Skip to main content

Virulence factors, prevalence and potential transmission of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from different sources: recent reports


Extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) are facultative pathogens that are part of the normal human intestinal flora. The ExPEC group includes uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC), neonatal meningitis E. coli (NMEC), sepsis-associated E. coli (SEPEC), and avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC). Virulence factors (VF) related to the pathogenicity of ExPEC are numerous and have a wide range of activities, from those related to bacteria colonization to those related to virulence, including adhesins, toxins, iron acquisition factors, lipopolysaccharides, polysaccharide capsules, and invasins, which are usually encoded on pathogenicity islands (PAIs), plasmids and other mobile genetic elements. Mechanisms underlying the dynamics of ExPEC transmission and the selection of virulent clones are still poorly understood and require further research. The time shift between colonization of ExPEC and the development of infection remains problematic in the context of establishing the relation between consumption of contaminated food and the appearance of first disease symptoms. What appears to be most difficult is to prove that ExPEC strains cause disease symptoms and to examine the mechanism of transition from the asymptomatic colonization of the intestines to the spreading of the bacteria outside the digestive system. A significant problem for researchers who are trying to ascribe ExPEC transmission to food, people or the environment is to draw the distinction between colonization of ExPEC and infection. Food safety is an important challenge for public health both at the production stage and in the course of its processing and distribution. Examination of the genetic similarity of ExPEC strains will allow to determine their origin from different sources. Many levels of genotyping have been proposed in which the typing of strains, plasmids and genes is compared in order to obtain a more complete picture of this complex problem. The aim of our study was to characterize E. coli strains isolated from humans, animals and food for the presence of bacterial genes encoding virulence factors such as toxins, and iron acquisition systems (siderophores) in the context of an increasing spread of ExPEC infections.


Escherichia coli are a group of bacteria normally found in the flora of human and animal digestive tracts and symbionts participating in digestion and synthesis of certain vitamins. Currently, 171 somatic (O), 55 flagellar (H) and 80 capsular (K) antigens have been identified, and there are over 160 serological types of E. coli. E. coli are involved in the urinary tract infection (UTI), hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), sepsis, surgical site infection (SSI), gastrointestinal tract infections, hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS), meningitis and inflammation of the meninges [1].

Mobile genetic elements of E. coli can be horizontally exchanged in related bacteria or in bacteria from different families, which allows their settlement in different environments. E. coli strains can be classified into the following phylogenetic groups: A, B1, B2, C, D, E, F, and clade I [2, 3]. Commensal E. coli, with no pathogenic features, that occur, among others, on the gastrointestinal tract mucosa, most often represent group A or B1. Pathogenic E. coli responsible for intestinal infections represent phylogenetic groups A, B1 or D. E. coli responsible for extraintestinal infections belong to groups B2 and D. Group E is related to group D (including O157: H7), while group F is related to the main group B2. Clones of E. coli strains, which are genetically diverse but phenotypically indistinguishable, have been assigned to cryptic clade I [4, 5].

There are some studies that revealed that the avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) and extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) strains, that cause infections in humans, are quite closely phylogenetically related and share some of the same virulence genes [6, 7]. It is possible that APEC strains could hypothetically pose a health risk to humans [8]. A genetic analysis carried out by Rodriguez-Siek and coworkers showed that APEC strains could be a reservoir of virulence genes of ExPEC, pathogenic to humans. This could be the reason for the genetic diversity and genes exchange among pathogenic E. coli strains. Some of human extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli strains have the iss gene in their genomes, which is responsible for increased survival of bacteria in the serum. The iss gene is located on plasmid ColV, a huge virulence plasmid typical of avian pathogenic E. coli strains, which indicates that an exchange of plasmids and, consequently, exchange of those virulence genes is possible between human and avian pathogenic E. coli strains [6].

The development of techniques of molecular biology enables for sequencing whole genomes of reference E. coli strains for example: commensal E. coli K-12, pathogenic strain O157:H7 that causes intestinal infections and uropathogenic E. coli J96. There are also known whole genetic sequences of at least 20 E. coli strains [2, 9]. Analysis of sequences of house-keeping genes that is MutliLocus Sequence Typing, MLST made possible to more accurate exploration the phylogenetic structure of E. coli species [10, 11]. This method based on determining the allel’s types of selected house-keeping genes and strains are assigned to Sequence Types, (STs) [2]. Analysis with MLST application showed faults and blanks in the past division of E. coli into four main phylogenetic groups. Analysis with sequencing revealed that among E. coli species there are hybrid groups and about 80–85% of E. coli strains were incorrectly assigned to phylogenetic groups [11,12,13]. With application of MLST revealed that among multidrug resistant extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli strains the most frequent is Sequence Type 131 (ST131) [14]. ST131 is a clone of E. coli disseminated worldwide and resistant to many antibiotics [15].

ExPEC—the spectrum of diseases

Extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) (Dale i Woodford) have a complex phylogenetic structure, wide range of virulence factors (VF), and considerable plasticity of the genome. These strains not only cause uncomplicated UTIs, but also bacteremia or sepsis. Mechanisms underlying the dynamics of ExPEC transmission and the selection of resistant clones are still poorly understood and require further research [16]. The ExPEC group includes uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC), neonatal meningitis E. coli (NMEC), sepsis-associated E. coli (SEPEC), and avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) (Table 1, Fig. 1). ExPEC E. coli have many virulence-associated factors, including adhesins, toxins, iron acquisition factors, lipopolysaccharides, polysaccharide capsules, and invasins, which are usually encoded on pathogenicity islands (PAIs), plasmids, and other mobile genetic elements [4, 5]. Urinary tract infection is one of the most common infectious diseases. Urinary tract represents a sterile space with the exception of the distal urethra. Urinary tract infections account for approximately 40% of all nosocomial infections and for 10–20% hospital-acquired infections, of which 81% occur in women aged 16–35 years. In men above 60 years of age, the incidence of UTI increases, which is associated with impaired urinary outflow due to enlarged prostate gland [17]. Urinary tract infections affect about 10% of the pediatric population and are diagnosed in about 1% of boys and about 3–8% of girls. In the neonatal period, the infection is more common in boys (approximately 60%), whereas from the age of 2–3 months this tendency is reversed. As there are no characteristic clinical symptoms in this period of life, sometimes the first observed symptoms of UTI are psychosomatic disorders or hypertension [18, 19]. Clinical symptoms associated with UTI may have a different clinical picture, ranging from asymptomatic bacteriuria, various ascending infections (e.g. acute pyelonephritis), up to severe urosepsis [18]. The most common etiologic pathogens associated with UTI include Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae, with predominating strains of uropathogenic E. coli [19]. E. coli strains are responsible for 75–95% of uncomplicated UTIs and for 40–50% of complicated UTIs [17].

Table 1 Virulence genes of ExPEC encoding adhesins, toxins and siderophores
Fig. 1

Pathogenic diversity of Escherichia coli strains

ExPEC are facultative pathogens that are part of the normal human intestinal flora, but their presence may be associated with some infectious diseases such as UTIs, neonatal meningitis (NMEC E. coli) and sepsis (SEPEC E. coli), with UTI being the most prevalent. Most UTIs are caused by a highly heterogeneous group of ExPEC, termed uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC). Urinary tract infection is a social problem that affects people all over the world; in the United States, for example, UTIs account for 4–5 billion dollars in health care costs a year [20].

APEC causing colibacillosis in poultry is considered to be a pathotype of ExPEC. Colibacillosis seems to be the major infectious disease in birds, responsible for significant economic losses of poultry farms worldwide, leading to high mortality and a decrease in poultry production [21]. By its association with various disease conditions, APEC can cause infections of extraintestinal organs or sepsis and also secondary infections in poultry and in wildfowl. The diseases that may be caused by APEC in fowl include respiratory tract infections, septicemia, polyserositis, coligranuloma, cellulitis, yolk sac infection, omphalitis, and swollen head syndrome [22].

ExPEC—the specific virulence factors

Uropathogenic E. coli have many virulence factors, i.e. adhesins, toxins (e.g. alpha-hemolysin, cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1, autotransporter toxins), iron/heme-acquisition systems, and iron ion transport. P, S and type 1 fimbriae are responsible, among others, for adhesion to epithelial cells of intestines, kidneys, or lower urinary tract, and for stimulating cytokine production by T cells. Moreover, they are an important colonization factor in extraintestinal infections. A characteristic feature of UPEC is the ability to multiply intracellularly [2, 23]. The loss of a portion of the genome involved in the production of type 1 fimbriae and inactivation of genes encoding P fimbriae have led to the formation of strains responsible for asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU). These strains can colonize the urinary tract without inducing inflammation [24]. A potential source of UPEC is host own intestinal flora, but the infection can also be transmitted through the fecal–oral route or through sexual contact [24]. E. coli K1 strains are the etiological factor of the majority of neonatal invasive infections such as meningitis, bacteremia/sepsis, and the severity of such infections is directly related to the presence and amount of capsular antigen. The potential source of infection with E. coli K1 strains may be hospital staff [1]. Early E. coli infection may have its source in the urogenital or digestive tract, particularly in the case of UTI in the perinatal period. In 2010, the National Reference Centre for Infections of Central Nervous System (KOROUN) registered 68 cases of invasive E. coli infections, including 19 in newborns [1, 25].

The NMEC strains have the ability to survive in the bloodstream and invade meninges of infants. Neonatal meningitis caused by E. coli strains is one of the most common infections contributing to high neonatal mortality (10%) and morbidity (30%) rate. A considerable genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity among NMEC strains poses many difficulties in determining characteristics that can be used to distinguish them from commensal E. coli [26]. Important VFs of NMEC include K1 capsular antigen, protecting against phagocytosis and responsible for bacteria spreading, ibeA, B, C, promoting invasion into cells and further into the tissues, Iss protein protecting against phagocytosis—bactericidal action of serum, and the colony stimulating factor V, which is not present in the UPEC strains. The NMEC and SEPEC isolates include ibeA, B, C, traT, iss, colV, cvaC, gimB, sfa/foc genes encoded on plasmids, which are not found in the studied UPEC isolates [27].

APEC strains are characterized by a specific set of virulence genes which enable the bacteria to cause extraintestinal infections. The virulence factors typical of APEC include haemolysins (HlyE), colicins (CvaC), increased serum survival protein (iss), fimbriae type I (FimC), temperature-sensitive hemagglutinin (Tsh), and siderophores (IucC, SitA) [28, 29].

ExPEC is a major cause of infections, particularly UTIs and septicemia, in both humans and domestic animals. Resistance to oxyimino-cephalosporins (e.g. cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefovecin and ceftiofur) is often due to the production of hydrolyzing enzymes known as extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs). Antibiotic resistance in E. coli is a rapidly expanding problem due to the organism’s ability to mutate, acquire and transmit plasmids and other mobile genetic elements encoding resistance genes [30].

ExPEC pathogenicity-associated islands and ExPEC virulence associated plasmids

PAIs are specific regions on the bacterial chromosome where virulence genes accumulate. PAIs and their associated virulence genes spread among bacterial populations by horizontal transfer [31]. Several PAIs have previously been identified in uropathogenic E. coli strains such as E. coli 536, E. coli J96, E. coli CFT073. PAIs I to IV from strain 536 encode a range of virulence factors, including P fimbriae, P-related fimbriae, α-hemolysin, S-fimbriae and yersiniabactin siderophore system. PAIs IJ96 and IIJ96 encode P fimbriae, P-related fimbriae and α-hemolysin. PAIs ICFT073 and IICFT073 encode P fimbriae, α-hemolysin and aerobactin [27]. Detailed characteristics of the pathogenicity islands and the function encoded are presented in Table 2. PAIs are frequent among E. coli strains causing extraintestinal infections, and ExPEC strains mainly belong to phylogenetic groups B2 and D [32].

Table 2 The pathogenicity islands and the functions encoded

Naturally occurring plasmids are able to promote the dissemination of a variety of traits including drug resistance, virulence and the metabolism of rare substances. E. coli have been found to possess a variety of plasmid types including those associated with virulence. Despite the large number of plasmid types known to occur among E. coli strains, plasmids encoding virulence-associated traits fall almost exclusively within a single incompatibility family known as IncF. Like the intestinal pathotypes, many EXPEC strains also contain virulence plasmids [5]. These plasmids are listed and described in Table 3.

Table 3 Sequenced ExPEC virulence-associated plasmids

ExPEC include NMEC, one of the predominant agents of neonatal bacterial meningitis [33]. The virulence-associated genes of the NMEC plasmid core includes all genes of the aerobactin (iutA/iucABCD), sit (sitABCD) and salmochelin (iroBCDEN) operons. All three operons encode high-affinity iron-transport systems that are used by bacteria to obtain iron in low-iron conditions such as those they encounter in host fluids and tissues. These operons have previously been reported in virulence plasmids of UPEC, APEC and NMEC with high frequency and have been associated with ExPEC virulence [34]. The data indicate that the three iron uptake systems, namely the ferric aerobactin system, the salmochelin siderophore system, and sitABCD system, have been associated with ExPEC virulence, and are encoded by core the genome of NMEC large virulence plasmids [35]. Some of APEC’s VGs are located at the plasmids typical of APEC strains, for example: IncFIB, IncFIC, pTJ100, ColV lub ColBM [6, 36].

Another gene found in the core genome of NMEC large virulence plasmid is iss. This gene encodes a protein linked with increased serum survival in human E. coli isolates. Numerous studies have documented its strong alignment with virulent (but not with avirulent) E. coli strains. The genes ompT and hlyF are also found in the core genome of APEC’s large virulence plasmids. ompT is predicted to encode the 42-kDa pro-protein, which is processed in the membrane to the 40-kDa mature form. Mature iss functions as a narrowly specific outer membrane endoprotease that has three functions: (1) it cleaves paired basic residues and is involved in membrane protein turnover, (2) can degrade interferon-gamma in vitro, (3) cleaves the human defensin LL-37. The hlyF gene is predicted to encode the putative hemolysin gene [34, 37]. Core genes of ExPEC-like plasmids in NMEC are listed and presented in Table 4.

Table 4 Core genes of ExPEC-like plasmids in NMEC

The purpose of this study was to characterize E. coli strains isolated from different sources—humans, animals and food in the context of the presence of bacterial genes encoding virulence factors responsible for the production of adhesins, toxins and iron acquisition systems (siderophores) in relation to the growing number of infections with ExPEC etiology.

The role of surface virulence factors in the development of ExPEC infections

The ability of bacteria to adhere to host cells is a necessary condition allowing bacterial pathogens to colonize the body. This phenomenon is referred to as tissue tropism and involves specific interaction with the target receptors and the surface of a particular tissue [38].

Adhesive properties of ExPEC

Many surface structures play a significant role in the process of specific adhesion. There are three main types of adhesins: fimbriae, afimbrial adhesins (Afa), and outer membrane proteins (OMPs) [39]. The expression of surface adhesins increases the virulence of pathogenic E. coli by initiating close contact of the bacteria with the host cell wall. Most genes that determine the presence of fimbriae on the surface of bacterial cells are encoded chromosomally or, less frequently, within the plasmid DNA. Different bacterial adhesins are adapted to colonize a specific niche. S fimbrial adhesins (sfa), F1C (“pseudotype I”) fimbriae (foc), coding P-like pili, papC, and Iha (iha) are the most frequently detected adhesins among isolates from UTI patients [40]. In UPEC strains, receptors for P- and S- fimbriae are located on the surface of epithelial cells lining the host urinary tract [41]. S-fimbrial adhesins are virulence factors present in strains responsible for meningitis and sepsis. These fimbriae have the ability to bind extracellular matrix components and sialoglycoproteins on brain capillary endothelial cells. NMEC contains K1 capsular antigens (kpsM, neuA) or the ibeA invasion gene. The relationship between the type of infection and the presence of characteristic virulence factors has been demonstrated, e.g. IbeA protein has surface receptors on brain capillary endothelial cells and allows pathogens to invade the nervous system [42].

Compared to NMEC, SEPEC strains may show the presence of K2 capsular antigen (kpsMII) and P and F17 fimbriae [43]. In contrast to UPEC, the pathogenesis mechanisms of NMEC and SEPEC strains have not been fully elucidated. The comparative analyzes of DNA sequences of ExPEC genomes indicate that dissemination of their virulence factors is very diverse [32, 44]. Although research has been ongoing for many years, specific criteria for classifying E. coli strains as ExPEC have not been established yet. According to results obtained by Johnson et al., ExPECs were defined as E. coli isolates containing two or more virulence markers, which were determined by multiplex PCR reaction, including papA genes (structural subunit of P-fimbriae) and/or papC (P fimbriae), sfa/foc (S and F1C fimbriae subunits), afa/dra (adhesins binding antigen Dr), kpsMT II (group 2 capsular polysaccharides) and iutA (aerobactin receptor) [45]. Uropathogenic virulence factors are often detected in UPEC, but they are non-existent or rare in E. coli strains of the normal intestinal microflora. The prevalence of gene encoding adhesins in commensal strains and in UPEC has been defined according to studies by Qin et al. P-type fimbrial genes have been reported in 28% of UPEC isolates and in 5% of commensal strains. Genes encoding afimbrial adhesins Afa have been present in 36% of UPEC isolates, but they have not been reported in any of the studied commensal strains [46]. Symptomatic UTIs caused by E. coli are associated with the ability of these strains to produce a number of virulence factors, with adhesins as essential virulence determinants [47]. Horizontal gene transfer plays a role in the spread of virulence genes located in mobile genetic elements isolated from strains contaminating different food products. In UPEC strains isolated in Mexico from unpasteurized cheeses, fimA-agn43 was the most frequently detected combination of virulence genes (in up to 29%) [48]. Similarly, Aslam et al. [49] reported the high prevalence of many virulence genes (ompT, traT, uidA, vat, hemF, iss and cvaC), including the genes responsible for adhesion, fimH and kpsMT KII in ExPEC isolates from frozen poultry meat.

Fimbrial adhesins from ExPEC

Fimbriae with affinity for structures containing mannose residues were classified as type 1, and mannose resistant fimbriae classified as type 2 (e.g. P, S, Dr fimbriae). FimB and fimE are responsible for controlling the expression of type 1 fimbriae. Three other genes, i.e. fimF, fimG and fimH, are involved in the adhesive property and longitudinal regulation. FimH adhesin, which is formed from FimA protein subunits, binds to uroplakin 1A receptor (UP1a) of bladder epithelial cells, allowing invasion and formation of biofilm-like intracellular structures [50, 51]. In the mouse model, it has been confirmed that type 1 fimbriae enable bacterial growth in the form of biofilms [47]. Moreover, Tarchouna et al. [52] have examined the role of E. coli virulence factors in the UTI pathogenesis. The prevalence of genes coding for fimbrial adhesive systems has been 68% for fimH, 41% for pap, and 34% for sfa/foc, whereas afimbrial adhesins (afa) have been detected in 20% of the examined strains. Similarly, high prevalence of adhesin-encoding genes in UPEC isolates has been reported by Rahdar et al. [53], namely 95% for fim, 57% for pap, 16% for foc, and 81% for sfa.

Mannose-resistant fimbriae include hemolytic F-type fimbriae, which are encoded by 11 genes in the pap genes cluster located on the chromosome. PapG adhesin occurs in 3 molecular variants: PapGI, PapGII, PapGIII, with PapG III allele associated with bladder inflammation in women and children, and PapGII related to human bacteremia. The P fimbriae are also common virulence factors in renal transplant patients and in patients with acute renal impairment [47, 54]. According to Shetty et al. [55], high prevalence of adhesin-encoding genes from E. coli isolates in patients diagnosed with UTI confirms that these structures are necessary to cause an infection. It is worth noting that in the group of strains with adhesin-coding genes, two genes conditioning fimbrial production, i.e. pap and sfa, have been found in 30.43% of isolates. In another study, vegetable samples contaminated with sewage from India, Thailand, Vietnam, and the Dominican Republic were analysed (Table 5). The authors have detected one or more uropathogenic virulence genes in 17 out of 26 (65.4%) E. coli strains isolated from local vegetables, which suggests that although the presence of a single virulence gene is not sufficient to classify the strain as UPEC, it is worth paying more attention to non-animal food products as the route for the spread of virulence genes. The simultaneous analysis of the various potential UPEC/ExPEC reservoirs may be useful in assessing potential risk factors for infections and help better target research to suppress the spread of pathogenic E. coli strains.

F1C fimbriae (foc) can bind β-GalNac-1, 4b-Gal residues on glycolipids expressed by epithelial cells of distal tubules and cells of the collecting ducts of the kidney, as well as by endothelial cells of the bladder and kidneys [41]. F1C fimbriae are expressed by about 14% of UPEC isolates and are associated with S-type fimbriae (sfa). These two adhesins show a high degree of homology, but they differ in receptor specificity; S fimbriae are encoded by 9 genes. The sfaA gene contains information about the major subunit, and the sfaS gene - information about specific adhesion, which binds to the α-sialyl-(2,3)-β-Gal receptor in the renal tubular epithelial cells, renal glomeruli, or vascular epithelium. SfaS adhesin produced by the S fimbrial adhesion (sfa) mediates interactions with sialic acid receptors on renal epithelial and endothelial cells. S fimbriae allow invasion of pathogens to host tissues, as they are often detected in strains responsible for meningitis and ascending UTIs, including pyelonephritis or sepsis [47, 56]. In turn, the plasmid-encoded MrkD protein is characteristic for type 3 fimbriae adhesin, which binds to type V collagen in renal tubules and contributes to the formation of bacterial biofilm and colonization of urological catheters [57]. Szemiako et al. [58] have analyzed genetic determinants of virulence of E. coli strains, which enable bacterial translocation from the urinary tract into the bloodstream in renal transplant patients. The authors have analyzed the following genetic determinants of adhesins: fimG/fimH (type 1 fimbrial genes), sfaD/sfaE (S fimbrial genes), papC (P fimbrial gene), and genes encoding fimbriae of the Dr family, afa/dra (B-C). The results obtained by the researchers indicate that the combination of genes encoding two adhesion factors simultaneously, e.g. P + Dr, P + S, or S + Dr, S + fim, is associated with a much greater risk of such a strain entering the circulatory system. In another study, Krawczyk et al. [56] have analyzed E. coli strains which are capable of translocating from the gastrointestinal tract into the vascular bed. The examined bacterial strains were isolated from clinical material collected from 115 patients with hematopoietic tumors and bacteremia. Thanks to the methods of genotyping used in the research, the authors have reported that 89 E. coli strains isolated from blood have the same genotype as E. coli isolated from intestines. A detailed genetic analysis of the examined strains has indicated that ampicillin-resistant E. coli strains with the afa/dr pattern are most commonly associated with bacteremia. The authors have indicated that the coexistence of papC, sfa, usp and cnf1 genes encoding virulence factors may predispose E. coli to translocate from the gastrointestinal tract to the vascular bed in the group of patients with hematological cancers.

Afimbrial adhesins from ExPEC

An important group of superficial virulence factors associated, among others, with the occurrence of pyelonephritis and recurrent cystitis is the Afa/Dr family of adhesins, which contains both the fimbrial adhesins, with Dr fimbriae and Afa afimbrial adhesins found mainly in uropathogenic E. coli strains [59]. draE/afaE determine the expression of genetic information and the production of adhesins, and draA, draB, draC, draD (afaA, afaB, afaC, afaD) genes encode helper proteins. The receptor common for the whole family is the decay-accelerating factor (DAF), expressed on the surface of erythrocytes and cells of other tissues (e.g. the epithelium of the urinary tract). Adhesin Dr has two other receptors. One of them is basement membrane type IV collagen, an important factor favoring UTIs, and the other one is carcinoembryonic antigen related to cell adhesion molecules (CEACAM), which serves as a signal receptor regulating physiological changes. Attachment to this receptor facilitates bacterial invasion of intraepithelial cells [60].

The role of capsules and biofilm in the adhesion of ExPEC strains

The coating on the outer surface of the cell wall protects bacteria against phagocytosis and the bactericidal action of the complement system. The diversified structure of polysaccharide capsules produced by several dozen types of UPEC strains allows mimicking host tissue components and making recognition by the immune system difficult [47]. E. coli strains expressing the K1 antigen are associated with the development of neonatal sepsis [61]. The production of the capsular K1 antigen is contingent on the presence of the neuC gene. The group of 14 kps operons is responsible for the K1 capsule formation. The kpsMTII gene encodes proteins required for polymer translocation from its site of synthesis to the cell surface. Wijetunge et al. [26], based on the genotyping results of the examined NMEC strains, have found that all isolates have the capacity to invade human brain endothelial cells, and more than 70% of them carried kpsII, K1, neuC, iucC, sit genes. The examined NMEC strains demonstrated very high (79.2%) ability to form biofilms.

Bacterial capsular antigen K that covers the cell surface may inhibit adhesion to epithelial cells. The interaction of FimF with d-mannose inhibits the transcription of capsid genes, which may lead to a reduced amount of K antigen on the surface of the E. coli cell, and, as a result, facilitate the adhesion process [62]. In turn, UpaG, a member of auto-transporter family of adhesins, shows affinity for fibronectin and laminin, allowing UPEC adherence to the bladder epithelium. Additionally, UpaG participates in creating biofilm on plastics, which facilitates colonization of urological catheters [63].

The translocation of bacterial cells from the growth phase in plankton to the growth phase in the biofilm is associated with a change in the expression of many genes encoding not only virulence factors, but also regulatory proteins. The biofilm-forming ability of E. coli is affected by the expression of gene encoding antigenic Agn43 (i.e. flu), which is involved in aggregation of E. coli cells [64]. Urinary tract infections can often cause bacteremia, especially in hospitalized patients, when, due to catheter contamination, biofilm is produced by invasive ExPEC strains possessing many virulence factors [65,66,67]. In their analysis of genes determining production of adhesins by SEPEC strains, Conceição et al. [18] have indicated that 98.0% of these SEPEC strains tested positive for the fimH, 69.4% for flu, 53.1% for csgA, 38.8% for vat, and 32.7% for iha. The authors have suggested that SEPEC adhesion to cell surfaces occurs with the involvement of non-fimH mechanisms.

Prevalence and transmission of ExPEC strains in different food products

There are many studies on the reservoir of ExPEC in relation to food production and distribution [7, 49, 68, 69]. Examples of E. coli (ExPEC phenotype) strains with high prevalence of virulence genes detected from different food products are presented in Table 5. In 2015, using multiplex PCR test, Mitchell et al. [70] examined E. coli strains isolated from chicken meat and egg shells determining 5 ExPEC-defining markers, i.e. papA and/or papC (P fimbriae), sfa and/or foc (S and F1C fimbriae), afa and/or dra (Dr-binding adhesins), kpsM II (group 2 capsule), and iutA (aerobactin system). In the initial stage of the study, the authors have established genotypic and phenotypic criteria characteristic for individual pathotypes in the ExPEC group, which allowed assigning examined isolates to a specific pathotype. These included the culture in the urine for UPEC, while NMEC was determined by the detection of two genes, kpsMTK1 and ibeA. Based on the obtained results, it has been found that the prevalence of ExPEC is much lower among egg-source isolates than in the group of chicken-source E. coli isolates (4.7% and 21% respectively). Many methods have been applied to identify the ExPEC strains with the zoonotic potential, including strains able to cause one or more diseases in the animal models of sepsis, meningitis or UTI [5, 22, 71, 72]. This confirms the results of other studies which have proven that E. coli isolates from the feces of healthy Danish broiler chickens were virulent in the UTI mouse model [73]. APEC share common virulence factors with UPEC, which confirms earlier hypotheses stating that ExPEC play a role in food-borne infections and pointing to the association of APEC with extraintestinal infections in humans [28, 74, 75]. APEC strains could be carried from birds to human by improperly prepared poultry meat and by direct contact with birds and their feces [76, 77]. Borzi and colleagues showed that helmeted guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) could be a reservoir of antibiotic resistant APEC what is a potential health risk for other species including humans [78].

Table 5 Examples of E. coli (ExPEC phenotype) strains detection from different food products

The acronym FUTI (food-borne urinary tract infection) describes UTIs associated with contaminated food. Pathotypes of E. coli responsible for FUTI have not yet been precisely defined [74]. Jakobsen et al. [79] have attempted to detect the presence of ExPEC-associated virulence genes in E. coli isolated from UTI patients, production animals, and meat. All isolates have been tested for the presence of eight ExPEC-related genes (kpsMII, papA, papC, iutA, sfaS, focG, afa, hlyD). The obtained results suggest that food-producing animals may be reservoirs of strains carrying ExPEC-related virulence genes responsible for UTI in humans. A detailed analysis of the genetic virulence determinants and resistance profiles to antimicrobial agents in the examined ExPEC strains isolated from UTI patients, production animals, or meat, have shown their high similarity, which in turn may increase the risk of zoonotic infections caused by these strains. Khan et al. [80] have observed that in the group of ExPEC strains isolated from pork samples in Hubei (China), up to 85% belonged to group B2. Among genes encoding surface virulence factors, the most prevalent genes were kpsMII (74.5%), fimH (70.4%) and papC (47.3%), while among much less frequently detected strains in group D, the most widespread virulence genes were sfaS and focG (76.9%), fimH (46.2%), and afa (38.5%). The authors suggest that, similarly to the avian or human ExPEC, E. coli strains isolated from pigs have many genetic determinants of virulence, which promote UTI in humans.

In the study conducted in Brazil, Cunha et al. [81] have characterized 27 APEC isolates from different poultry farms that belonged to serogroup O6, which has often been isolated as the etiological agent of UTI and sepsis, not only in Brazil, but also globally. These strains have many genetic virulence determinants that commonly occur in UPEC and SEPEC isolates, and, to a lesser extent, in NMEC isolates obtained from newborns with meningitis, in which adhesin-encoding genes were most frequently detected: pap (85%), sfa (100%). On the other hand, Canadian studies on the frequency of detecting ExPEC in meat, have reported a significantly higher share of these isolates in samples from chickens compared to beef or pork [82]. The genetic similarity between E. coli strains isolated mainly from chickens and ExPEC that cause UTI in humans may indicate that meat, particularly from chickens, may be a reservoir for ExPEC causing UTI in humans. Many researchers suggest that detection of E. coli with virulence factors that facilitate the development of human ExPEC infections in food products of animal origin, particularly in poultry, is currently an important problem of food safety that requires constant monitoring [83].

Due to the phenomenon of phase variation, i.e. controlling the expression of bacterial structures responsible for adhesion, bacterial cells can regulate the process of developing fimbriae. Phase variation protects pathogens from the immune system. No fimbriae expression can result in the absence of adherence mechanisms and be a signal to produce other types of adhesins. It has been observed that strains without typical adhesins could adhere to and invade T-24 cells, and induce infections such as strains with those adhesins [83]. The results of the experiment show that the adhesion process is very complex and many mechanisms remain unexplained.

ExPEC siderophores and toxins

VFs related to the pathogenicity of ExPEC are numerous and have a wide range of activities, from those related to bacteria colonization to those related to virulence, i.e. invasiveness. Current scientific evidence suggests that infection cannot be caused by a single virulence factor, but by many specific agents. Most importantly, preference of bacteria to colonize a specific site in the host organism is associated with timed expression of genes encoding virulence factors. Additionally, it has been observed that the coexistence of many virulence genes is associated with increased intestinal translocation [3, 49, 70], and VF profiles of ExPEC strains from bacteremia are highly diversified [3]. Therefore, an interesting research trend is to determine the relationship between individual VFs typical of ExPEC and the localization of extraintestinal infection [70]. Siderophores, described extensively in this section, are secondary metabolites, with their primary function being to assist in capturing iron to maintain bacterial growth and development [84]. Although siderophore production can aid bacterial growth, production of these factors may increase metabolic costs [85]. Consecutive VFs, which were also the focus of this part of the paper, are toxins. Toxins play a very important role during an infection as they contribute to the spreading of bacteria in tissues, increase cytotoxicity and insensitivity to neutrophils [86].

Iron in human body

Iron (Fe) is essential for life and proper functioning of all living organisms, including vertebrates, invertebrates, and prokaryotic organisms such as bacteria [87]. Iron, as an electron carrier, plays a key role in basic cellular processes such as cellular respiration, DNA replication, or oxygen transport. Moreover, iron is built into the protein structure as a prosthetic group [88, 89]. To properly promote metabolic processes, share and display pathogenic properties, bacteria need access to Fe [90], and gaining such access is difficult as only a small amount of iron in nature is available to organisms [87, 91]. In the host organisms, iron is sequestered or distributed within cells and tissues by binding to proteins storing iron in tissues (ferritin). In higher organisms, iron mainly occurs as trivalent ions (Fe+3) of very low solubility [92]. Therefore, Fe in the porphyrin ring is a part of heme—cofactor of hemoglobin, myoglobin, and cytochromes [90, 93]. Iron ions stored in such a way become inaccessible to bacteria. Another strategy of preventing bacteria from using Fe resources in higher organisms is that it is captured by serous transferrin, which has very high affinity for Fe. When bacteria enter the body, macrophages accumulate free Fe in the cytoplasm [87, 94]. It is estimated that the concentration of unbound Fe in human serum is 10−24 M, whereas in tissues this value varies from 10−7 M to 10−5 M (M = mol/dm−3). These values are significantly lower than the level of Fe required for the proper functioning and division of bacterial cells, which ranges from 105 M to 106 M [95,96,97].

Acquiring iron by ExPEC

Iron deficiency weakens bacterial adaptive abilities by generating disturbances in cellular capsules [98]. However, thanks to their adaptive abilities, bacteria have developed mechanisms that enable them to acquire iron in the host body, thus survive and cause infection [99]. In the case of ExPEC strain, access to Fe in the blood serum is of paramount importance. Since E. coli can cause sepsis and infections of various organs with very low iron availability, this pathotype has developed many strategies for obtaining iron from infected sites [100, 101]. It has been proven that ExPEC strains have membrane pumps that transfer Fe to the cell interior, e.g. the FeoAB pump found in commensal and pathogenic E. coli [102], SitABCD transporter (ABC type transporter, ATP-binding cassette) [103], and Hma and ChuA transporters that enable Fe uptake directly from extracellular heme [96]. ExpEC pathotypes have specialized systems to indirectly uptake Fe based on the so-called shuttle mechanism involving small molecules (200–2000 Da) with high affinity for Fe ions (strong chelating properties) [97]. Interestingly, these complexes, called siderophores, occur not only in prokaryotes, but also in fungi and plants. Siderophores allow capturing trivalent iron (Fe+3) from ferritin and transferrin [89, 96]. The important role of siderophores in ExPEC virulence may be confirmed by the results obtained by Stromberg et al. [73] who have reported 100% gene prevalence for these factors in 40 ExPEC isolates from chicken faeces, including 38% strains growing in human urine.

Types of siderophores in ExPEC

Siderophores can be divided into five main classes: catecholates, phenolates, hydroxamic acids, α-hydroxycarboxylates, and a mixed type containing different siderophores. Extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli are equipped with siderophores that increase their virulence: enterobactin and salmochelin (catecholate siderophores), yersiniabactin (phenolate siderophore), and aerobactin (a mixed-type siderophore). Since the siderophore enterobactin is found in virtually all E. coli strains, both commensal and pathogenic, a question arises whether it should be considered as a virulence factor. Enterobactin and salmochelin are synthesized not only by E. coli, but also by other pathogenic gut bacteria such as Salmonella spp. or Klebsiella spp. [96, 97]. Salmochelin, a glycosylated derivative of enterobactin, was first discovered in Salmonella spp. (hence the name of this siderophore). Salmochelin occurs in ExPEC strains and is considered a characteristic virulence factor for the ExPEC pathotype. Salmochelin is encoded by the iroBCDEN gene cluster [104] located on ColV or ColBM virulence plasmids, or identified on PAIs [105]. It has been reported that IroB is the sole gene with glycosyltransferase activity necessary for salmochelin production, which leads to glycosylation of enterobactin that changes its properties from strongly hydrophobic to hydrophilic. This change may contribute to the virulence of ExPEC [106, 107]. The iroN gene is an ExPEC salmochelin marker and an important virulence gene in virotyping ExPEC strains [108]. Aerobactin is another siderophore characteristic for ExPEC. Similarly to salmochelin, this siderophore is also encoded by ColV and ColBM virulence plasmids of ExPEC [96, 105]. Aerobactin receptor shows much greater efficiency in capturing Fe than enterobactin. Extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli may include another type of siderophore, i.e. yersiniabactin, which was originally detected in Yersinia pestis, mainly during colonization of the urinary tract. Yersiniabactin contributes to the pathogenicity of uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC), especially during colonization of the urinary tract. Yersiniabactin may protect bacterial cells against host immune response [88, 96, 109].

Toxins produced by ExPEC

The analysis of literature data allowed extracting the most frequently detected genes encoding toxins in ExPEC, which include: tsh (temperature-sensitive hemagglutinin tsh autotransporter), hlyA, hlyD i hlyF (α-hemolysin), cnf1 (cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1), sat (secreted autotransported toxin), pic (protease involved in colonization), vat (vacuolating autotransporter protein), cdtB (cytolethal distending factor), and astA (enteroaggregative E. coli toxin) [2, 44, 69, 70, 110,111,112]. Genetic criteria proposed by Mellata et al. in studies on sepsis, meningitis, and rodent models of UTI have defined NMEC based on the presence of, among others, one or more genes encoding toxins: hlyF, tsh, astA, and cdtB. Depending on strains identified as NMEC, the authors have detected the tsh or cdtB gene, two genes (hlyF, tsh) or three genes (astA, hlyF, tsh). A similar correlation was observed in the case of siderophore genes, i.e. fyuA, iroN, iutA, ire, which were present in UPEC and NMEC (two or more) [70, 83]. In genotyping tests, studying ExPEC pathogenicity for poultry and rodents, Stromberg et al. have used multiplex PCR for the above-mentioned genes [73]. A comparative analysis using multiplex PCR has shown that ExPEC isolates from birds and humans contain similar sets of VF-encoding genes, and they fall into the same phylogenetic groups (A, B1, B2, and D), which suggests the zoonotic origin of ExPEC [113]. Chinese studies have indicated a dominating B2 group (169/285) among 285 analyzed samples from pig farms, slaughterhouses, and supermarkets. Most frequently detected genes for E. coli toxins and siderophores were iutA (82.9%, 97/117), ireA (60.6%, 71/117), cnf (57.3%, 67/117), hlyD (30.7%, 36/117), fyu (21.4%, 25/117), and vat (9.4%, 11/117), which represented more than half of all the virulence genes detected in E. coli strains [80].

Prevalence of genes encoding toxins and siderophores in ExPEC food isolates

In recent years, extensive research has been conducted into the spread of ExPEC in the human population in the context of eating contaminated food [47, 67, 82, 110, 113, 114]. As it has already been pointed out, detecting of these pathogens in food products is difficult because specific molecular markers have not yet been identified for ExPEC [73]. Mitchell et al. [70] have characterized and thoroughly analyzed ExPEC isolates from food products taking into account their division into UPEC, NMEC and SEPEC pathotypes. The authors have suggested that poultry can be the source of virulent pathotypes, capable of inducing UTI, neonatal meningitis, and sepsis. In the Canadian research, ExPEC isolates have been reported as the microbiological contamination of poultry available for sale in retail outlets, with a frequency of 8.4%. In all genetically analyzed strains, out of 54 virulence genes, 9 dominated in the case of ExPEC, while vat, responsible for the production of vacuole toxin, was the most frequently detected gene encoding toxins [28]. Studies carried out in Mexico have shown that the popular, region-specific, unpasteurized cheeses such as “Queso Fresco”, “Queso Crema”, “Queso Doble Crema”, “Queso Panela”, and “Queso Poro” were microbiologically contaminated with E. coli in more than 50% of cases. Although the highest percentage of strains belonged to the group causing gastrointestinal symptoms, 26% of strains were potential UPEC. Genes determining the synthesis of toxins and siderophores (hlyA, vat, cnf1, fyuA, iroN, iutA) have been used to identify ExPEC strains. The fyuA gene was found in 39% of isolates, and iutA and hlyA genes were detected in less than 10%. Potential uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) were isolated in 29% of samples. The general hygiene conditions and practices of producers influenced the quality of cheese, which was reportedly quite low [48]. Egyptian research from 2016 indicated that raw milk, Karish cheese and Ras cheese were highly contaminated with E. coli carrying hlyA, cnf1, vat genes and fyuA, iroN, iutA siderophores [69]. Moreover, eggs are reportedly contaminated with E. coli that cause diarrhea and with ExPEC pathogens. The Spanish study, based on data from 2016, shows that eggs for retail sale were of good quality due to the low incidence of E. coli on egg surface (34/180), which was around 19% [97]. In the United States, ExPEC pathotypes were detected only in 4% of examined eggs, and in 96% of poultry [70].

The time shift between colonization of ExPEC and the development of infection remains problematic in the context of establishing the relation between consumption of contaminated food and the appearance of the first symptoms of the disease. The most difficult part is to gather evidence in order to prove that ExPEC cause disease symptoms and to examine the mechanism of transition from the asymptomatic colonization of intestines to the spread outside the digestive tract. A significant challenge faced by researchers attempting to attribute ExPEC transmission to food, people or the environment is the delay between ExPEC colonization and infection [115]. Contrary to E. coli that cause diarrhea with symptoms occurring shortly after ingestion, ExPEC can live in human intestines for months or even years until they find favorable conditions, primarily associated with impaired immune function, urinary catheters, urethral infection, or prostate biopsy [116].

Pathogenicity of ExPEC resulting from toxins and siderophores

In a retrospective study of E. coli O45 isolates recovered from patients with colibacillosis and from poultry, Spanish and French researchers have detected multiple clusters of PFGE patterns similar at < 85% [67]. Direct transmission of ExPEC from food to humans is difficult to detect. Moreover, it would be highly unethical to test the effectiveness of causing ExPEC infections in humans. Therefore, the only possible solution is to determine the pathogenicity of bacteria on animal models or human cell lines. In the Stromberg et al.’s research from 2017 [73], it has been assessed whether chicken fecal E. coli isolates from healthy chickens could cause colibacillosis in chicken and rodent models. Selected isolates, genetically identified as ExPEC (showing i.a. hlyF, iutA, tsh genes) were tested for their virulence potential for humans to induce sepsis, meningitis, and UTIs in female BALB/c mice and CBA/J mice (to cause only UTI). It has been shown that the examined E. coli strains have the ability to cause central nervous system infections in the Sprague–Dawley rats meningitis model. Interestingly, some isolates classified as non-ExPEC were able to cause ExPEC-associated illnesses in animal models but the authors do not explain that mechanism. Focusing on the virulence factors determining the development of UPEC infections, Hagan et al. [40] have conducted a very interesting analysis of gene expression in E. coli isolates from the urine of women with suspected UTI. An important element was to link the expression of individual genes with the process of infection, which was assumed to represent naturally occurring processes in the cells during infection in humans. The authors have suggested that during UTI, E. coli uses many iron and carbon uptake pathways, which allows intensive replication with simultaneous inhibition of type 1 fimbriae synthesis. In another study, 96 ExPEC strains isolated from the urine and blood of patients at the University Hospital of Londrina have been compared with 50 commensal strains from healthy individuals. Among 96 patients infected with ExPEC, 90 (93.8%) were suffered from UTIs that were classified as cystitis (91.1%), urosepsis (6.7%), and pyelonephritis (2.2%). The iroN, iutA, ompT and hlyF genes have been more frequently detected in clinical ExPEC isolates compared to commensal isolates [117]. Other studies have demonstrated that strains isolated from cases of avian colibacillosis are able to cause disease in a rat model of human neonatal meningitis [5]. In order to further evaluate the zoonotic potential of ExPEC, the virulence of selected strains has been assessed in the mouse model. The authors have analyzed the potential of ExPEC to cause sepsis, meningitis and UTI, and whether virulence factors detected in vitro translate to virulence factors in vivo. Certain E. coli strains isolated from chickens were able to cause one or even many diseases, but interestingly, not only from the ExPEC spectrum. It has been assumed that E. coli may use different virulence-related strategies to induce sepsis, besides these associated with resistance to bactericidal action of complement [83]. These two examples prove that there is a need for further research on pathogenic E. coli in order to explain their virulence mechanisms.


Taking into account the latest epidemiological data on ExPEC infections, large-scale molecular research should be carried out on new reservoirs and pathways of ExPEC strains, and, in particular, on the mechanisms underlying invasive diseases and asymptomatic intestinal colonization so as to guide the development of different prophylactic procedures, such as production of vaccines or therapeutic strategies targeting new bacterial agents. This also underlines the importance of educating producers, traders and sellers about the new emerging microbial threats and the significant role of proper food trade to minimize such risks. A comparative analysis has shown that avian and human E. coli isolates contain similar sets of genes encoding virulence factors, and that they belong to the same phylogenetic groups, which may indicate the zoonotic origin of ExPEC. Many authors confirm the presence of genetically closely related strains isolated from infections of epidemic character, which usually presented unusual virulence profiles or antibiotics susceptibility. Researchers are particularly interested in the problem of food contamination by ExPEC/UPEC strains in correlation with their virulence factors. With the increasing demand for poultry meat and poultry products and the growing poultry industry around the world, food safety is an important challenge for public health. In order to assess the dissemination of ExPEC strains we should examine the level of genetic similarity between isolates from different hosts. Multiple levels of genotyping are proposed, in which typing of strains, plasmids and genes is compared in order to obtain a more complete picture of this complex problem.



urinary tract infection


hospital-acquired pneumonia


surgical site infection


hemolytic-uremic syndrome


extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli


virulence factors


uropathogenic E. coli


neonatal meningitis E. coli


sepsis-associated E. coli


avian pathogenic E. coli


pathogenicity island


asymptomatic bacteriuria


outer membrane proteins


decay-accelerating factor


carcinoembryonic antigen related to cell adhesion molecules


food-borne urinary tract infection


  1. 1.

    Alkeskas A, Ogrodzki P, Saad M, Masood N, Rhoma NR, Moore K, Farbos A, Paszkiewicz K, Forsythe S. The molecular characterisation of Escherichia coli K1 isolated from neonatal nasogastric feeding tubes”. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:449.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Baldy-Chudzik K, Bok E, Mazurek J. Well-known and new variants of pathogenic Escherichia coli as a consequence of the plastic genome. Post Hig Med Dosw. 2015;69:345–61.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Dale AP, Woodford N. Extra-intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC): disease, carriage and clones. J Infect. 2015;71:615–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Köhler CD, Dobrindt U. What defines extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli? Int J Med Microbiol. 2011;301:642–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Tivendale KA, Logue CM, Kariyawasam S, Jordan D, Hussein A, Li G, Wannemuehler Y, Nolan LK. Avian-pathogenic Escherichia coli strains are similar to neonatal meningitis E. coli strains and are able to cause meningitis in the rat model of human disease. Infect Immun. 2010;78:3412–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rodriguez-Siek KE, Giddings CW, Doetkott C, Johnson TJ, Fakhr MK, Nolan LK. Comparison of Escherichia coli isolates implicated in human urinary tract infection and avian colibacillosis. Microbiol Read Engl. 2005;151:2097–110.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Manges AR. Escherichia coli and urinary tract infections: the role of poultry-meat”. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:122–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bélanger L, Garenaux A, Harel J, Boulianne M, Nadeau N, Dozois CM. Escherichia coli from animal reservoirs as a potential source of human extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2011;62:1–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Chaudhuri RR, Henderson IR. The evolution of the Escherichia coli phylogeny. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12:214–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Johnson JR, Owens KL, Clabots CR, Weissman SJ, Cannon SB. Phylogenetic relationships among clonal groups of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli as assessed by multi-locus sequence analysis. Microbes Infect. 2006;8:1702–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wirth T, Falush D, Lan R, Colles F, Mensa P, Wieler LH, Karch H, Reeves PR, Maiden MC, Ochman H, Achtman M. Sex and virulence in Escherichia coli: an evolutionary perspective. Mol Microbiol. 2006;60:1136–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Gordon DM, Clermont O, Tolley H, Denamur E. Assigning Escherichia coli strains to phylogenetic groups: multi-locus sequence typing versus the PCR triplex method. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:2484–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Clermont O, Christenson JK, Denamur E, Gordon DM. The Clermont Escherichia coli phylo-typing method revisited: improvement of specificity and detection of new phylo-groups. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2013;5:58–65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Rogers BA, Doi Y. Who is leading this dance? Understanding the spread of Escherichia coli sequence type 131. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013;34:370–2.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Rogers BA, Sidjabat HE, Paterson DL. Escherichia coli O25b-ST131: a pandemic, multiresistant, community-associated strain. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66:1–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Riley LW. Pandemic lineages of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20:380–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Tan CW, Chlebicki MP. Urinary tract infections in adults. Singap Med J. 2016;57:485–90.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Conceição RA, Ludovico MS, Andrade CGTJ, Yano T. Human sepsis-associated Escherichia coli (SEPEC) is able to adhere to and invade kidney epithelial cells in culture. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2012;2012(45):417–24.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chakraborty A, Adhikari P, Shenoy S, Saralaya V. Molecular characterisation of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates at a tertiary care hospital in South India. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2017;35:305–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Foxman B. Urinary tract infection syndromes occurrence, recurrence, bacteriology, risk factors, and disease burden. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2014;28:1–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kemmett K, Williams NJ, Chaloner G, Humphrey S, Wigley P, Humphrey T. The contribution of systemic Escherichia coli infection to the early mortalities of commercial broiler chickens. Avian Pathol. 2014;43:37–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Markland SM, LeStrange KJ, Sharma M, Kniel KE. Old friends in new places: exploring the role of extraintestinal E. coli in intestinal disease and foodborne illness. Zoonoses Public Health. 2015;62:491–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ewers C, Li G, Wilking H, Kiebling S, Alt K, Antao E, Laturnus C, Diehl I, Glodde S, Homeier T. Avian pathogenic, uropathogenic, and newborn meningitis-causing Escherichia coli: how closely related are they? Int J Med Microbiol. 2007;297:163–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Terlizzi ME, Gribaudo G, Maffei ME. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) infections: virulence factors, bladder responses, antibiotic, and non-antibiotic antimicrobial strategies. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1566.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Sabih A, Leslie SW. Complicated urinary tract infections. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wijetunge DSS, Gongati S, DebRoy C, Kim KS, Couraud PO, Romero IA, Weksler B, Kariyawasam S. Characterizing the pathotype of neonatal meningitis causing Escherichia coli (NMEC). BMC Microbiol. 2015;15:211.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Schmidt H, Hensel M. Pathogenicity islands in bacterial pathogenesis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17:14–56.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ewers C, Antão EM, Diehl I, Philipp HC, Wieler LH. Intestine and environment of the chicken as reservoirs for extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli strains with zoonotic potential. Appl Env Microbiol. 2009;75:184–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Li G, Laturnus C, Ewers C, Wieler LH. Identification of genes required for avian Escherichia coli septicemia by signature-tagged mutagenesis. Infect Immun. 2005;73:2818–27.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Chroma M, Kolar M. Genetic methods for detection of antibiotic resistance: focus on extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czechoslov. 2010;154:289–96.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hacker J, Blum-Oehler G, Mühldorfer I, Tschäpe H. Pathogenicity islands of virulent bacteria: structure, function and impact on microbial evolution. Mol Microbiol. 1997;23:1089–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bingen-Bidois M, Clermont O, Bonacorsi S, Terki M, Brahimi N, Loukil C, Barraud D, Bingen E. Phylogenetic analysis and prevalence of urosepsis strains of Escherichia coli bearing pathogenicity island-like domains. Infect Immun. 2002;70:3216–26.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Grimwood K, Anderson P, Anderson V, Tan L, Nolan T. Twelve year outcomes following bacterial meningitis: further evidence for persisting effects. Arch Dis Child. 2000;83:111–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Johnson TJ, Wannemuehler YM, Nolan LK. Evolution of the iss gene in Escherichia coli. Appl Env Microbiol. 2008;74:2360–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Lemaître C, Bidet P, Benoit JF, Schlemmer D, Sobral E, d’Humieres C, Bonacorsi S. The ssbL gene harbored by the ColV plasmid of an Escherichia coli neonatal meningitis strain is an auxiliary virulence factor boosting the production of siderophores through the shikimate pathway. J Bacteriol. 2014;196:1343–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Mellata M. Human and avian extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli: infections, zoonotic risks, and antibiotic resistance trends. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2013;10:916–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Guindon S, Delsuc F, Dufayard JF, Gascuel O. Estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies with PhyML. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;537:113–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Klemm P, Hancock V, Schembri MA. Fimbrial adhesins from extraintestinal Escherichia coli. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2010;2:628–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lindberg S, Xia Y, Sondén B, Göransson M, Hacker J, Uhlin BE. Regulatory interactions among adhesin gene systems of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 2008;76:771–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hagan EC, Mobley HLT. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli outer membrane antigens expressed during urinary tract infection. Infect Immun. 2007;75:3941–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Mulvey MA. Adhesion and entry of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Cell Microbiol. 2002;4:257–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Bonacorsi S, Bingen E. Molecular epidemiology of Escherichia coli causing neonatal meningitis. Int J Med Microbiol. 2005;295:373–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Jakobsen L, Garneau P, Kurbasic A, Bruant G, Stegger M, Harel J, Jensen KS, Brousseau R, Hammerum AM, Frimodt-Møller N. Microarray-based detection of extended virulence and antimicrobial resistance gene profiles in phylogroup B2 Escherichia coli of human, meat and animal origin. J Med Microbiol. 2011;60:1502–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Johnson JR, Russo TA. Extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC): the “other bad E. coli”. J Lab Clin Med. 2002;139:155–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Singer RS. Urinary tract infections attributed to diverse ExPEC strains in food animals: evidence and data gaps. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:28.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Qin X, Hu F, Wu S, Ye X, Zhu D, Zhang Y, Wang M. Comparison of adhesin genes and antimicrobial susceptibilities between uropathogenic and intestinal commensal Escherichia coli strains. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e61169.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Bien J, Sokolova O, Bozko P. Role of uropathogenic Escherichia coli virulence factors in development of urinary tract infection and kidney damage. Int J Nephrol. 2012;3:681473–15.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Guzman-Hernandez R, Contreras-Rodriguez A, Hernandez-Velez R, Perez-Martinez I, Lopez-Merino A, Zaidi MB, Estrada-Garcia T. Mexican unpasteurised fresh cheeses are contaminated with Salmonella spp., non-O157 Shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli and potential uropathogenic E. coli strains: a public health risk. Int J Food Microbiol. 2016;237:10–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Aslam M, Toufeer M, Narvaez Bravo C, Lai V, Rempel H, Manges A, Diarra MS. Characterization of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from retail poultry meats from Alberta, Canada. Int J Food Microbiol. 2014;177:49–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Eto DS, Jones TA, Sundsbak JL, Mulvey MA. Integrin-mediated host cell invasion by type 1-piliated uropathogenic Escherichia coli. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:e100.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Rangel DE, Marín-Medina N, Castro JE, González-Mancera A, Forero-Shelton M. Observation of bacterial type I pili extension and contraction under fluid flow. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e65563.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Tarchouna M, Ferjani A, Ben-Selma W, Boukadida J. Distribution of uropathogenic virulence genes in Escherichia coli isolated from patients with urinary tract infection. Int J Infect Dis. 2013;17:e450–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Rahdar M, Rashki A, Miri HR, Ghalehnoo MR. Detection of pap, sfa, afa, foc, and fim adhesin-encoding operons in uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates collected from patients with urinary tract infection. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015;8:e22647.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Wullt B, Bergsten G, Connell H, Röllano P, Gebratsedik N, Hang L, Svanborg C. P-fimbriae trigger mucosal responses to Escherichia coli in the human urinary tract. Cell Microbiol. 2001;3:255–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Shetty AV, Kumar SH, Shekar M, Shetty AK, Karunasagar I. Prevalence of adhesive genes among uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from patients with urinary tract infection in Mangalore. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2014;32:175–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Krawczyk B, Śledzińska A, Szemiako K, Samet A, Nowicki B, Kur J. Characterisation of Escherichia coli isolates from the blood of haematological adult patients with bacteraemia: translocation from gut to blood requires the cooperation of multiple virulence factors. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;34:1135–43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Okrągła E, Szychowska K, Wolska L. Mechanisms of urinary tract sterility maintenance. Post Hig Med Dosw. 2014;68:684–94.

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Szemiako K, Krawczyk B, Samet A, Śledzińska A, Nowicki B, Nowicki S, Kur J. A subset of two adherence systems, acute pro-inflammatory pap genes and invasion coding dra, fim, or sfa, increases the risk of Escherichia coli translocation to the bloodstream. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;32:1579–82.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Frömmel U, Lehmann W, Rödiger S, Böhm A, Nitschke J, Weinreich J, Groß J, Roggenbuck D, Zinke O, Ansorge H, Vogel S, Klemm P, Wex T, Schröder C, Wieler LH, Schierack P. Adhesion of human and animal Escherichia coli strains in association with their virulence-associated genes and phylogenetic origins. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:5814–29.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Servin AL. Pathogenesis of Afa/Dr diffusely adhering Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18:264–92.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Sáez-López E, Bosch J, Salvia MD, Fernández-Orth D, Cepas V, Ferrer-Navarro M, Figueras-Aloy J, Vila J, Soto SM. Outbreak caused by Escherichia coli O18: K1: H7 sequence type 95 in a neonatal intensive care unit in Barcelona, Spain. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017;36:1079–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Schwan WR, Beck MT, Hultgren SJ, Pinkner J, Woolever NL, Larson T. Down-regulation of the kps region 1 capsular assembly operon following attachment of Escherichia coli type 1 fimbriae to d-mannose receptors. Infect Immun. 2005;73:1226–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Valle J, Mabbett AN, Ulett GC, Toledo-Arana A, Wecker K, Totsika M, Schembri MA, Ghigo J-M, Beloin C. UpaG, a new member of the trimeric autotransporter family of adhesins in uropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:4147–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Wallecha A, Oreh H, van der Woude MW, deHaseth PL. Control of gene expression at a bacterial leader RNA, the agn43 gene encoding outer membrane protein Ag43 of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2014;196:2728–35.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Marschall J, Zhang L, Foxman B, Warren DK, Henderson JP. Both host and pathogen factors predispose to Escherichia coli urinary-source bacteremia in hospitalized patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:1692–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Eberly AR, Floyd KA, Beebout CJ, Colling SJ, Fitzgerald MJ, Stratton CW, Schmitz EJ, Hadjifrangiskou M. Biofilm formation by uropathogenic Escherichia coli is favored under oxygen conditions that mimic the bladder environment. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:E2077.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Rijavec M, Müller-Premru M, Zakotnik B, Žgur-Bertok D. Virulence factors and biofilm production among Escherichia coli strains causing bacteraemia of urinary tract origin. J Med Microbiol. 2008;57:1329–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Jakobsen L, Garneau P, Bruant G, Harel J, Olsen SS, Porsbo LJ, Hammerum AM, Frimodt-Møller N. Is Escherichia coli urinary tract infection a zoonosis? Proof of direct link with production animals and meat. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;31:1121–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Ombarak RA, Hinenoya A, Awasthi SP, Iguchi A, Shima A, Elbagory ARM, Yamasaki S. Prevalence and pathogenic potential of Escherichia coli isolates from raw milk and raw milk cheese in Egypt. Int J Food Microbiol. 2016;221:69–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Mitchell NM, Johnson JR, Johnston B, Curtiss R, Mellata M. Zoonotic potential of Escherichia coli isolates from retail chicken meat products and eggs. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:1177–87.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Berman H, Barberino MG, Moreira ED, Riley L, Reis JN. Distribution of strain type and antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates causing meningitis in a large urban setting in Brazil. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:1418–22.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Green SI, Kaelber JT, Ma L, Trautner BW, Ramig RF, Maresso AW. Bacteriophages from ExPEC reservoirs kill pandemic multidrug-resistant strains of clonal group ST131 in animal models of bacteremia. Sci Rep. 2017;7:46151.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Stromberg ZR, Johnson JR, Fairbrother JM, Kilbourne J, Van Goor A, Curtiss RRd, Mellata M. Evaluation of Escherichia coli isolates from healthy chickens to determine their potential risk to poultry and human health. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0180599.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Nordstrom L, Liu CM, Price LB. Foodborne urinary tract infections: a new paradigm for antimicrobial-resistant foodborne illness. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:29.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Vincent C, Boerlin P, Daignault D, Dozois CM, Dutil L, Galanakis C, Reid-Smith RJ, Tellier PP, Tellis PA, Ziebell K, Manges AR. Food reservoir for Escherichia coli causing urinary tract infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:88–95.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Duriez P, Zhang Y, Lu Z, Scott A, Topp E. Loss of virulence genes in Escherichia coli populations during manure storage on a commercial swine farm. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:3935–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Guenther S, Grobbel M, Beutlich J, Guerra B, Ulrich RG, Wieler LH, Ewers C. Detection of pandemic B2-O25-ST131 Escherichia coli harbouring the CTX-M-9 extended-spectrum β-lactamase type in a feral urban brown rat (Rattus norvegicus). J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:582–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Borzi MM, Cardozo MV, Oliveira ES, Pollo AS, Guastalli EAL, Santos LFD, Avila FA. Characterization of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from free-range helmeted guineafowl. Braz J Microbiol. 2018;49:107–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Jakobsen L, Spangholm DJ, Pedersen K, Jensen LB, Emborg HD, Agerso Y, Aarestrup FM, Hammerum AM, Frimodt-Moller N. Broiler chickens, broiler chicken meat, pigs and pork as sources of ExPEC related virulence genes and resistance in Escherichia coli isolates from community-dwelling humans and UTI patients. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010;142:264–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Khan SB, Zou G, Cheng YT, Xiao R, Li L, Wu B, Zhou R. Phylogenetic grouping and distribution of virulence genes in Escherichia coli along the production and supply chain of pork around Hubei, China. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2017;50:382–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Cunha MPV, Saidenberg AB, Moreno AM, Ferreira AJP, Vieira MAM, Gomes TAT, Knobl T. Pandemic extra-intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) clonal group O6-B2-ST73 as a cause of avian colibacillosis in Brazil. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0178970.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Schaeffer EM. Chicken as reservoir for extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli in Humans, Canada. J Urol. 2013;189:153.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Mellata M, Johnson JR, Curtiss R. Escherichia coli isolates from commercial chicken meat and eggs cause sepsis, meningitis and urinary tract infection in rodent models of human infections. Zoonoses Public Health. 2018;65:103–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Su Q, Guan T, Lv H. Siderophore biosynthesis coordinately modulated the virulence-associated interactive metabolome of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and human urine. Sci Rep. 2016;6:24099.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Lv H, Hung CS, Henderson JP. Metabolomic analysis of siderophore cheater mutants reveals metabolic costs of expression in uropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Proteome Res. 2014;13:1397–404.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Los FCO, Randis TM, Aroian RV, Ratner AJ. Role of pore-forming toxins in bacterial infectious diseases. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2013;77:173–207.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Ganz T. Iron in innate immunity: starve the invaders. Curr Opin Immunol. 2009;21:63–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Caza M, Lépine F, Dozois CM. Secretion, but not overall synthesis, of catecholate siderophores contributes to virulence of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2011;80:266–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Ratledge C, Dover LG. Iron metabolism in pathogenic bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2000;54:881–941.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Skaar EP. The battle for iron between bacterial pathogens and their vertebrate hosts. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000949.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Cassat JE, Skaar EP. Iron in infection and immunity. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;13:509–19.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Andrews SC, Robinson AK, Rodríguez-Quiñones F. Bacterial iron homeostasis. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003;27:215–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Kehl-Fie TE, Skaar EP. Nutritional immunity beyond iron: a role for manganese and zinc. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2010;14:218–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Doherty CP. Host-pathogen interactions: the role of iron. J Nutr. 2007;137:1341–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Braun V, Braun M. Iron transport and signaling in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 2002;529:78–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Garénaux A, Caza M, Dozois CM. The Ins and Outs of siderophore mediated iron uptake by extra-intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli. Vet Microbiol. 2011;153:89–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Miethke M, Marahiel MA. Siderophore-based iron acquisition and pathogen control. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2007;71:413–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Simões LC, Simões M, Vieira MJ. Biofilm interactions between distinct bacterial genera isolated from drinking water. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:6192–200.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Cherayil BJ. The role of iron in the immune response to bacterial infection. Immunol Res. 2011;50:1–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Gao Q, Wang X, Xu H, Xu Y, Ling J, Zhang D, Gao S, Liu X. Roles of iron acquisition systems in virulence of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli: salmochelin and aerobactin contribute more to virulence than heme in a chicken infection model. BMC Microbiol. 2012;20:143.

    Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Johnson JR. Virulence factors in Escherichia coli urinary tract infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1991;4:80–128.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Lau CKY, Krewulak KD, Vogel HJ. Bacterial ferrous iron transport: the Feo system. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2016;40:273–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Sabri M, Caza M, Proulx J, Lymberopoulos MH, Brée A, Moulin-Schouleur M, Curtiss R, Dozois CM. Contribution of the SitABCD, MntH, and FeoB metal transporters to the virulence of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli O78 strain chi7122. Infect Immun. 2008;6:601–11.

    Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Bister B, Bischoff D, Nicholson GJ, Valdebenito M, Schneider K, Winkelmann G, Hantke K, Süssmuth RD. The structure of salmochelins: C-glucosylated enterobactins of Salmonella enterica. Biometals. 2004;17:471–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Johnson TJ, Siek KE, Johnson SJ, Nolan LK. DNA sequence of a ColV plasmid and prevalence of selected plasmid-encoded virulence genes among avian Escherichia coli strains. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:745–58.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Dobrindt U, Blum-Oehler G, Hartsch T, Gottschalk G, Ron EZ, Fünfstück R, Hacker J. S-fimbria-encoding determinant sfa(I) is located on pathogenicity island III(536) of uropathogenic Escherichia coli strain 536. Infect Immun. 2001;69:4248–56.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Hantke K, Nicholson G, Rabsch W, Winkelmann G. Salmochelins, siderophores of Salmonella enterica and uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains, are recognized by the outer membrane receptor IroN. PNAS. 2003;100:3677–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Olesen B, Hansen DS, Nilsson F, Frimodt-Moller J, Leihof RF, Struve C, Scheutz F, Johnston B, Krogfelt KA, Johnson JR. Prevalence and characteristics of the epidemic multiresistant Escherichia coli ST131 clonal group among extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing E. coli isolates in Copenhagen, Denmark. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:1779–85.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Fetherston JD, Kirillina O, Bobrov AG, Paulley JT, Perry RD. The yersiniabactin transport system is critical for the pathogenesis of bubonic and pneumonic plague. Infect Immun. 2010;78:2045–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Grande Burgos MJ, Fernández Márquez ML, Pérez Pulido R, Gálvez A, Lucas López R. Virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli strains isolated from hen egg shells. Int J Food Microbiol. 2016;238:89–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Mora A, Viso S, López C, Alonso MP, García-Garrote F, Dabhi G, Mamani R, Herrera A, Marzoa J, Blanco M, Blanco JE, Moulin-Schouleur M, Schouler C, Blanco J. Poultry as reservoir for extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli O45:K1:H7-B2-ST95 in humans. Vet Microbiol. 2013;167:506–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Vila J, Sáez-López E, Johnson JR, Römling U, Dobrindt U, Canton R, Giske CG, Naas T, Carattoli A, Martínez-Medina M, Bosch J, Retamar P, Rodríguez-Baño J, Baquero F, Soto SM. Escherichia coli: an old friend with new tidings. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2016;40:437–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Giufrè M, Graziani C, Accogli M, Luzzi I, Busani L, Cerquetti M. Escherichia coli of human and avian origin: detection of clonal groups associated with fluoroquinolone and multidrug resistance in Italy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67:860–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Bergeron CR, Prussing C, Boerlin P, Daignault D, Dutil L, Reid-Smith RJ, Zhanel GG, Manges AR. Chicken as reservoir for extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli in humans. Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:415–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    van Hoek AH, Stalenhoef JE, van Duijkeren E, Franz E. Comparative virulotyping of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant E. coli isolated from broilers, humans on broiler farms and in the general population and UTI patients. Vet Microbiol. 2016;194:55–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Chromek M, Slamová Z, Bergman P, Kovács L, Podracká L, Ehrén I, Hökfelt T, Gudmundsson GH, Gallo RL, Agerberth B, Brauner A. The antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin protects the urinary tract against invasive bacterial infection. Nat Med. 2006;12:636–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Cyoia PS, Rodrigues GR, Nishio EK, Medeiros LP, Koga VL, Pereira APD, Vespero EC, Houle S, Dozois CM, Nakazato G, Kobayashi RKT. Presence of virulence genes and pathogenicity islands in extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli isolates from Brazil. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2015;9:1068–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Müller AM, Stephan R, Nüesch-Inderbinen M. Distribution of virulence factors in ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolated from the environment, livestock, food and humans. Sci Total Environ. 2016;541:667–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

JS, BFK—the concept and design of the topic of the manuscript. All authors—collection of literature data for the preparation of the manuscript. JS, BFK, MK, MFM—wrote the manuscript. ICK, GBP—critical revision of the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


This work was supported by the National Institute of Health (Grant ST.E090.18.021 Wroclaw Medical University). A part of presented paper was based on research financed by National Science Centre, Poland PRELUDIUM 9 2015/17/N/NZ9/00977 (Marta Ksiazczyk).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jolanta Sarowska.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarowska, J., Futoma-Koloch, B., Jama-Kmiecik, A. et al. Virulence factors, prevalence and potential transmission of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from different sources: recent reports. Gut Pathog 11, 10 (2019).

Download citation


  • Eschericha coli
  • Virulence
  • ExPEC
  • Adhesin
  • Toxin
  • Siderophore