can cause the infection similarly [10]. Most of these bacteria are members of the fecal microbiota and can cause the infection through an endogenous route [6, 11]. E. faecalis isolates have been recognized as the second uropathogen in some countries [2, 3].

In our study, we found a high prevalence of resistance to tetracycline and minocycline among E. faecalis strains in the urine and fecal specimens of symptomatic patients. This frequency was in agreement with the reports published by Maraki et al. and Ma et al. in Greece and China; [12, 13], but higher than the results obtained by other researchers from India, and Brazil [10, 14]. Arbitrary usage of antibiotics for the treatment of infections or agriculture could explain a higher rate of resistance to this antibiotic compared with other antimicrobials. In our study, the observed rates of resistance to tetracycline and minocycline in the fecal isolates were higher than those reported in the studies conducted by other researchers in healthy peoples [15,16,17]. This higher frequency of resistance among the fecal isolates could be caused by the possible transmission of Enterococci from animal reservoirs through the food chain. Link of Enterococci of animal origins with the strains colonizing the human intestine was described in several studies [18]. Since tetracycline might co-select vancomycin-resistant strains, special consideration should be done for enrichment or spread of these strains in humans. The frequency of resistance to gentamicin (120 µg), ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and gatifloxacin in urine specimens was 28.6%, 20.6%, 14.3% and 12.7%, which was relatively similar to those detected in fecal specimens (15.8%, 12.6%, and 6.3%, respectively). This rate is consistent with the report published by Sallem et al. in Tunisia, but lower than those reported by Tantry et al., Ma et al. and Linhares in India, China, and Portugal [2, 11, 12], and higher than the studies conducted by Novais et al. and Del Campo et al. in Portugal and Spain [15,16,17]. Penicillin G, ampicillin, vancomycin, nitrofurantoin, linezolid, and daptomycin were active against all the isolates from both types of the samples.

Due to the increase in MDR E. faecalis isolates, which has caused serious health concerns in HA-UTIs, there is little research on the phenotype of MDR these strains in CA-UTIs23. In our study, the low frequency of the MDR phenotype was detected in the strains isolated from urine and feces specimens (7.9% and 3.1%, respectively). This result was comparable to the 10% MDR rate reported in our previous study from CA-UTIs in Iran [19] but lower than those reported from patients with HA-UTIs [20] in urine specimens and CA-UTIs [21]. Also, this result was comparable to the 8.8% MDR rate reported by Hasannejad Bibalan and et al. in Iran [22] and lower than those reported from fecal healthy volunteers in Spain [15].

Several virulence determinants have been detected and examined among E. faecalis from different origins, such as clinical, food, and animal sources. However, there is little information about the relationship between their presence among different isolates and their capacity for tissue-specific pathogenicity [23]. Cross-contamination, through persistent colonization of the gastrointestinal tract as the main source of Enterococci, is considered as a source infection by E. faecalis in patients with CA-UTI [6]. Despite this possible involvement, there are no data about virulence entity of these strains to explain their capability for colonization and pathogenesis in the urinary tract, a phenomenon that was established for uropathogenic E. coli [6, 24].

In this study, efbA, ace, and gelE genes were the most prevalent virulence determinants in both types of samples. Our results were comparable to the results of Sharifi et al., Samadi Kafil et al., and Cosentino et al. among the isolates from patients with hospital-acquired UTIs High incidence of efbA in our isolates proposed this gene is important for virulence in UTIs [25,26,27]. EfbA, a PavA-like fibronectin-binding protein, plays an important role in adherence to extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins and is required for optimal virulence in an experimental model of ascending UTI [8]. Similarly, it seems that Ace protein (Adhesion to collagen of E. faecalis) bind to extracellular matrix proteins of the urinary tract, and plays an important role in early-stage colonization and pathogenesis of UTI [28], while gelatinase (gelE), is a secreted protease, that is involved in the dissemination of bacterium by the degradation of polymerized fibrin [29]. The frequency of ace and gelE genes in fecal specimens was higher than those reported from healthy volunteers in Tunisia [17]. In our study, the frequency of esp, asa, and cyl genes were 77.8%, 79.4%, and 54% in urine and 74.6%, 65%, and 46% in fecal specimens, respectively. Our result was similar previous reports published by other studies in HA-UTIs [26, 30,31,32] and in opposing with some other reports [25, 27]. In the case of esp, its frequency among our isolates was higher than those reported in Tunisia among E. faecalis isolates from healthy volunteers (25.4%) [17].

There is little information about multiple virulence determinants among E. faecalis isolates associated with CA-UTIs. E. faecalis, likely through multiple virulence factors that may involve in its colonization, survival, and pathogenicity, promote disease in the urinary tract. Heidari et al. investigated the incidence of genetic virulence markers among clinical E. faecalis and found that occurrence of multiple virulence factors was common in the urinary tract isolates, while most of the strains carried predominantly four, five and seven virulence determinants in HA-UTIs [33]. Aberna and Prabakaran investigated the presence of genetic virulence markers in E. faecalis and found that the occurrence of multiple virulence factors was common in the urinary tract isolates, while most of the strains carried predominantly two and three virulence determinants in HA-UTIs [24]. Shahraki and Rabi Nezhad Mousavi investigated the presence of seven virulence determinants in clinical multi-drug resistance Enterococci from patients with HA-UTI and found that most of the strains carried two virulence determinants in the urinary tract [34]. In the current study, 39.6% of the strains in urine specimens contained all the virulence determinants, while 28.5% and 25.3% carried five and four virulence determinants that were different from the aforementioned results. This discrepancy could be due to the difference in sample types and geographic locations; however, providing more accurate conclusions is not possible, since there is little information about community-acquired UTI through Enterococci and its association with related virulence determinants. Khalid investigated the occurrence of five virulence-associate genes in E. faecalis isolates associated with CA-UTIs and found that 28% of the strains contained all the virulence determinants, while 36% and 32% harbored four and five genetic markers of virulence [21]. In our previous study investigated the concomitant distribution of virulence genes among E. faecalis isolates and found that 28.5% of strains contain all virulence determinants, 28.5% and 30%, five, and four virulence determinants [19]. These results were in agreement with the current study results. In the current study, 36.5% of the strains in fecal specimens carried all the virulence determinants, while 19% and 31.7% contained five and four virulence determinants. Therefore the simultaneous presence of several virulence determinants in fecal specimens can enhance persistence and adhesion in the urinary tract. To have a better understanding about the link between carriage of the virulence determinants and resistance phenotypes, further study should be done at the expression level.

Results of RAPD-PCR showed that 26.9% of the isolates had similar molecular patterns in urine and fecal specimens in each patient, which was considered as endogenous strains. PFGE results also showed that 15.8% of the pair of isolates had similar pulsotypes in each patient. The importance of a complete virulence genotype in the occurrence of endogenous CA-UTIs was shown in our study. Accordingly, 64–70% of the isolates from patients with endogenous UTI showed complete genotype. These results showed that PFGE is a more reliable method and has better reproducibility than RAPD-PCR. Braak et al. examined two techniques of PFGE and RAPD-PCR on vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) strains and similarly concluded that PFGE is a more reliable typing method [35]. The lower discriminatory power of RAPD-PCR compared with PFGE was reported by Barbier et al. for the study of VRE strains in hospitalized patients [36].

Conclusions

In conclusion, our results provide the first report of molecular investigation for the detection of the endogenous source of CA-UTIs. Association between uropathogenic E. faecalis strains with the intestinal counterparts was shown based on their virulence and genomic background, which indicated that some intestinal strains could lead to CA-UTI due to the presence of some particular virulence determinants. Further studies are needed to determine genetic events that are involved in the acquisition or loss of these virulence genes. Susceptibility of these strains to most of the antimicrobials proposed administration of a different therapeutic strategy against the infection in these patients compared with those suffering from hospital-acquired UTIs in the clinical settings. Further studies on the urinary tract and gastrointestinal tract cell lines for investigation of the adherence capacity of the E. faecalis isolates will help us to better understand the contribution of these virulence factors in their colonization and pathogenesis.

Methods

Patients and bacterial strains

Through a clean catch method, 126 pairs of urine and stool specimens were collected from consecutive outpatients who attended to Milad hospital during August 2014 and March 2015 in Tehran, Iran. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. All patients provided written informed consent, similar to the Declaration of Helsinki before entry into the study. Samples of patients with a history of a recent hospitalization or antibiotic usage were excluded from the study. The freshly prepared urine specimens were inoculated on Sheep Blood agar using a calibrated loop and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Colony-forming units per milliliter ≥ 105 was considered as bacteriuria. Fecal specimens were cultured on Enterococosel agar (BBL, USA) plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The presumed E. faecalis isolates in both samples were identified by the bacteriological conventional methods, including catalase, bile esculin test, fermentation of arabinose (1%), and growth in 6.5% NaCl solution [37]. PCR was performed with species-specific primers (see “Molecular examinations” section) to confirm the results of the biochemical tests. All the strains were stored at − 70 °C in Tryptic Soy Broth medium supplemented with 20% glycerol. E. faecalis ATCC 29212 was used as the control strain for both biochemical and molecular identification methods. To prevent the effect of mixed type infection, subcultures of a single colony from each sample was used for all the experiments.

Molecular examinations

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antibiotic resistance phenotypes of the strains to 11 antibiotics were determined by disk diffusion (Kirby–Bauer) method according to the standard recommendation of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute criteria [38]. Resistance to daptomycin was also tested using the E-test strip (Liofilchem®, Italy). E. faecalis ATCC 29212 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25,923 were used as quality control strains. The antibiotic panels used were as follows: penicillin G (10 units), ampicillin (10 µg), vancomycin (30 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), minocycline (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg), gatifloxacin (5 µg), nitrofurantoin (300 µg), gentamicin (120 µg) and linezolid (30 µg) (Mast Group Ltd., United Kingdom).

DNA extraction

High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit (Roche, Germany) was used to extract genomic DNA from all Enterococci isolates with some modifications. Suspected colonies of Enterococci were subcultured onto the Blood agar medium. The grown colonies were mixed in 200 µl phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH, 8) and the pellets were resuspended in 200 µl PBS containing 5 µg lysozyme solutions and incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. The lysates were incubated with proteinase K (40 µl), and the obtained DNA samples were preserved at − 20 °C for polymerase chain reactions (PCR).

Molecular characterization and virulence genotype determination of E. faecalis strains

Molecular characterization of E. faecalis was done by species-specific primers for ddlE.faecalis gene (Table 7). The amplification was performed in a 25 μl reaction mixture containing 12.5 μl master Mix (Amplicon, Denmark), 10.5 μl distilled water, 0.5 μl of each of the primers (F and R), and 1 μl of template DNA. Specific primers were used to amplify sequences of esp, efbA, asa, ace, cyl, and gelE genes, as main virulence factors. PCR was performed in a thermal cycler (Eppendorf, Germany) at following conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles consisting of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, annealing ranging from 45 to 60 °C (Table 7) for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were visualized using a UV transilluminator after electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel and staining with the red safe solution (Bioneer, South Korea). To confirm the correct amplification of the target genes, direct sequencing of one amplified product for each gene was carried out using ABI 3730X capillary sequencer (Pishgam, Macrogen, Seoul, Korea).

Table 7 Oligonucleotide primers and conditions used to amplify different virulence marker genes in E. faecalis strains by PCR

Characterization of E. faecalis strains using DNA fingerprinting analysis techniques

Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA polymerase chain reaction (RAPD-PCR)

RAPD-PCR was performed using random primer 1283 (5′-GCGATCCCCA-3′) to screen genetic diversity among the E. faecalis strains. The amplification was performed in a 25 μl reaction mixture containing 12.5 μl master mix (Amplicon, Denmark), 8.5 μl of distilled water, 2 μM of primer, and 2 μl of template DNA. PCR was performed in a thermal cycler (Eppendorf, Germany) for cycles as follows: initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 4 min followed by 4 cycles consisting of denaturation (94 °C for 4 min), annealing (36 °C for 4 min), and extension (72 °C for 4 min), followed by a new cycle include denaturation (94 °C for 30 s), annealing (36 °C for 1 min), and extension (72 °C for 2 min) for 40 cycles and a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min. Gel electrophoresis was used to interpret the results as described by [39]. The similarity of all banding profiles was analyzed by the GelCompar II software. E. faecalis ATCC 29212 was used as the control strain in this assay.

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)

Genomic DNA was prepared in agarose plugs as described by Turabelidze et al. with some modifications [40]. In brief, after cell lysis by lysozyme and then incubation with proteinase K, DNA was digested with Sma I. The PFGE procedure was carried out using a contour-clamped homogeneous electric field apparatus (CHEF DRII, Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA). Digested genomic DNA of Salmonella enterica serotype Braenderup (H9812) was used as a size marker. The PFGE patterns were determined using the Dice coefficient in GelCompar II version 2.0 (Applied Maths, Belgium). Accordingly, isolates that differed by ≤ 3 bands were assigned to the same pulse-type (PT), while isolates that differed by ≥ 4 bands were assigned to different types [39].

Statistical analysis

SPSS software version 17.0 (IBM SPSS Statistic) was used for statistical analysis.

Availability of data and materials

Data supporting the findings of this study of infectious diseases and the Center for Tropical Medical Research are available. However, there are restrictions on the availability of this data and are therefore not available to the public. However, the data are available at the request of the authors with a reasonable request and with permission from the infectious diseases and tropical medicine research center.

Abbreviations

CA-UTI:

Community acquired-urinary tract infection

HA-UTI:

Hospital acquired-urinary tract infection

ECM:

Extracellular matrix

esp :

Enterococcal surface protein

asa1 :

Aggregation substance

ace :

Adhesion of collagen of enterococci

cyl :

Cytolysin

gelE :

Gelatinase

efbA :

Pav A-like fibronectin-binding protein

RAPD-PCR:

Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA polymerase chain reaction

PFGE:

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis

References

  1. 1.

    Foxman B. The epidemiology of urinary tract infection. Nat Rev Urol. 2010;7(12):653–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tantry BA, Rahiman S. Antibacterial resistance and trend of urinary tract pathogens to commonly used antibiotics in Kashmir Valley. West Indian Med J. 2012;61(7):703–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lee SJ, Lee DS, Choe HS, Shim BS, Kim CS, Kim ME, Cho YH. Antimicrobial resistance in community-acquired urinary tract infections: results from the Korean Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System. J Infect Chemother. 2011;17(3):440–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sood S, Malhotra M, Das BK, Kapil A. Enterococcal infections & antimicrobial resistance. Indian J Med Res. 2008;128(2):111–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lebreton F, Willems RJL, Gilmore MS. In: Gilmore MS, Clewell DB, Ike Y, Shankar N, editors. Enterococci: from commensals to leading causes of drug resistant infection. Boston: Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary; 2014.

  6. 6.

    Flores-Mireles AL, Walker JN, Caparon M, Hultgren SJ. Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13(5):269–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Yang JX, Li T, Ning YZ, Shao DH, Liu J, Wang SQ, Liang GW. Molecular characterization of resistance, virulence and clonality in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcusfaecalis: a hospital-based study in Beijing, China. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;33:253–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Torelli R, Serror P, Bugli F, Paroni Sterbini F, Florio AR, Stringaro A, Colone M, De Carolis E, Martini C, Giard JC, et al. The PavA-like fibronectin-binding protein of Enterococcus faecalis, EfbA, is important for virulence in a mouse model of ascending urinary tract infection. J Infect Dis. 2012;206(6):952–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gulhan T, Boynukara B, Ciftci A, Sogut MU, Findik A. Characterization of Enterococcus faecalis isolates originating from different sources for their virulence factors and genes, antibiotic resistance patterns, genotypes and biofilm production. Iranian J Vet Res. 2015;16(3):261–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kiffer CR, Mendes C, Oplustil CP, Sampaio JL. Antibiotic resistance and trend of urinary pathogens in general outpatients from a major urban city. Int Braz J Urol. 2007;33(1):42–8 (discussion 49).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Linhares I, Raposo T, Rodrigues A, Almeida A. Frequency and antimicrobial resistance patterns of bacteria implicated in community urinary tract infections: a ten-year surveillance study (2000–2009). BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:19.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ma KL, Wang CX. Analysis of the spectrum and antibiotic resistance of uropathogens in vitro: results based on a retrospective study from a tertiary hospital. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41(7):601–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Maraki S, Mantadakis E, Michailidis L, Samonis G. Changing antibiotic susceptibilities of community acquired uropathogens in Greece, 2005–2010. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2013;46:202–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Singhal A, Sharma R, Jain M, Vyas L. Hospital and community isolates of uropathogens and their antibiotic sensitivity pattern from a Tertiary Care Hospital in North West India. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4(1):51–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    del Campo R, Ruiz-Garbajosa P, Sanchez-Moreno MP, Baquero F, Torres C, Canton R, Coque TM. Antimicrobial resistance in recent fecal enterococci from healthy volunteers and food handlers in Spain: genes and phenotypes. Microb Drug Resist. 2003;9(1):47–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Novais C, Coque TM, Sousa JC, Peixe LV. Antimicrobial resistance among faecal enterococci from healthy individuals in Portugal. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006;12(11):1131–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sallem RB, Klibi N, Klibi A, Said LB, Dziri R, Boudabous A, Torres C, Slama KB. Antibiotic resistance and virulence of enterococci isolates from healthy humans in Tunisia. Ann Microbiol. 2016;66(2):717–25.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hammerum AM. Enterococci of animal origin and their significance for public health. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(7):619–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Karimi A, Ghalavand Z, Fallah F, Eslami P, Parvin M, Alebouyeh M. Prevalence of virulence determinants and antibiotic resistance patterns of Enterococcus faecalis strains in patients with community-acquired urinary tract infections in Iran. Int J Environ Health Res. 2018;28(6):599–608.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Arbabi L, Boustanshenas M, Rahbar M, Owlia P, Adabi M, Rasouli Koohi S, Afshar M, Fathizadeh S, Majidpour A, Talebi-Taher M. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern and virulence genes in Enterococcus spp. isolated from clinical samples of Milad Hospital of Tehran, Iran. Arch Clin Infect Dis. 2016;11(3):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Khalid HM. Molecular detection of virulence factors of Enterococcus faecalis isolated from urine samples in Duhok city, Kurdistan region/Iraq. Sci j Univ Zakho. 2016;4(1):63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hasannejad Bibalan M, Eshaghi M, Sadeghi J, Asadian M, Narimani T, Talebi M. Clonal diversity in multi drug resistant (MDR) enterococci isolated from fecal normal flora. Int J Mol Cell Med. 2015;4(4):240–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kline KA, Lewis AL. Gram-positive uropathogens, polymicrobial urinary tract infection, and the emerging microbiota of the urinary tract. Microbiol Spectr. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.UTI-0012-2012.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Arularasi Aberna R, Prabakaran K. Evaluation for the association of virulence determinants among E. faecalis with its clinical outcome. Int J Biol Med Res. 2011;2(2):523–7.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Cosentino S, Podda GS, Corda A, Fadda ME, Deplano M, Pisano MB. Molecular detection of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance pattern in clinical Enterococcus faecalis strains in Sardinia. J Prev Med Hyg. 2010;51(1):31–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kafil HS, Mobarez AM, Moghadam MF. Adhesion and virulence factor properties of Enterococci isolated from clinical samples in Iran. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2013;56(3):238–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sharifi Y, Hasani A, Ghotaslou R, Naghili B, Aghazadeh M, Milani M, Bazmany A. Virulence and antimicrobial resistance in enterococci isolated from urinary tract infections. Adv Pharm Bull. 2013;3(1):197–201.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Nallapareddy SR, Qin X, Weinstock GM, Höök M, Murray BE. Enterococcus faecalis adhesin, ace, mediates attachment to extracellular matrix proteins collagen type IV and Laminin as well as Collagen Type I. Infect Immun. 2000;68(9):5218–24.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Waters CM, Antiporta MH, Murray BE, Dunny GM. Role of the Enterococcus faecalis GelE protease in determination of cellular chain length, supernatant pheromone levels, and degradation of fibrin and misfolded surface proteins. J Bacteriol. 2003;185(12):3613–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Moniri R, Ghasemi A, Moosavi SGA, Dastehgoli K, Rezaei M. Virulence gene’s relationship with biofilm formation and detection of aac (6’)/aph (2”) in Enterococcus faecalis isolated from patients with urinary tract infection. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2013;6(5):1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Strateva T, Atanasova D, Savov E, Petrova G, Mitov I. Incidence of virulence determinants in clinical Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcusfaecium isolates collected in Bulgaria. Braz J Infect Dis. 2016;20(2):127–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Creti R, Imperi M, Bertuccini L, Fabretti F, Orefici G, Di Rosa R, Baldassarri L. Survey for virulence determinants among Enterococcusfaecalis isolated from different sources. J Med Microbiol. 2004;53(Pt 1):13–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Heidari H, Hasanpour S, Ebrahim-Saraie HS, Motamedifar M. High incidence of virulence factors among clinical Enterococcusfaecalis Isolates in Southwestern Iran. Infect Chemother. 2017;49(1):51–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Shahraki S, Rabi Nezhad Mousavi M. Determination of virulence factors in clinical multidrug resistance enterococci isolates at southeast of Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2017;10(5):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    van den Braak N, Power E, Anthony R, Endtz HP, Verbrugh HA, van Belkum A. Random amplification of polymorphic DNA versus pulsed field gel electrophoresis of SmaI DNA macrorestriction fragments for typing strains of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000;192(1):45–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Barbier N, Saulnier P, Chachaty E, Dumontier S, Andremont A. Random amplified polymorphic DNA typing versus pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for epidemiological typing of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34(5):1096–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Manero A, Blanch AR. Identification of Enterococcus spp. with a biochemical key. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65(10):4425–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). In: Performances standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-fourth informational supplement. Vol. 34(1). CLSI document M100-S24, Wayne; 2014.

  39. 39.

    Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, Persing DH, Swaminathan B. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33(9):2233–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Turabelidze D, Kotetishvili M, Kreger A, Morris JG Jr, Sulakvelidze A. Improved pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for typing vancomycin-resistant enterococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(11):4242–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was part of a Ph.D. thesis at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. We also would like to thank members of Pediatric Infections Research Center, Research Institute for Children's Health, Tehran, Iran, and staff of the Department of Microbiology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran for their sincere cooperation and support in this study.

Funding

This work was supported by Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. The funders had no role in designing the study, collecting data, and interpreting or deciding to submit the work for publication.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MA designed the concept of this study. MR and LA designed and performed experiments. MA, MR and ZG analyzed data and drafted manuscripts. KG, MA and MR provided research material and critical revision of this article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marjan Rashidan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Since all urine and stool samples were routinely submitted for isolation and identification of E. faecalis strains, and all samples were pseudonymized, no informed consent was obtained.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghalavand, Z., Alebouyeh, M., Ghanati, K. et al. Genetic relatedness of the Enterococcus faecalis isolates in stool and urine samples of patients with community-acquired urinary tract infection. Gut Pathog 12, 42 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-020-00380-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Enterococcus faecalis
  • Virulence
  • Urinary tract infection
  • Fecal microbiota
  • Antimicrobial resistance