Skip to main content
Download PDF

Occurrence of Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli in raw chicken and beef meat in northern Egypt and dissemination of their antibiotic resistance markers

Gut Pathogens volume 9, Article number: 57 (2017) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The global incidence of foodborne infections and antibiotic resistance is recently increased and considered of public health concern. Currently, scarcely information is available on foodborne infections and ESBL associated with poultry and beef meat in Egypt.

Methods

In total, 180 chicken and beef meat samples as well as internal organs were collected from different districts in northern Egypt. The samples were investigated for the prevalence and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella enterica serovars and Escherichia coli. All isolates were investigated for harbouring class 1 and class 2 integrons.

Results

Out of 180 investigated samples 15 S. enterica (8.3%) and 21 E. coli (11.7%) were isolated and identified. S. enterica isolates were typed as 9 S. Typhimurium (60.0%), 3 S. Paratyphi A (20.0%), 2 S. Enteritidis (13.3%) and 1 S. Kentucky (6.7%). Twenty-one E. coli isolates were serotyped into O1, O18, O20, O78, O103, O119, O126, O145, O146 and O158. The phenotypic antibiotic resistance profiles of S. enterica serovars to ampicillin, cefotaxime, cefpodoxime, trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole and tetracycline were 86.7, 80.0, 60.0, 53.3 and 40.0%, respectively. Isolated E. coli were resistant to tetracycline (80.9%), ampicillin (71.4%), streptomycin, trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole (61.9% for each) and cefotaxime (33.3%). The dissemination of genes coding for ESBL and AmpC β-lactamase in S. enterica isolates included bla CTX-M (73.3%), bla TEM (73.3%) and bla CMY (13.3%). In E. coli isolates bla TEM, bla CTX-M and bla OXA were identified in 52.4, 42.9 and 14.3%, respectively. The plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes identified in S. enterica were qnrA (33.3%), qnrB (20.0%) and qnrS (6.7%) while qnrA and qnrB were detected in 33.3% of E. coli isolates. Class 1 integron was detected in 13.3% of S. enterica and in 14.3% of E. coli isolates. Class 2 integron as well as the colistin resistance gene mcr-1 was not found in any of E. coli or S. enterica isolates.

Conclusions

This study showed high prevalence of S. enterica and E. coli as foodborne pathogens in raw chicken and beef meat in Nile Delta, Egypt. The emergence of antimicrobial resistance in S. enterica and E. coli isolates is of public health concern in Egypt. Molecular biological investigation elucidated the presence of genes associated with antibiotic resistance as well as class 1 integron in S. enterica and E. coli.

Background

In spite of the improved technology and hygienic practices in developed countries at all stages of poultry and beef meat production, foodborne infections remain as a continuous threat to human and animal health. Escherichia (E.) coli and S. enterica serovars are the dominant members of Enterobacteriaceae causing foodborne infections. The expansion of antibiotic resistance in bacteria is also an emerging public health hazard due to the compromised efficacy in the treatment of infectious diseases [1].

The continuous exposure of bacterial strains by β-lactams has led to dynamic and massive production and mutation of β-lactamases [2]. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) are derived from point mutations in the bla TEM-1 and bla SHV-1 β-lactamase genes, which cannot hydrolyse cephamycins and are inhibited by clavulanic acid [3], while ampicillin class C β-lactamase (AmpC) enzymes are active on cephamycins as well as oxyiminocephalosporins and monobactams [4]. ESBLs are mostly located on mobile genetic elements (plasmids or integrons), which can facilitate their mobility from bacterial species to others by horizontal gene transfer [5].

In Egypt, Salmonella isolates from chicken meat and organs showed high resistance to different antibiotic classes [6,7,8] where also, ESBL-producing E. coli were isolated from retail chicken meat and dairy products in Egypt [9, 10].

Quinolones considered as drugs of choice for treatment of human infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria. However, resistance to quinolones has been emerged over the time due to misuse and/or overdose of drugs in human and veterinary practice [11]. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) represented by quinolone resistance (qnr) genes is widely distributed among bacteria [12,13,14].

Integrons are genetic elements able to capture individual antibiotic resistance genes including β-lactamases encoding genes and stimulate their transcription and expression [15]. The capture and spread of antibiotic resistance determinants by integrons stimulates the rapid evolution of multidrug resistances (MDR) among Gram-negative bacteria [16]. Among five main integron classes, integrons 1 and 2 are most frequent in Gram-negative bacteria. More than 70 different antibiotic resistance genes have been characterized within integrons [16].

Colistin as antimicrobial substance was used against Gram-negative bacteria. Its usage has been limited due to its systemic toxicity but it was re-introduced as a last-line option in treatment of human infections [17, 18].

This study aimed to discuss the prevalence, serotyping, antibiotic resistance and characterization of resistance-associated genes in S. enterica serovars and E. coli isolated from beef and poultry meat products in the Nile Delta, Egypt.

Methods

Sampling, isolation and identification of bacteria

One hundred and eighty samples were randomly collected aseptically (90 chicken and 90 beef meat and organs) from slaughterhouses and markets in four districts in northern Egypt (Dakahlia, Damietta, Kafr El-Sheikh and Gharbia governorates). Briefly, 30 samples of freshly slaughtered chickens and 30 samples of native frozen chickens from restaurants and supermarkets (each 15 from breast and from thigh muscles and skin) were taken. Thirty samples of organs (gizzard and liver) were collected from freshly slaughtered chickens. In addition, 30 beef meat samples of freshly slaughtered carcasses (neck, brisket, flank and rump muscles) were obtained from slaughterhouses. Thirty samples from locally frozen beef meat, collected from supermarkets and restaurants and 30 samples from organs (liver, spleen and heart) from freshly slaughtered animals were used in this study (Tables 1, 2).

Table 1 Sources, number of S. enterica isolates and results of their serovar identification
Full size table
Table 2 Sources, number of E. coli isolates and results of their serogroup identification
Full size table

Ten grams of each meat and organ sample were incised using sterile scalpel and forceps, transported immediately to the laboratory in ice bags, then transferred into sterile homogenizer flask containing 45 ml of nutrient broth (Oxoid, Manchester, UK). The mixture was allowed to stand for 15 min at room temperature. From each sample, 1 ml was added to 9 ml of buffered peptone water (Oxoid) for E. coli cultivation and 9 ml of Rappaport–Vassiliadis broth (Oxoid) for S. enterica isolation. After aerobic incubation at 37 °C overnight, a loopful from Rappaport–Vassiliadis broth was streaked on xylose lysine deoxycholate (XLD) agar (Oxoid) and from buffered peptone water on eosin methylene blue (EMB) agar (Oxoid). The inoculated plates were incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 18–24 h. Suspected colonies were identified biochemically using API 20E (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France).

All biochemically confirmed Salmonella isolates were serotyped on the basis of somatic (O) and flagellar (H) antigens by slide agglutination test using commercial antisera (SIFIN, Berlin, Germany) following Kauffman–White scheme [19]. Serological identification of E. coli was carried out using slide agglutination method using commercial antisera (SIFIN). The serotyping was carried out at the Serology Unit, Animal Health Research Institute, Dokki, Egypt, and the Bacteriology Laboratory, Central Laboratories of Ministry of Health, Cairo, Egypt.

DNA extraction and purification

The identified bacterial cultures were cultivated in Luria–Bertani (LB) broth (Oxoid) at 37 °C overnight. DNA was extracted and purified using DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kits (Qiagen, Manchester, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Molecular identification of S. enterica serovars and E. coli

The isolated strains were further identified as S. enterica and E. coli using PCR assays. The amplification targets and primers (Eurofins, Yokohama, Japan) are listed in Table 3. All phenotypically identified S. enterica serovars were tested for harbouring ompC gene. Isolated E. coli were confirmed by species-specific PCR targeting the 16S rRNA genes and resulting in a 585 bp amplicon. PCR assays used in this study resulted in Salmonella, S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium specific products of 204, 304 and 401 bp length, respectively.

Table 3 PCR primers, their sequences and amplification targets used in this study
Full size table

The PCR protocol consisted of the following steps: (i) an initial denaturation step of 2 min at 95 °C; (ii) 30 cycles with 1 cycle consisting of 1 min at 95 °C, 1 min at 57 °C, and 2 min at 72 °C; and (iii) a final elongation step of 5 min at 72 °C.

Five-microliter aliquots of reaction mixture were run in electrophoreses using 1.5% agarose gels (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan) and visualized under UV light after ethidium bromide staining.

Determination of antimicrobial susceptibility profiles

The antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion test [20]. Briefly, one colony picked up, streaked on Mueller–Hinton blood agar (Oxoid) and incubated at 37 °C overnight. Bacterial colonies were suspended in 0.9% NaCl to obtain a McFarland turbidity of 0.5 (Dr. Lange, photometer CADAS 30, Berlin, Germany) containing 1–2  × 108 colony-forming units (CFU)/ml of E. coli strain ATCC 25922. Three hundred μl of the suspension were spread onto the surface of a Mueller–Hinton agar plate (Oxoid) using a sterile swab. The antimicrobial discs (Oxoid) of thirteen clinically used antibiotics, which are used in the Egyptian poultry and cattle farms (Tables 4, 5) were distributed onto the surface of the Mueller–Hinton agar plates using a multi-disc dispenser (Oxoid). The plates were incubated at 37 °C overnight. The diameters of inhibition zones were measured using sliding calipers and interpreted using standard break points according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [21].

Table 4 Breakpoint values of antimicrobial agents according to CLSI, 2011 and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of 15 S. enterica isolates used in this study
Full size table
Table 5 Breakpoint values of antimicrobial agents according to CLSI, 2011 and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of E. coli isolates used in this study
Full size table

The antimicrobial susceptibility of colistin was determined by disc diffusion susceptibility testing using colistin discs (Oxoid) containing 10 μg. The disc zone diameters was interpreted according to previous report [22].

Molecular detection of antimicrobial resistance associated genes

Escherichia coli and S. enterica isolates were tested for β-lactamase-encoding genes bla TEM, bla SHV, bla CTX-M, bla OXA and bla CMY by PCR using universal primers for the corresponding gene families (Table 3) as described previously [23]. PCR amplification was also used for screening of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes qnrA, qnrB and qnrS.

For detection of variants of bla TEM, bla SHV, bla CTX-M, bla OXA and bla CMY amplified PCR fragments were purified from agarose gels using Nucleospin Gel Extraction Kit (Macherey–Nagel, Düren, Germany). The products were sequenced and the sequencing results were analyzed using BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast.cgi).

Colistin resistance associated gene mcr-1was identified using a PCR assay (Table 3) as described by Liu et al. [24]. PCR for detection of carbapenemases blaOXA-23 gene was performed using OXA-23-F and OXA-23-R (Table 3). PCR reaction and conditions were performed according to Braun et al. [25].

Detection and sequencing of class 1 and class 2 integrons

PCR assays for detection of class 1 and class 2 integrons were performed using primers given in Table 3 and yielded PCR fragments that were purified from agarose gels using Nucleospin Gel Extraction Kit (Macherey–Nagel, Düren, Germany). The products were sequenced in Genome Centre, Gifu University, Japan. The sequencing results were analyzed using BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast.cgi).

Results

Out of 180 examined samples 15 S. enterica (8.3%) (7 from poultry and 8 from beef) (Table 1) as well as 21 E. coli (11.7%) (15 from poultry and 6 from beef) (Table 2) were isolated and identified using bacteriological methods and biochemical characterization.

Serological characterization of S. enterica and E. coli

Fifteen isolated S. enterica were typed as 9 S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (60.0%; 3 from chicken and 6 from beef), 3 S. enterica Paratyphi A (20.0%; 2 from chickens and 1 from beef), 2 S. enterica serovar Enteritidis (13.3%; 1 from chicken and 1 from beef) and 1 S. enterica serovar Kentucky (6.7%) from chicken sample (Table 1).

Twenty-one E. coli isolates were characterized as 4 O18 (19.0%) and 4 O78 (19.0%) serotypes. Other serotypes are given in Table 2.

Molecular identification of Salmonella serovars

All 15 recovered S. enterica serovars harboured ompC gene, which confirms Salmonella genus. Nine S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (60.0%) and two S. enterica serovar Enteritidis (13.3%) were identified by means of serovar-specific bands using PCR (Table 3). Four other isolates could not be typed with PCR method (26.7%).

Determination of antimicrobial susceptibility profiles

The results of determination of antimicrobial resistance of S. enterica and E. coli isolates to thirteen antibiotics are given in Tables 4 and 5. Most of the S. enterica isolates showed resistance to ampicillin (87.0%) and cefotaxime (80.0%) and all were susceptible to chloramphenicol, colistin and ciprofloxacin. Resistance to other antibiotics was shown in Table 4.

Seven isolates of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium were resistant to ampicillin, cefotaxime and cefpodoxime (77.8%), while 6 isolates (66.7%) were highly sensitive to ciprofloxacin. Resistance to other antibiotics was weaker developed.

Both S. enterica serovar Enteritidis isolates were resistant to ampicillin, cefotaxime and tetracycline. Additionally, one isolate showed resistance to streptomycin, nalidixic acid, trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole and streptomycin.

In addition to the entire resistance to ampicillin and cefotaxime, majority of the S. enterica serovar Paratyphi A isolates were resistant to amoxicillin–clavulanic acid, ceftriaxone and trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole.

Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky isolate showed no pronounced susceptibility to any of the tested antibiotics and was resistant to six of them (Table 4). Seven out of 15 S. enterica serovars (46.7%) revealed phenotypic multidrug resistance exhibiting by resistance to three or more classes of antibiotics (Table 4).

Escherichia coli isolates showed resistance to tetracycline, ampicillin, streptomycin, trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole and amoxicillin–clavulanic acid with 80.9, 71.4, 61.9, 61.9 and 61.9%, respectively. Ten (47.6%), 9 (42.8%) and 9 (42.8%) isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin and ceftriaxone, respectively. All tested isolates were susceptible to colistin. Thirteen E. coli isolates (61.9%) were characterized as multidrug resistant (Table 5).

The multidrug resistance of isolated Salmonella and E. coli was shown in Tables 6 and 7, respectively.

Table 6 Phenotypic resistance and resistance determinants found in S. enterica isolates in this study
Full size table
Table 7 Phenotypic resistance and resistance determinants found in E. coli isolates in this study
Full size table

Molecular detection of resistance-associated genes

Six of 8 screened resistance-associated genes were detected in S. enterica serovars by PCR (Table 6). Eleven (73.3%) isolates harboured bla CTX-M gene (1, 3 and 14) associated with cefotaxime resistance and 11 (73.3%) isolates harboured bla TEM-1 gene associated with penicillin and narrow spectrum β-lactamase resistance. Five (33.3%) isolates harboured quinolone resistance gene A (qnrA), while 3 (20.0%), 2 (13.3%) and 1 (6.7%) of S. enterica serovars possessed qnrB, bla CMY and qnrS genes, respectively. bla OXA associated with resistance to ampicillin and cephalothin and bla SHV associated with plasmid-mediated ampicillin resistance were not found in any isolate.

In E. coli isolates, 5 of 8 screened resistance-associated genes were detected by PCR (Table 7). Eleven (52.4%) out of 21 isolates harboured bla TEM (1 and 104), while bla CTX-M (1 and 14) was detected in 9 isolates (42.9%). Seven isolates (33.3%) carried qnrA and qnrB and in three isolates (14.3%) bla OXA-1 was detected. Genes bla CMY, bla SHV and qnrS were not detected in any of the E. coli isolates.

Plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene mcr-1 and carbapenemase resistance gene blaOXA-23 were not identified neither in S. enterica nor in E. coli isolates using PCR assay.

Integron gene cassettes and DNA sequencing

Class 1 integron was detected in two isolates of S. Typhimurium using PCR (Table 6). The inserted gene cassettes identified three types of antimicrobial resistance genes associated with class 1 integron: dihydrofolate reductase types (dfrA15 and dfrA17) which confer resistance to trimethoprim, and aminoglycoside adenyltransferase type aadA2 that confers resistance to streptomycin and spectinomycin.

Three E. coli isolates of serotypes O18, O78 and O78 were harbouring class 1 integron (Table 7). The inserted gene cassettes identified three types of class 1 integron. The identified antimicrobial resistance genes were dihydrofolate reductase types; dfrA1, dfrA15 and dfrA1-orf which confer resistance to trimethoprim.

All S. enterica and E. coli isolates were negative for class 2 integrons.

Discussion

Salmonellosis and Salmonella infections considered as critical threats to human and animal health. In this study, the prevalence of S. enterica serovars in chicken and beef meat was 8.3%, which was considerably lower than incidence rates that reported in Ethiopia (12.0% in raw meat) [26], Canary islands (16.5% in chicken meat) [27], Northwestern Spain (17.9% in chicken) [28], Ethiopia (17.9% in chicken and giblets) [29], and Egypt (10.0% in poultry meat) [7]. On the other hand, it was higher than reported previously in meat products in Egypt (6.6%) and in ground beef in the United States (4.2%) [30, 31].

In total, S. enterica serovar Typhimurium was the dominant serovar. These results were in accordance with previous study from chicken products in Cambodia and Thailand [32]. Controversially, S. enterica serovar Enteritidis was the dominant serotype in imported frozen poultry samples from Brazil to Canary Islands and in chicken carcasses in Spain [27, 28]. Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky was frequently detected in samples coming from US to Canary Islands [27].

Prevalence of E. coli in chicken meat and organs was 16.7% which was lower than in Nigeria (43.4%) in frozen poultry meat [33] but higher than in Korea (4.9% in poultry meat) [34]. Prevalence of E. coli in beef meat was 6.7%, while in Korea and Iran were found 4.1 and 29.0%, respectively [34, 35].

In this study, 19.0% of E. coli isolates typed as O78 was mainly from poultry products, while in China, O78 was identified in 60.0% of E. coli isolated from chicken and ducks [36]. E. coli type O158 identified in 9.5% only in beef meat while O158 detected in 22.7% of food isolates in Chile [37].

Bacterial antimicrobial resistance is a global emerging problem of public health concern.

In the current study, a high percentage of S. enterica serovars were resistant to ampicillin and cefotaxime. The resistance to other antimicrobial agents was variable while all isolates were sensitive to chloramphenicol and ciprofloxacin. The results were in a partial accordance with results of previous reports stating that all S. enterica isolated from chicken meat and beef were sensitive to ciprofloxacin [38]. 72.4% of Salmonella isolates in Thai meat products were resistant to ampicillin while 71.0% of isolates in Cambodian meat products were resistant to sulfamethoxazole [32]. Controversially, S. enterica isolated from animals and food of animal origin in Italy were highly resistant to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin and tetracycline [39] and all Salmonella isolated from beef in Tunisia were susceptible to amoxicillin and clavulanic acid [40].

In total, 46.7% of S. enterica serovars showed multidrug resistance, which was higher than resistance of Salmonella isolated from raw chicken (31.0%) in Pennsylvania during [41]. Less multidrug resistant S. enterica isolates (6.0%) were identified in cattle hides and carcasses in the US [42].

The results of this study showed that the antimicrobial resistance of E. coli isolated from poultry was higher than from beef to the most of tested antibiotics. The high resistance to tetracycline, ampicillin, amoxycillin–clavulanic acid, trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole and streptomycin in this study was in agreement with previous reports conducted in Egypt [10, 43] and Algeria [44]. While in Spain, most of E. coli isolated from diarrhoeic and healthy lambs were highly resistant to tetracycline and streptomycin but show lower resistance to ampicillin [45]. Most of E. coli isolates in this study were sensitive to enrofloxacin, chloramphenicol and ceftriaxone which is in agreement with previous results in Spain [45].

In this study, 61.9% of E. coli isolates were multidrug resistant. Similar results reported previously in Ghana and US [23, 46].

Most of the phenotypically antibiotic resistant S. enterica serovars carried antibiotic resistance marker genes associated with β-lactams and quinolones.

The β-lactamase encoding gene bla TEM conferring resistance to penicillins and first-generation cephalosporins was detected in 73.3% of S. enterica serovars and in 76.9% of ampicillin-resistant isolates which is significantly high in comparison to 57.3% (bla TEM-1) in S. enterica isolated from retail chickens in China [47]. Another β-lactamase encoding gene bla CMY-2, an AmpC beta-lactamase gene that confers resistance to a wide variety of β-lactam antibiotics detected in 13.3% of isolates. In contrast, in 4.7% of S. enterica serovars Typhimurium and Enteritidis originated from diseased broilers in Egypt bla CMY-2 was identified [48] and all resistant S. enterica serovar Typhimurium isolated from retail meat in US were harbouring bla CMY [49]. The same gene could not be detected previously in any S. enterica serovar Typhimurium isolated from chicken meat in Egypt [8].

bla CTX-M could be identified in 73.3% of isolated S. enterica serovars. In 24.0 and 18.8% of different Salmonella serovars isolated from retail chicken carcasses in China, bla CTX-M-15 and bla CTX-M-3 were detected, respectively [47].

The bla SHV is responsible for the plasmid-mediated ampicillin resistance and β-lactamase encoding genes bla OXA conferring resistance to ampicillin and cephalothin not detected in any of S. enterica serovars in this study. This result was in accordance with a result for S. enterica serovar Typhimurium isolated from chicken meat in Egypt [8]. In contrast, 30.2% of ESBL-producing Salmonella isolated from raw chicken carcasses in China were harbouring bla OXA-1 [47].

Although none of S. enterica serovars were phenotypically resistant to ciprofloxacin, qnrA, qnrB and qnrS genes were detected in 33.3, 20.0 and 6.7%, respectively in all S. enterica serovars and in 100, 60.0 and 20.0%, respectively in S. enterica resistant to nalidixic acid. A different result showed that 1.16% of nalidixic acid-resistant S. enterica serovars isolated from animal products in Tunisia carried qnr gene [50]. In other studies in China qnrA, qnrB and qnrS genes detected with low percentage in S. enterica serovar Enteritidis isolated from retail raw poultry [51, 52].

The bla TEM gene was detected in 52.3% of all isolated E. coli and in 73.3% of ampicillin-resistant isolates. Other studies detected bla TEM in 97.1 and 75.0% of E. coli isolates from lambs in Spain and meat products in Cambodia, respectively [32, 45]. In China, bla TEM was identified in 7.8% of ESBL-producing E. coli recovered from meat products [53].

The β-lactamase encoding gene bla CMY was not found in any of the isolated E. coli. In contrast, bla CMY-2 was detected in 89.0% E. coli isolated from poultry meat in Denmark [54] and in 12.5% of ESBL-producing E. coli isolated from meat products in Cambodia [32].

The bla CTX-M detected in 42.9% of E. coli isolated in this study. In Ghana 50.0% of ESBL-producing E. coli isolates from meat harboured bla CTX-M [46] while these β-lactamase encoding genes bla CTX-M-15 and bla CTX-M-9 were detected rarely (1.6%) in E. coli isolates from meat products in China [53].

The bla SHV gene was not found in any of the E. coli isolates. Controversially, previous studies detected bla SHV in 9.4, 5.3 and 2.0% in meat products in China, broiler chickens and chicken carcasses in Iran, respectively [53, 55, 56].

bla OXA-1 was detected in 14.3% of the E. coli isolates which is in contrast with previous report conducted in retail meat in US where the gene could not be identified [23].

The most common carbapenemase types were blaOXA-23 and blaOXA-48 accounting for 47% of all identified carbapenemase genes [25, 57]. In this study, blaOXA-23 was not identified in all isolated strains.

In isolated E. coli, qnrA and qnrB detected in 33.3% of isolates, all nalidixic acid and/or ciprofloxacin resistant isolates harboured both genes. While qnrB and qnrS were identified in 10.4% of nalidixic acid resistant E. coli isolated from Algerian retail chicken meat [44] and in 10.0% of E. coli isolates obtained from bovine carcasses in Mexico [58]. In contrast, qnrA, qrnB and qrnS genes could not be identified in enrofloxacin-resistant E. coli strains from poultry in Mexico [59].

The presence of genetic elements such as integrons and transposons are often associated with multi-resistant phenotypes among Salmonella isolates [60]. In this study, class 1 integron detected in 13.3% of S. enterica serovars. The identified gene cassettes were dfrA15, dfrA17 and aadA2. In previous studies, class 1 integron identified in 90.0% of multi-drug resistant Salmonella isolates from retail chicken meat in Japan and the identified genes cassettes were dfrA1, dfrA7, aadA1, aadB, and catB3 [61, 62]. The gene cassettes of class 1 integron which detected in Salmonella spp. isolated from poultry meat in Egypt were harbouring aac (3)-Id, aadA2, aadA4, aadA7, sat, dfrA15, lnuF and estX resistance genes [7]. In a study conducted in Portugal, 75.0% of S. enterica isolated from different sources including food products had one or two class 1 integrons [63].

The identified gene cassettes of class 1 integron dfrA1, dfrA15 and dfrA1-orf which confer resistance to trimethoprim were identified in 14.3% of E. coli isolated in this study. This is in agreement with E. coli isolates from retail chickens in Japan [62] and in 1.9 and 11.4% of isolates from Thai and Cambodian meat samples obtained from slaughterhouses and fresh markets and the most common gene cassette was dfrA12-aadA2 [32].

Class 2 integrons were not detected in all isolates of this study which is in contrast to 5.6% positive samples in Egypt [10].

In this study, mcr-1 gene associated with colistin resistance was neither detected in S. enterica nor E. coli isolates. This result was in agreement with the result reported by Doumith et al. [64] who investigated 24,000 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from food and humans including S. enterica and E. coli and found only 15 mcr-1 positive isolates. Recently, Quesada et al. identified the gene mcr-1 in nine S. enterica and E. coli isolates from poultry and swine for the first time in Spain [65]. Jayol et al. found the mcr-1 in 13% of E. coli and S. enterica [66]. Considering the frequent use of colistin in animal production and the importance of this antimicrobial for the control of multi-resistant Gram-negative nosocomial infections in humans, monitoring the dissemination of resistance to colistin is mandatory.

In conclusion, the results of this study showed high prevalence of S. enterica and E. coli as foodborne pathogens isolated from poultry and beef meat in Egypt. The emergence of antimicrobial resistance of S. enterica and E. coli isolates is of public concerns in Egypt. Significant resistance was detected to penicillin, cephalosporins, tetracycline and sulphonamides. Dissemination of ESBL and AmpC-β-lactamase resistance-associated genes in S. enterica and E. coli was determined. Presence of class 1 integron in S. enterica and E. coli and genes associated with antibiotic resistance was also confirmed. Class 2 integron was not detected in any isolate. Further work should be performed to characterize S. enterica and E. coli isolates of animal and human origin from the same region sharing the same resistance markers in order to highlight potential horizontal gene transfer by these zoonotic organisms.

References

  1. Helmy Y, El-Adawy H, Abdelwhab E. A comprehensive review of common bacterial, parasitic and viral zoonoses at the human–animal interface in Egypt. Pathogens. 2017;6:33.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Pitout J, Laupland K. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: an emerging public-health concern. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8:159–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bush K, Jacoby GA. Updated functional classification of β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:969–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacoby GA. AmpC β-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009;22:161–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Pfeifer Y, Cullik A, Witte W. Resistance to cephalosporins and carbapenems in Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. Int J Med Microbiol. 2010;300:371–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Abd-Elghany SM, Sallam KI, Abd-Elkhalek A, Tamura T. Occurrence, genetic characterization and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolated from chicken meat and giblets. Epidemiol Infect. 2015;143:997–1003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gharieb RM, Tartor YH, Khedr MH. Non-typhoidal Salmonella in poultry meat and diarrhoeic patients: prevalence, antibiogram, virulotyping, molecular detection and sequencing of class I integrons in multidrug resistant strains. Gut Pathog. 2015;7:15–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmed HA, El-Hofy FI, Shafik SM, Abdelrahman MA, Elsaid GA. Characterization of virulence-associated genes, antimicrobial resistance genes, and class 1 integrons in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium isolates from chicken meat and humans in Egypt. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2016;13:281–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abdallah HM, Reuland EA, Wintermans BB, Al Naiemi N, Koek A, Abdelwahab AM, et al. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases and/or carbapenemases-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolated from retail chicken meat in Zagazig, Egypt. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0136052.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahmed AM, Shimamoto T. Molecular analysis of multidrug resistance in Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolated from meat and dairy products. Int J Food Microbiol. 2015;193:68–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Andriole VT. The quinolones: past, present, and future. Clin Infect Dis. 2005113-19.

  12. Flach CF, Boulund F, Kristiansson E, Larsson DJ. Functional verification of computationally predicted qnr genes. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2013;12:34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Guan X, Xue X, Liu Y, Wang J, Wang Y, Wang K, et al. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance—current knowledge and future perspectives. J Int Med Res. 2013;41:20–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Robicsek A, Jacoby GA, Hooper DC. The worldwide emergence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:629–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hanau-Bercot B, Podglajen I, Casin I, Collatz E. An intrinsic control element for translational initiation in class 1 integrons. Mol Microbiol. 2002;44:119–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rowe-Magnus DA, Guerout AM, Mazel D. Bacterial resistance evolution by recruitment of super-integron gene cassettes. Mol Microbiol. 2002;43:1657–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tzouvelekis L, Markogiannakis A, Piperaki E, Souli M, Daikos G. Treating infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;20:862–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sun S, Negrea A, Rhen M, Andersson D. Genetic analysis of colistin resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:2298–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Popoff MY, Bockemuhl J, Gheesling LL. Supplement 2002 (no. 46) to the Kauffmann–White scheme. Res Microbiol. 2004;155:568–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966;45:493–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. CLSI. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-first informational supplement: CLSI document M100-S21. CLSI. 2011;31:42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maalej S, Meziou M, Rhimi F, Hammami A. Comparison of disc diffusion, Etest and agar dilution for susceptibility testing of colistin against Enterobacteriaceae. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2011;53:546–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao S, Blickenstaff K, Bodeis-Jones S, Gaines SA, Tong E, McDermott PF. Comparison of the prevalences and antimicrobial resistances of Escherichia coli isolates from different retail meats in the United States, 2002 to 2008. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:1701–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu Y, Wang Y, Walsh T, Yi LX, Zhang R, Spencer J, et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:161–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Braun S, Monecke S, Thurmer A, Ruppelt A, Makarewicz O, Pletz M, et al. Rapid identification of carbapenemase genes in gram-negative bacteria with an oligonucleotide microarray-based assay. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e102232.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ejo M, Garedew L, Alebachew Z, Worku W. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolated from animal-origin food items in Gondar, Ethiopia. Biomed Res Int. 2016;4290506:15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hernandez T, Sierra A, Rodriguez-Alvarez C, Torres A, Arevalo MP, Calvo M, et al. Salmonella enterica serotypes isolated from imported frozen chicken meat in the Canary islands. J Food Prot. 2005;68:2702–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Capita R, Alonso-Calleja C, Prieto M. Prevalence of Salmonella enterica serovars and genovars from chicken carcasses in slaughterhouses in Spain. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;103:1366–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tibaijuka B, Molla B, Hildebrandt G, Kleer J. Occurrence of Salmonellae in retail raw chicken products in Ethiopia. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2003;116:55–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ahmed AM, Shimamoto T. Isolation and molecular characterization of Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Shigella spp. from meat and dairy products in Egypt. Int J Food Microbiol. 2014;169:M405–10.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bosilevac JM, Guerini MN, Kalchayanand N, Koohmaraie M. Prevalence and characterization of salmonellae in commercial ground beef in the United States. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:1892–900.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Trongjit S, Angkititrakul S, Tuttle RE, Poungseree J, Padungtod P, Chuanchuen R. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella enterica isolated from broiler chickens, pigs and meat products in Thailand-Cambodia border provinces. Microbiol Immunol. 2017;61:23–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Adeyanju GT, Ishola O. Salmonella and Escherichia coli contamination of poultry meat from a processing plant and retail markets in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Springerplus. 2014;3:139.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee GY, Jang HI, Hwang IG, Rhee MS. Prevalence and classification of pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from fresh beef, poultry, and pork in Korea. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009;134:196–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Momtaz H, Dehkordi FS, Hosseini MJ, Sarshar M, Heidari M. Serogroups, virulence genes and antibiotic resistance in Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from diarrheic and non-diarrheic pediatric patients in Iran. Gut Pathog. 2013;5:1757–4749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang S, Meng Q, Dai J, Han X, Han Y, Ding C, et al. Development of an allele-specific PCR assay for simultaneous sero-typing of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli predominant O1, O2, O18 and O78 strains. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e96904.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Alexandre M, Prado V, Ulloa MT, Arellano C, Rios M. Detection of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in meat foods using DNA probes, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and polymerase chain reaction. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2001;48:321–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Larkin C, Poppe C, McNab B, McEwen B, Mahdi A, Odumeru J. Antibiotic resistance of Salmonella isolated from hog, beef, and chicken carcass samples from provincially inspected abattoirs in Ontario. J Food Prot. 2004;67:448–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Perugini AG, Carullo MR, Esposito A, Caligiuri V, Capuano F, Galiero G, et al. Characterization of antimicrobial resistant Salmonella enterica serovars Enteritidis and Typhimurium isolates from animal and food in Southern Italy. Vet Res Commun. 2010;34:387–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Oueslati W, Rjeibi MR, Mhadhbi M, Jbeli M, Zrelli S, Ettriqui A. Prevalence, virulence and antibiotic susceptibility of Salmonella spp. strains, isolated from beef in Greater Tunis (Tunisia). Meat Sci. 2016;119:154–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. M’Ikanatha NM, Sandt CH, Localio AR, Tewari D, Rankin SC, Whichard JM, et al. Multidrug-resistant Salmonella isolates from retail chicken meat compared with human clinical isolates. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2010;7:929–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Brichta-Harhay DM, Arthur TM, Bosilevac JM, Kalchayanand N, Shackelford SD, Wheeler TL, et al. Diversity of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica strains associated with cattle at harvest in the United States. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:1783–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Ahmed AM, Shimamoto T, Shimamoto T. Molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant avian pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from septicemic broilers. Int J Med Microbiol. 2013;303:475–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Laarem M, Barguigua A, Nayme K, Akila A, Zerouali K, El Mdaghri N, et al. Occurrence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance and virulence genes in avian Escherichia coli isolates from Algeria. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2017;11:143–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Medina A, Horcajo P, Jurado S, De la Fuente R, Ruiz-Santa-Quiteria JA, Dominguez-Bernal G, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of antimicrobial resistance in enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli and atypical enteropathogenic E. coli strains from ruminants. J Vet Diagn Investig. 2011;23:91–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rasmussen MM, Opintan JA, Frimodt-Moller N, Styrishave B. Beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolates in imported and locally produced chicken meat from Ghana. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0139706.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Qiao J, Zhang Q, Alali WQ, Wang J, Meng L, Xiao Y, et al. Characterization of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs)-producing Salmonella in retail raw chicken carcasses. Int J Food Microbiol. 2017;248:72–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ahmed AM, Shimamoto T. Genetic analysis of multiple antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella isolated from diseased broilers in Egypt. Microbiol Immunol. 2012;56:254–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Folster JP, Tolar B, Pecic G, Sheehan D, Rickert R, Hise K, et al. Characterization of blaCMY plasmids and their possible role in source attribution of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium infections. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2014;11:301–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Al-Gallas N, Abbassi MS, Gharbi B, Manai M, Ben Fayala MN, Bichihi R, et al. Occurrence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants and rmtB gene in Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and Typhimurium isolated from food-animal products in Tunisia. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2013;10:813–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang Y, Yang B, Wu Y, Zhang Z, Meng X, Xi M, et al. Molecular characterization of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis on retail raw poultry in six provinces and two National cities in China. Food Microbiol. 2015;46:74–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang Z, Meng X, Wang Y, Xia X, Wang X, Xi M, et al. Presence of qnr, aac(6′)-Ib, qepA, oqxAB, and mutations in gyrase and topoisomerase in nalidixic acid-resistant Salmonella isolates recovered from retail chicken carcasses. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2014;11:698–705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Li L, Ye L, Kromann S, Meng H. Occurrence of extended-spectrum B-lactamases, plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance, and disinfectant resistance genes in Escherichia coli isolated from ready-to-eat meat products. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2017;14:109–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Hansen KH, Bortolaia V, Nielsen CA, Nielsen JB, Schonning K, Agerso Y, et al. Host-specific patterns of genetic diversity among IncI1-Igamma and IncK plasmids encoding CMY-2 B-lactamase in Escherichia coli isolates from humans, poultry meat, poultry, and dogs in Denmark. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:4705–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Jafari RA, Motamedi H, Maleki E, Ghanbarpour R, Mayahi M. Phylogenetic typing and detection of extended-spectrum B-lactamases in Escherichia coli isolates from broiler chickens in Ahvaz, Iran. Vet Res Forum. 2016;7:227–33.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Bagheri M, Ghanbarpour R, Alizade H. Shiga toxin and beta-lactamases genes in Escherichia coli phylotypes isolated from carcasses of broiler chickens slaughtered in Iran. Int J Food Microbiol. 2014;177:16–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kaase M. Carbapenemases in gram-negative bacteria. Current data and trends of resistance resulting from the work of national reference centres. Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz. 2012;55:1401–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. de Oca SAM, Talavera-Rojas M, Soriano-Vargas E, Barba-Leon J, Vazquez-Navarrete J. Determination of extended spectrum β-lactamases/AmpC B-lactamases and plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance in Escherichia coli isolates obtained from bovine carcasses in Mexico. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2015;47:975–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Del Rio-Avila C, Rosario C, Arroyo-Escalante S, Carrillo-Casas EM, Diaz-Aparicio E, Suarez-Guemes F, et al. Characterisation of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli of 1997 and 2005 isolates from poultry in Mexico. Br Poult Sci. 2016;57:494–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Guerra B, Soto S, Helmuth R, Mendoza MC. Characterization of a self-transferable plasmid from Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium clinical isolates carrying two integron-borne gene cassettes together with virulence and drug resistance genes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:2977–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Ahmed AM, Ishida Y, Shimamoto T. Molecular characterization of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella isolated from animals in Japan. J Appl Microbiol. 2009;106:402–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ahmed AM, Shimabukuro H, Shimamoto T. Isolation and molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant strains of Escherichia coli and Salmonella from retail chicken meat in Japan. J Food Sci. 2009;74:1750–3841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Antunes P, Machado J, Peixe L. Characterization of antimicrobial resistance and class 1 and 2 integrons in Salmonella enterica isolates from different sources in Portugal. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;58:297–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Doumith M, Godbole G, Ashton P, Larkin L, Dallman T, Day M, et al. Detection of the plasmid-mediated mcr-1 gene conferring colistin resistance in human and food isolates of Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli in England and Wales. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71:2300–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Quesada A, Ugarte-Ruiz M, Iglesias M, Porrero M, Martinez R, Florez-Cuadrado D, et al. Detection of plasmid mediated colistin resistance (MCR-1) in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica isolated from poultry and swine in Spain. Res Vet Sci. 2016;105:134–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Jayol A, Nordmann P, Lehours P, Poirel L, Dubois V. Comparison of methods for detection of plasmid-mediated and chromosomally encoded colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae. Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;S1198-743X:30291–4.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Seidavi A, Mirhosseini SZ, Shivazad M, Chamani M, Sadeghi AA, Pourseify R. Detection and investigation of Escherichia coli in contents of duodenum, jejunum, ileum and cecum of broilers at different ages by PCR. Asia-Pac J Mol Biol Biotechnol. 2010;18:321–6.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Alvarez J, Sota M, Vivanco AB, Perales I, Cisterna R, Rementeria A, et al. Development of a multiplex PCR technique for detection and epidemiological typing of Salmonella in human clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:1734–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Ahmed AM, Motoi Y, Sato M, Maruyama A, Watanabe H, Fukumoto Y, et al. Zoo animals as reservoirs of gram-negative bacteria harboring integrons and antimicrobial resistance genes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:6686–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

AAM participated in the conception and design of the study. AAM performed the farm and laboratory work. AAM, HH, HE, HT, HN and HMH analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript and contributed to manuscript discussion. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank technical assistants at Kafrelsheikh University for their excellent technical assistance. The authors thank Animal Health Research Institute, Mansoura Laboratory for its great effort in sample collection and preparation.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data

All the data supporting the results presented in the main manuscript.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent for participate

This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations of the, Egyptian Network of Research Ethics Committees (ENREC) which complies with the international laws and regulation regarding ethical considerations in research.

Funding

This study was done without any specific funding.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Institute of Bacterial Infections and Zoonoses, Naumburger Str. 96a, 07743, Jena, Germany

    Amira A. Moawad, Helmut Hotzel, Herbert Tomaso, Heinrich Neubauer & Hosny El-Adawy

  2. Bacteriology department, Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI), Mansoura branch, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt

    Amira A. Moawad

  3. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh, 33516, Egypt

    Hosny El-Adawy

  4. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

    Omnia Awad

  5. Institute of Poultry Diseases, Free University Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Hafez M. Hafez

Authors
  1. Amira A. Moawad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Helmut Hotzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Omnia Awad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Herbert Tomaso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Heinrich Neubauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hafez M. Hafez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hosny El-Adawy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hosny El-Adawy.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moawad, A.A., Hotzel, H., Awad, O. et al. Occurrence of Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli in raw chicken and beef meat in northern Egypt and dissemination of their antibiotic resistance markers. Gut Pathog 9, 57 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-017-0206-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-017-0206-9

Keywords

Gut Pathogens

ISSN: 1757-4749