- Open Access
Lactobacilli with probiotic potential in the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster)
© Assefa et al. 2015
Received: 26 October 2015
Accepted: 15 December 2015
Published: 30 December 2015
Recent research suggests integration of the intestinal microbiota in gut-brain communication which could lead to new approaches to treat neurological disorders. The highly social prairie voles are an excellent model system to study the effects of environmental factors on social behavior. For future studies on the role of probiotics in ameliorating disorders with social withdrawal symptoms, we report the characterization of intestinal Lactobacillus isolates with probiotic potential from voles.
Methods and results
30 bacterial strains were isolated from the vole intestine and found to be distinct but closely related to Lactobacillus johnsonii using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and Random Amplification of Polymorphic DNA fingerprinting. In vitro characterizations including acid and bile tolerance, antimicrobial effects, antibiotic susceptibility, and adherence to intestinal epithelial cells were performed to assess the probiotic potential of selected strains. Since previous studies revealed that mercury ingestion triggers social deficits in voles, mercury resistance of the probiotic candidates was evaluated which could be an important factor in preventing/treating these behavioral changes.
This study demonstrates that lactobacilli with probiotic potential are present in the vole intestine. The Lactobacillus isolates identified in this study will provide a basis for the investigation of probiotic effects in the vole behavioral model system.
Interest in the use of probiotic bacteria to enhance intestinal health in humans and animals has been growing in recent years. Probiotics are “live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host” . At the beginning of the 20th century, the Ukrainian bacteriologist Elie Metchnikoff  suggested that health benefits were associated with the ingestion of lactic acid bacteria such a Lactobacillus bulgaricus. At present, many intestinal probiotics belong to the genus Lactobacillus. Lactobacilli are aerotolerant gram-positive bacteria that form an important portion of the normal human microbiotas of the oral cavity , gastrointestinal tract [3, 4], and female genitourinary tract [5–7]. Of the more than 150  known species of lactobacilli, the “acidophilus complex” has received particular attention because of the reported probiotic properties of some members of this subgroup . An example is the species Lactobacillus johnsonii. Several studies reported that L. johnsonii strains isolated from the human intestine undergo processes that are thought to be beneficial to human health, particularly in the areas of immunomodulation, pathogen inhibition, and cell attachment [10, 11]. In addition, accumulating clinical and scientific evidence highlights the important role of probiotic lactobacilli in the bidirectional communication of the gut-brain-axis [12–14]. Studies in mice on L. rhamnosus JB-1 treatment have shown alteration in the central gamma–aminobutyric acid (GABA) expression and modulation of emotional behavior and depression . At present, however, the mechanisms how probiotics such as L. johnsonii could affect brain function are unclear, but proposed mechanisms involve, e.g., the bacterial production of neurotransmitter precursors or of chemical compounds that act as hormones or that stimulate vagal afferent pathways [13, 15, 16].
For the past two decades, prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) have been the dominant animal model in which to study the formation and maintenance of social affiliations [17, 18] and have been proposed as an important animal model in which to study disorders such as schizophrenia, autism, and the effects of traumatic brain injury, all of which negatively impact social functioning [19, 20]. Prairie vole social behavior has been well-characterized. Field studies show that prairie voles are highly social; pairs share a nest and parental duties and, in fact, both members of a pair often are found in the same trap . In the laboratory, voles appear to avoid isolation by seeking out conspecifics, and in fact, voles suffer significant stress when isolated [22–26]. In contrast to more traditional laboratory animals, prairie vole social behaviors actually are remarkably similar to those of humans, even displaying characteristics such as long-term pair-bonding, care of offspring by both parents, and sharing of a nest even beyond the breeding season . Further, autonomic responses in voles are more like those of humans than they are like those of other rodent species . Importantly, both the behavioral repertoire and the physiology of voles are well documented (e.g., [27, 29–32], so there is a strong literature base upon which additional studies can rest. Given their social structure, prairie voles present an ideal animal model in which to study the of the role of the microbiota-gut-brain-behavior axis in mediating social affiliation and avoidance behaviors, mate choice, parental care and other complex social interactions.
The primary objective of this study was to lay the groundwork for probiotic studies in voles by isolating Lactobacillus strains with high probiotic potential from the vole intestine. Host adaption is an important factor for probiosis. Therefore, we chose to isolate vole strains rather than using probiotics originating from humans or other animals. Lactobacilli were isolated using enrichment media and subsequently classified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing which also allowed for PCR-based analyses of Lactobacillus abundance in the vole intestine. Since orally administered probiotics must survive passage through the highly acidic stomach and withstand the adverse intestinal environment, the strains’ acid tolerance and bile resistance were determined. Further characteristics such as antimicrobial activities against fungi and bacteria as well as adhesion to intestinal epithelial cell lines were examined. In addition we included an assessment of the strains’ resistance to mercury chloride. There is evidence that probiotic bacteria could bind many toxic compounds such as aflatoxin B1 , cyanotoxins , cadmium and lead [35–37] from environmental samples. In this study, the probiotic candidate strains’ resistance to mercury chloride was also determined because research by Curtis and coworkers  revealed social withdrawal symptoms specifically in male voles upon inorganic mercury ingestion. Resistant strains might be more likely to survive mercury exposure and exert beneficial effects on an exposed host organism. All lactobacilli isolated from the vole intestine in this study were closely related to L. johnsonii and several of the isolated strains exhibited potential for probiotic properties.
For purposes of characterizing the baseline state of vole gut lactobacilli, we have used same-sex cage mates. This eliminates the potential confounds of stress responses associated with social isolation or endocrine responses associated with reproductive activation, mating, and parental behavior [22–26]. Further research will be needed to assess whether and how the microbiota might change in pair-bonded and/or parental animals. Although these are important questions, they are beyond the scope of this paper, and will be addressed in subsequent studies.
Isolation of Lactobacillus strains from the prairie vole intestine
List of bacterial and fungal strains used in this study
Vole small intestine
Vole small intestine
Human blood isolate
Human vaginal isolate
Human fecal isolate
Strain differentiation by RAPD analysis
DNA oligonucleotide primers and hydrolysis probes used in this study
Adapted from 
Abundance of lactobacilli in the prairie vole GI tract
For purposes of characterizing the baseline state of vole gut microbiota, we have used same-sex cage mates. This eliminates the potential confounds of stress responses associated with social isolation or endocrine responses associated with reproductive activation, mating, and parental behavior [6–10]. Further research will be needed to assess whether and how the microbiota might change in pair-bonded and/or parental animals. Although these are important questions, they are beyond the scope of this paper, and will be addressed in subsequent studies.
Acid tolerance of isolated Lactobacillus strains
Resistance to bile and the bile acid taurocholate
H2O2 production and IC50 values of human and vole Lactobacillus strains for bovine bile, taurocholate, and HgCl2
H2O 2 a
Bovine bile (%)b
7 ± 0.3
0.1 ± 0.03
0.1 ± 0.00
3.0 ± 0.9
0.1 ± 0.01
0.1 ± 0.01
4.2 ± 0.3
0.2 ± 0.01
0.2 ± 0.04
1.6 ± 0.1
0.1 ± 0.03
0.1 ± 0.03
1.8 ± 0.8
0.1 ± 0.03
0.1 ± 0.03
0.8 ± 0.4
0.1 ± 0.03
0.2 ± 0.23
7 ± 1.2
0.2 ± 0.16
0.2 ± 0.23
2.8 ± 0.6
0.2 ± 0.07
0.2 ± 0.10
3.3 ± 0.7
0.2 ± 0.07
0.2 ± 0.11
3.6 ± 0.7
0.1 ± 0.03
0.2 ± 0.13
0.2 ± 0.22
0.2 ± 0.22
0.4 ± 0.3
0.1 ± 0.10
0.2 ± 0.22
0.2 ± 0.1
9 ± 2.3
0.2 ± 0.06
0.2 ± 0.24
0.2 ± 0.1
10 ± 3.5
0.1 ± 0.12
0.2 ± 0.15
1.4 ± 0.5
0.1 ± 0.05
0.1 ± 0.09
5 ± 1.2
0.1 ± 0.05
0.2 ± 0.23
8 ± 1.2
0.2 ± 0.27
0.2 ± 0.25
8 ± 1.7
0.1 ± 0.11
0.2 ± 0.12
9 ± 0.3
0.1 ± 0.09
0.2 ± 0.23
9 ± 1.7
0.2 ± 0.25
0.2 ± 0.25
0.2 ± 0.1
10 ± 2
0.2 ± 0.25
0.2 ± 0.26
9 ± 0.7
0.1 ± 0.08
0.4 ± 0.23
0.13 ± 0.1
3 ± 1.6
0.3 ± 0.20
0.4 ± 0.12
0.2 ± 0.1
13 ± 1.2
0.2 ± 0.18
0.2 ± 0.10
0.2 ± 0.1
10 ± 1.2
0.1 ± 0.08
0.2 ± 0.11
0.3 ± 0.2
9 ± 1.0
0.3 ± 0.16
0.3 ± 0.12
8 ± 3.9
0.1 ± 0.04
0.1 ± 0.05
0.2 ± 0.1
10 ± 2.3
0.1 ± 0.02
0.4 ± 0.07
11 ± 2.6
0.2 ± 0.14
0.2 ± 0.11
0.8 ± 0.2
0.1 ± 0.03
0.2 ± 0.05
4.0 ± 0.8
0.02 ± 0.0
0.02 ± 0.0
1.0 ± 0.1
0.1 ± 0.04
0.2 ± 0.11
Resistance to mercuric chloride
Lactobacilli have been suggested as candidate microorganisms that could aid in bioremediation and detoxification of heavy metals in the environment and in humans . As a first step in the assessment of the capability of the investigated lactobacilli in mercury detoxification, we tested the strains’ resistance to different mercury chloride concentrations. The IC50 values are summarized in Table 3. Based on percentage growth at the initial 24 h incubation, most selected strains were found to be inhibited to 50 % of control growth by concentrations ≥0.1 mmol/L of HgCl2. In some strains (e.g., PV037), longer incubation to 48 h revealed adaptive effects, i.e. an increase in the IC50 value, suggesting the induction of resistance mechanisms. Overall, these results indicated that the tested vole strains and LGG tolerated similar HgCl2 concentrations in growth media while strain ATCC 33200 exhibited at least five-fold lower resistance (Table 3).
Inhibition of pathogens
Adhesion to the intestinal epithelial cell line Caco-2
The susceptibilities of the five probiotic candidates to eight antibiotics from different antibiotic classes were determined by broth microdilution testing. Relatively low MICs were found with clindamycin, erythromycin, ampicillin, and doxycyclin (see Additional file 2: Table S1). However, the strains and controls (ATCC 33200 and LGG) were highly resistant to the aminoglycoside antibiotic neomycin.
It has become evident that the gut microbiota can influence host physiology, gut brain-communication, brain function and behavior . The emerging concept of intricate involvement of the gut microbiota in the bidirectional communication between the enteric and central nervous systems (gut-brain-axis) raises the possibility of modulation of the integrated neuronal, hormonal and immune pathways by administration of probiotics . In the present study, we isolated and characterized thirty Lactobacillus strains closely related to L. johnsonii from prairie voles, animals which have been suggested as a powerful experimental model in which to study the social brain . In light of the in vitro results reported here, we propose the selection of five strains with high probiotic potential for further studies on the potential role of probiotics in modulating neurological disorders that are associated with social withdrawal symptoms.
Lactobacilli are commonly associated with the gastrointestinal tract of animals and humans, as also evidenced by our Lactobacillus abundance results in the vole GI tract (see Fig. 3). Interestingly, these results suggest high numbers of lactobacilli in the stomachs of some animals. Voles, like many herbivorous small mammals, are known to be coprophagic . However, to what extent coprophagy serves to maintain a steady supply of microorganisms, in addition to the well-established nutritional benefits of coprophagy , is unknown. Thus, it is unclear whether the relatively high concentrations of lactobacilli in the stomach are the result of recent ingestion of fecal material, or are representative of the normal stomach microbiota in voles.
Probiotic effects of lactobacilli are based on adaptation factors for survival in the host’s gastrointestinal tract and probiotic factors for competition with pathogens and further health-promoting interactions with the host . L. johnsonii appears to be the main species of lactobacilli inhabiting the human gastrointestinal tract and some L. johnsonii strains have been shown to exert probiotic effects [11, 46, 47]. Factors characteristic of L. johnsonii probiotics encompass immunomodulation, the ability to adhere to mammalian cells, and pathogen inhibition through production of antimicrobial substances such as lactic acid and bacteriocins. As an example, L. johnsonii NCC533 exerts antimicrobial mechanisms against several pathogens in vitro, including pH reduction, and lactic acid, bacteriocin and H2O2 production [48–50]. Here, we report that even though the isolated strains share highly similar 16S rRNA gene sequences to the species L. johnsonii, not all Lactobacillus isolates in this study produced the antimicrobial H2O2 under the test conditions. Nonetheless, the four H2O2 producers were among the eleven isolates exerting potent antibacterial and even antifungal effects. Although the identities of the inhibitory substances generated by the vole isolates have not been characterized, the broad inhibitory effects against the indicator bacteria and fungi are likely to be due to production of peroxide, organic acids such as lactic acid, bacteriocins, and other antimicrobial substances as reported for many probiotic Lactobacillus strains [45, 51]. Lactic acid production in concert with a low pH microenvironment leads to increased cellular toxicity due to diffusion of the undissociated acid into cells and subsequent intracellular acidification which could also promote synergism with other antimicrobial components [45, 52, 53]. Alakomi and coworkers  stated that lactic acid, in addition to its antimicrobial property based on lowering of the pH, also functions as a permeabilizer of the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria, and thus potentiates susceptibility to other antimicrobial molecules.
During passage through the stomach, orally administered probiotics are exposed to high levels of acid stress. The pH value of gastric juice can vary in the range from 1.5 to 4.5 in a 2 h period . Thus, probiotic candidates destined to benefit intestinal function must be able to remain viable after several hours in a highly acidic environment. As demonstrated, 17 of the investigated strains revealed acid tolerance after 4 h incubation under strong acidic conditions and were able to retain cell viability (Fig. 4). The results are similar to previous reports [56, 57] which suggests that the isolated strains have the ability to passage through the stomach without sustaining severe damage.
Resistance to bile and bile acid is another important adaptive factor of probiotics in the intestinal tract. Reports regarding the composition of bile juice from different animals are limited; as a result, most studies used ox gall (bovine bile) as a substitute. The average bile concentration is around 0.3 % and may range up to 2 % during the first hour of digestion . We used bovine bile at concentrations ranging from 0.13 to 8 % to assess bile tolerance of the Lactobacillus strains. Previous reports stated that lactobacilli tolerated on average 0.3 % [51, 55, 56]. After 24 h incubation, five strains including ATCC 33200 exhibited IC50 values >2 % while the probiotic reference strain L. rhamnosus GG showed an IC50 of 1 %. Exposure to bile is accompanied by mild acid stress. Therefore, bile resistance is based on hydrolysis of bile (salts) and mechanisms of acid tolerance . Future studies will reveal why some of the isolated strains can withstand such high bile concentrations.
We also investigated the strains’ susceptibility to inorganic mercury, a trait usually not considered in the characterization of probiotics. However, intestinal bacteria, including lactobacilli, play important roles in intestinal homeostasis, and their susceptibility to toxic metals could be of importance in certain gastrointestinal and/or neurological diseases induced by these metals . Administering probiotics resistant to toxic metals could be an important factor to ameliorate metals-induced neurological disorders, including those associated with social withdrawal symptoms. A goal of this study is the identification of strains with high resistance to mercury chloride in combination with potent probiotic properties, which could potentially be used in future prophylactic or therapeutic interventions in the prairie vole animal model of mercury effects on social behavior . Our in vitro studies revealed that some vole Lactobacillus isolates, in contrast to the lower tolerance of ATCC 33200, had IC50 values as high as 125 μmol/L which is 16,968 times the recommended maximum level of inorganic mercury for human consumption (2 ppb, ). A few strains (e.g., PV012, PV037; see Table 3) showed adaptation when the 24–48 h exposures to HgCl2 were compared. Higher IC50 values at 48 h could be due to induction of resistance genes/mechanisms, e.g., exerted by detoxifying proteins such as mercuric reductase (merA) or metal transporters. Interestingly, an unpublished draft genome sequence of strain PV012 generated via Ion Torrent PGM sequencing by our laboratory revealed the presence of a potential merA gene (data not shown). This gene might be expressed during extended inorganic mercury exposure to convey detoxification processes. Additionally, binding and sequestration of toxic metals by lactobacilli could be a possible remedial process which could be another probiotic health effect [37, 61, 62].
Probiotic bacteria can generate biofilms in the intestinal tract, albeit isolated cells and microcolonies appear to be more frequently encountered forms of colonization . Nevertheless, we evaluated the strains for biofilm formation on an abiotic surface (polystyrene) in standard MRS medium without biofilm-promoting stressors (e.g., bile addition or omission of glucose; [63, 64]. Strains PV024, PV029, and PV036 showed the highest biofilm production (Fig. 7), however, these strains exhibited low degrees of antimicrobial activity and tolerance to bile and/or acidic pH conditions. Thus, under our assay conditions the ability to form biofilms on abiotic surfaces was negatively correlated with probiotic potential.
Adhesion of probiotic bacteria to the intestinal mucosa is considered another important adaptation factor for probiotic activity . Several components of the bacterial cell surface appear to participate in the adherence of the bacterial strains to intestinal epithelial cells. Adhesion properties are strain characteristics and cannot be generalized to the species and therefore have to be individually tested . In this study, we identified five strains that combined high resistance to acid, bile, and metal toxicity with potent antimicrobial properties and assayed their adhesion to the human intestinal cell line Caco-2. PV012 was the most adhesive strain followed by PV019 and PV039. The observed adhesion percentages were comparable with previous studies [11, 57]. Moreover, the adherence of both PV012 and PV019 was comparable or even better than that of ATCC 33200 and LGG (see Fig. 8). At present little is known whether adhesion of the vole isolates is regulated by inter- or intra-species signaling (quorum sensing) or which cell envelope components are involved in the adhesion process. However, strong adhesion to cells from a non-adapted host suggests a more generalized adhesion mechanism. Future studies will help to elucidate whether adhesion properties are correlated with probiotic effects in vivo.
The antibiotic susceptibility profiles of the prairie vole Lactobacillus strains (see Additional file 2: Table S1) could be of interest for future genetic manipulations of these bacteria and also for studies on the effects of antibiotics on the vole gastrointestinal microbiome.
Most importantly, future studies will investigate whether the isolated Lactobacillus strains are capable of influencing brain function and thereby altering behavior. In this context, probiotic effects on the highly developed social behavior of these animals will be of particular interest.
Through the combined use of enrichment media, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and molecular strain typing, we isolated and differentiated thirty Lactobacillus strains from the prairie vole intestine. The described characterization of a set of adaptive and probiotic factors led to the selection of five vole Lactobacillus strains: PV012, PV017, PV018, PV019, and PV039. The selected strains showed evidence of potent antibacterial and antifungal properties, strong adherence to intestinal epithelial cells as well as resistance to bile and low pH. Moreover, they could potentially be employed in intestinal detoxification of inorganic mercury. Thus, the selected strains meet important prerequisites to study probiotic health effects in the prairie vole social behavior model.
Strains and culture conditions
Bacteria and fungi used in this study are shown in Table 1. Bacterial cultures were routinely grown in Difco Lactobacilli MRS broth (de Mann, Rogosa and Sharpe medium for lactobacilli; BD Diagnostics, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) or Luria–Bertani broth (LB Miller, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; for E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) at 37 °C. YPD medium (Fisher Scientific; 10 g/L yeast extract, 20 g/L tryptone, 20 g/L dextrose) was used for growing Candida albicans. Solid media were generated by adding 15 g/L (bacteria) or 20 g/L (fungi) agar to the respective media. Stock cultures were maintained at −80 °C with 15 % v/v glycerol as cryopreservative.
Animal care and handling
The voles used in this study were sexually-naïve adult (>60 days of age) male and female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) from a laboratory breeding-colony descended from an Illinois population and were of the F4 and F5 generations relative to most recent out-crossing with wild stock. Voles are housed at 21 °C with a 14:10 light:dark cycle. Breeding pairs are housed in plastic cages (20 × 25 × 45 cm) containing corncob bedding with hay as nesting material. Ad libitum food (Purina rabbit chow supplemented with black-oil sunflower seeds) and water are available. After weaning at 21 days of age, offspring are housed in same-sex pairs in plastic cages (10 × 17 × 28 cm) until used in experiments. Except for the breeding pairs, sexes are maintained in separate rooms until used in experiments. The general experimental manipulations and animal handling procedures were approved by the Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Bacterial strain isolation from the prairie vole GI tract
The bacterial strains isolated and characterized in this study are shown in Table 1. Two animals from each sex were euthanized and duplicate intestinal specimens were collected from the cecum, small intestine and colon. Following suspension of intestinal content in 0.5 mL sterile water, a dilution series (100–10−5) was prepared for each sample and 100 μL of each dilution were cultured immediately on MRS agar plates. Samples from different animals or sites were kept separate. Enrichment for lactobacilli was achieved under anaerobic growth conditions at 37 °C for 48 h using a GasPak™ 100 container and EZ Anaerobe Pouch system (BD Diagnostics). Subsequently, bacterial colonies were randomly selected (up to 10 colonies per plate) and sub-cultured at least twice for purification. Only isolates with good and uniform growth on MRS agar were considered for further study. Following repeated purification, a distinct colony from selected isolates was used as inoculum for liquid MRS cultures. After 24–48 h of growth, frozen stock cultures with 15 % (v/v) glycerol as cryopreservative were prepared from these cultures. Working cultures were routinely propagated from the stocks aerobically or anaerobically.
Lactobacillus DNA extraction, PCR and 16S rRNA-based identification
DNA extractions were performed from each of the thirty isolates. Bacterial DNA was isolated from 10 ml MRS broth culture grown overnight using a ZR Fungal/Bacterial DNA MiniPrep™ kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4500×g for 10 min at 4 °C and re-suspended in 750 µL of lysis buffer and added to ZR Bashing Bead Lysis tubes. A Mini-Beadbeater-96 (Biospec Products, Bartlesville, OK, USA) was employed for cell disruption. The resulting crude bacterial cell homogenates were processed for genomic DNA isolation according to the kit’s instructions. DNA concentrations were determined using a BioTek Synergy 2 Multimode Microplate Reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc. Winooski, Vermont).
The universal primers 8F and 1491R (see Table 2) were used to generate PCR amplicons of the bacterial 16S rRNA genes . PCRs were carried out in a PTC-200 DNA Engine thermocycler (Bio Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) in 50 µL reactions employing AmpliTaq Gold 360 Master Mix (25 µL, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 0.2 μM of 8F/1491R primer mix, and 1–2 µL bacterial DNA solution (100 ng) following the manufacturer’s guidelines. Amplification parameters consisted of an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 10 min followed by 30 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 55 °C, and 90 s at 72 °C. A final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min completed the reactions. Aliquots of the PCRs were evaluated by gel electrophoresis on 1 % agarose gels. Successful PCRs were purified and concentrated using the ZR DNA Clean and Concentrator 25 kit (Zymo Research) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Sanger sequencing of the isolates’ 16S rRNA gene amplicons was performed for species identification. PCR amplicons from twelve isolates were cloned in the pCR4-TOPO vector (TOPO TA Cloning Kit, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for sequencing, whereas the remaining eighteen PCR amplicons were directly sequenced. The latter approach yielded results faster, while still providing the sequence information necessary for classification of the strains. Recombinant plasmids were transformed into E. coli Novablue Singles™ competent cells (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) by electroporation using an ECM 399 electroporation system (BTX Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA, USA). Plasmids from successful transformations were isolated with the Zyppy Plasmid Midiprep kit (Zymo Research) following the manufacturer’s instructions and then sequenced. Amplicons/plasmid inserts were sequenced from both directions at the OSU Stillwater Recombinant DNA/Protein Core Facility. For classification of the isolates, the assembled sequences were compared to published 16S rDNA sequences in the NCBI GeneBank and Greengenes databases (http://www.greengenes.lbl.gov/blast; ) using the BLAST tool.
Determination of the relative abundance of lactobacilli in the prairie vole GI tract
The relative abundance of Lactobacillus 16S rRNA gene copies in various regions of the prairie vole gastrointestinal tract (stomach, proximal and distal small intestine, cecum, and colon) was determined by exonuclease-based quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). For this purpose, DNA was isolated from gastrointestinal contents of five female and seven male animals (one sample per site) using the ZR Fecal DNA MiniPrep kit (Zymo Research) according to the manufacturer’s directions. A group-specific assay to detect lactobacilli was designed employing the primer pair TaqLacF-TaqLacR in conjunction with the hydrolysis probe GKLPV16STaq (Table 2). For normalization across samples, qPCR assays with broad-range primers (GK1053F-1391R) and the hydrolysis probe GKUNI16STaqCCC were used. Quantitative PCR reactions were run on Applied Biosystems StepOne™ or 7500 real-time PCR systems using the TaqMan Universal Master MixII with UNG reagents (Life Technologies) and the following reaction parameters: UNG incubation 2 min at 50 °C, polymerase activation 10 min at 95 °C, 40 cycles of denaturation (30 s at 95 °C), annealing (30 s at 52 °C), and extension (90 s at 65 °C). Ribosomal RNA copy numbers were determined by comparison of quantification cycle values (Cq) of sample assays with standard curves generated with pLBB4c, a plasmid containing a Lactobacillus 8F-1491R 16S rRNA gene fragment that provided a quantified template for both targets. Assays were replicated at least in duplicate. Relative abundances of Lactobacillus 16S rRNA gene copies in each sample were calculated as percentages of the respective broad-range PCR values.
Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fingerprinting
Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis was used to genetically differentiate the isolated Lactobacillus strains. For RAPD fingerprinting, the same bacterial DNA extracts were used as for cloning and sequencing so that the results could be directly matched. RAPD analysis was adapted from a previously described procedure . The oligonucleotide primer RAPD 272 (see Table 2) was used throughout the study. PCRs were run on a PTC-200 DNA Engine thermocycler (Bio Rad) in 25 µL reactions employing AmpliTaqGold 360 Master Mix (12.5 µL, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 10 µmol/L primer and 100 ng template DNA. PCR cycles were performed as follows: (1) 4 cycles of 94 °C for 5 min, 36 °C for 5 min (70 s ramp time), and 72 °C for 5 min (70 s ramp time), (2) 30 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min (55 s to heat from 72 °C), 36 °C for 1 min. (60 s ramp time), 72 °C for 2 min (70 s ramp time); and (3) a final extension of 72 °C for 6 min followed by a hold at 4 °C. All Lactobacillus strains were processed in duplicate to ensure RAPD typing was reproducible and reliable. The probiotic strains L. johnsonii ATCC 33200 and L. rhamnosus GG were used as references. PCR amplicons were separated by gel electrophoresis using 1.5 % high resolution agarose gels in 1× Tris–Acetate-EDTA buffer with a 100 bp DNA ladder (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) as size marker. Gels were stained with SYBR Safe DNA gel stain (Life Technologies) and scanned with a Typhoon 9410 Variable Mode Imager (GE Healthcare Biosciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). The resulting fingerprint bands were analyzed with Image Quant TL software (GE Healthcare) and PCR fragments patterns for each strain were determined. These amplicon patterns were used for cluster analyses to compare RAPD results of the Lactobacillus strains using “DendroUPGMA” (http://genomes.urv.cat/UPGMA/; ).
Acid tolerance test
Freshly grown Lactobacillus cultures were pelleted at 4500×g for 10 min at 4 °C, washed twice and re-suspended in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2). Each pellet was diluted to OD600nm = 0.05 in PBS at pH 1–5, 7 (adjusted with 1.0 N HCl) and incubated at 37 °C for 1, 2, and 4 h. Subsequently, 20 µL of the bacteria were inoculated into Cellstar 96-well tissue culture plates (Greiner Bio-One, Monroe, NC, USA) containing 180 µL of MRS broth and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Growth was determined by OD600nm readings on a microplate reader.
Bile and bile acid tolerance test
The method described by Ehrmann and coworkers  was used for testing tolerance to bovine bile (B3833, Sigma-Aldrich) and taurocholate (T4009, Sigma-Aldrich). Following overnight cultures in MRS, the bacteria were inoculated to a starting OD600nm = 0.05 in 96-well tissue culture plates containing MRS with dilution series of bovine bile (0.13, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 % w/v) or taurocholate (0.2, 0.4, 0.9, 1.8, 3.5, 7.0, and 14 mmol/L). MRS broth without addition of inhibitors was used as control. After incubation for 24 h, growth was determined by OD600nm readings. Each assay was carried out in duplicate wells and repeated three times.
Antimicrobial effects towards bacteria and fungi
The antimicrobial activity in Lactobacillus culture supernatants was tested as previously described by Lee and coworkers . Briefly, the vole Lactobacillus strains and the two reference strains (ATCC 33200 and LGG) were cultured overnight in 6-well tissue culture plates (Cellstar, Greiner Bio-One). Cell-free supernatants were harvested by centrifugation for 5 min at 4000×g, sterilized with 0.2 µm polyethersulfone membrane syringe filters, and 100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, 3.12, and 1.6 µL of the supernatants were pipetted into Cellstar 96-well tissue culture plates. The volume in each well was adjusted to 100 µL with MRS broth. As indicator microorganisms, the pathogens P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, C. albicans, and the non-pathogenic K-12 E. coli strain NovaBlue Singles (see Table 1) were added in 100 µL fresh medium (LB for E. coli and P. aeruginosa, MRS for C. albicans and S. aureus; all adjusted OD600nm = 0.01) into the wells containing Lactobacillus supernatants and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Pure cultures of each indicator microorganism were included as controls. Growth of the indicators was assessed by optical density readings at 600 nm in a Biotek Synergy 2 microplate reader. The assay was carried out in duplicate wells and repeated three times with all microbial cultures prepared fresh from frozen stocks.
Analysis of H2O2 production
The ability of the isolates to produce hydrogen peroxide was determined qualitatively using the 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS)-MRS agar method . Thirty mg of ABTS (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 2 mg of horseradish peroxidase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) were dissolved in 10 mL distilled water and filter-sterilized. This ABTS/peroxidase solution was added to 90 mL of MRS agar that had been cooled to 50 °C following autoclaving. Twenty-five mL of the solution were poured into petri dishes and left to solidify. Four µL of freshly grown Lactobacillus suspensions adjusted to OD600nm = 1 were spotted on the agar plates and incubated for 24 h under anaerobic conditions. Subsequently, culture plates were exposed to ambient air for up to 24 h for pigment formation. Production of hydrogen peroxide was visualized by light to dark purple colonies. Each assay was performed in duplicate plates and repeated three times. Probiotic strains L. reuteri RC-14 and L. rhamnosus GG were included as positive and negative controls, respectively.
Mercuric chloride resistance assay
For determining the strains’ resistance to HgCl2 (215465, Sigma-Aldrich), the Lactobacillus strains were grown aerobically overnight in MRS broth. The assay was performed in 96-well plates with 100 µL inocula in MRS (OD600nm = 0.05) prepared from the overnight cultures and additional 100 µL of MRS broth containing HgCl2 dilutions to achieve end concentrations of 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.0625, 0.031, 0.015, and 0.008 mmol/L. Wells containing MRS broth without HgCl2 were included as a control. Growth was monitored at 24 and 48 h using a BioTek Synergy 2 microplate reader for OD600nm determinations. All tests were performed in triplicate wells and the experiment was repeated thrice.
The ability of the Lactobacillus strains to form biofilms on plastic surfaces was quantified using the crystal violet staining method . The strains were grown in MRS medium in a 6-well plate under aerobic conditions for 48 h. Subsequently, the culture medium was aspirated and adherent cells were washed twice with sterile PBS. Three mL of 0.02 % crystal violet (w/v) was added into each well to stain the surface attached bacteria and incubated for 20 min. Excess dye was rinsed off by washing the cells 5 times with distilled water. Two mL ethanol (95 %) was added to each well to redissolve the crystal violet dye from the biofilms. Following alcoholic elution, 200 µL aliquots of the eluate were transferred to a microplate and the absorbance was read at 590 nm in a Synergy 2 Multimode Microplate Reader. All tests were carried out in triplicate wells and repeated three times.
Caco-2 cell adhesion assay
The Caco-2 cell line (HTB-37) was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA). The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s minimal essential medium (DMEM; Life Technologies) supplemented with 10 % (v/v) heat-inactivated (30 min, 56 °C) fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin (Life Technologies) at 37 °C, 5 % CO2in a Heracell 150i incubator (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). For adhesion assays, Caco-2 monolayers were prepared in 24-well standard tissue culture plates (Cellstar, Greiner Bio-One). The Caco-2 cells were seeded at a concentration of 1.0 × 104 cells per well to obtain confluence and maintained for 20 days prior to the adhesion assays. The cell culture medium was replaced every other day. The number of cells per well was determined by trypsinization of the monolayer and counting using a hemocytometer. In addition, cell number and viability of the monolayer was confirmed using the PrestoBlue Cell Viability Reagent kit according to manufacturer’s instructions (Life Technologies).The adherence of Lactobacillus strains to Caco-2 cells was determined by the method of Fernandez et al.  with some modifications. Briefly, the Caco-2 monolayer was washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) pH 7.4 (Sigma). PBS was also used to wash and adjust the lactobacilli to desired cell densities. Dilutions according to OD600nm readings were used for approximation of cell densities. Viable bacterial cell numbers introduced in the adhesion assays were determined by CFU counting on MRS agar. Bacteria from an overnight culture were washed in PBS. For each adhesion assay, 500 µL of Lactobacillus suspension ranging from 1.5 × 108 to 4.9 × 108 cells per ml were added to the wells containing Caco-2 monolayers and incubated at 37 °C in 5 % CO2 atmosphere. After 90 min of incubation, the Caco-2 monolayers were washed three times with PBS to release non-adherent bacteria. In order to enumerate the attached viable bacteria, the mammalian cells were lysed in sterile water by repeated up and down pipetting for 10 min. Appropriate dilutions of the mixtures of lysed Caco-2 cells and bacteria were plated on MRS agar plates and incubated at 37 °C. The CFU count was determined after 48 h incubation. Data were expressed as the percent adhesion rate, i.e., the ratio between the number of adherent bacteria and the number of bacteria added to the cell monolayer. Each adhesion assay was performed in duplicate wells with cells from three successive passages (P5, P8, and P14). ATCC 33200 and LGG were included as reference strains.
Antibiotic susceptibility testing
The antibiotic susceptibilities of selected Lactobacillus strains (five prairie vole isolates and two controls) were determined using a broth microdilution assay as described previously . The microplate assay was adapted to MRS medium in order to support vigorous growth of lactobacilli. Eight antimicrobial drugs representing different antibiotic classes were tested: ampicillin, chloramphenicol, neomycin (A9518, C0378, N6386; Sigma-Aldrich), doxycycline, ciprofloxacin (BP2653, 449620050; Thermo Fisher Scientific), erythromycin, cephalexin monohydrate, and clindamycin HCl (E57000, C59000, C41050, Research Products International Corp.; Mount Prospect, IL, USA). Antibiotic stock solutions were prepared according to the manufacturers’ recommendations and diluted to final assay concentrations of 64–0.125 mg/L or 128–0.25 mg/L (only neomycin and cephalexin) in assay volumes of 200 μl per microplate well . Lactobacillus inocula were adjusted to OD600nm = 0.001 and plates were read after 18 h of incubation. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was defined as the lowest concentration of antibiotic giving a complete inhibition of visible bacterial growth in comparison to control wells . All tests were performed twice with duplicate wells.
All quantitative data are the average of three independent experiments ± standard deviations (mean ± SD). Statistical significance of the results was evaluated by one-way or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the IBM SPSS Statistics package (version 19) and PRISM (version 5; GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
SA: contributions to concepts, design, performed experiments, input to analysis and interpretation of data, contribution in drafting and revising the manuscript. KA performed the Lactobacillus abundance analysis. SB provided draft genome sequences for strain PV012, PV021, and PV034. JTC provided animals and managed the prairie vole colony for the entire project. GAK: project PI, was involved in strain isolation, sequencing, analysis and interpretation of data, writing, editing and revising of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This research was supported by the Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences (OSU-CHS). Additional funding to GAK was provided by the Health Research award project number HR13-013 from the Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology. The StepOne™ Real-Time PCR system used in this study was supported by Cancer Sucks Inc., Bixby, OK, USA. The authors are thankful to Dr. Robert Allen, OSU-CHS Department of Forensic Sciences, for providing access to the ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR system and to Dr. Gregor Reid, R&D Centre for Probiotics, Lawson Health Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, for providing L. reuteri RC-14.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, Merenstein DJ, Pot B, et al. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11(8):506–14. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Metchnikoff E. Essais optimistes. Paris: A. Maloine; 1907.Google Scholar
- Ahrne S, Nobaek S, Jeppsson B, Adlerberth I, Wold AE, Molin G. The normal Lactobacillus flora of healthy human rectal and oral mucosa. J Appl Microbiol. 1998;85(1):88–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reid G, Kim SO, Köhler GA. Selecting, testing and understanding probiotic microorganisms. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2006;46(2):149–57.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Antonio MA, Hawes SE, Hillier SL. The identification of vaginal Lactobacillus species and the demographic and microbiologic characteristics of women colonized by these species. J Infect Dis. 1999;180(6):1950–6. doi:10.1086/315109.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gustafsson RJ, Ahrne S, Jeppsson B, Benoni C, Olsson C, Stjernquist M, et al. The Lactobacillus flora in vagina and rectum of fertile and postmenopausal healthy Swedish women. BMC Womens Health. 2011;11(1):17. doi:10.1186/1472-6874-11-17.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hummelen R, Macklaim JM, Bisanz JE, Hammond JA, McMillan A, Vongsa R, et al. Vaginal microbiome and epithelial gene array in post-menopausal women with moderate to severe dryness. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e26602. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026602.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Salvetti E, Torriani S, Felis G. The genus Lactobacillus: a taxonomic update. Probiotics Antimicro Prot. 2012;4(4):217–26. doi:10.1007/s12602-012-9117-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mercenier A, Pavan S, Pot B. Probiotics as biotherapeutic agents: present knowledge and future prospects. Curr Pharm Des. 2003;9(2):175–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pridmore RD, Berger B, Desiere F, Vilanova D, Barretto C, Pittet AC, et al. The genome sequence of the probiotic intestinal bacterium Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC 533. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(8):2512–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamano T, Iino H, Takada M, Blum S, Rochat F, Fukushima Y. Improvement of the human intestinal flora by ingestion of the probiotic strain Lactobacillus johnsonii La1. Br J Nutr. 2006;95(2):303–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bercik P, Denou E, Collins J, Jackson W, Lu J, Jury J et al. The intestinal microbiota affect central levels of brain-derived neurotropic factor and behavior in mice. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(2):599–609, e1–3. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.052.
- Bravo JA, Forsythe P, Chew MV, Escaravage E, Savignac HM, Dinan TG, et al. Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(38):16050–5. doi:10.1073/pnas.1102999108.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kamiya T, Wang L, Forsythe P, Goettsche G, Mao Y, Wang Y, et al. Inhibitory effects of Lactobacillus reuteri on visceral pain induced by colorectal distension in Sprague-Dawley rats. Gut. 2006;55(2):191–6. doi:10.1136/gut.2005.070987.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bravo JA, Julio-Pieper M, Forsythe P, Kunze W, Dinan TG, Bienenstock J, et al. Communication between gastrointestinal bacteria and the nervous system. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2012;12(6):667–72. doi:10.1016/j.coph.2012.09.010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13(10):701–12. doi:10.1038/nrn3346.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aragona BJ, Wang Z. The prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster): an animal model for behavioral neuroendocrine research on pair bonding. ILAR J. 2004;45(1):35–45.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carter CS, DeVries AC, Getz LL. Physiological substrates of mammalian monogamy: the prairie vole model. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1995;19(2):303–14. doi:10.1016/0149-7634(94)00070-H.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Insel TR. A neurobiological basis of social attachment. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154(6):726–35.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Young LJ, Pitkow LJ, Ferguson JN. Neuropeptides and social behavior: animal models relevant to autism. Mol Psychiatry. 2002;7(suppl 2):S38–9. doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001175.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Getz L, Carter CS, Gavish L. The mating system of the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster: field and laboratory evidence for pair-bonding. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1981;8(3):189–94. doi:10.1007/BF00299829.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- DeVries AC. Interaction among social environment, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, and behavior. Horm Behav. 2002;41(4):405–13. doi:10.1006/hbeh.2002.1780.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- DeVries AC, DeVries MB, Taymans SE, Carter CS. The effects of stress on social preferences are sexually dimorphic in prairie voles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93(21):11980–4.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- DeVries AC, Glasper ER, Detillion CE. Social modulation of stress responses. Physiol Behav. 2003;79(3):399–407.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- DeVries AC, Taymans SE, Carter CS. Social modulation of corticosteroid responses in male prairie voles. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997;807:494–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Klein SL, Hairston JE, Devries AC, Nelson RJ. Social environment and steroid hormones affect species and sex differences in immune function among voles. Horm Behav. 1997;32(1):30–9. doi:10.1006/hbeh.1997.1402.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carter CS, Getz LL. Monogamy and the prairie vole. Sci Am. 1993;268(6):100–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grippo AJ, Lamb DG, Carter CS, Porges SW. Cardiac regulation in the socially monogamous prairie vole. Physiol Behav. 2007;90(2–3):386–93. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.09.037.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Curtis JT, Wang Z. The neurochemistry of pair bonding. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2003;12(2):49–53. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01224.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kenkel WM, Yee JR, Porges SW, Ferris CF, Carter CS. Cardioacceleration in alloparents in response to stimuli from prairie vole pups: the significance of thermoregulation. Behav Brain Res. 2015;286:71–9. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2015.02.033.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lyons SA, Getz LL. Reproductive activation of virgin female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) by paired and unpaired males. Behav Process. 1993;29(3):191–9. doi:10.1016/0376-6357(93)90123-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Taylor SA, Salo AL, Dewsbury DA. Estrus induction in four species of voles (Microtus). J Comp Psychol. 1992;106(4):366–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pierides M, El-Nezami H, Peltonen K, Salminen S, Ahokas J. Ability of dairy strains of lactic acid bacteria to bind aflatoxin M1 in a food model. J Food Prot. 2000;63(5):645–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meriluoto J, Gueimonde M, Haskard CA, Spoof L, Sjovall O, Salminen S. Removal of the cyanobacterial toxin microcystin-LR by human probiotics. Toxicon. 2005;46(1):111–4. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2005.03.013.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bhakta JN, Ohnishi K, Munekage Y, Iwasaki K, Wei MQ. Characterization of lactic acid bacteria-based probiotics as potential heavy metal sorbents. J Appl Microbiol. 2012;112(6):1193–206. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05284.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Halttunen T, Salminen S, Tahvonen R. Rapid removal of lead and cadmium from water by specific lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;114(1):30–5. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.10.040.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Monachese M, Burton JP, Reid G. Bioremediation and tolerance of humans to heavy metals through microbial processes: a potential role for probiotics? Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(18):6397–404. doi:10.1128/aem.01665-12.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Curtis JT, Hood AN, Chen Y, Cobb GP, Wallace DR. Chronic metals ingestion by prairie voles produces sex-specific deficits in social behavior: an animal model of autism. Behav Brain Res. 2010;213(1):42–9. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.04.028.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mahenthiralingam E, Marchbank A, Drevinek P, Garaiova I, Plummer S. Use of colony-based bacterial strain typing for tracking the fate of Lactobacillus strains during human consumption. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9:251. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-9-251.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bizhang M, Ellerbrock B, Preza D, Raab W, Singh P, Beikler T, et al. Detection of nine microorganisms from the initial carious root lesions using a TaqMan-based real-time PCR. Oral Dis. 2011;17(7):642–52. doi:10.1111/j.1601-0825.2011.01815.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Byun R, Nadkarni MA, Chhour KL, Martin FE, Jacques NA, Hunter N. Quantitative analysis of diverse Lactobacillus species present in advanced dental caries. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(7):3128–36. doi:10.1128/JCM.42.7.3128-3136.2004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- O’Toole GA, Pratt LA, Watnick PI, Newman DK, Weaver VB, Kolter R. Genetic approaches to study of biofilms. Methods Enzymol. 1999;310:91–109.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McGraw LA, Young LJ. The prairie vole: an emerging model organism for understanding the social brain. Trends Neurosci. 2010;33(2):103–9. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2009.11.006.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of the vole. Nutrient Requirements of Laboratory Animals, Fourth Revised Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 1995. pp. 144–8.Google Scholar
- Lebeer S, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SC. Genes and molecules of lactobacilli supporting probiotic action. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008;72(4):728–64. doi:10.1128/mmbr.00017-08.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Klaenhammer TR, Azcarate-Peril MA, Altermann E, Barrangou R. Influence of the dairy environment on gene expression and substrate utilization in lactic acid bacteria. J Nutr. 2007;137(3 suppl 2):748S–50S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamano T, Tanida M, Niijima A, Maeda K, Okumura N, Fukushima Y, et al. Effects of the probiotic strain Lactobacillus johnsonii strain La1 on autonomic nerves and blood glucose in rats. Life Sci. 2006;79(20):1963–7. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2006.06.038.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Allison GE, Klaenhammer TR. Functional analysis of the gene encoding immunity to lactacin F, lafI, and its use as a Lactobacillus-specific, food-grade genetic marker. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62(12):4450–60.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- De Vuyst L, Leroy F. Bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria: production, purification, and food applications. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;13(4):194–9. doi:10.1159/000104752.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pridmore RD, Pittet AC, Praplan F, Cavadini C. Hydrogen peroxide production by Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC 533 and its role in anti-Salmonella activity. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008;283(2):210–5. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01176.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin WH, Yu B, Jang SH, Tsen HY. Different probiotic properties for Lactobacillus fermentum strains isolated from swine and poultry. Anaerobe. 2007;13(3–4):107–13. doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2007.04.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cabo ML, Braber AF, Koenraad PM. Apparent antifungal activity of several lactic acid bacteria against Penicillium discolor is due to acetic acid in the medium. J Food Prot. 2002;65(8):1309–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Köhler GA, Assefa S, Reid G. Probiotic Interference of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 with the opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2012;2012:14. doi:10.1155/2012/636474.
- Alakomi HL, Skytta E, Saarela M, Mattila-Sandholm T, Latva-Kala K, Helander IM. Lactic acid permeabilizes gram-negative bacteria by disrupting the outer membrane. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66(5):2001–5.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Verdenelli MC, Ghelfi F, Silvi S, Orpianesi C, Cecchini C, Cresci A. Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus paracasei isolated from human faeces. Eur J Nutr. 2009;48(6):355–63. doi:10.1007/s00394-009-0021-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ehrmann MA, Kurzak P, Bauer J, Vogel RF. Characterization of lactobacilli towards their use as probiotic adjuncts in poultry. J Appl Microbiol. 2002;92(5):966–75.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kaushik JK, Kumar A, Duary RK, Mohanty AK, Grover S, Batish VK. Functional and probiotic attributes of an indigenous isolate of Lactobacillus plantarum. PLoS One. 2009;4(12):e8099. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008099.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gotcheva V, Hristozova E, Hristozova T, Guo M, Roshkova Z, Angelov A. Assessment of potential probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria and yeast strains. Food Biotechnol. 2002;16(3):211–25. doi:10.1081/FBT-120016668.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ibrahim F, Halttunen T, Tahvonen R, Salminen S. Probiotic bacteria as potential detoxification tools: assessing their heavy metal binding isotherms. Can J Microbiol. 2006;52(9):877–85. doi:10.1139/w06-043.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Risher JF. Elemental mercury and inorganic mercury compounds: human health aspects. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.Google Scholar
- Robinson JB, Tuovinen OH. Mechanisms of microbial resistance and detoxification of mercury and organomercury compounds: physiological, biochemical, and genetic analyses. Microbiol Rev. 1984;48(2):95–124.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bisanz JE, Enos MK, Mwanga JR, Changalucha J, Burton JP, Gloor GB et al. Randomized open-label pilot study of the influence of probiotics and the gut microbiome on toxic metal levels in Tanzanian pregnant women and school children. MBio. 2014;5(5):e01580-14. doi:10.1128/mBio.01580-14.
- Lebeer S, Verhoeven TL, Perea Velez M, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SC. Impact of environmental and genetic factors on biofilm formation by the probiotic strain Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(21):6768–75. doi:10.1128/aem.01393-07.
- Ambalam P, Kondepudi KK, Nilsson I, Wadstrom T, Ljungh A. Bile stimulates cell surface hydrophobicity, Congo red binding and biofilm formation of Lactobacillus strains. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2012;333(1):10–9. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02590.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M, editors. Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. New York: Wiley; 1991. p. 115–75.Google Scholar
- DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(7):5069–72. doi:10.1128/AEM.03006-05.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Garcia-Vallve S, Palau J, Romeu A. Horizontal gene transfer in glycosyl hydrolases inferred from codon usage in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;16(9):1125–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee DY, Seo YS, Rayamajhi N, Kang ML, Lee SI, Yoo HS. Isolation, characterization, and evaluation of wild isolates of Lactobacillus reuteri from pig feces. J Microbiol. 2009;47(6):663–72. doi:10.1007/s12275-009-0124-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rupf S, Merte K, Eschrich K, Stosser L, Kneist S. Peroxidase reaction as a parameter for discrimination of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus. Caries Res. 2001;35(4):258–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li X, Yan Z, Xu J. Quantitative variation of biofilms among strains in natural populations of Candida albicans. Microbiology. 2003;149(Pt 2):353–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fernandez MF, Boris S, Barbes C. Probiotic properties of human lactobacilli strains to be used in the gastrointestinal tract. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94(3):449–55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wiegand I, Hilpert K, Hancock RE. Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(2):163–75. doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.521.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gillum AM, Tsay EY, Kirsch DR. Isolation of the Candida albicans gene for orotidine-5′-phosphate decarboxylase by complementation of S. cerevisiae ura3 and E. coli pyrF mutations. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;198(1):179–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Holloway BW, Krishnapillai V, Morgan AF. Chromosomal genetics of Pseudomonas. Microbiol Rev. 1979;43(1):73–102.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Reid G, Charbonneau D, Erb J, Kochanowski B, Beuerman D, Poehner R, et al. Oral use of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and L. fermentum RC-14 significantly alters vaginal flora: randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 64 healthy women. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003;35(2):131–4. doi:10.1016/S0928-8244(02)00465-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reid G, Cook RL, Bruce AW. Examination of strains of lactobacilli for properties that may influence bacterial interference in the urinary tract. J Urol. 1987;138(2):330–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Silva M, Jacobus NV, Deneke C, Gorbach SL. Antimicrobial substance from a human Lactobacillus strain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987;31(8):1231–3.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Turner S, Pryer KM, Miao VP, Palmer JD. Investigating deep phylogenetic relationships among cyanobacteria and plastids by small subunit rRNA sequence analysis. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1999;46(4):327–38.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baker GC, Smith JJ, Cowan DA. Review and re-analysis of domain-specific 16S primers. J Microbiol Methods. 2003;55(3):541–55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar